ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT04602806Updated Sep 14, 2026

Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury (TRACK-TBI) Precision Medicine Phase 2 Option 1

An observational study in Traumatic Brain Injury, sponsored by University of California, San Francisco. Enrolling by invitation at 5 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-14.

Sponsored by University of California, San Francisco · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
50
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is being conducted to validate early and ultra-early blood-based and novel imaging biomarkers of Diffuse Axonal Injury (DAI), Microvascular Injury (MVI), and neuroinflammation that may serve as predictive and pharmacodynamic biomarkers in a new cohort of moderate-severe TRACK-TBI subjects. The study team will enroll a cohort of moderate to severe TBI subjects (N=50), stratified according to VA/DoD criteria for these injury severities through the existing TRACK-TBI network sites to obtain novel advanced neuroimaging and more frequent biomarker sampling. Subjects will be assessed over 3 months.

Read the detailed description

In 2009, the multicenter Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury Consortium was implemented to characterize the clinical, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and blood-based biomarker features of TBI to inform design of next-generation precision medicine clinical trials in TBI. Over the past 10+ years, TRACK-TBI has been supported by National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), Department of Defense (DoD), Department of Energy (DoE), the National Football League, and other philanthropic and industry partners. TRACK-TBI has enrolled >3000 control and TBI subjects across the injury spectrum at 18 US Level 1 Trauma Centers. This effort has established the world's largest collection of TBI imaging studies and bio-specimens. The study results are already being adopted into clinical research and bedside practice. The TRACK-TBI Consortium is now primed to deliver on critical military and public health knowledge gaps and needs: objective classification of TBI based on what is termed as "mechanistic" endophenotypes, e.g., diffuse axonal injury (DAI), microvascular injury (MVI), and neuroinflammation. An endophenotype is an internal phenotype discoverable by biochemical, physiological, radiological, pathological, or other techniques, which is intermediate between a complex phenotype and the presumptive genetic or environmental contribution to a disease. Endophenotypes are quantitative, continuous variables, unlike a phenotype which is usually a binary, categorical variable. These mechanistic endophenotypes, defined by imaging and blood-based biomarkers, will direct targeted treatments based on mechanism, providing the tools needed for successful execution of precision medicine clinical trials. To achieve the goal of precision medicine in TBI, it is necessary to identify subgroups of TBI patients that will respond to a targeted therapy. Investigators will assess putative blood-based and neuroimaging biomarkers for DAI, MVI, and neuroinflammation. Fluid biomarkers complement imaging markers and may provide important tools for precision medicine clinical trials. Investigators will collect acute data (early and ultra-early i.e., hours-days following injury), to validate the utility of these biomarkers in defining TBI mechanistic endophenotypes for use in clinical trials.

Specific Aim for TRACK-TBI Precision Medicine Phase 2-Option 1: To validate early and ultra-early blood based and novel imaging biomarkers of DAI, MVI, and neuroinflammation that may serve as predictive and pharmacodynamic biomarkers in a cohort of moderate-severe subjects.

02

Conditions studied

  • Traumatic Brain Injury

Keywords

  • Traumatic Brain Injury
  • Biomarkers
  • Neuroimaging
  • Psychological Health
  • Concussion
03

In context

Brain Injuries, Traumatic

1,721 studies on the registry are indexed under Brain Injuries, Traumatic; 447 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 50 is below the median of 117 across 557 observational studies indexed under Brain Injuries, Traumatic.

Browse Brain Injuries, Traumatic studies →

Lead sponsor

University of California, San Francisco is the lead sponsor of 2,169 studies on the registry; 372 are open to participants now.

Of its 267 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 202 (76%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

This is a population-based TBI study. All patients presenting with traumatic brain injury and receive a head CT scan as part of standard care within 6 hours of injury are initially eligible.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 - 65y inclusive
  • History or evidence of TBI, according to DoD-VA criteria
  • Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) 3 - 15 after resuscitation in the ED
  • Head CT with evidence of trauma-related abnormality (except for isolated epidural hematoma (EDH))
  • Ability to undergo MRI within 48 hours of injury
  • Ability to obtain from participant or Legally Authorized Representative (LAR) within 6 hours of injury
  • Fluency in English or Spanish

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unstable respiratory or hemodynamic status
  • Evidence of penetrating brain injury
  • Isolated EDH as only trauma-related CT abnormality
  • Systemic traumatic injury that would preclude participation in study, which is expected to result in long-term disability not related to TBI
  • Evidence of serious infectious complications (sepsis, bacteremia, multilobar pneumonia)
  • Acute ischemic heart disease (myocardial infarction or unstable angina)
  • History of syncope or hypotension
  • Systolic blood pressure (SBP) \< 90 mm Hg, Diastolic blood pressure (DBP)\< 40 mm Hg for longer than 5 minutes
  • History or evidence of active
  • History of pre-existing neurologic disorder, such as dementia, mild cognitive impairment, uncontrolled epilepsy, multiple sclerosis, strokes, brain tumors, prior severe TBI, or other disorder that may confound interpretation of MRI or neuropsychological results
  • History of pre-existing disabling mental illness, such as major depression or schizophrenia
  • History or evidence of chronic heart failure or chronic renal failure
  • Low likelihood of follow-up (e.g., participant or family indicating low interest, residence in another state or country, unhoused or lack of reliable contacts)
  • Women who are pregnant or breast-feeding
  • Prisoners or patients in custody
  • Patients on psychiatric hold (e.g. 5150, 5250)
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Moderate to Severe TBI Subjects

    Adult patients (age 18-65y inclusive) presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) with a history of acute TBI as per American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine (ACRM) Criteria (i.e., patient has sustained a traumatically-induced physiological disruption of brain function).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Blood Specimen for Analysis of Biomarkers

    Using advanced blood-based assay platforms, levels of blood biomarkers neurofilament light chain (NfL), Tau, Interleukin 6 (IL6), Interleukin (IL10), and Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) will be measured to validate their utility as early predictive and pharmacodynamic biomarkers for Diffuse Axonal Injury (DAI), Microvascular Injury (MVI), and Neuroinflammation. In addition, Ubiquitin C-terminal Hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1)/Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) markers will also be assayed for comparison. All biomarkers will be measured in picograms/milliliter (pg/mL).

    Time frame: < 6 hours from the time of TBI

  2. Blood Specimen for Analysis of Biomarkers

    Using advanced blood-based assay platforms, levels of blood biomarkers neurofilament light chain (NfL), Tau, Interleukin 6 (IL6), Interleukin (IL10), and Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) will be measured to validate their utility as early predictive and pharmacodynamic biomarkers for Diffuse Axonal Injury (DAI), Microvascular Injury (MVI), and Neuroinflammation. In addition, Ubiquitin C-terminal Hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1)/Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) markers will also be assayed for comparison. All biomarkers will be measured in picograms/milliliter (pg/mL).

    Time frame: 12 hours from the time of TBI

  3. Blood Specimen for Analysis of Biomarkers

    Using advanced blood-based assay platforms, levels of blood biomarkers neurofilament light chain (NfL), Tau, Interleukin 6 (IL6), Interleukin (IL10), and Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) will be measured to validate their utility as early predictive and pharmacodynamic biomarkers for Diffuse Axonal Injury (DAI), Microvascular Injury (MVI), and Neuroinflammation. In addition, Ubiquitin C-terminal Hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1)/Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) markers will also be assayed for comparison. All biomarkers will be measured in picograms/milliliter (pg/mL).

    Time frame: 24 hours from the time of TBI

  4. Blood Specimen for Analysis of Biomarkers

    Using advanced blood-based assay platforms, levels of blood biomarkers neurofilament light chain (NfL), Tau, Interleukin 6 (IL6), Interleukin (IL10), and Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) will be measured to validate their utility as early predictive and pharmacodynamic biomarkers for Diffuse Axonal Injury (DAI), Microvascular Injury (MVI), and Neuroinflammation. In addition, Ubiquitin C-terminal Hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1)/Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) markers will also be assayed for comparison. All biomarkers will be measured in picograms/milliliter (pg/mL).

    Time frame: Day 2 from the time of TBI

  5. Blood Specimen for Analysis of Biomarkers

    Using advanced blood-based assay platforms, levels of blood biomarkers neurofilament light chain (NfL), Tau, Interleukin 6 (IL6), Interleukin (IL10), and Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) will be measured to validate their utility as early predictive and pharmacodynamic biomarkers for Diffuse Axonal Injury (DAI), Microvascular Injury (MVI), and Neuroinflammation. In addition, Ubiquitin C-terminal Hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1)/Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) markers will also be assayed for comparison. All biomarkers will be measured in picograms/milliliter (pg/mL).

    Time frame: Day 3 from the time of TBI

  6. Blood Specimen for Analysis of Biomarkers

    Using advanced blood-based assay platforms, levels of blood biomarkers neurofilament light chain (NfL), Tau, Interleukin 6 (IL6), Interleukin (IL10), and Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) will be measured to validate their utility as early predictive and pharmacodynamic biomarkers for Diffuse Axonal Injury (DAI), Microvascular Injury (MVI), and Neuroinflammation. In addition, Ubiquitin C-terminal Hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1)/Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) markers will also be assayed for comparison. All biomarkers will be measured in picograms/milliliter (pg/mL).

    Time frame: Day 5 from the time of TBI

  7. Blood Specimen for Analysis of Biomarkers

    Using advanced blood-based assay platforms, levels of blood biomarkers neurofilament light chain (NfL), Tau, Interleukin 6 (IL6), Interleukin (IL10), and Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) will be measured to validate their utility as early predictive and pharmacodynamic biomarkers for Diffuse Axonal Injury (DAI), Microvascular Injury (MVI), and Neuroinflammation. In addition, Ubiquitin C-terminal Hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1)/Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) markers will also be assayed for comparison. All biomarkers will be measured in picograms/milliliter (pg/mL).

    Time frame: Week 4 from the time of TBI

  8. Blood Specimen for Analysis of Biomarkers

    Using advanced blood-based assay platforms, levels of blood biomarkers neurofilament light chain (NfL), Tau, Interleukin 6 (IL6), Interleukin (IL10), and Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) will be measured to validate their utility as early predictive and pharmacodynamic biomarkers for Diffuse Axonal Injury (DAI), Microvascular Injury (MVI), and Neuroinflammation. In addition, Ubiquitin C-terminal Hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1)/Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) markers will also be assayed for comparison. All biomarkers will be measured in picograms/milliliter (pg/mL).

    Time frame: Week 6 from the time of TBI

  9. Blood Specimen for Analysis of Biomarkers

    Using advanced blood-based assay platforms, levels of blood biomarkers neurofilament light chain (NfL), Tau, Interleukin 6 (IL6), Interleukin (IL10), and Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) will be measured to validate their utility as early predictive and pharmacodynamic biomarkers for Diffuse Axonal Injury (DAI), Microvascular Injury (MVI), and Neuroinflammation. In addition, Ubiquitin C-terminal Hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1)/Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) markers will also be assayed for comparison. All biomarkers will be measured in picograms/milliliter (pg/mL).

    Time frame: 3 Months from the time of TBI

  10. 3 Tesla Brain Structural and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

    This study aims to validate early and ultra-early novel imaging biomarkers in the acute phase after injury. In addition to volumetrics, Diffuse Tensor Imaging (DTI) and Resting State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (rs-fMRI), the MRI protocol will incorporate novel imaging measures of axonal density using neurite density index (NDI) from Neurite Orientation Dispersion And Density Imaging (NODDI) analysis of multi-shell diffusion MRI, cerebral blood flow using Arterial Spin Labeled (ASL) perfusion, and neuroinflammation using free water content isotropic diffusion fraction (FISO) from NODDI analysis of multi-shell diffusion MRI.

    Time frame: Within 24-48 hours from the time of TBI

  11. 3 Tesla Brain Structural and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

    This study aims to validate early and ultra-early novel imaging biomarkers in the acute phase after injury. In addition to volumetrics, Diffuse Tensor Imaging (DTI) and Resting State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (rs-fMRI), the MRI protocol will incorporate novel imaging measures of axonal density using neurite density index (NDI) from Neurite Orientation Dispersion And Density Imaging (NODDI) analysis of multi-shell diffusion MRI, cerebral blood flow using Arterial Spin Labeled (ASL) perfusion, and neuroinflammation using free water content isotropic diffusion fraction (FISO) from NODDI analysis of multi-shell diffusion MRI.

    Time frame: 2 Weeks from the time of TBI

  12. 3 Tesla Brain Structural and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

    This study aims to validate early and ultra-early novel imaging biomarkers in the acute phase after injury. In addition to volumetrics, Diffuse Tensor Imaging (DTI) and Resting State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (rs-fMRI), the MRI protocol will incorporate novel imaging measures of axonal density using neurite density index (NDI) from Neurite Orientation Dispersion And Density Imaging (NODDI) analysis of multi-shell diffusion MRI, cerebral blood flow using Arterial Spin Labeled (ASL) perfusion, and neuroinflammation using free water content isotropic diffusion fraction (FISO) from NODDI analysis of multi-shell diffusion MRI.

    Time frame: 3 Months from the time of TBI

Secondary outcomes

  1. Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE)

    The GOSE provides an overall measure of functional status based on information on cognition, independence, employability, and social/community participation collected via structured interview. Individuals are described by one of the eight outcome categories: Dead (1); Vegetative State (2); Lower Severe Disability (3); Upper Severe Disability (4); Lower Moderate Disability (5); Upper Moderate Disability (6); Lower Good Recovery (7) and Upper Good Recovery (8). Good Recovery is defined as a score of 7-8, Moderate Disability is defined by a score of 5-6 and Severe Disability is defined by a score of 3-4.

    Time frame: 2 Weeks from the time of TBI

  2. Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE)

    The GOSE provides an overall measure of functional status based on information on cognition, independence, employability, and social/community participation collected via structured interview. Individuals are described by one of the eight outcome categories: Dead (1); Vegetative State (2); Lower Severe Disability (3); Upper Severe Disability (4); Lower Moderate Disability (5); Upper Moderate Disability (6); Lower Good Recovery (7) and Upper Good Recovery (8). Good Recovery is defined as a score of 7-8, Moderate Disability is defined by a score of 5-6 and Severe Disability is defined by a score of 3-4.

    Time frame: 6 Weeks from the time of TBI

  3. Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE)

    The GOSE provides an overall measure of functional status based on information on cognition, independence, employability, and social/community participation collected via structured interview. Individuals are described by one of the eight outcome categories: Dead (1); Vegetative State (2); Lower Severe Disability (3); Upper Severe Disability (4); Lower Moderate Disability (5); Upper Moderate Disability (6); Lower Good Recovery (7) and Upper Good Recovery (8). Good Recovery is defined as a score of 7-8, Moderate Disability is defined by a score of 5-6 and Severe Disability is defined by a score of 3-4.

    Time frame: 3 Months from the time of TBI

07

Study locations

5 sites
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Maas AI, Roozenbeek B, Manley GT. Clinical trials in traumatic brain injury: past experience and current developments. Neurotherapeutics. 2010 Jan;7(1):115-26. doi: 10.1016/j.nurt.2009.10.022. PubMed 20129503 ↗
  • Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment and prognosis of coma after head injury. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1976;34(1-4):45-55. doi: 10.1007/BF01405862. PubMed 961490 ↗
  • Wilson JT, Pettigrew LE, Teasdale GM. Structured interviews for the Glasgow Outcome Scale and the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale: guidelines for their use. J Neurotrauma. 1998 Aug;15(8):573-85. doi: 10.1089/neu.1998.15.573. PubMed 9726257 ↗
  • Maas AI, Harrison-Felix CL, Menon D, Adelson PD, Balkin T, Bullock R, Engel DC, Gordon W, Orman JL, Lew HL, Robertson C, Temkin N, Valadka A, Verfaellie M, Wainwright M, Wright DW, Schwab K. Common data elements for traumatic brain injury: recommendations from the interagency working group on demographics and clinical assessment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Nov;91(11):1641-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.07.232. PubMed 21044707 ↗
  • Manley GT, Diaz-Arrastia R, Brophy M, Engel D, Goodman C, Gwinn K, Veenstra TD, Ling G, Ottens AK, Tortella F, Hayes RL. Common data elements for traumatic brain injury: recommendations from the biospecimens and biomarkers working group. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Nov;91(11):1667-72. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.05.018. PubMed 21044710 ↗
  • Duhaime AC, Gean AD, Haacke EM, Hicks R, Wintermark M, Mukherjee P, Brody D, Latour L, Riedy G; Common Data Elements Neuroimaging Working Group Members, Pediatric Working Group Members. Common data elements in radiologic imaging of traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Nov;91(11):1661-6. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.07.238. PubMed 21044709 ↗
  • Whyte J, Vasterling J, Manley GT. Common data elements for research on traumatic brain injury and psychological health: current status and future development. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Nov;91(11):1692-6. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.06.031. PubMed 21044713 ↗
  • Almasy L, Blangero J. Endophenotypes as quantitative risk factors for psychiatric disease: rationale and study design. Am J Med Genet. 2001 Jan 8;105(1):42-4. PubMed 11424994 ↗
  • O'Neil ME, Carlson KF, Storzbach D, Brenner LA, Freeman M, Quinones AR, Motu'apuaka M, Kansagara D. Factors associated with mild traumatic brain injury in veterans and military personnel: a systematic review. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2014 Mar;20(3):249-61. doi: 10.1017/S1355617714000204. PubMed 24622505 ↗
  • Alsop DC, Detre JA, Golay X, Gunther M, Hendrikse J, Hernandez-Garcia L, Lu H, MacIntosh BJ, Parkes LM, Smits M, van Osch MJ, Wang DJ, Wong EC, Zaharchuk G. Recommended implementation of arterial spin-labeled perfusion MRI for clinical applications: A consensus of the ISMRM perfusion study group and the European consortium for ASL in dementia. Magn Reson Med. 2015 Jan;73(1):102-16. doi: 10.1002/mrm.25197. Epub 2014 Apr 8. PubMed 24715426 ↗
  • Dikmen S, Machamer J, Miller B, Doctor J, Temkin N. Functional status examination: a new instrument for assessing outcome in traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2001 Feb;18(2):127-40. doi: 10.1089/08977150150502578. PubMed 11229707 ↗
  • McCrea M, Kelly JP, Randolph C. Standardized Assessment of Concussion (SAC): Manual for Administration, Scoring and Interpretation. 2nd ed. Waukesha, WI: CNS Inc; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • Smith GP, Burger GK. Detection of malingering: validation of the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS). J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1997;25(2):183-9. PubMed 9213290 ↗
  • Reitan, R.M. and D. Wolfson, The Halstead-Reitan neuropsychological test battery: Theory and clinical interpretation. Vol. 4. 1985: Reitan Neuropsychology.
  • Finkelstein E, Corso P, Miller T and Associates. The Incidence and Economic Burden of Injuries in the United States. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 2006.
  • Dolmans RGF, Barber J, Foreman B, Temkin NR, Okonkwo DO, Robertson CS, Manley GT, Rosenthal ES. Sedation Intensity in Patients with Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in the Intensive Care Unit: A TRACK-TBI Cohort Study. Neurocrit Care. 2025 Apr;42(2):551-561. doi: 10.1007/s12028-024-02054-7. Epub 2024 Aug 13. PubMed 39138718 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The TRACK TBI investigators have created a Data Use Agreement/Human Materials Transfer Agreement (DUA/HTMA) for TRACK-TBI Research Collaborations. This Agreement is for the use of clinical data, neuroimaging, and bio-specimens collected by the TRACK-TBI investigators. All Research Collaborators can submit a written request to the TRACK-TBI Executive Committee. This study involves research in the area of traumatic brain injury (TBI). The Department of Defense, in collaboration with the National Institutes of Health, has developed the Federal Interagency Traumatic Brain Injury Research (FITBIR) Informatics System, a central repository and resource for sharing data to promote collaboration, accelerate research, and advance knowledge on the characterization, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of TBI. The TRACK-TBI Investigators will share study data via FITBIR in accordance with FITBIR policy and procedures.

Time frame: Data will become available after study completion.

Access criteria: All Research Collaborations with TRACK-TBI begins with a written request submitted to the TRACK-TBI Executive Committee. The Research Collaboration Proposal form is attached as Appendix 1 in the Research Collaboration Policy available on the TRACK-TBI website. Access to FITBIR data will be according to FITBIR policies found at https://fitbir.nih.gov/jsp/about/policy.jsp

Data sharing details ↗ · tracktbi.ucsf.edu

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jun 2021 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Apr 2030, 106 months after the start.

Of 228 non-industry observational studies under Brain Injuries, Traumatic, half reached primary completion within 50 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 23 and three quarters within 95. This study's planned 106 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 250 studies reached it within 49 months; a quarter within 23 and three quarters within 95.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 20, 2020
First posted
Oct 26, 2020
StartActual
Jun 1, 2021
Primary completionEst.
Apr 2030
CompletionEst.
Apr 2030
Last update
Sep 14, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 14, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04602806
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 26, 2020
Start date
Jun 1, 2021
Primary completion
Apr 2030 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 14, 2026

Study contacts

Geoffrey T Manley, MD, PhD
study director · University of California, San Francisco
Claudia S Robertson, MD
study director · Baylor College of Medicine
David O Okonkwo, MD, PhD
study director · University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
Ramon Diaz-Arrastia, MD, PhD
study director · University of Pennsylvania
Nancy R Temkin, PhD
study director · University of Washington
Pratik Mukherjee, MD, PhD
study director · University of California, San Francisco
Joseph T Giacino, PhD
study director · Harvard Medical School, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital
Murray B Stein, MD, MPH
study director · University of California, San Diego
Mike McCrea, PhD, ABPP
principal investigator · Medical College of Wisconsin
Ramesh Grandhi, MD, MS
principal investigator · University of Utah

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion