CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04413708P3-TUpdated Mar 12, 2025Results posted

mHealth Technologies to Enhance PrEP Adherence Among Thai MSM

An interventional study of P3-T PrEP Adherence App in Adherence, Patient, Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis and HIV/AIDS, sponsored by Duke University. Completed at 1 site in Thailand. Open to male participants aged 16 Years to 24 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-03-12.

Sponsored by Duke University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
16 Years to 24 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

This study aims to: 1) adapt the theory-based P3 (Prepared, Protected, emPowered) app designed to improve pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) adherence, retention in PrEP clinical care, and PrEP persistence among young gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (YMSM) in the United States for YMSM in Thailand, and 2) conduct a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and potential impact of the adapted P3-Thailand (P3-T) app.

Read the detailed description

This R21 study, titled "Novel mHealth Technologies to Enhance PrEP Adherence among Thai MSM: Collaborative Adaptation and Evaluation" was designed to adapt and test a theory-based, PrEP adherence smartphone app, P3, to 1) improve PrEP adherence and thus protective PrEP drug levels, 2) to increase retention in PrEP clinical care, 3) support PrEP persistence among YMSM in the United States for YMSM in Thailand, and 4) conduct a pilot RCT to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the adapted P3-T app and to examine the potential impact of the app on PrEP adherence.

The study was a partnership between Duke University, Chulalongkorn University, Thai Red Cross AIDS Research Centre (TRC-ARC), and the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, and includes a robust plan to increase mHealth capacity at Chulalongkorn University and TRC-ARC.

P3 is a theory-based, comprehensive smartphone app platform for YMSM that utilizes social networking and game-based mechanics as well as evidenced-based features to improve PrEP medication adherence. P3 is a product born from the collaborative effort of researchers and health game developers working closely with members of the target population in the United States. Built on a successful, evidence-based platform designed by our collaborating technology partner, Ayogo, and tested by our study team, P3 is flexible, allowing for customization and adaptations for different cultural and linguistic contexts, and responsive to changes in technology.

The social networking features of P3 are designed to capitalize on social involvement as a means through which YMSM can receive information and social support, experience social norms and reflective appraisals, and feel a sense of connectedness to peers. Peers have been recognized as a highly important source of sexual health and HIV prevention information and support among Thai YMSM. The gaming features of P3 were goal-oriented and immersive and provided a challenging and motivating environment for behavior change. As a result, P3 is ideal for engaging YMSM in behavior change, by maintaining attention and avoiding boredom and attrition.

The pilot RCT of the adapted P3-T app was conducted with 60 YMSM newly starting PrEP in Bangkok, Thailand to 1) assess app feasibility and acceptability, and 2) explore the potential impact of the app on PrEP adherence.

In-depth interviews were conducted with 10 P3-T arm participants after the 3-month intervention period. The interview will ask participants about their experience and impressions of the app, how they used it, and how it may have impacted their behaviors during the 3-month intervention period.

02

Conditions studied

  • Adherence, Patient
  • Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis
  • HIV/AIDS

Keywords

  • PrEP adherence
  • HIV
  • Young men who have sex with men
  • YMSM
  • Thailand
  • Mobile app
  • mHealth
03

In context

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome

2,040 studies on the registry are indexed under Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome; 272 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 60 is below the median of 105 across 1,543 interventional studies indexed under Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome.

Browse Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Duke University is the lead sponsor of 2,025 studies on the registry; 275 are open to participants now.

Of its 194 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 159 (82%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years to 24 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Male sex at birth
  • Gender identity is male
  • Identify as a man who has sex with men
  • Ages 16-24
  • Plan to start PrEP in next 14 days
  • Able to speak and read Thai
  • Own an Android or iOS smartphone

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Currently participating in another experimental PrEP adherence intervention
  • Plan to move out of Bangkok in the next 6 months
  • Unable to be consented due to an active substance use or psychological condition
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Care provider)
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    P3-T PrEP adherence app

    Intended app use includes, at a minimum, participant completion of selected app activities (medication tracking, daily quest, social wall post) each day for the 3 month intervention period. Participant completion of Standard of Care PrEP adherence and sexual risk behavior counseling at the 1-month post-prescription visit and the 4-month post-prescription visit.

    Behavioral: P3-T PrEP Adherence App

  • No intervention
    Standard of Care

    Participant completion of Standard of Care PrEP adherence and sexual risk behavior counseling at the 1-month post-prescription visit and the 4-month post-prescription visit.

Interventions

  • BehavioralP3-T PrEP Adherence App

    P3-T provides daily PrEP reminders, a medication tracker and calendar, personalized medication adherence strategies, refill reminders, and tailored adherence support messages; social support via a social wall that includes daily discussion prompts; daily quests to build knowledge and skills; a multimedia knowledge center; interactive narrative collections; personalized adherence counseling provided by an adherence counselor via in-app messaging; in-app rewards; a "bank account" that rewards daily app use by adding or subtracting a small financial reward based on daily app use; and, a user profile that includes a user-selected avatar.

    Also known as: P3-T

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Intervention Feasibility: Average Number of Days of Any App Use

    The number of days of any app use among those assigned to the P3-T adherence arm during the 3-month intervention period as recorded by backend app metrics. Higher number of days indicates higher intervention feasibility.

    Time frame: Month 3

  2. Intervention Feasibility: Average Number of Days of PrEP Medication Tracked Through App

    The number of days of PrEP medication tracked through app during the 3-month intervention period among participants assigned to the P3-T adherence arm as recorded by backend app metrics. Higher number indicates higher intervention feasibility.

    Time frame: Month 3

  3. Intervention Acceptability: Mean Intervention Acceptability, Composite Score CSQ-8

    Intervention acceptability was assessed using the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8), an 8-item validated scale measuring the construct of global intervention satisfaction, collected in the 3-month follow-up survey (intervention group only). The eight items (quality of app, kind of service received from app, app met needs, recommend app to a friend, amount of help received from app, the effectiveness of app for dealing with health issue (PrEP adherence), overall satisfaction, and willingness to use the app again) were assessed using a 4-point response scale with individually specified anchors. The mean composite score of the CSQ-8 was calculated with a total possible range of 8 (lowest acceptability, worst outcome) to 32 (highest acceptability, best outcome).

    Time frame: Month 3

Secondary outcomes

  1. Difference in PrEP Medication Adherence Between Study Arms at Month 3

    The number of participants with protective levels of tenofovir-diphosphate (TFV-DP) at month 3 between the study arms.

    Time frame: Month 3

  2. Difference in PrEP Medication Adherence Between Study Arms at Month 6

    The number of participants with protective levels of TFV-DP at month 6 between the study arms.

    Time frame: Month 6

07

Results

Posted Mar 12, 2025

Participant flow

Individuals were recruited by study staff based on physician referral to the Chulalongkorn pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) clinic in Bangkok, Thailand between June 12, 2020 and January 15, 2021.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneP3-T PrEP Adherence AppStandard of Care
Started3030
Completed2928
Not completed12
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up12

Outcome measures

PrimaryIntervention Feasibility: Average Number of Days of Any App Use

The number of days of any app use among those assigned to the P3-T adherence arm during the 3-month intervention period as recorded by backend app metrics. Higher number of days indicates higher intervention feasibility.

Time frame:
Month 3
Reported as:
Mean · days
Intervention Feasibility: Average Number of Days of Any App Use
daysP3-T PrEP Adherence App
Intervention Feasibility: Average Number of Days of Any App Use68 ± 29
PrimaryIntervention Feasibility: Average Number of Days of PrEP Medication Tracked Through App

The number of days of PrEP medication tracked through app during the 3-month intervention period among participants assigned to the P3-T adherence arm as recorded by backend app metrics. Higher number indicates higher intervention feasibility.

Time frame:
Month 3
Reported as:
Mean · Days
Intervention Feasibility: Average Number of Days of PrEP Medication Tracked Through App
DaysP3-T PrEP Adherence App
Intervention Feasibility: Average Number of Days of PrEP Medication Tracked Through App60 ± 28
PrimaryIntervention Acceptability: Mean Intervention Acceptability, Composite Score CSQ-8

Intervention acceptability was assessed using the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8), an 8-item validated scale measuring the construct of global intervention satisfaction, collected in the 3-month follow-up survey (intervention group only). The eight items (quality of app, kind of service received from app, app met needs, recommend app to a friend, amount of help received from app, the effectiveness of app for dealing with health issue (PrEP adherence), overall satisfaction, and willingness to use the app again) were assessed using a 4-point response scale with individually specified anchors. The mean composite score of the CSQ-8 was calculated with a total possible range of 8 (lowest acceptability, worst outcome) to 32 (highest acceptability, best outcome).

Time frame:
Month 3
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Intervention Acceptability: Mean Intervention Acceptability, Composite Score CSQ-8
score on a scaleP3-T PrEP Adherence App
Intervention Acceptability: Mean Intervention Acceptability, Composite Score CSQ-825.18 ± 4.11
SecondaryDifference in PrEP Medication Adherence Between Study Arms at Month 3

The number of participants with protective levels of tenofovir-diphosphate (TFV-DP) at month 3 between the study arms.

Time frame:
Month 3
Reported as:
Number · count of participants
Difference in PrEP Medication Adherence Between Study Arms at Month 3
count of participantsP3-T PrEP Adherence AppStandard of Care
Difference in PrEP Medication Adherence Between Study Arms at Month 32723
Statistical analysis
  • P3-T PrEP Adherence App vs Standard of Care · Fisher Exact · p = 0.41 · Risk ratio (rr): 1.62 · 95% CI 0.50 to 5.17
SecondaryDifference in PrEP Medication Adherence Between Study Arms at Month 6

The number of participants with protective levels of TFV-DP at month 6 between the study arms.

Time frame:
Month 6
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Difference in PrEP Medication Adherence Between Study Arms at Month 6
ParticipantsP3-T PrEP Adherence AppStandard of Care
Difference in PrEP Medication Adherence Between Study Arms at Month 62118
Statistical analysis
  • P3-T PrEP Adherence App vs Standard of Care · Fisher Exact · p = 1.0 · Risk ratio (rr): 1.07 · 95% CI 0.61 to 1.90

Adverse events

Collected over Approximately 6 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
P3-T PrEP Adherence App0/30 (0%)0/30 (0%)0/30 (0%)
Standard of Care0/30 (0%)0/30 (0%)0/30 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

The primary analysis population included young, gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men, ages 16-24, who were initiating preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Individuals were randomized 1:1 into either the P3-T app intervention + standard of care or the standard of care arm. Study participants completed a Qualtrics survey at baseline, M3, and M6. At M3 and M6 dried blood spots were collected for tenofovir diphosphate (TFV-DP) to quantify PrEP adherence levels.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)P3-T PrEP Adherence AppStandard of CareTotal
Median21 (20 to 21)22 (20 to 23)21 (20 to 22)
Sex/Gender, Customized
Sex/Gender, Customized(participants)P3-T PrEP Adherence AppStandard of CareTotal
Assigned male sex at birth303060
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)P3-T PrEP Adherence AppStandard of CareTotal
Count of participants——0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)P3-T PrEP Adherence AppStandard of CareTotal
Thailand303060
Current sexual identity
Current sexual identity(Participants)P3-T PrEP Adherence AppStandard of CareTotal
Gay, homosexual, same gender loving222446
Bisexual538
Queer224
Other112
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Chulalongkorn University
    Bangkok, 10330, Thailand
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Songtaweesin WN, LeGrand S, Bandara S, Piccone C, Wongharn P, Moonwong J, Jupimai T, Saisaengjan C, Theerawit T, Muessig K, Hightow-Weidman L, Puthanakit T, Phanuphak N, Tangmunkongvorakul A. Adaptation of a Theory-Based Social Networking and Gamified App-Based Intervention to Improve Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Adherence Among Young Men Who Have Sex With Men in Bangkok, Thailand: Qualitative Study. J Med Internet Res. 2021 Nov 4;23(11):e23852. doi: 10.2196/23852. PubMed 34734828 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Mar 16, 2021
  • Informed consent form · Apr 29, 2020

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 12, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04413708
Lead sponsor
Duke University
Collaborators
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Chulalongkorn University, Thai Red Cross AIDS Research Centre, Fogarty International Center of the National Institute of Health
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 4, 2020
Start date
Jun 12, 2020
Primary completion
Aug 10, 2021
Completion
Aug 10, 2021
Results posted
Mar 12, 2025
Last update
Mar 12, 2025

Study contacts

Sara LeGrand, Ph.D.
principal investigator · Duke University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion