ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07381478Updated Feb 2, 2026

3°C Saline Injection at the Duodenal Papilla to Prevent Post-ERCP Pancreatitis

A Phase 2/3 interventional study of Topical Cold Sterile Saline Irrigation of the Duodenal Papilla (3°C) and Standard ERCP (Usual Care) in Pancreatitis, sponsored by Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Completed at 1 site in Colombia. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-02.

Sponsored by Universidad Nacional de Colombia · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 4 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Aug 2025, registered Jan 2026).
Phase
Phase 2/3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
900
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is an endoscopic procedure used to diagnose and treat problems in the bile ducts and pancreas. One of its most common complications is **post-ERCP pancreatitis**. This multicenter randomized clinical trial will evaluate whether **cooling the duodenal papilla** with **sterile saline at 3°C** immediately after ERCP can reduce the risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis compared with standard ERCP care.

Adults **≥18 years** with a **native papilla** scheduled for diagnostic or therapeutic ERCP at **three high-complexity university hospitals in Bogotá/Cundinamarca (Colombia)** will be randomized **1:1** to: (1) **intervention**-instillation of **250 mL** of **3°C sterile saline** in **five 50-mL aliquots** directed to the papilla through the endoscope working channel at the end of ERCP, with aspiration between aliquots; or (2) **control**-standard ERCP with no additional instillation. The saline temperature will be verified immediately before administration. Standard preventive measures (e.g., rectal NSAIDs, lactated Ringer's hydration, prophylactic pancreatic stent when clinically indicated) may be used per usual care and will be recorded.

The **primary outcome** is post-ERCP pancreatitis at **24 hours**, defined using Cotton criteria (new/worsening abdominal pain plus serum amylase or lipase ≥3× the upper limit of normal). Secondary outcomes include pancreatitis severity, other ERCP-related complications, and safety through day 7 (including a telephone follow-up). Participants will be screened and consented before sedation; randomization occurs at the end of the ERCP; clinical assessment and labs are performed at 24 hours; follow-up continues through day 7.

Safety monitoring will include systematic assessment for potential effects related to local cooling (e.g., chills, duodenal spasm, mucosal bleeding at the instillation site, or clinically relevant hypothermia) at 2 and 24 hours, with surveillance for serious adverse events through day 7.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pancreatitis

Browse trials for

03

In context

Pancreatitis

557 studies on the registry are indexed under Pancreatitis; 164 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 900 is above the median of 100 across 349 interventional studies indexed under Pancreatitis.

Browse Pancreatitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Universidad Nacional de Colombia is the lead sponsor of 39 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

**Inclusion Criteria:**

  • Adults **18 years of age or older**
  • **Native (unmodified) duodenal papilla**
  • Scheduled for **diagnostic or therapeutic ERCP**

**Exclusion Criteria:**

  • **Inaccessible papilla** or papilla **surgically altered/modified**
  • **Ongoing acute or chronic pancreatitis**
  • **Pregnancy**
  • **Ethical or medical to ERCP**
  • **Lack of **
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
900 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Cold Saline Papillary Irrigation (3°C)

    At the end of ERCP, 250 mL of sterile saline at 3°C is instilled onto the duodenal papilla in five 50-mL aliquots through the endoscope working channel, with aspiration between aliquots to enhance the local effect.

    Procedure: Topical Cold Sterile Saline Irrigation of the Duodenal Papilla (3°C)

  • Active comparator
    Standard ERCP (Usual Care)

    Standard ERCP performed with no additional saline instillation. Usual prophylaxis may be used when clinically indicated (e.g., rectal NSAIDs, lactated Ringer's hydration, prophylactic pancreatic stent in high-risk cases) and is recorded.

    Other: Standard ERCP (Usual Care)

Interventions

  • ProcedureTopical Cold Sterile Saline Irrigation of the Duodenal Papilla (3°C)

    250 mL of 3°C sterile saline administered in five 50-mL aliquots directed to the papilla via the endoscope working channel at ERCP completion, with aspiration between aliquots; saline temperature is verified immediately before administration

  • OtherStandard ERCP (Usual Care)

    Standard ERCP performed with no additional saline instillation. Usual prophylaxis may be used when clinically indicated (e.g., rectal NSAIDs, lactated Ringer's hydration, prophylactic pancreatic stent in high-risk cases) and is recorded.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) at 24 hours

    Proportion of participants with PEP defined by Cotton criteria: compatible abdominal pain plus serum amylase or lipase ≥3× upper limit of normal at 24 hours

    Time frame: 24 hours after ERCP

Secondary outcomes

  1. Incidence of moderate-to-severe post-ERCP pancreatitis

    Time frame: Up to Day 7 after ERCP

  2. Abdominal pain assessment

    Time frame: 24 hours after ERCP

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hospital San Rafael de Facatativá
    Bogotá, Bogota D.C. 110111, Colombia
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Aug 2025 to primary completion in Jan 2026, 4 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 24, 2026
First posted
Feb 2, 2026
StartActual
Aug 26, 2025
Primary completionActual
Jan 12, 2026
CompletionActual
Jan 14, 2026
Last update
Feb 2, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 2, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07381478
Lead sponsor
Universidad Nacional de Colombia
Collaborators
Hospital San Rafael de Facatativá
Responsible party
Juan Pablo Alzate (Clinical research institute investigator, Universidad Nacional de Colombia) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 2, 2026
Start date
Aug 26, 2025
Primary completion
Jan 12, 2026
Completion
Jan 14, 2026
Last update
Feb 2, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion