CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04404166Updated Jan 30, 2026Results posted

Phone-based Intervention Under Nurse Guidance After Stroke 2

A Phase 3 interventional study of PINGS 2 and Standard of Care in Blood Pressure, Stroke and Cardiovascular Diseases, sponsored by Northern California Institute of Research and Education. Completed at 10 sites in Ghana. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 100 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-30.

Sponsored by Northern California Institute of Research and Education · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
500
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 100 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The overall objective of Phone-based Intervention under Nurse Guidance after Stroke II (PINGS-2) is to deploy a hybrid study design to firstly, demonstrate the efficacy of a theoretical-model-based, mHealth technology-centered, nurse-led, multi-level integrated approach to substantially improve longer term BP control among 500 recent stroke patients encountered at 10 hospitals in Ghana. Secondly, PINGS II seeks to develop an implementation strategy for routine integration and policy adoption of mhealth for post-stroke BP control in a LMIC setting. The investigators will leverage experience gained from the NIH Global Brain Disorders funded R21 pilot study (NS094033) to test efficacy of a refined, culturally-tailored, and potentially implementable intervention aimed at addressing the premier modifiable risk for stroke \& other key variables in an under-resourced system burdened by suboptimal care \& outcomes.

02

Conditions studied

  • Blood Pressure
  • Stroke
  • Cardiovascular Diseases
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 100 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • age ≥ 18 years (stroke is commoner above this age cut-off)
  • male or females (sex is a biologic variable of interest)
  • recent stroke (within one month of symptom onset)- stroke may be ischemic or hemorrhagic based on brain imaging or diagnosed clinically using the locally validated version of the 8-item questionnaire for verifying stroke free status (8-QVSFS) when neuroimaging is not feasible
  • uncontrolled HTN (SBP ≥ 140 mmHg at both the last clinical encounter post-stroke and the eligibility screening visit) - SBP is used as the selection variable since most African hypertensives \<60 years have systolic or combination systolic/ diastolic HTN and for most patients, controlling SBP also results in DBP control
  • patients or family carers should own a basic mobile phone that can receive text/audio messages.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

- Any condition that would limit participation in follow up assessments, such as severe cognitive impairment/dementia (MMSE ≤24).

04

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
500 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    PINGS 2

    Participants received a 12-month, multicomponent, nurse-led intervention in addition to usual post-stroke care. The intervention included: Home blood pressure monitoring at least weekly with nurse follow-up for threshold breaches. Mobile phone medication reminders (daily alarms set on the participant's own device). Weekly audio health education messages in local dialects emphasizing stroke risk factor control and medication adherence. Nurse navigators provided case management, coordinated clinic visits as needed, and tracked blood pressure readings and adherence.

    Behavioral: PINGS 2

  • Active comparator
    Standard of Care

    Participants received standard secondary prevention after stroke according to local guidelines. This typically included periodic physician follow-up, antihypertensive therapy, antiplatelets, and statins prescribed at the clinician's discretion. To maintain contact frequency similar to the intervention group, participants received neutral lifestyle text messages unrelated to hypertension or stroke prevention.

    Other: Standard of Care

Interventions

  • BehavioralPINGS 2

    Home BP monitoring, medication reminders using phone alerts, and patient education on hypertension, cardiovascular risk reduction \& stroke

  • OtherStandard of Care

    Standard of Care (routine post-stroke management per guidelines)

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Systolic Blood Pressure

    Target goal of \<140/90 mmHg measured at baseline, months 3, 6, 9 and 12. Measured by blinded evaluator using an automated BP monitor.

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Self-management

    Hypertension Self-Care Profile (HBP-SCP) Total Score, a validated measure assessing hypertension self-management across three domains: behavior, motivation, and self-efficacy. Each subscale ranges from 20 to 80, yielding a total score range of 60 to 240. Higher scores indicate better self-care. Month 12 total scores are reported.

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Number of Cardiovascular ED Encounters and Re-hospitalizations

    To be assessed via once monthly calls to patients and/or carers over 12 months of follow up in both the PINGS and usual care groups. Patient carers in both arms will also be encouraged to contact study team within 48 hours of hospitalizations for prompt and blinded adjudication of all potential CVD ED encounters to minimize reporting bias between the two groups.

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. Number of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events

    Major Adverse Cardiovascular events (MACE) to be assessed include recurrent stroke: fatal/ severely disabling stroke or non-fatal stroke; Coronary Artery Disease: Acute STEMI/NSTEMI, sudden cardiac deaths. MACE will be confirmed by a blinded adjudicator by reviewing where available clinical notes supported by investigations e.g. CT scan, EKGs, review of death certificates or verbal autopsy if death occurs outside hospital.

    Time frame: 12 months

  4. Health-related Quality of Life: The Euro Quality of Life-5D Questionnaire

    The EQ-5D questionnaire,186 will assess state of health of study participants at baseline and Month 12. Scores range from 0 (the worst possible health status) to 100 (the best possible health status).

    Time frame: 12 months

  5. Medication Adherence: Hill-Bone Compliance Scale

    Hill-Bone Compliance to High Blood Pressure Therapy Scale, a validated 14-item measure assessing adherence to antihypertensive therapy across three domains: medication-taking behavior, appointment keeping, and salt intake. Total scores range from 14 to 56, with higher scores indicating worse adherence (greater non-adherence). Month 12 total scores are reported.

    Time frame: 12 months

  6. Medication Adherence: Medication Possession Ratio (MPR)

    Medication Possession Ratio (MPR), calculated as the percentage of days covered by filled antihypertensive prescriptions over 12 months. Values range from 0% to 100%, with higher values indicating better adherence. Month 12 MPR values are reported.

    Time frame: 12 months

Other outcomes

  1. Health Literacy in HPT/Stroke

    Self-Report: HTN/stroke Knowledge questionnaire (r=.70) Health literacy questionnaire (r = .74, .82) Assessed at months 0, 6,12. Higher scores indicate higher health literacy. Scales 1-5 are scored on a 4-point Likert-type response scale (strongly disagree, disagree, agree, strongly agree) and scales 6-9 are scored on a 5-point Likert-type scale with response options focusing on difficulty (cannot do or always difficult, usually difficult, sometimes difficult, usually easy, always easy). Month 12 is reported.

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Disability/Functional Status

    Functional status after stroke will be assessed by Research Assistants using the Modified Rankin Scale with a scores ranging from 0 to 6, where 0=no functional limitation and 6 = death. Assessed at months 0, 3, 6, 9 and 12.

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. Sex, Cultural, Socio-economic Factors, Study Site

    Assessed based on self reports at baseline. Cultural factors to assess include language spoken at home, religious observances, acceptance of gender roles; occupation, religious beliefs and dietary practices.

    Time frame: Baseline

  4. Baseline Age

    Mean age of participants at enrollment, reported in years. Age is a continuous baseline characteristic and is therefore reported separately from categorical sociodemographic variables. Higher values indicate older age.

    Time frame: Baseline

06

Results

Posted Jan 30, 2026

Participant flow

Recruitment Period: First participant enrolled: October 23, 2020 Last participant enrolled: April 21, 2023 Last participant completed follow-up: April 5, 2024 Recruitment Locations: 10 hospitals in Ghana (3 tertiary, 2 district, 5 primary level). Urban, peri-urban, and rural populations. Recruitment Setting: Participants identified during acute stroke hospitalization or follow-up clinics. Stroke confirmed by CT (when feasible) or validated stroke-free questionnaire (QVSFS).

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePINGS 2Standard of Care
Started244256
Completed200210
Not completed4446

Outcome measures

PrimarySystolic Blood Pressure

Target goal of \<140/90 mmHg measured at baseline, months 3, 6, 9 and 12. Measured by blinded evaluator using an automated BP monitor.

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Number · participants
Systolic Blood Pressure
participantsPINGS 2Standard of Care
Systolic Blood Pressure67 (61 to 73)43 (37 to 49)
Statistical analysis
  • PINGS 2 vs Standard of Care · Chi-squared · p = <0.001 (Comparison of proportions (PINGS 2 vs Standard of Care), ITT population.) · Risk difference (rd): 24 · 95% CI 15 to 33The estimation parameter is the risk difference (PINGS minus Standard of Care) with corresponding 95% confidence interval.
SecondarySelf-management

Hypertension Self-Care Profile (HBP-SCP) Total Score, a validated measure assessing hypertension self-management across three domains: behavior, motivation, and self-efficacy. Each subscale ranges from 20 to 80, yielding a total score range of 60 to 240. Higher scores indicate better self-care. Month 12 total scores are reported.

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale (60-240)
Self-management
score on a scale (60-240)PINGS 2Standard of Care
Self-management100 ± 22103 ± 24
Statistical analysis
  • PINGS 2 vs Standard of Care · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.14 (Unadjusted analysis comparing mean HBP SCP scores at 12 months between PINGS 2 and Standard of Care. Adjustment for baseline imbalances (stroke type and diabetes status) did not materially change the result.) · Mean difference (net): -3.5 · 95% CI -8.3 to 1.2Negative value indicates lower mean self-management score in PINGS 2 vs Standard of Care.
SecondaryNumber of Cardiovascular ED Encounters and Re-hospitalizations

To be assessed via once monthly calls to patients and/or carers over 12 months of follow up in both the PINGS and usual care groups. Patient carers in both arms will also be encouraged to contact study team within 48 hours of hospitalizations for prompt and blinded adjudication of all potential CVD ED encounters to minimize reporting bias between the two groups.

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Cardiovascular ED Encounters and Re-hospitalizations
participantsPINGS 2Standard of Care
Number of Cardiovascular ED Encounters and Re-hospitalizations12
Statistical analysis
  • PINGS 2 vs Standard of Care · Fisher Exact · p = 0.9 · Risk difference (rd): -0.5RD = PINGS - SOC (1/200 vs 2/210).
SecondaryNumber of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events

Major Adverse Cardiovascular events (MACE) to be assessed include recurrent stroke: fatal/ severely disabling stroke or non-fatal stroke; Coronary Artery Disease: Acute STEMI/NSTEMI, sudden cardiac deaths. MACE will be confirmed by a blinded adjudicator by reviewing where available clinical notes supported by investigations e.g. CT scan, EKGs, review of death certificates or verbal autopsy if death occurs outside hospital.

