ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04491175Updated Aug 19, 2025

Impact of DuoTherm on Opioid Use and Low Back Pain

An interventional study of M-Stim and TENS in Opioid Use and Low Back Pain, sponsored by MMJ Labs LLC. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 90 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-08-19.

Sponsored by MMJ Labs LLC · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was Jul 2024, 2 years 4 months ago, and no results have been posted to the registry.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
160
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Evaluate the difference in opioid use, pain intensity and pain interference in patients with moderate to severe low back pain using DuoTherm multimodal harmonic mechanical stimulation (M-Stim) unit compared to Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS)

Read the detailed description

160 patients with acute or exacerbations of chronic low back pain (LBP) presenting for chiropractic and rehabilitation care will be randomized to one of two conditions: an M-Stim pain relief belt device incorporating 8 patterns of vibration motors (and optional heat, cold, and pressure) delivered through a sculpted metal plate; or a 4-lead TENS unit with 8 channels of stimulation and adjustable intensity. Patients will be blinded to the hypothesis-driving intervention. They will be prompted daily by a Qualtrics text link to a secure data recording site collecting analgesic use and treatments, including opioid brand, dose, pill number, and source, and pain data, then weekly for 3 months (acute pain) or 6 months (chronic).

02

Conditions studied

  • Opioid Use
  • Low Back Pain

Keywords

  • chronic pain
  • analgesia
  • medical device
  • opioid
  • low back pain
  • neuromodulation
  • multifidus
03

In context

Low Back Pain

2,922 studies on the registry are indexed under Low Back Pain; 580 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 160 is above the median of 60 across 2,364 interventional studies indexed under Low Back Pain.

Browse Low Back Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

MMJ Labs LLC is the lead sponsor of 4 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age18-90
  • Moderate-to-severe low back pain with numeric rating scale >=4/10
  • Capacity to understand
  • Willingness to communicate prescriptions, pill number, dose, and source of opioids used

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Opioid prescription in the past month for acute LBP (new pain \<3 months)
  • Radicular pain
  • greater than 50 (device won't fit)
  • Sensitivity to cold or vibration (e.g Raynaud's or Sickle Cell Disease)
  • Diabetic neuropathy
  • New neurologic deficits
  • Skin lesions over the low back area
  • to any medication for pain management
  • Inability to apply DuoTherm or TENS device
  • Pacemaker
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
160 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Multimodal Harmonic Mechanical Stimulation Neuromodulation Wearable Belt (M-Stim)

    DuoTherm is a novel multimodal low back pain relief device incorporating 8 harmonic vibration patterns of mechanical stimulation (M-Stim) including neuromodulatory frequencies, 5 intensity levels, and optional heat, cold, and pressure delivered through a sculpted metal plate attached with a belt and controlled by buttons on the belt. Patients will be instructed to use the device at least daily for 30 minutes.

    Device: M-Stim

  • Active comparator
    Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS)

    A prescription 4-lead 8-channel TENS unit (LG Smart) with variable intensity settings. Patients will be instructed to use the TENS at least daily for 30 minutes.

    Device: TENS

Interventions

  • DeviceM-Stim

    The casing for the device is a 54" belt with 3-button haptic controller for on-off, therapy cycles(8) and intensity(5) levels.

    Also known as: DuoTherm, Multiple VibraCool M-Stim units in a harmonic array on a thermoconductive plate with optional cold, heat, and pressure

  • DeviceTENS

    LG SMART TENS stimulator is a portable electrotherapy devcie featuring transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) therapeutic device, which is used for pain relief. The stimulator sends a gentle electrical current to underlying nerves and muscle groups via electrodes applied on the skin. The parameters of the device are controlled by buttons on a controller with an adjustable intensity level.

    Also known as: LG Smart TENS

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Opioid initiation in the opioid-naive

    New opioid prescriptions for subjects without history of opioids for LBP

    Time frame: All opioid diaries for 3 months

  2. Opioid use in prior users

    Change in milligram morphine equivalents (MME) reported daily

    Time frame: 28 days (duration of daily recording)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Opioid Use Risk Factors in the Opioid-Naive

    The difference in opioid use days, MME, and those using opioids more than 7 days after presentation

    Time frame: All opioid diaries for 3 months

  2. Opioid use in those with more severe pain

    Opioid use days in those with the NIH Research Taskforce severity of moderate to severe in M-Stim versus TENS

    Time frame: All opioid diaries for 6 months

  3. Opioid prescribing compared to a contemporaneous national LPB prescribing of 25%

    New opioid prescription rate for each intervention compared to nationally prevalent prescribing rates of 25% with moderate to severe pain in outpatient settings

    Time frame: All opioid diaries for 6 months

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Sport and Spine Rehab Clinics
    Landover, Maryland 20785, United States
  • Kaizo Health Fairfax
    Fairfax, Virginia 22030, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Stumbo SP, Yarborough BJ, McCarty D, Weisner C, Green CA. Patient-reported pathways to opioid use disorders and pain-related barriers to treatment engagement. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2017 Feb;73:47-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2016.11.003. Epub 2016 Nov 15. PubMed 28017184 ↗
  • Deyo RA, Dworkin SF, Amtmann D, Andersson G, Borenstein D, Carragee E, Carrino J, Chou R, Cook K, Delitto A, Goertz C, Khalsa P, Loeser J, Mackey S, Panagis J, Rainville J, Tosteson T, Turk D, Von Korff M, Weiner DK. Report of the NIH Task Force on research standards for chronic low back pain. Phys Ther. 2015 Feb;95(2):e1-e18. doi: 10.2522/ptj.2015.95.2.e1. PubMed 25639530 ↗
  • Davis CS, Lieberman AJ, Hernandez-Delgado H, Suba C. Laws limiting the prescribing or dispensing of opioids for acute pain in the United States: A national systematic legal review. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019 Jan 1;194:166-172. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.09.022. Epub 2018 Nov 3. PubMed 30445274 ↗
  • Hawker GA, Mian S, Kendzerska T, French M. Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF-36 BPS), and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Nov;63 Suppl 11:S240-52. doi: 10.1002/acr.20543. No abstract available. PubMed 22588748 ↗
  • Darnall BD, Colloca L. Optimizing Placebo and Minimizing Nocebo to Reduce Pain, Catastrophizing, and Opioid Use: A Review of the Science and an Evidence-Informed Clinical Toolkit. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2018;139:129-157. doi: 10.1016/bs.irn.2018.07.022. Epub 2018 Aug 6. PubMed 30146045 ↗
  • French SD, Cameron M, Walker BF, Reggars JW, Esterman AJ. Superficial heat or cold for low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jan 25;2006(1):CD004750. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004750.pub2. PubMed 16437495 ↗
  • Farber K, Wieland LS. Massage for Low-back Pain. Explore (NY). 2016 May-Jun;12(3):215-7. doi: 10.1016/j.explore.2016.02.014. Epub 2016 Mar 2. PubMed 27033320 ↗
  • Nadler SF, Steiner DJ, Petty SR, Erasala GN, Hengehold DA, Weingand KW. Overnight use of continuous low-level heatwrap therapy for relief of low back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003 Mar;84(3):335-42. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2003.50103. PubMed 12638100 ↗
  • Delitto A, Patterson CG, Stevans JM, Freburger JK, Khoja SS, Schneider MJ, Greco CM, Freel JA, Sowa GA, Wasan AD, Brennan GP, Hunter SJ, Minick KI, Wegener ST, Ephraim PL, Beneciuk JM, George SZ, Saper RB. Stratified care to prevent chronic low back pain in high-risk patients: The TARGET trial. A multi-site pragmatic cluster randomized trial. EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Mar 30;34:100795. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100795. eCollection 2021 Apr. PubMed 33870150 ↗
  • Deyo RA, Hallvik SE, Hildebran C, Marino M, Dexter E, Irvine JM, O'Kane N, Van Otterloo J, Wright DA, Leichtling G, Millet LM. Association Between Initial Opioid Prescribing Patterns and Subsequent Long-Term Use Among Opioid-Naive Patients: A Statewide Retrospective Cohort Study. J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Jan;32(1):21-27. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3810-3. Epub 2016 Aug 2. PubMed 27484682 ↗
  • Hayden JA, Ellis J, Asbridge M, Ogilvie R, Merdad R, Grant DAG, Stewart SA, Campbell S. Prolonged opioid use among opioid-naive individuals after prescription for nonspecific low back pain in the emergency department. Pain. 2021 Mar 1;162(3):740-748. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002075. PubMed 32947539 ↗
  • Baxter AL, Thrasher A, Etnoyer-Slaski JL, Cohen LL. Multimodal mechanical stimulation reduces acute and chronic low back pain: Pilot data from a HEAL phase 1 study. Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2023 Apr 26;4:1114633. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2023.1114633. eCollection 2023. PubMed 37179530 ↗
  • Baxter AL, Etnoyer-Slaski JL, Williams JAR, Swartout K, Cohen LL, Lawson ML. Preventing opioid prescribing for low back pain using multimodal mechanical stimulation vs. TENS: a randomized-controlled trial. Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2025 Jul 10;6:1612572. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2025.1612572. eCollection 2025. PubMed 40709052 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Individual participant data that underlie the clinical results reported in any publications, after deidentification, will be available for a period of 36 months after publication to achieve approved aims of any researcher who provides a methodologically sound proposal. Proposals should be directed to info@mmjlabs.com. To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Clinical study report

Time frame: up to 36 months after publication of results

Access criteria: researchers providing approved methodologically sound proposals

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 19, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04491175
Lead sponsor
MMJ Labs LLC
Collaborators
Sport and Spine Rehab Clinical Research Foundation, National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
Responsible party
Amy Lynn Baxter (CEO, MMJ Labs LLC) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 29, 2020
Start date
Jun 23, 2022
Primary completion
Jul 9, 2024
Completion
May 29, 2025
Last update
Aug 19, 2025

Study contacts

Jena Slaski
study director · Sport and Spine Clinical Research Foundation

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion