An interventional study of Psychosocial Pain Management (PPMI) and Enhanced Usual Care (EUC) in Opioid-use Disorder, Medication Assisted Treatment and Chronic Pain, sponsored by University of Michigan. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-07-09.
Sponsored by University of Michigan · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care
The purpose of this research study is to look at the effect of programs aimed at helping people manage chronic pain and medication treatment. The program sessions focus on educational information and strategies for pain and medication management. The researchers enroll people who have chronic pain and have recently begun buprenorphine treatment to see if participants could benefit from these programs. This research study will help the researchers learn how to improve current therapies for pain and medication management.
1,411 studies on the registry are indexed under Opioid-Related Disorders; 290 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 200 is above the median of 63 across 1,123 interventional studies indexed under Opioid-Related Disorders.
Browse Opioid-Related Disorders studies →University of Michigan is the lead sponsor of 1,475 studies on the registry; 196 are open to participants now.
Of its 162 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 128 (79%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Eight Cognitive Behavioral Therapy-based individual telephone or video therapy sessions with research study therapist.
Behavioral: Psychosocial Pain Management (PPMI)
Two individual telephone educational sessions with research study therapist.
Behavioral: Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)
The main theme of the treatment is to provide participants with new ways of thinking and coping skills related to managing pain and opioid use in order to increase the likelihood the participant may remain in buprenorphine treatment.
The EUC condition is designed to match the PPMI condition in terms of the non-specific aspects of receiving support for pain, substance use, and receiving monitoring of buprenorphine adherence.
Retention on Buprenorphine Treatment According to TimeLine Follow-Back - 3-months
In this study, "retention on buprenorphine treatment" was defined as the time until a participant stopped taking their medication for 7 or more days in a row. This information was collected using a calendar recall method, the TimeLine Follow-Back (TLFB) measure at 3 months. The average number of days participants remained on buprenorphine before this happened was calculated, using the data collected at 3-month follow-up.
Time frame: 3-months post enrollment
Retention on Buprenorphine Treatment According to TimeLine Follow-Back - 12 Months
In this study, "retention on buprenorphine treatment" was defined as the time until a participant stopped taking their medication for 7 or more days in a row. This information was collected using a calendar recall method, the TimeLine Follow-Back (TLFB) measure at 12 months. The average number of days participants remained on buprenorphine before this happened was calculated, using the data collected at 12-month follow-up.
Time frame: 12-months post enrollment
Average Change in Self-reported Level of Pain Intensity on the Numerical Rating Scale for Pain Intensity (NRS-I) at 3-month Follow up (Compared to Baseline)
Pain level will be measured using the Numerical Rating Scale for Pain Intensity (NRS-I), an 11-point numeric rating scale (0=no pain, 10= worst pain imaginable), which will be collected at the baseline enrollment assessment and 3-month follow-up. To calculate our measure, we subtracted each participant's score at 3-month assessment and subtracted it from their baseline score. We then averaged calculated average change in scores for each intervention group.
Time frame: 3-months post enrollment
Average Change in Self-Reported Level of Pain Related Functioning on the Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI) at 3-month Follow up (Compared to Baseline)
Pain-related functioning will be measured using the pain interference subscale of the Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI), an 11-point numeric rating scale (0 = no pain/does not interfere, 10 = worst pain imaginable/completely interferes). For this study, an increase in pain-related functioning will be measured as a reduction in the pain interference scale scores over time. The BPI interference subscale measures how much pain has interfered with seven daily activities and will provide a current level of pain-related functioning (past 24-hours) at the 3-month follow-up. BPI pain interference will be calculated as the mean of the seven interference items. For each follow-up time point, the baseline value will be subtracted to obtain a change score.
Time frame: 3-months post enrollment
Percent Days Abstinent From Substance Use on the TimeLine Follow-Back - 3-months
Frequency of substance use will be measured using the TimeLine Follow-Back and will be collected at 3-month follow-up. During the administration, the participant will be asked to recall their alcohol and drug use utilizing a calendar-assisted structured interview that provides the participant with temporal cues to increase the accuracy of recall. At each follow-up, data will be collected for the entire period since the previous date of data collection. Percent days abstinent from substances (e.g. alcohol and drugs) will be used as the primary measure of substance use. Values shown are the treatment group average percent of days that participants were abstinent from substances after 3 months follow-up.
Time frame: 3-months post enrollment
Average Change in Self-reported Level of Pain Intensity on the Numerical Rating Scale for Pain Intensity (NRS-I) at 12-month Follow up (Compared to Baseline)
Pain level will be measured using the Numerical Rating Scale for Pain Intensity (NRS-I), an 11-point numeric rating scale (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain imaginable), which will be collected at the baseline enrollment assessment and the 12-month follow-up. For each follow-up time point, the baseline value will be subtracted to obtain a change score.
Time frame: 12-months post enrollment
Average Change in Self-Reported Level of Pain Related Functioning on the Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI) at 12-month Follow up (Compared to Baseline)
Pain-related functioning will be measured using the pain interference subscale of the Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI), an 11-point numeric rating scale (0 = no pain/does not interfere, 10 = worst pain imaginable/completely interferes). For this study, an increase in pain-related functioning will be measured as a reduction in the pain interference scale scores over time. The BPI interference subscale measures how much pain has interfered with seven daily activities and will provide a current level of pain-related functioning (past 24-hours) at the 12-month follow-up. BPI pain interference will be calculated as the mean of the seven interference items. For each follow-up time point, the baseline value will be subtracted to obtain a change score.
Time frame: 12-months post enrollment
Percent Days Abstinent From Substance Use on the TimeLine Follow-Back - 12 Months
Frequency of substance use will be measured using the TimeLine Follow-Back and will be collected at the 12-month follow-up. During the administration, the participant will be asked to recall their alcohol and drug use utilizing a calendar-assisted structured interview that provides the participant with temporal cues to increase the accuracy of recall. At each follow-up, data will be collected for the entire period since the previous date of data collection. Percent days abstinent from substances (e.g. alcohol and drugs) will be used as the primary measure of substance use. Values shown are the treatment group average percent of days that participants were abstinent from substances after 12 months follow-up.
Time frame: 12-months post enrollment
IRB approval from the University of Michigan (UM) was obtained in February 2020 with remote recruitment changes approved in June 2020. Several of the recruitment strategies used were in person recruitment at local buprenorphine clinics; posted flyers at community locations; targeted advertising on Facebook, Instagram, and Craigslist; posts on the UMHealthResearch.org page; advertising on websites that target patients in recovery; review of health records at UM and Ann Arbor VA Healthcare System
| Milestone | Psychosocial Pain Management (PPMI) | Enhanced Usual Care (EUC) |
|---|---|---|
| Started | 98 | 102 |
| Completed | 98 | 102 |
| Not completed | 0 | 0 |
| Milestone | Psychosocial Pain Management (PPMI) | Enhanced Usual Care (EUC) |
|---|---|---|
| Started | 98 | 102 |
| Completed interview | 81 | 82 |
| Completed | 76 | 76 |
| Not completed | 22 | 26 |
| Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject | 1 | 1 |
| Withdrew: Lost to follow-up | 21 | 25 |
| Milestone | Psychosocial Pain Management (PPMI) | Enhanced Usual Care (EUC) |
|---|---|---|
| Started | 97 | 101 |
| Completed interview | 78 | 84 |
| Completed | 74 | 77 |
| Not completed | 23 | 24 |
| Withdrew: Lost to follow-up | 20 | 24 |
| Withdrew: Death | 1 | 0 |
| Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject | 2 | 0 |
| Milestone | Psychosocial Pain Management (PPMI) | Enhanced Usual Care (EUC) |
|---|---|---|
| Started | 94 | 101 |
| Completed interview | 72 | 74 |
| Completed | 70 | 72 |
| Not completed | 24 | 29 |
| Withdrew: Lost to follow-up | 23 | 28 |
| Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject | 1 | 1 |
| Milestone | Psychosocial Pain Management (PPMI) | Enhanced Usual Care (EUC) |
|---|---|---|
| Started | 93 | 100 |
| Completed interview | 69 | 70 |
| Completed | 66 | 63 |
| Not completed | 27 | 37 |
| Withdrew: Lost to follow-up | 27 | 36 |
| Withdrew: Death | 0 | 1 |
| Milestone | Psychosocial Pain Management (PPMI) | Enhanced Usual Care (EUC) |
|---|---|---|
| Started | 93 | 99 |
| Completed interview | 68 | 73 |
| Completed | 66 | 68 |
| Not completed | 27 | 31 |
| Withdrew: Lost to follow-up | 27 | 31 |
In this study, "retention on buprenorphine treatment" was defined as the time until a participant stopped taking their medication for 7 or more days in a row. This information was collected using a calendar recall method, the TimeLine Follow-Back (TLFB) measure at 3 months. The average number of days participants remained on buprenorphine before this happened was calculated, using the data collected at 3-month follow-up.
| days | Psychosocial Pain Management (PPMI) | Enhanced Usual Care (EUC) |
|---|---|---|
| Retention on Buprenorphine Treatment According to TimeLine Follow-Back - 3-months | 81.1 ± 26.6 | 75.4 ± 32.3 |
In this study, "retention on buprenorphine treatment" was defined as the time until a participant stopped taking their medication for 7 or more days in a row. This information was collected using a calendar recall method, the TimeLine Follow-Back (TLFB) measure at 12 months. The average number of days participants remained on buprenorphine before this happened was calculated, using the data collected at 12-month follow-up.
| days | Psychosocial Pain Management (PPMI) | Enhanced Usual Care (EUC) |
|---|---|---|
| Retention on Buprenorphine Treatment According to TimeLine Follow-Back - 12 Months | 252.1 ± 135.5 | 236.5 ± 148.9 |
Pain level will be measured using the Numerical Rating Scale for Pain Intensity (NRS-I), an 11-point numeric rating scale (0=no pain, 10= worst pain imaginable), which will be collected at the baseline enrollment assessment and 3-month follow-up. To calculate our measure, we subtracted each participant's score at 3-month assessment and subtracted it from their baseline score. We then averaged calculated average change in scores for each intervention group.
| score on a scale | Psychosocial Pain Management (PPMI) | Enhanced Usual Care (EUC) |
|---|---|---|
| Average Change in Self-reported Level of Pain Intensity on the Numerical Rating Scale for Pain Intensity (NRS-I) at 3-month Follow up (Compared to Baseline) | -0.7 ± 1.4 | -1.1 ± 2.2 |
Pain-related functioning will be measured using the pain interference subscale of the Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI), an 11-point numeric rating scale (0 = no pain/does not interfere, 10 = worst pain imaginable/completely interferes). For this study, an increase in pain-related functioning will be measured as a reduction in the pain interference scale scores over time. The BPI interference subscale measures how much pain has interfered with seven daily activities and will provide a current level of pain-related functioning (past 24-hours) at the 3-month follow-up. BPI pain interference will be calculated as the mean of the seven interference items. For each follow-up time point, the baseline value will be subtracted to obtain a change score.
| score on a scale | Psychosocial Pain Management (PPMI) | Enhanced Usual Care (EUC) |
|---|---|---|
| Average Change in Self-Reported Level of Pain Related Functioning on the Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI) at 3-month Follow up (Compared to Baseline) | -0.3 ± 2.1 | -0.8 ± 2.2 |
Frequency of substance use will be measured using the TimeLine Follow-Back and will be collected at 3-month follow-up. During the administration, the participant will be asked to recall their alcohol and drug use utilizing a calendar-assisted structured interview that provides the participant with temporal cues to increase the accuracy of recall. At each follow-up, data will be collected for the entire period since the previous date of data collection. Percent days abstinent from substances (e.g. alcohol and drugs) will be used as the primary measure of substance use. Values shown are the treatment group average percent of days that participants were abstinent from substances after 3 months follow-up.
| percent of days | Psychosocial Pain Management (PPMI) | Enhanced Usual Care (EUC) |
|---|---|---|
| Percent Days Abstinent From Substance Use on the TimeLine Follow-Back - 3-months | 76.7 ± 37.5 | 74.2 ± 37.8 |
Pain level will be measured using the Numerical Rating Scale for Pain Intensity (NRS-I), an 11-point numeric rating scale (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain imaginable), which will be collected at the baseline enrollment assessment and the 12-month follow-up. For each follow-up time point, the baseline value will be subtracted to obtain a change score.
| score on a scale | Psychosocial Pain Management (PPMI) | Enhanced Usual Care (EUC) |
|---|---|---|
| Average Change in Self-reported Level of Pain Intensity on the Numerical Rating Scale for Pain Intensity (NRS-I) at 12-month Follow up (Compared to Baseline) | -1.5 ± 2.2 | -1.9 ± 2.6 |
Pain-related functioning will be measured using the pain interference subscale of the Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI), an 11-point numeric rating scale (0 = no pain/does not interfere, 10 = worst pain imaginable/completely interferes). For this study, an increase in pain-related functioning will be measured as a reduction in the pain interference scale scores over time. The BPI interference subscale measures how much pain has interfered with seven daily activities and will provide a current level of pain-related functioning (past 24-hours) at the 12-month follow-up. BPI pain interference will be calculated as the mean of the seven interference items. For each follow-up time point, the baseline value will be subtracted to obtain a change score.
| score on a scale | Psychosocial Pain Management (PPMI) | Enhanced Usual Care (EUC) |
|---|---|---|
| Average Change in Self-Reported Level of Pain Related Functioning on the Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI) at 12-month Follow up (Compared to Baseline) | -0.6 ± 2.9 | -0.9 ± 2.5 |
Frequency of substance use will be measured using the TimeLine Follow-Back and will be collected at the 12-month follow-up. During the administration, the participant will be asked to recall their alcohol and drug use utilizing a calendar-assisted structured interview that provides the participant with temporal cues to increase the accuracy of recall. At each follow-up, data will be collected for the entire period since the previous date of data collection. Percent days abstinent from substances (e.g. alcohol and drugs) will be used as the primary measure of substance use. Values shown are the treatment group average percent of days that participants were abstinent from substances after 12 months follow-up.
| percent of days | Psychosocial Pain Management (PPMI) | Enhanced Usual Care (EUC) |
|---|---|---|
| Percent Days Abstinent From Substance Use on the TimeLine Follow-Back - 12 Months | 74.7 ± 35.2 | 79.6 ± 32.0 |
Collected over 12 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Psychosocial Pain Management (PPMI) | 1/98 (1%) | 20/98 (20.4%) | 10/98 (10.2%) |
| Enhanced Usual Care (EUC) | 1/102 (1%) | 16/102 (15.7%) | 7/102 (6.9%) |
| Event | Psychosocial Pain Management (PPMI) | Enhanced Usual Care (EUC) |
|---|---|---|
| Hospitalization - general medicalGeneral disorders | 16/98 | 13/102 |
| Hospitalization - psychPsychiatric disorders | 4/98 | 4/102 |
| Event | Psychosocial Pain Management (PPMI) | Enhanced Usual Care (EUC) |
|---|---|---|
| Residential Substance Use TreatmentGeneral disorders | 2/98 | 5/102 |
| DetoxGeneral disorders | 1/98 | 4/102 |
| Emergency Medical VisitGeneral disorders | 3/98 | 0/102 |
| Injury - FallGeneral disorders | 3/98 | 0/102 |
| Car AccidentGeneral disorders | 1/98 | 0/102 |
| Age, Continuous(years) | Psychosocial Pain Management (PPMI) | Enhanced Usual Care (EUC) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 42.37 ± 10.79 | 44.68 ± 10.78 | 43.55 ± 10.82 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Psychosocial Pain Management (PPMI) | Enhanced Usual Care (EUC) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 57 | 58 | 115 |
| Male | 41 | 44 | 85 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants) | Psychosocial Pain Management (PPMI) | Enhanced Usual Care (EUC) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hispanic or Latino | 8 | 4 | 12 |
| Not Hispanic or Latino | 88 | 97 | 185 |
| Unknown or Not Reported | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants) | Psychosocial Pain Management (PPMI) | Enhanced Usual Care (EUC) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Asian | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Black or African American | 12 | 8 | 20 |
| White | 75 | 90 | 165 |
| More than one race | 3 | 1 | 4 |
| Unknown or Not Reported | 8 | 3 | 11 |
| Region of Enrollment(participants) | Psychosocial Pain Management (PPMI) | Enhanced Usual Care (EUC) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 98 | 102 | 200 |
| Military Status(Participants) | Psychosocial Pain Management (PPMI) | Enhanced Usual Care (EUC) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Count of participants | 2 | 5 | 7 |
| Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Score(units on a scale) | Psychosocial Pain Management (PPMI) | Enhanced Usual Care (EUC) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 4.7 ± 2.2 | 4.8 ± 2.4 | 4.8 ± 2.3 |
| Percent days abstinent(percent) | Psychosocial Pain Management (PPMI) | Enhanced Usual Care (EUC) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 51.3 ± 33.2 | 50.9 ± 34.0 | 51.1 ± 33.6 |
3 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.
Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.
Plan to share: No
This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University of Michigan