CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04616352Updated Aug 3, 2021

Cefuroxime Resistance in Pyelonephritis

An observational study in Urinary Tract Infections, sponsored by Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Completed at 1 site in Colombia. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-08-03.

Sponsored by Universidad Nacional de Colombia · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
973
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Resistance to empirical antibiotic treatment has resulted in increased mortality and morbidity in serious infections caused by certain common resistant pathogens in the community. The risk for increased mortality has been also the motivation for recent guidelines that suggest early empirical antimicrobial treatment with broad spectrum antibiotics within a few hours of suspecting sepsis, regardless of the potential microorganism or infection focus. Resistance to second-generation cephalosporins among patients with community-acquired urinary tract infection by E. coli has exceeded 20% in an increasing number of institutions and communities, without being clear about the impact of such resistance on the effectiveness of treatment. This is especially important in urinary infections, since, in general, mortality is very low. We expect to establish if there is a relationship between inappropriate empirical therapy and morbidity (in terms of length of stay or readmission) among hospitalized patients with pyelonephritis treated with empirical cefuroxime therapy to help to define the need for a change in the current guidelines. These guidelines will have application not only in Colombia, but also in other countries in Latin America or other countries that still use this empirical therapy. It will also define the need for use of broader spectrum antibiotics in this clinical scenario.

Read the detailed description

Objectives:

  1. Establish the relationship between inappropriate empirical cefuroxime therapy in adult patients hospitalized with pyelonephritis and hospital stay.
  2. Establish the relationship between inappropriate empirical cefuroxime therapy in adult patients hospitalized with pyelonephritis and readmission due to pyelonephritis.
  3. Establish the relationship between inappropriate empirical therapy with cefuroxime in adult patients hospitalized with pyelonephritis and the time to readmission caused pyelonephritis.

The investigators proposed a retrospective cohort of hospitalized pyelonephritis patients with empirical antimicrobial management with cefuroxime in one institution of third complexity level. Exposure is understood as resistance to cefuroxime, that is, the impact of inappropriate empirical cefuroxime therapy on patients receiving this antibiotic. Patients who are admitted to the cohort had the diagnosis of pyelonephritis and were hospitalized for intravenous antimicrobial treatment and are followed up to the following outcomes: hospital discharge, or readmission due to pyelonephritis to the same or another institution of the insurance network.

The study will be conducted following the Good Clinical Practices for Research and approval by the Research Ethics Committee (REC) or Investigation Research Boards (IRB) of the participating institutions. The clinical information will be collected through online forms based on the information in the electronic medical record. Microbiological information will be taken from clinical laboratory reports (Whonet ver 5.5., WHO). The accuracy of the information collected will be verified by evaluating 100% of the formats. A pilot test will be carried out after approval by the IRB (25 february, 2020). The information will be stored anonymously, discarding from the database personal information of the patient that might allow the identification. Variables collected from the Electronic Medical Record include demographic, clinical (comorbidities, clinical status) and microbiological information. Other variables include time to change antibiotic (if done) and time of use of antibiotic. Information for the outcomes proposed include length of stay (in days), readmission (new admission because of pyelonephritis in the following 30 days after the first episode), and time to readmission (in days).

A propensity score matching will be performed to diminish the risk of selection bias and unbalanced subjects. Alternatively, and inverse probability treatment weighting can be used to balance the variables included. Both models will be constructed using a logistic regression for the probability of cefuroxime resistant. Final comparison between the exposed population and control population will be done using survival curves for the time to hospital discharge.

02

Conditions studied

  • Urinary Tract Infections

Keywords

  • pyelonephritis
  • urinary tract infections, complicated
  • cefuroxime
  • cephalosporins
  • Escherichia coli
  • Drug Resistance, Microbial
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patiens with ≥ 18 years with a clinical diagnosis of community acquired pyelonephritis that require hospitalization and with positive culture for Escherichia coli.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years.
  • Clinical diagnosis of pyelonephritis.
  • Antibiotic treatment with cefuroxime.
  • Urine culture positive for Escherichia coli

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Use of antibiotic for less than 24 hours.
  • Not availability of antimicrobial susceptibility testing.
  • Use of urinary catheter for more than 30 days.
04

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
973 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • OtherResistance to cefuroxime

    Non susceptibility in vitro testing

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time to hospital discharge

    Time since admission to hospital discharge

    Time frame: Up to 30 days

  2. Readmission

    Proportion of patients admitted to hospital because of new episode of urinary tract infection

    Time frame: Up to 30 days after discharge

  3. Time to readmission

    Time since discharge to readmission

    Time frame: Up to 30 days after discharge

06

Study locations

1 site
  • Clínica Reina Sofía
    Bogota, DC 111134, Colombia
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Nocua-Baez LC, Cortes JA, Leal AL, Arias GF, Ovalle-Guerro MV, Saavedra-Rojas SY, Buitrago G, Escobar-Perez JA, Castro-Cardozo B. [Antimicrobial susceptibility profile in urinary pathogens causing community-acquired infections in diabetic patients in Colombia]. Biomedica. 2017 Sep 1;37(3):353-360. doi: 10.7705/biomedica.v37i3.3348. Spanish. PubMed 28968012 ↗
  • Leal AL, Cortes JA, Arias G, Ovalle MV, Saavedra SY, Buitrago G, Escobar JA, Castro BE; GREBO. [Emergence of resistance to third generation cephalosporins by Enterobacteriaceae causing community-onset urinary tract infections in hospitals in Colombia]. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2013 May;31(5):298-303. doi: 10.1016/j.eimc.2012.04.007. Epub 2012 Jun 15. Spanish. PubMed 22703702 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04616352
Lead sponsor
Universidad Nacional de Colombia
Responsible party
Jorge Alberto Cortes Luna (Primary investigator, Universidad Nacional de Colombia) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 4, 2020
Start date
Dec 26, 2020
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2021
Completion
Jul 30, 2021
Last update
Aug 3, 2021

Study contacts

Jorge A Cortes, MD
principal investigator · Univesidad Nacional de Colombia

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion