ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT04505046INSPiRED-WP3Updated Aug 7, 2020

Validation of INSPiRED Innovative Smart Diagnostic Devices for the Detection of Parasites Infections.

An observational study in Testing, Performance and Specificity, sponsored by Centre de Recherche Médicale de Lambaréné. Status unknown at 1 site in Gabon. Open to participants aged 2 Years to 50 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-08-07.

Sponsored by Centre de Recherche Médicale de Lambaréné · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Aug 2020), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
460
Ages
2 Years to 50 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Malaria, schistosomiasis and ancylostomiasis are three parasitic diseases which affect hundreds of millions of people and are an important cause of global mortality and morbidity. For the control of these poverty related parasitic diseases, and to complement chemotherapeutic strategies, accurate and accessible diagnostic procedures play a crucial role.

In recent years, innovative smart mobile technologies have been applied for detection and identification of cultured parasite species, which is basically based on sample imaging and parasite morphology identification. Promising advances have been made with this technology and coupled with its small size, low cost and easy to manipulate, makes it suitable for point of care diagnostics in low resource setting.

The aim of the proposed explorative study is to further validate sensitivity and specificity of each of the developed devices, using besides microscopy a range of more advanced reference tests.

Read the detailed description

Malaria, schistosomiasis and ancylostomiasis are three parasitic diseases which affect hundreds of millions of people and are an important cause of global mortality and morbidity. For the control of these poverty related parasitic diseases, and to complement chemotherapeutic strategies, accurate and accessible diagnostic procedures play a crucial role. Especially in remote and/or low resource settings, appropriate diagnostic tests are often lacking. These tests should not only be sensitive and specific, but also affordable, reliable, and easy to operate. In recent years, innovative smart mobile technologies have been applied for detection and identification of cultured parasite species, which is basically based on sample imaging and parasite morphology identification. Promising advances have been made with this technology and coupled with its small size, low cost and easy to manipulate, makes it suitable for point of care diagnostics in low resource setting. At the Technical University of Delft, a smart optical device prototype has been recently developed for the detection of Plasmodium. This Excelscope has been tested on a small number of malaria cases in Nigeria, showing promising results. In addition, TU Delft has developed a prototype for the detection of Schistosoma haematobium eggs in urine, which is ready for further validation in the field. Still under construction is a smart optical device for the detection of helminth eggs in stool, including eggs of hookworms. For each of these three smart optical devices using respectively blood, urine or stool, a diagnostic performance is aimed which does not significantly deviate in sensitivity and specificity from the diagnostic tests commonly in use in low resource settings, e.g. basic microscopy. At the same time, the optical devices have supplementary logistical advantages, e.g. easiness to use, high throughput and low costs per sample. The aim of the proposed explorative study is to further validate sensitivity and specificity of each of the developed devices, using besides microscopy a range of more advanced reference tests. For this purpose, diagnostic samples (blood, urine, stool) collected from ongoing studies involving malaria, schistosomiasis and STHs. at CERMEL will be used. The outcome of this study will give new insight in the diagnostic performance of the innovative smart optical devices, specifically in comparison to the WHO recommended diagnostic procedures currently used at CERMEL. The study is the core activity of Work Package 3 within the INSPiRED project.

02

Conditions studied

  • Testing
  • Performance
  • Specificity
  • Sensitivity

Keywords

  • Plasmodium
  • Schistosoma
  • hookworm
03

In context

Hypersensitivity

1,055 studies on the registry are indexed under Hypersensitivity; 149 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 460 is above the median of 166 across 327 observational studies indexed under Hypersensitivity.

Browse Hypersensitivity studies →

Lead sponsor

Centre de Recherche Médicale de Lambaréné is the lead sponsor of 17 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
2 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

All study participants, living in Lambaréné areas and its surrounding with parasitic infection

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Infected with malaria
  • Infected with Schistosomiasis
  • Soil-transmitted helminths

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

-No sample provided

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
460 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
1 Day
Patient registry
Yes
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. AiDx devise is good as a conventional microscopy

    Optical diagnostic devices is specific, sensitive as well as predicting value as microscopic test

    Time frame: 3 years

  2. Schistoscope

    Optical diagnostic devices is specific, sensitive as well as predicting value as microscopic test

    Time frame: 3 years

  3. Hookworm and other STH devise is good as conventional. microscopic test

    Optical diagnostic devices is specific, sensitive as well as predicting value as microscopic test

    Time frame: 3 years

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Centre de Recherches Medicales de Lambarene
    Lambaréné, Moyen Ogooué BP 242, Gabon
    Recruiting
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Mar 2020 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2022, 33 months after the start.

Of 101 non-industry observational studies under Hypersensitivity, half reached primary completion within 45 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 19 and three quarters within 203. This study's planned 33 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 124 studies reached it within 41 months; a quarter within 19 and three quarters within 136.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 13, 2020
First posted
Aug 7, 2020
StartActual
Mar 20, 2020
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2022
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2023
Last update
Aug 7, 2020
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 7, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04505046
Lead sponsor
Centre de Recherche Médicale de Lambaréné
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 7, 2020
Start date
Mar 20, 2020
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2022 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2023 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 7, 2020

Study contacts

Ayola A ADEGNIKA, PhD; MD
Contact
aadegnika@cermel.org
+2466244472
Brice Meulah, MsC
Contact
meulahfabrice@gmail.com
+24174567447
Romuald Mba, MSc
study chair · Centre de Recherches Médicales de Lambaréné - CERMEL

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Aug 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion