CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04625244Updated Oct 8, 2024

Can Video Assisted Therapy Replace In-Person Occupational Therapy After Hand Surgery: a Noninferiority Study

An interventional study of Video assisted home therapy in Thumb Osteoarthritis, sponsored by Carilion Clinic. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-10-08.

Sponsored by Carilion Clinic · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
67
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will investigate a video assisted, home therapy program where participants complete hand therapy on their own following thumb arthroplasty. In this program, participants will receive prerecorded informational videos. Half of the participants in this study will do standard of care, in-person therapy. The other half will be enrolled in the home therapy program. Participants will fill out an assessment of their physical ability before surgery and again three months after surgery. These assessments will be compared between groups. The study team hypothesizes that the video-assisted, home therapy program will be noninferior to traditional in-person therapy.

Read the detailed description

Current postoperative hand therapy regimens can be burdensome to patients and non-compliance rates are high. Our service area has a lack of hand therapists in the rural areas and the most common barrier to receiving care is access and transportation. In-person therapy requires patients to have significant flexibility in transportation, work schedule and childcare. Travel time and distances put patients who are already disadvantaged at an increased risk of failed treatment. Furthermore, our hand therapy clinics have high utilization after first CMC arthroplasty (thumb joint replacement) procedures, for which therapy is protocol-driven and results are predictable-two aspects that lend this procedure to amenable results from a virtual, unsupervised program.

This study's central hypothesis is that video assisted therapy can be used in postoperative hand therapy without a change in subject outcomes. In this study, the investigators choose to study therapy for one of the most common postoperative diagnoses seen in Carilion Clinic's hand therapy clinics: thumb arthroplasty (replacement of a thumb joint).

Specific Aim 1 is to determine if a video-assisted, home therapy program (pre-recorded instructional videos) can effectively replace in-person occupational therapy for thumb arthroplasty.

Hypothesis: Outcomes of a therapy program consisting of pre-recorded instructional videos will be noninferior to the standard of care regimen for thumb arthroplasty.

The significance of this study is that it investigates a home therapy solution that the investigators expect to increase access to healthcare in rural populations. This study is novel because it will be the first prospective, randomized control trial to investigate the utility of video-assisted home therapy following hand surgery.

02

Conditions studied

  • Thumb Osteoarthritis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • video assisted therapy
  • CMC arthroplasty
  • carpometacarpal arthroplasty
  • thumb surgery
  • hand surgery
  • home therapy
  • self directed therapy
03

In context

Osteoarthritis

4,399 studies on the registry are indexed under Osteoarthritis; 583 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 67 is close to the median of 70 across 3,440 interventional studies indexed under Osteoarthritis.

Browse Osteoarthritis studies →

Lead sponsor

Carilion Clinic is the lead sponsor of 71 studies on the registry; 13 are open to participants now.

Of its 9 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 2 (22%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Undergoing elective carpometacarpal (CMC) arthroplasty (CPT code 25447)
  • Access to a cellphone, tablet or home computer that is connected to internet and has a 5.5" or larger screen

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Bilateral procedures
  • Revision procedures
  • All concomitant procedures, except MCP fusion, CTS release, and thumb trigger finger release
  • Artificial CMC joint replacement
  • Inability to provide informed consent for the study
  • Non-native English speakers
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
67 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Group 1: In-person therapy

    Standard of care, in-person therapy with a Certified Hand Therapist (CHT)

  • Experimental
    Group 2: Home therapy program

    Participants will be sent video links to three therapy videos demonstrating postoperative recovery exercises, starting 4 weeks after surgery.

    Other: Video assisted home therapy

Interventions

  • OtherVideo assisted home therapy

    Subjects will follow along with prerecorded therapy videos.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Upper extremity function, as assessed by the change in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) v. 2.0 Upper Extremity assessment.

    Improvement in PROMIS upper extremity score from baseline. PROMIS scores are translated into t-scores and range from 0 (worst possible function) to 100 (best possible function). Positive improvement values indicate improvement in function. Negative values indicate a decline in function.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to Day 90 after surgery.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Upper extremity function, as assessed by the change in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) v. 2.0 Upper Extremity assessment.

    Improvement in PROMIS upper extremity score from baseline. PROMIS scores are translated into t-scores and range from 0 (worst possible function) to 100 (best possible function). Positive improvement values indicate improvement in function. Negative values indicate a decline in function.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to Day 365 after surgery.

  2. Pain interference, as assessed by the change in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) v. 1.0 Pain Interference 6a.

    Difference in PROMIS pain interference score from baseline. PROMIS scores are translated into t-scores and range from 0 (minimum pain interference) to 100 (maximum pain interference). Negative differences from baseline indicate improvement in pain interference. Positive differences from baseline indicate worsening of pain interference.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to Day 90 after surgery.

  3. Pain interference, as assessed by the change in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) v. 1.0 Pain Interference 6a.

    Difference in PROMIS pain interference score from baseline. PROMIS scores are translated into t-scores and range from 0 (minimum pain interference) to 100 (maximum pain interference). Negative differences from baseline indicate improvement in pain interference. Positive differences from baseline indicate worsening of pain interference.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to Day 365 after surgery.

  4. Grip strength

    Improvement in grip strength from baseline in operative hand. Measured in pounds force with a dynamometer. A positive change indicates gain of strength.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to Day 90 after surgery.

  5. Key pinch strength

    Improvement in key pinch strength from baseline in operative hand. Measured in pounds force with a dynamometer. A positive change indicates gain of strength.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to Day 90 after surgery.

  6. 3-finger pinch strength

    Improvement in 3-finger pinch strength from baseline in operative hand. Measured in pounds force with a dynamometer. A positive change indicates gain of strength.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to Day 90 after surgery.

  7. Thumb radial abduction

    Improvement in thumb radial abduction from baseline in operative thumb. Measured in degrees with a goniometer. A positive change indicates gain of motion.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to Day 90 after surgery.

  8. Thumb palmer abduction

    Improvement in thumb palmer abduction from baseline in operative thumb. Measured in degrees with a goniometer. A positive change indicates gain of motion.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to Day 90 after surgery.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Carilion Clinic Orthopaedic Surgery
    Roanoke, Virginia 24014, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Srikesavan C, Williamson E, Cranston T, Hunter J, Adams J, Lamb SE. An Online Hand Exercise Intervention for Adults With Rheumatoid Arthritis (mySARAH): Design, Development, and Usability Testing. J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jun 27;20(6):e10457. doi: 10.2196/10457. PubMed 29950288 ↗
  • Hoogland J, Wijnen A, Munsterman T, Gerritsma CL, Dijkstra B, Zijlstra WP, Annegarn J, Ibarra F, Zijlstra W, Stevens M. Feasibility and Patient Experience of a Home-Based Rehabilitation Program Driven by a Tablet App and Mobility Monitoring for Patients After a Total Hip Arthroplasty. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Jan 31;7(1):e10342. doi: 10.2196/10342. PubMed 30702438 ↗
  • Lee DJ, Calfee RP. The Minimal Clinically Important Difference for PROMIS Physical Function in Patients With Thumb Carpometacarpal Arthritis. Hand (N Y). 2021 Sep;16(5):638-643. doi: 10.1177/1558944719880025. Epub 2019 Oct 18. PubMed 31625400 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 8, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04625244
Lead sponsor
Carilion Clinic
Collaborators
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Responsible party
Peter J Apel (Orthopedic Hand and Upper Extremity Surgeon, Carilion Clinic) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 12, 2020
Start date
Jun 9, 2021
Primary completion
Sep 14, 2023
Completion
Apr 14, 2024
Last update
Oct 8, 2024

Study contacts

Peter J Apel, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Carilion Clinic Department of Orthopaedics / Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion