CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04517903QFKUpdated May 29, 2026

Validation Study on Eye Rubbing Questionnaire in Patients With or Suspected of Having a Keratoconus (KC)

An interventional study of eye rubbing questionnaire in Keratoconus, sponsored by University Hospital, Bordeaux. Completed at 8 sites in France. Open to participants aged 13 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-29.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Bordeaux · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
292
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
13 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

KC is a degenerative disorder of the cornea. Keratoconus etiopathogenesis remains unclear and may rely on environmental and genetic factors. Usually considered as a rare disease (\<1/2000), but the prevalence is nowadays growing worldwide up to 1/500. In that pathology, cornea progressively gets thinner, and there is a deformation of the corneal surface which can induce high order optical aberrations and visual impairment.

Eye rubbing is certainly the main factor in the progression or development of keratoconus (KC), yet it is only very partially evaluated and quantified in current management. Environmental and clinical factors will be collected and associated with a eye rubbing Questionnaire, specifically pointing out eye rubbing.

Read the detailed description

CNRK center is working on an eye rubbing questionnaire since 2017 in order to quantify that pejorative factor. Patient education can limit in a certain amount the Keratoconus progression. Thus, our objective will be to evaluate the therapeutic impact on Keratoconus progression of patient's education against eye rubbing according to an eye rubbing Questionnaire.

The validation of a dedicated questionnaire is an important act that will allow the scientific evaluation of this factor with both environmental and behavioral traits. It can thus be integrated into our care activity for its intrinsic educational and therapeutic virtues and for its decision-making aid for certain treatments. It will be useful first of all for the refinement of the correct prescription of corneal collagen crosslinking for evolving KC or KC with a high risk of progression.

02

Conditions studied

  • Keratoconus

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Keratoconus
  • Eye rubbing
03

In context

Keratoconus

307 studies on the registry are indexed under Keratoconus; 56 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 292 is above the median of 40 across 203 interventional studies indexed under Keratoconus.

Browse Keratoconus studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Bordeaux is the lead sponsor of 783 studies on the registry; 188 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
13 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Coming for the first time for expert advice on KC
  • Having a suspected or known KC
  • Being over 13 years old (or from 13 years old)
  • Possess computer connection equipment (computer, tablet or smartphone) and access to the network, for the completion of the questionnaire at home.
  • Being affiliated to or beneficiary of health insurance
  • Have signed the informed consent form from the patient and from legal representatives for minor patient

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Being incapacitated or unable to follow study procedures
  • Patient under legal protection
  • Previous ocular surgery
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Sequential assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
292 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    exploratory phase

    eye rubbing questionnaire at baseline and 15 days later

    Other: eye rubbing questionnaire

Interventions

  • Othereye rubbing questionnaire

    eye rubbing questionnaire at baseline and 15 days later for exploratory phase; at baseline and then validation by a Group Nominal

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. validation of our eye rubbing questionnaire

    validation of our eye rubbing questionnaire will be made through the evaluation of its Suitability (Appearance validity, Content validity), Reliability (Consistency and homogeneity, Reproducibility), Applicability (Feasibility and acceptability), Validity (Construct validity), Sensitivity (Sensitivity to change, Discriminative validity)

    Time frame: Baseline and 15 days after (Day 15)

Secondary outcomes

  1. questionnaire simplification

    Statistical criteria for questionnaire simplification: ceiling and floor effects, response rates, correlations, reproducibility, measurement error and internal consistency. These elements are part of the content validity and reliability stages of the COSMIN recommendations

    Time frame: Month 6

  2. Expert consensus by nominal group

    Expert consensus by nominal group. This is the only method suitable for validating a clinical questionnaire

    Time frame: Month 6

07

Study locations

8 sites
  • CHU Bordeaux
    Bordeaux, France
  • CHU Brest
    Brest, France
  • CHU de Clermont-Ferrad
    Clermont-Ferrand, France
  • Hospices Civils de Lyon
    Lyon, France
  • CHU de Montpellier
    Montpellier, France
  • Centre National Ophtalmologique des Quinze Vingt
    Paris, France
  • CHU de Rouen
    Rouen, France
  • CHU de Toulouse
    Toulouse, France
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 29, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04517903
Lead sponsor
University Hospital, Bordeaux
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 19, 2020
Start date
Mar 16, 2021
Primary completion
Oct 13, 2021
Completion
Oct 13, 2021
Last update
May 29, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion