ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04631016FRONTIER-4Updated Feb 27, 2025Results posted

A Phase II, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Assess MEDI3506 in Participants With COPD and Chronic Bronchitis

A Phase 2 interventional study of Tozorakimab and Placebo in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and Chronic Bronchitis, sponsored by AstraZeneca. Completed at 90 sites in 15 countries. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-27.

Primary conditionBronchitis, ChronicRegistry: Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Bronchitis, Chronic
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Bronchitis, Chronic, a narrower term within Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by AstraZeneca · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
137
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a research study to determine the efficacy and safety of investigational drug MEDI3506 for the treatment of adult participants with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Chronic Bronchitis.

Read the detailed description

Study D9180C00002 is a Phase II, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group, proof of concept study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MEDI3506 in adult participants with moderate to severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Chronic Bronchitis.

Approximately 85 sites globally will participate in this study. Approximately 144 participants will be randomized to 2 treatment groups in a 1:1 ratio to receive MEDI3506 or placebo.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
  • Chronic Bronchitis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • MEDI3506
  • IL-33
  • COPD
  • Chronic Bronchitis
  • Lung function
  • Inflammation
03

In context

Bronchitis, Chronic Reclassified

209 studies on the registry are indexed under Bronchitis, Chronic; 14 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 137 is above the median of 101 across 154 interventional studies indexed under Bronchitis, Chronic.

Browse Bronchitis, Chronic studies →

Lead sponsor

AstraZeneca is the lead sponsor of 3,499 studies on the registry; 270 are open to participants now.

Of its 368 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 178 (48%) have results posted.

Compared within Bronchitis, Chronic, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Provision of .
  • Participant must be 40 to 80 years of age inclusive, at the time of signing the informed consent form (ICF).
  • Participants who are current or ex-smokers with a tobacco history of >= 10 pack-years.
  • Participants who have a documented history of for at least 1 year.
  • Participants who have a post-BD /FVC \< 0.70 and a post-BD FEV1 >= 20% and \< 80% predicted normal value at screening. Centralized spirometry will be used for this criteria assessment.
  • Participants who have a physician confirmed participant history of chronic bronchitis as defined as presence of cough and sputum on most days for >= 3 months/year in at least the 2 year period immediately prior to study visit 1 (SV1) (Screening).
  • Participants who have an average BCSS score of >= 2 in cough and >= 2 in sputum domains assessed over 14 days preceding SV3.
  • Participants who have a documented stable regimen of dual therapy or triple therapy for >= 3 months prior to enrolment; there should have been no change in treatment after the previous exacerbation prior to entering into the study. Where dual therapy consists of inhaled (ICS) + long-acting beta 2 agonist (LABA) or LABA + long-acting muscarinic receptor antagonist (LAMA), and triple therapy consists of ICS + LABA + LAMA.
  • Participants who have a documented history of >= 1 moderate or severe AECOPD requiring systemic corticosteroids and/or antibiotics for at least 3 days duration (or 1 injection of depot formulation), or hospitalization for reason of AECOPD in the previous 24 months.
  • within the range 18 to 40 kg/m\^2 (inclusive).
  • Female participants of , must have negative pregnancy tests.
  • Male and female participants must follow protocol guidance.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants with a positive diagnostic nucleic acid test for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) at screening. Participants with mild or asymptomatic disease could be rescreened.
  • Participants with a significant coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) illness within 6 months of enrolment.
  • As judged by the investigator, any evidence of any active medical or psychiatric condition or other reason which in the investigator's opinion makes it undesirable for the participant to participate in the study.
  • Current or past diagnosis of asthma which persisted beyond age of 25 years.
  • pulmonary disease other than , radiological findings, and/or laboratory findings suggestive of a respiratory disease other than COPD that is contributing to the participant's respiratory symptoms.
  • Increased pre-BD at randomization visit (SV3) compared to Screening SV1 of >= 400 mL or >= 25% of SV1 FEV1.
  • Any other clinically relevant abnormal findings on physical examination, laboratory testing; or chest CT scan, which in the opinion of the investigator or medical monitor may compromise the safety of the participant in the study or interfere with evaluation of the study intervention or reduce the participant's ability to participate in the study.

Chest CT scan findings requiring further investigation or repeat CT surveillance before SV14.

  • A family history of heart failure.
  • A \< 45% measured by echocardiogram.
  • History of a clinically significant infection (viral, bacterial, or fungal) within 4 weeks.
  • History of, or a reason to believe a participant has a history of, drug or alcohol abuse within the past 2 years prior to screening.
  • Participants with a recent history of, or who have a positive test for, infective hepatitis or unexplained jaundice, or participants who have been treated for , , or (HIV).
  • Evidence of active or untreated latent tuberculosis (TB).
  • Change in smoking status in 12 weeks prior to enrolment or intention to change smoking status between enrolment and end of follow-up.
  • Participants currently receiving background therapy that is not approved by regulatory authorities in the country of study for COPD are not eligible for the study.
  • History of treatment with cardiotoxic medications (eg, as part of cancer therapy) including thiazolidinedione's.
  • Treatment with broad spectrum antibiotic within 4 weeks prior to randomization (Day 1).
  • Receiving any of the prohibited concomitant medications as specified in the clinical study protocol (CSP).
  • Inability to perform technically acceptable spirometry.

Additional inclusion and exclusion criteria's applies.

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(12)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

FEV1

From a breathing test (spirometry): how much air you can blow out in the first second. Often given as a percentage of what is expected for your age, height and sex.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
137 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Tozorakimab

    Participants received 7 doses of subcutaneous (SC) tozorakimab Dose Level 1 injection once every 4 weeks (Q4W).

    Drug: Tozorakimab

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Participants received 7 doses of SC placebo injection matched to tozorakimab once Q4W.

    Other: Placebo

Interventions

  • Participants will receive SC injection of tozorakimab as stated in arm description.

    Also known as: MEDI3506

  • OtherPlacebo

    Participants will receive SC injection of placebo as stated in arm description.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Pre-bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (Pre-BD FEV1) as Measured in Clinic

    The mean change from baseline in Pre-BD FEV1 at Week 12 (tozorakimab - placebo) estimated using a repeated measures mixed effects analysis of covariance measures was estimated. Data available from all visits up to and including Week 12, irrespective of whether the participant discontinued study drug or received reliever therapy was considered. FEV1 was measured by spirometry at clinic.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day -35 to Day -28) through Week 12

Secondary outcomes

  1. Serum Tozorakimab Concentration

    Serum concentration of tozorakimab collected over time are reported. The lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) for tozorakimab was considered to be 10 μg/L.

    Time frame: Post-dose at Study Weeks 2, 4, 12, 20, 24, 28, 32, and 36

  2. Number of Participants With Positive Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) to Tozorakimab

    Number of participants with positive ADA to tozorakimab are reported. Treatment-induced ADA positive is defined as ADA negative at baseline and positive at post-baseline assessment. Treatment-boosted ADA positive is defined as ADA positive at baseline and boosted (\>= 4 fold) the pre-existing titre during the study period. Persistent positive is defined as ADA negative at baseline and positive at \>= 2 post-baseline assessments (with \>= 16 weeks between first and last positive) or ADA positive at last post-baseline assessment. Transiently positive is defined as ADA negative at baseline and at least one post-baseline ADA positive measurement and not fulfilling the conditions for persistently positive.

    Time frame: Pre-dose at Study Weeks 0 (baseline) and post-dose at Study Weeks 2, 4, 12, 20, 24, 28, 32, and 36

  3. Number of Participants Experiencing First Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Composite Exacerbations (COPDCompEx) Event

    The COPDCompEx combines exacerbations with events defined from participant e-Diaries and peak expiratory flow (PEF). COPDCompEx defined exacerbations included episodes leading to one or more of the following: hospitalization, emergency room visit, treatment with systemic corticosteroids (injected and/or oral), or treatment with antibiotics. Diary COPDCompEx events are defined by threshold and slope criteria being met for \>= 2 consecutive days using the following diary and home spirometry variables: overall symptom rating, night-time awakenings due to symptoms, reliever medication use, PEF.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day -35 to Day -28) through Week 28

  4. Change From Baseline to Week 12 in 4-weekly Mean Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms of COPD (E-RS:COPD) Total Score

    Change from baseline to Week 12 in 4-weekly mean E-RS:COPD total score is reported. The E-RS™:COPD is an 11-item electronic patient reported outcome (ePRO) questionnaires developed to evaluate the severity of respiratory symptoms of COPD including breathlessness (5 items; score range: 0 to 17), cough and sputum (3 items; score range: 0 to 11), and chest symptoms (3 items; score range: 0 to 12). The ePRO was completed every day at home and at site visits. Summation of E-RS:COPD item responses produced a total score ranging from 0 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater severity. The 4-weekly mean will be calculated as the sum of all non-missing daily scores over the 28-day evaluation period, divided by the number of non-missing daily scores.

    Time frame: Baseline (from evening of Study Day -14 to the morning of Study Day 1) through Week 12

  5. Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Mean Breathlessness, Cough and Sputum Scale (BCSS) Score (Over the Previous 4 Weeks)

    Change from baseline to Week 12 in mean BCSS score (over the previous 4 weeks) is reported. The BCSS was a 3-item daily diary that assesses the severity of the 3 symptoms: breathlessness, sputum, and cough, each on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 4 (severe symptoms). Item scores were summed to yield a total score ranging from 0 to 12; wherein higher total score indicated more severe symptoms. The BCSS was captured each evening via eDiary. The 4-weekly mean BCSS score was calculated as the sum of all non-missing daily scores over the 28-dayevaluation period, divided by the number of non-missing daily scores.

    Time frame: Baseline (from evening of Study Day -14 to the morning of Study Day 1) through Week 12

  6. Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Cough Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score

    Change from baseline to Week 12 in cough VAS score is reported. Participants were asked to complete a cough severity VAS (100 mm linear scale marked with a horizontal line by the participant, with 0 mm representing ''no cough'' and 100 mm representing "worst cough") that measured subjective assessment by the participant of the prior 24 hrs for severity of cough symptoms. It was completed each evening in the eDiary. The 4-weekly mean cough VAS score was calculated as the sum of all non-missing daily scores over the 28-day evaluation period, divided by the number of non-missing daily scores.

    Time frame: Baseline (from evening of Study Day -14 to the morning of Study Day 1) through Week 12

  7. Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score

    Change from baseline to Week 12 in SGRQ total score is reported. The SGRQ was a 50-item electronic PRO instrument developed to measure the health status of participants with airway obstruction diseases and is divided into 2 parts. Part 1 consisted 8 items pertaining to the severity of respiratory symptoms in the preceding 4 weeks; Part 2 consisted 42 items related to the daily activity and psychosocial impacts of the individual's respiratory condition. The SGRQ yielded a total score and three domain scores (symptoms, activity, and impacts). The total score indicated the impact of disease on overall health status, which was expressed as a percentage of overall impairment, in which 100 represents the worst possible health status and 0 indicates the best possible health status. The domain scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicative of greater impairment.

    Time frame: Baseline (from evening of Study Day -14 to the morning of Study Day 1) through Week 12

  8. Percentage of Participants With a Decrease in SGRQ Total Score of >= 4 Points From Baseline to Week 12

    Percentage of participants with a decrease in SGRQ total score of \>= 4 points from baseline to Week 12 is reported. The SGRQ was a 50-item electronic PRO instrument developed to measure the health status of participants with airway obstruction diseases and is divided into 2 parts. Part 1 consisted 8 items pertaining to the severity of respiratory symptoms in the preceding 4 weeks; Part 2 consisted 42 items related to the daily activity and psychosocial impacts of individual's respiratory condition. SGRQ yielded a total score and three domain scores (symptoms, activity, and impacts). Total score indicated the impact of disease on overall health status, which was expressed as a percentage of overall impairment, in which 100 represents worst possible health status and 0 indicates best possible health status. The domain scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicative of greater impairment. A change of 4 units/points is associated with a minimum clinically important difference.

    Time frame: Baseline (from evening of Study Day -14 to the morning of Study Day 1) through Week 12

  9. Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Airwave Oscillometry (AO) Parameters

    Change from baseline to Week 12 in AO parameters including frequency dependence of resistance at 5-20 Hz (R5-R20) and respiratory resistance at 5 Hz (R5; total airway resistance) and 20 Hz (R20; resistance of large airways) is reported. AO is a non-invasive lung function test assessed using an AO device. It is assessed during quiet, tidal breathing with no participant effort required, by superimposing a multi-frequency oscillation onto the participant's natural breathing. AO device uses a vibrating mesh to generate a multifrequency sinusoidal pseudorandom noise (PRN) signal. The AO markers; respiratory resistance at 5 Hz (R5) and 20 Hz (R20) and difference between resistance at 5 and 20Hz (R5-R20; resistance in small airways) are recorded. These markers measure peripheral airway resistance.

    Time frame: Baseline (Study Day 1) and Week 12

  10. Change From Baseline to Week 12 in AO Parameter-Area Under the Reactance Curve (AX)

    Change from baseline to Week 12 in AO Parameter-Area Under the Reactance Curve (AX) is reported. AO is a non-invasive lung function test assessed using an AO device. It is assessed during quiet, tidal breathing with no participant effort required, by superimposing a multi-frequency oscillation onto the participant's natural breathing.

    Time frame: Baseline (Study Day 1) and Week 12

  11. Ratio to Baseline in Daily, Night-time, and Awake Time Cough Frequency at Week 12

    Ratio to baseline in daily, night-time, and awake time cough frequency at Week 12 is reported. Objective cough frequency was measured using an ambulatory cough monitoring (ACM) which was fitted and worn by the participants for approximately 24 hours after the visits. Daily cough frequency as full average hourly cough of the full duration of recording, night time cough frequency as sleep average hourly cough of the duration of recording at night, and awake time cough frequency as awake average hourly cough of the full duration of recording minus sleep recording will be derived from the recording.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day -21 to Day -7) and Week 12

  12. Change From Baseline in Pre-BD FEV1 and Post-BD FEV1 Through Week 28 in Participants With Extent of Emphysema < 10%

    Change from baseline in pre-BD FEV1 and post-BD FEV1 through Week 28 in participants with extent of emphysema \< 10% is reported.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week -5 to -4) through Week 28 post-dose

  13. Change From Baseline in Pre-BD FEV1 and Post-BD FEV1 Through Week 28 in Participants With Extent of Emphysema >= 10%

    Change from baseline in pre-BD FEV1 and post-BD FEV1 through Week 28 in participants with extent of emphysema \>= 10% is reported.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week -5 to -4) through Week 28 post-dose

  14. Change From Baseline in Pre-BD and Post-BD Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Through Week 28 in Participants With Extent of Emphysema < 10%

    Change from baseline in pre-BD and post-BD FVC through Week 28 in participants with extent of emphysema \< 10% is reported.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week -5 to -4) through Week 28 post-dose

  15. Change From Baseline in Pre-BD and Post-BD FVC Through Week 28 in Participants With Extent of Emphysema >= 10%

    Change from baseline in pre-BD and post-BD FVC through Week 28 in participants with extent of emphysema \>= 10% is reported.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week -5 to -4) through Week 28 post-dose

  16. Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs), and TEAEs of Special Interest (TEAESIs)

    An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. A serious adverse event (SAE) is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Adverse event of special interest (AESI) are AEs of scientific and medical interest specific to understanding of tozorakimab and requires close monitoring. The TEAEs are defined as events present at baseline that worsened in intensity after administration of study drug or events absent at baseline that emerged after administration of study drug.

    Time frame: Day 1 through 253 days (maximum observed duration)

  17. Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEs

    Number of participants with abnormal vital signs reported as TEAEs are reported. Abnormal vital signs are defined as any abnormal finding in the vital sign parameters (oral or tympanic temperature, diastolic blood pressure, systolic blood pressure, heart \[pulse\] rate, and respiratory rate).

    Time frame: Day 1 through 253 days (maximum observed duration)

  18. Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs

    Number of participants with abnormal clinical laboratory parameters reported as TEAEs are reported. Abnormal clinical laboratory parameters defined as any abnormal finding during analysis of clinical chemistry, hematology, endocrinology, and urinalysis.

    Time frame: Day 1 through 253 days (maximum observed duration)

  19. Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Reported as TEAEs

    Number of participants with abnormal ECGs reported as TEAEs are reported.

    Time frame: Day 1 through 253 days (maximum observed duration)

  20. Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) as Measured by Echocardiogram

    Change from baseline in LVEF as measured by echocardiogram is reported.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week -3 to -1) through Week 28

  21. Change From Baseline in N-terminal Pro-brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) Level

    Change in NT-proBNP Level from baseline is reported.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day -35 to Day -28) through Week 28

  22. Number of Participants With Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Related AEs and SAEs

    The number of participants with COVID-19 related AEs and SAEs are reported.

    Time frame: Day 1 through 253 days (maximum observed duration)

  23. Number of Participants Seropositive for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)

    Number of participants who were seronegative at baseline and who had positive SARS-Cov-2 serology result at the end of study is reported.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) through Week 28

Other outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Post-BD FEV1 To Weeks 12 and 28

    Change from baseline in post-BD FEV1 to Weeks 12 and 28 is reported.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week -5 to -4) to Weeks 12 and 28 post-dose

07

Results

Posted Feb 27, 2025

Participant flow

The study was conducted at 47 centers in 12 countries (Australia, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Germany, United Kingdom, Hungary, Israel, Poland, South Africa, Spain, and USA).

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneTozorakimabPlacebo
Started6968
Treated6768
Completed5863
Not completed115
Withdrew: Adverse event30
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject54
Withdrew: Reason unspecified10
Withdrew: Failure to meet randomization criteria21

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Pre-bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (Pre-BD FEV1) as Measured in Clinic

The mean change from baseline in Pre-BD FEV1 at Week 12 (tozorakimab - placebo) estimated using a repeated measures mixed effects analysis of covariance measures was estimated. Data available from all visits up to and including Week 12, irrespective of whether the participant discontinued study drug or received reliever therapy was considered. FEV1 was measured by spirometry at clinic.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day -35 to Day -28) through Week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Litre
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Pre-bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (Pre-BD FEV1) as Measured in Clinic
LitreTozorakimabPlacebo
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Pre-bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (Pre-BD FEV1) as Measured in Clinic0.019 ± 0.026-0.005 ± 0.025
Statistical analysis
  • Tozorakimab vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.216 · Ls mean difference: 0.024 · 80% CI -0.015 to 0.063
SecondarySerum Tozorakimab Concentration

Serum concentration of tozorakimab collected over time are reported. The lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) for tozorakimab was considered to be 10 μg/L.

Time frame:
Post-dose at Study Weeks 2, 4, 12, 20, 24, 28, 32, and 36
Reported as:
Mean · μg/L
Serum Tozorakimab Concentration
μg/LTozorakimab
Week 224604.70 ± 43934.55
Week 48041.59 ± 22355.66
Week 127548.78 ± 6416.68
Week 2010789.81 ± 31903.70
Week 246410.05 ± 4123.46
Week 287289.36 ± 5331.35
Week 321483.19 ± 1779.88
Week 36420.13 ± 701.12
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Positive Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) to Tozorakimab

Number of participants with positive ADA to tozorakimab are reported. Treatment-induced ADA positive is defined as ADA negative at baseline and positive at post-baseline assessment. Treatment-boosted ADA positive is defined as ADA positive at baseline and boosted (\>= 4 fold) the pre-existing titre during the study period. Persistent positive is defined as ADA negative at baseline and positive at \>= 2 post-baseline assessments (with \>= 16 weeks between first and last positive) or ADA positive at last post-baseline assessment. Transiently positive is defined as ADA negative at baseline and at least one post-baseline ADA positive measurement and not fulfilling the conditions for persistently positive.

Time frame:
Pre-dose at Study Weeks 0 (baseline) and post-dose at Study Weeks 2, 4, 12, 20, 24, 28, 32, and 36
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Positive Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) to Tozorakimab
ParticipantsTozorakimabPlacebo
Treatment-induced ADA10
Treatment-boosted ADA00
Persistently positive ADA00
Transiently positive ADA10
SecondaryNumber of Participants Experiencing First Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Composite Exacerbations (COPDCompEx) Event

The COPDCompEx combines exacerbations with events defined from participant e-Diaries and peak expiratory flow (PEF). COPDCompEx defined exacerbations included episodes leading to one or more of the following: hospitalization, emergency room visit, treatment with systemic corticosteroids (injected and/or oral), or treatment with antibiotics. Diary COPDCompEx events are defined by threshold and slope criteria being met for \>= 2 consecutive days using the following diary and home spirometry variables: overall symptom rating, night-time awakenings due to symptoms, reliever medication use, PEF.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day -35 to Day -28) through Week 28
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Experiencing First Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Composite Exacerbations (COPDCompEx) Event
ParticipantsTozorakimabPlacebo
Number of Participants Experiencing First Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Composite Exacerbations (COPDCompEx) Event2836
Statistical analysis
  • Tozorakimab vs Placebo · Regression, Cox · p = 0.186 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.79 · 80% CI 0.57 to 1.11
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 12 in 4-weekly Mean Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms of COPD (E-RS:COPD) Total Score

Change from baseline to Week 12 in 4-weekly mean E-RS:COPD total score is reported. The E-RS™:COPD is an 11-item electronic patient reported outcome (ePRO) questionnaires developed to evaluate the severity of respiratory symptoms of COPD including breathlessness (5 items; score range: 0 to 17), cough and sputum (3 items; score range: 0 to 11), and chest symptoms (3 items; score range: 0 to 12). The ePRO was completed every day at home and at site visits. Summation of E-RS:COPD item responses produced a total score ranging from 0 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater severity. The 4-weekly mean will be calculated as the sum of all non-missing daily scores over the 28-day evaluation period, divided by the number of non-missing daily scores.

Time frame:
Baseline (from evening of Study Day -14 to the morning of Study Day 1) through Week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Units on a scale
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in 4-weekly Mean Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms of COPD (E-RS:COPD) Total Score
Units on a scaleTozorakimabPlacebo
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in 4-weekly Mean Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms of COPD (E-RS:COPD) Total Score-6.09 ± 1.004-6.06 ± 0.962
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Mean Breathlessness, Cough and Sputum Scale (BCSS) Score (Over the Previous 4 Weeks)

Change from baseline to Week 12 in mean BCSS score (over the previous 4 weeks) is reported. The BCSS was a 3-item daily diary that assesses the severity of the 3 symptoms: breathlessness, sputum, and cough, each on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 4 (severe symptoms). Item scores were summed to yield a total score ranging from 0 to 12; wherein higher total score indicated more severe symptoms. The BCSS was captured each evening via eDiary. The 4-weekly mean BCSS score was calculated as the sum of all non-missing daily scores over the 28-dayevaluation period, divided by the number of non-missing daily scores.

Time frame:
Baseline (from evening of Study Day -14 to the morning of Study Day 1) through Week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Units on a scale
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Mean Breathlessness, Cough and Sputum Scale (BCSS) Score (Over the Previous 4 Weeks)
Units on a scaleTozorakimabPlacebo
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Mean Breathlessness, Cough and Sputum Scale (BCSS) Score (Over the Previous 4 Weeks)-2.18 ± 0.313-2.18 ± 0.298
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Cough Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score

Change from baseline to Week 12 in cough VAS score is reported. Participants were asked to complete a cough severity VAS (100 mm linear scale marked with a horizontal line by the participant, with 0 mm representing ''no cough'' and 100 mm representing "worst cough") that measured subjective assessment by the participant of the prior 24 hrs for severity of cough symptoms. It was completed each evening in the eDiary. The 4-weekly mean cough VAS score was calculated as the sum of all non-missing daily scores over the 28-day evaluation period, divided by the number of non-missing daily scores.

Time frame:
Baseline (from evening of Study Day -14 to the morning of Study Day 1) through Week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · mm
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Cough Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score
mmTozorakimabPlacebo
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Cough Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score-17.21 ± 3.639-17.70 ± 3.483
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score

Change from baseline to Week 12 in SGRQ total score is reported. The SGRQ was a 50-item electronic PRO instrument developed to measure the health status of participants with airway obstruction diseases and is divided into 2 parts. Part 1 consisted 8 items pertaining to the severity of respiratory symptoms in the preceding 4 weeks; Part 2 consisted 42 items related to the daily activity and psychosocial impacts of the individual's respiratory condition. The SGRQ yielded a total score and three domain scores (symptoms, activity, and impacts). The total score indicated the impact of disease on overall health status, which was expressed as a percentage of overall impairment, in which 100 represents the worst possible health status and 0 indicates the best possible health status. The domain scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicative of greater impairment.

Time frame:
Baseline (from evening of Study Day -14 to the morning of Study Day 1) through Week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Units on a scale
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score
Units on a scaleTozorakimabPlacebo
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score-9.177 ± 2.116-8.273 ± 2.029
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With a Decrease in SGRQ Total Score of >= 4 Points From Baseline to Week 12

Percentage of participants with a decrease in SGRQ total score of \>= 4 points from baseline to Week 12 is reported. The SGRQ was a 50-item electronic PRO instrument developed to measure the health status of participants with airway obstruction diseases and is divided into 2 parts. Part 1 consisted 8 items pertaining to the severity of respiratory symptoms in the preceding 4 weeks; Part 2 consisted 42 items related to the daily activity and psychosocial impacts of individual's respiratory condition. SGRQ yielded a total score and three domain scores (symptoms, activity, and impacts). Total score indicated the impact of disease on overall health status, which was expressed as a percentage of overall impairment, in which 100 represents worst possible health status and 0 indicates best possible health status. The domain scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicative of greater impairment. A change of 4 units/points is associated with a minimum clinically important difference.

Time frame:
Baseline (from evening of Study Day -14 to the morning of Study Day 1) through Week 12
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With a Decrease in SGRQ Total Score of >= 4 Points From Baseline to Week 12
Percentage of ParticipantsTozorakimabPlacebo
Percentage of Participants With a Decrease in SGRQ Total Score of >= 4 Points From Baseline to Week 1261.3 (0.62 to 1.58)61.5
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Airwave Oscillometry (AO) Parameters

Change from baseline to Week 12 in AO parameters including frequency dependence of resistance at 5-20 Hz (R5-R20) and respiratory resistance at 5 Hz (R5; total airway resistance) and 20 Hz (R20; resistance of large airways) is reported. AO is a non-invasive lung function test assessed using an AO device. It is assessed during quiet, tidal breathing with no participant effort required, by superimposing a multi-frequency oscillation onto the participant's natural breathing. AO device uses a vibrating mesh to generate a multifrequency sinusoidal pseudorandom noise (PRN) signal. The AO markers; respiratory resistance at 5 Hz (R5) and 20 Hz (R20) and difference between resistance at 5 and 20Hz (R5-R20; resistance in small airways) are recorded. These markers measure peripheral airway resistance.

Time frame:
Baseline (Study Day 1) and Week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · kPa*s/L
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Airwave Oscillometry (AO) Parameters
kPa*s/LTozorakimabPlacebo
R5-R200.008 ± 0.013-0.014 ± 0.013
R50.015 ± 0.032-0.030 ± 0.030
R200.006 ± 0.024-0.017 ± 0.023
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 12 in AO Parameter-Area Under the Reactance Curve (AX)

Change from baseline to Week 12 in AO Parameter-Area Under the Reactance Curve (AX) is reported. AO is a non-invasive lung function test assessed using an AO device. It is assessed during quiet, tidal breathing with no participant effort required, by superimposing a multi-frequency oscillation onto the participant's natural breathing.

Time frame:
Baseline (Study Day 1) and Week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · kPa/L
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in AO Parameter-Area Under the Reactance Curve (AX)
kPa/LTozorakimabPlacebo
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in AO Parameter-Area Under the Reactance Curve (AX)-0.081 ± 0.375-0.267 ± 0.360
SecondaryRatio to Baseline in Daily, Night-time, and Awake Time Cough Frequency at Week 12

Ratio to baseline in daily, night-time, and awake time cough frequency at Week 12 is reported. Objective cough frequency was measured using an ambulatory cough monitoring (ACM) which was fitted and worn by the participants for approximately 24 hours after the visits. Daily cough frequency as full average hourly cough of the full duration of recording, night time cough frequency as sleep average hourly cough of the duration of recording at night, and awake time cough frequency as awake average hourly cough of the full duration of recording minus sleep recording will be derived from the recording.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day -21 to Day -7) and Week 12
Reported as:
Geometric least squares mean · Ratio to baseline
Ratio to Baseline in Daily, Night-time, and Awake Time Cough Frequency at Week 12
Ratio to baselineTozorakimabPlacebo
Daily cough frequency0.89 (0.74 to 1.07)0.83 (0.70 to 0.99)
Night-time cough frequency1.03 (0.62 to 1.70)0.61 (0.38 to 0.98)
Awake time cough frequency0.89 (0.74 to 1.07)0.84 (0.71 to 0.99)
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Pre-BD FEV1 and Post-BD FEV1 Through Week 28 in Participants With Extent of Emphysema < 10%

Change from baseline in pre-BD FEV1 and post-BD FEV1 through Week 28 in participants with extent of emphysema \< 10% is reported.

Time frame:
Baseline (Week -5 to -4) through Week 28 post-dose
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Litre
Change From Baseline in Pre-BD FEV1 and Post-BD FEV1 Through Week 28 in Participants With Extent of Emphysema < 10%
LitreTozorakimabPlacebo
Pre-BD FEV10.031 ± 0.0570.006 ± 0.049
Post-BD FEV1-0.039 ± 0.071-0.018 ± 0.059
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Pre-BD FEV1 and Post-BD FEV1 Through Week 28 in Participants With Extent of Emphysema >= 10%

Change from baseline in pre-BD FEV1 and post-BD FEV1 through Week 28 in participants with extent of emphysema \>= 10% is reported.

Time frame:
Baseline (Week -5 to -4) through Week 28 post-dose
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Litre
Change From Baseline in Pre-BD FEV1 and Post-BD FEV1 Through Week 28 in Participants With Extent of Emphysema >= 10%
LitreTozorakimabPlacebo
Pre-BD FEV1 Week 28-0.015 ± 0.036-0.068 ± 0.034
Post-BD FEV1 Week 280.074 ± 0.044-0.053 ± 0.042
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Pre-BD and Post-BD Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Through Week 28 in Participants With Extent of Emphysema < 10%

Change from baseline in pre-BD and post-BD FVC through Week 28 in participants with extent of emphysema \< 10% is reported.

Time frame:
Baseline (Week -5 to -4) through Week 28 post-dose
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Litre
Change From Baseline in Pre-BD and Post-BD Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Through Week 28 in Participants With Extent of Emphysema < 10%
LitreTozorakimabPlacebo
Pre-BD FVC Week 28-0.143 ± 0.105-0.056 ± 0.093
Post-BD FVC Week 28-0.121 ± 0.1140.046 ± 0.096
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Pre-BD and Post-BD FVC Through Week 28 in Participants With Extent of Emphysema >= 10%

Change from baseline in pre-BD and post-BD FVC through Week 28 in participants with extent of emphysema \>= 10% is reported.

Time frame:
Baseline (Week -5 to -4) through Week 28 post-dose
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Litre
Change From Baseline in Pre-BD and Post-BD FVC Through Week 28 in Participants With Extent of Emphysema >= 10%
LitreTozorakimabPlacebo
Pre-BD FVC Week 280.089 ± 0.086-0.121 ± 0.084
Post-BD FVC Week 280.081 ± 0.081-0.094 ± 0.077
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs), and TEAEs of Special Interest (TEAESIs)

An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. A serious adverse event (SAE) is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Adverse event of special interest (AESI) are AEs of scientific and medical interest specific to understanding of tozorakimab and requires close monitoring. The TEAEs are defined as events present at baseline that worsened in intensity after administration of study drug or events absent at baseline that emerged after administration of study drug.

Time frame:
Day 1 through 253 days (maximum observed duration)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs), and TEAEs of Special Interest (TEAESIs)
ParticipantsTozorakimabPlacebo
Any TEAEs5350
Any TESAEs149
Any TEAESIs3324
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEs

Number of participants with abnormal vital signs reported as TEAEs are reported. Abnormal vital signs are defined as any abnormal finding in the vital sign parameters (oral or tympanic temperature, diastolic blood pressure, systolic blood pressure, heart \[pulse\] rate, and respiratory rate).

Time frame:
Day 1 through 253 days (maximum observed duration)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEs
ParticipantsTozorakimabPlacebo
Hypertension23
Hypotension10
Dyspnoea23
Pyrexia10
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs

Number of participants with abnormal clinical laboratory parameters reported as TEAEs are reported. Abnormal clinical laboratory parameters defined as any abnormal finding during analysis of clinical chemistry, hematology, endocrinology, and urinalysis.

Time frame:
Day 1 through 253 days (maximum observed duration)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs
ParticipantsTozorakimabPlacebo
Anaemia01
Hypercholesterolaemia01
Hyperuricaemia01
Hypertransaminasaemia10
Haematuria20
SARS-CoV-2 test positive20
Hyperthyroidism01
Hypothyroidism10
Urinary tract infection01
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Reported as TEAEs

Number of participants with abnormal ECGs reported as TEAEs are reported.

Time frame:
Day 1 through 253 days (maximum observed duration)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Reported as TEAEs
ParticipantsTozorakimabPlacebo
Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Reported as TEAEs10
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) as Measured by Echocardiogram

Change from baseline in LVEF as measured by echocardiogram is reported.

Time frame:
Baseline (Week -3 to -1) through Week 28
Reported as:
Mean · Ratio
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) as Measured by Echocardiogram
RatioTozorakimabPlacebo
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) as Measured by Echocardiogram0.9 ± 5.780.2 ± 4.61
SecondaryChange From Baseline in N-terminal Pro-brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) Level

Change in NT-proBNP Level from baseline is reported.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day -35 to Day -28) through Week 28
Reported as:
Mean · pmol/L
Change From Baseline in N-terminal Pro-brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) Level
pmol/LTozorakimabPlacebo
Change From Baseline in N-terminal Pro-brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) Level4.051 ± 17.9371.948 ± 14.280
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Related AEs and SAEs

The number of participants with COVID-19 related AEs and SAEs are reported.

Time frame:
Day 1 through 253 days (maximum observed duration)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Related AEs and SAEs
ParticipantsTozorakimabPlacebo
COVID-19 related AEs1714
COVID-19 related SAEs10
SecondaryNumber of Participants Seropositive for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)

Number of participants who were seronegative at baseline and who had positive SARS-Cov-2 serology result at the end of study is reported.

Time frame:
Baseline (Week 0) through Week 28
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Seropositive for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)
ParticipantsTozorakimabPlacebo
Number of Participants Seropositive for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)66
Other pre-specifiedChange From Baseline in Post-BD FEV1 To Weeks 12 and 28

Change from baseline in post-BD FEV1 to Weeks 12 and 28 is reported.

Time frame:
Baseline (Week -5 to -4) to Weeks 12 and 28 post-dose
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Litre
Change From Baseline in Post-BD FEV1 To Weeks 12 and 28
LitreTozorakimabPlacebo
Week 120.041 ± 0.036-0.025 ± 0.033
Week 280.021 ± 0.036-0.049 ± 0.033
Statistical analysis
  • Tozorakimab vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.044 (One-sided p-value) · Least square mean difference: 0.067 · 80% CI 0.017 to 0.116Kenward-Roger correction has been used for degrees of freedom approximation in the generation of model.
  • Tozorakimab vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.036 (One-sided p-value) · Least square mean difference: 0.070 · 80% CI 0.020 to 0.120Kenward-Roger correction has been used for degrees of freedom approximation in the generation of model.

Adverse events

Collected over Day 1 through 253 days (maximum observed duration). Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Tozorakimab0/67 (0%)14/67 (20.9%)40/67 (59.7%)
Placebo0/68 (0%)9/68 (13.2%)39/68 (57.4%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 15
Most frequent serious events
EventTozorakimabPlacebo
Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders6/676/68
Acetabulum fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/670/68
Wrist fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/670/68
DehydrationMetabolism and nutrition disorders1/670/68
OsteoarthritisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/670/68
Transitional cell carcinomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/670/68
Transient ischaemic attackNervous system disorders1/670/68
PancreatitisGastrointestinal disorders1/670/68
Covid-19Infections and infestations1/670/68
InfluenzaInfections and infestations1/670/68
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventTozorakimabPlacebo
Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders26/6727/68
Covid-19Infections and infestations14/6714/68
Injection site erythemaGeneral disorders10/670/68
HeadacheNervous system disorders8/673/68
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations3/677/68

Baseline characteristics

As-treated population included all participants who received any study drug and were analyzed according to the treatment they actually received.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)TozorakimabPlaceboTotal
Mean64.5 ± 8.364.3 ± 6.164.4 ± 7.22
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)TozorakimabPlaceboTotal
Female262753
Male414182
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)TozorakimabPlaceboTotal
Hispanic or Latino123
Not Hispanic or Latino6666132
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)TozorakimabPlaceboTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian011
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American112
White6465129
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported213
08

Study locations

90 sites
  • Research Site
    Sheffield, Alabama 35660, United States
  • Research Site
    Newport Beach, California 92663, United States
  • Research Site
    Newark, Delaware 19713, United States
  • Research Site
    Kissimmee, Florida 34746, United States
  • Research Site
    Ormond Beach, Florida 32174, United States
  • Research Site
    Winter Park, Florida 32789, United States
  • Research Site
    Lakeside Park, Kentucky 41017, United States
  • Research Site
    White Marsh, Maryland 21162, United States
  • Research Site
    Ann Arbor, Michigan 48197, United States
  • Research Site
    New Bern, North Carolina 28562, United States
  • Research Site
    Columbus, Ohio 43215, United States
  • Research Site
    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73120, United States
  • Research Site
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States
  • Research Site
    North Charleston, South Carolina 29406, United States
  • Research Site
    Spartanburg, South Carolina 29303, United States
  • Research Site
    Boerne, Texas 78006, United States
  • Research Site
    Nedlands, 6009, Australia
  • Research Site
    South Brisbane, 4101, Australia
  • Research Site
    Spearwood, 6163, Australia
  • Research Site
    Tarragindi, 4121, Australia
  • Research Site
    St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador A1B 3V6, Canada
  • Research Site
    Ajax, Ontario L1S 2J5, Canada
  • Research Site
    Sherbrooke, Quebec J1L 0H8, Canada
  • Research Site
    Trois-Rivières, Quebec G8T 7A1, Canada
  • Research Site
    Quebec, G1G 3Y8, Canada
  • Research Site
    Quebec, G2J 0C4, Canada
  • Research Site
    Brno, 625 00, Czechia
  • Research Site
    Olomouc, 77900, Czechia
  • Research Site
    Pisek, 397 01, Czechia
  • Research Site
    Praha 4, 140 46, Czechia
  • Research Site
    Rokycany, 337 22, Czechia
  • Research Site
    Hvidovre, 2650, Denmark
  • Research Site
    København NV, 2400, Denmark
  • Research Site
    Naestved, 4700, Denmark
  • Research Site
    Odense C, 5000, Denmark
  • Research Site
    Ålborg, 9000, Denmark
  • Research Site
    Bamberg, 96049, Germany
  • Research Site
    Berlin, 10717, Germany
  • Research Site
    Berlin, 13187, Germany
  • Research Site
    Darmstadt, 64283, Germany
  • Research Site
    Hannover, D-30173, Germany
  • Research Site
    Leipzig, 04107, Germany
  • Research Site
    Mainz, 55128, Germany
  • Research Site
    Marburg, 35037, Germany
  • Research Site
    Balassagyarmat, 2660, Hungary
  • Research Site
    Budapest, 1033, Hungary
  • Research Site
    Debrecen, 4032, Hungary
  • Research Site
    Edelény, 3780, Hungary
  • Research Site
    Gödöllő, 2100, Hungary
  • Research Site
    Hajdúnánás, 4080, Hungary
  • Research Site
    Pécs, 7635, Hungary
  • Research Site
    Ashkelon, 7830604, Israel
  • Research Site
    Jerusalem, 91031, Israel
  • Research Site
    Jerusalem, 91120, Israel
  • Research Site
    Rehovot, 7661041, Israel
  • Research Site
    Eindhoven, 5623EJ, Netherlands
  • Research Site
    Rotterdam, 3083 AN, Netherlands
  • Research Site
    Zutphen, 7207 AE, Netherlands
  • Research Site
    Auckland, 0626, New Zealand
  • Research Site
    Christchurch, 8013, New Zealand
  • Research Site
    Tauranga, 3110, New Zealand
  • Research Site
    Wellington, 6021, New Zealand
  • Research Site
    Białystok, 15-044, Poland
  • Research Site
    Bydgoszcz, 85-079, Poland
  • Research Site
    Katowice, 40-648, Poland
  • Research Site
    Krakow, 31-501, Poland
  • Research Site
    Poznań, 60-693, Poland
  • Research Site
    Tarnów, 33-100, Poland
  • Research Site
    Wroclaw, 54-239, Poland
  • Research Site
    Cape Town, 7700, South Africa
  • Research Site
    Durban, 4001, South Africa
  • Research Site
    Johannesburg, 2113, South Africa
  • Research Site
    Tygervalley, 7530, South Africa
  • Research Site
    Alzira, 46600, Spain
  • Research Site
    Madrid, 28007, Spain
  • Research Site
    Málaga, 29010, Spain
  • Research Site
    Mérida, 06800, Spain
  • Research Site
    Salamanca, 37007, Spain
  • Research Site
    Santander, 39010, Spain
  • Research Site
    Zaragoza, 50009, Spain
  • Research Site
    Kaohsiung, 807, Taiwan
  • Research Site
    Kaohsiung, 83301, Taiwan
  • Research Site
    Taipei City, 110, Taiwan
  • Research Site
    Taipei City, 114, Taiwan
  • Research Site
    Taoyuan City, 333, Taiwan
  • Research Site
    Bradford, BD9 6RJ, United Kingdom
  • Research Site
    Bristol, BS105NB, United Kingdom
  • Research Site
    Edinburgh, EH16 4SA, United Kingdom
  • Research Site
    London, EC1A 7BE, United Kingdom
  • Research Site
    Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, NE7 7DN, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Qualified researchers can request access to anonymized individual patient-level data from AstraZeneca group of companies sponsored clinical trials via the request portal. All request will be evaluated as per the AZ disclosure commitment: https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm.com/ST/Submission/Disclosure. Yes, indicates that AZ are accepting requests for IPD, but this does not mean all requests will be shared.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan

Time frame: AstraZeneca will meet or exceed data availability as per the commitments made to the EFPIA Pharma Data Sharing Principles. For details of our timelines, please rerefer to our disclosure commitment at https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm.com/ST/Submission/Disclosure.

Access criteria: When a request has been approved AstraZeneca will provide access to the deidentified individual patient-level data in an approved sponsored tool . Signed Data Sharing Agreement (non-negotiable contract for data accessors) must be in place before accessing requested information. Additionally, all users will need to accept the terms and conditions of the SAS MSE to gain access. For additional details, please review the Disclosure Statements at https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm.com/ST/Submission/Disclosure.

Data sharing details ↗ · astrazenecagroup-dt.pharmacm.com

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 27, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04631016
Lead sponsor
AstraZeneca
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 16, 2020
Start date
Dec 14, 2020
Primary completion
May 30, 2023
Completion
Nov 13, 2023
Results posted
Feb 27, 2025
Last update
Feb 27, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Tozorakimab

Start the discussion