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events
participantsPINGS 2Standard of Care
Number of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events1612
Statistical analysis
  • PINGS 2 vs Standard of Care · Chi-squared · p = 0.5 · Risk difference (rd): 1.9 · 95% CI -2.6 to 6.3Risk difference = PINGS - SOC (16/244 vs 12/256).
SecondaryHealth-related Quality of Life: The Euro Quality of Life-5D Questionnaire

The EQ-5D questionnaire,186 will assess state of health of study participants at baseline and Month 12. Scores range from 0 (the worst possible health status) to 100 (the best possible health status).

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a scale (0-100)
Health-related Quality of Life: The Euro Quality of Life-5D Questionnaire
Score on a scale (0-100)PINGS 2Standard of Care
Health-related Quality of Life: The Euro Quality of Life-5D Questionnaire76 ± 2476 ± 24
Statistical analysis
  • PINGS 2 vs Standard of Care · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.9 · Mean difference (net): 0.3 · 95% CI -4.4 to 5Mean difference = PINGS - SOC; higher scores represent better quality of life.
SecondaryMedication Adherence: Hill-Bone Compliance Scale

Hill-Bone Compliance to High Blood Pressure Therapy Scale, a validated 14-item measure assessing adherence to antihypertensive therapy across three domains: medication-taking behavior, appointment keeping, and salt intake. Total scores range from 14 to 56, with higher scores indicating worse adherence (greater non-adherence). Month 12 total scores are reported.

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale (14-56)
Medication Adherence: Hill-Bone Compliance Scale
score on a scale (14-56)PINGS 2Standard of Care
Medication Adherence: Hill-Bone Compliance Scale51.5 ± 2.951.2 ± 3.7
Statistical analysis
  • PINGS 2 vs Standard of Care · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.4 (Unadjusted comparison of 12-month mean Hill-Bone scores.) · Mean difference (net): 0.3 · 95% CI -0.34 to 0.93Mean difference calculated as PINGS 2 minus Standard of Care.
SecondaryMedication Adherence: Medication Possession Ratio (MPR)

Medication Possession Ratio (MPR), calculated as the percentage of days covered by filled antihypertensive prescriptions over 12 months. Values range from 0% to 100%, with higher values indicating better adherence. Month 12 MPR values are reported.

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Mean · percentage %
Medication Adherence: Medication Possession Ratio (MPR)
percentage %PINGS 2Standard of Care
Medication Adherence: Medication Possession Ratio (MPR)83 ± 2285 ± 21
Statistical analysis
  • PINGS 2 vs Standard of Care · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.4 (Unadjusted comparison of 12-month mean MPR between arms (α=0.05).) · Mean difference (net): -1.9 · 95% CI -6.4 to 2.6Difference calculated as PINGS 2 minus Standard of Care.
Other pre-specifiedHealth Literacy in HPT/Stroke

Self-Report: HTN/stroke Knowledge questionnaire (r=.70) Health literacy questionnaire (r = .74, .82) Assessed at months 0, 6,12. Higher scores indicate higher health literacy. Scales 1-5 are scored on a 4-point Likert-type response scale (strongly disagree, disagree, agree, strongly agree) and scales 6-9 are scored on a 5-point Likert-type scale with response options focusing on difficulty (cannot do or always difficult, usually difficult, sometimes difficult, usually easy, always easy). Month 12 is reported.

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a scale (0-15)
Health Literacy in HPT/Stroke
Score on a scale (0-15)PINGS 2Standard of Care
Health Literacy in HPT/Stroke10 ± 29 ± 2
Statistical analysis
  • PINGS 2 vs Standard of Care · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.14 · Mean difference (net): 0.34 · 95% CI -0.11 to 0.78Mean difference = PINGS - SOC; higher scores indicate better health literacy.
Other pre-specifiedDisability/Functional Status

Functional status after stroke will be assessed by Research Assistants using the Modified Rankin Scale with a scores ranging from 0 to 6, where 0=no functional limitation and 6 = death. Assessed at months 0, 3, 6, 9 and 12.

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a scale (0-6)
Disability/Functional Status
Score on a scale (0-6)PINGS 2Standard of Care
Disability/Functional Status1.5 ± 1.31.6 ± 1.3
Statistical analysis
  • PINGS 2 vs Standard of Care · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.6 · Mean difference (net): -0.07 · 95% CI -0.32 to 0.19Mean difference is PINGS - SOC; negative values favor PINGS (lower disability).
Other pre-specifiedSex, Cultural, Socio-economic Factors, Study Site

Assessed based on self reports at baseline. Cultural factors to assess include language spoken at home, religious observances, acceptance of gender roles; occupation, religious beliefs and dietary practices.

Time frame:
Baseline
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Sex, Cultural, Socio-economic Factors, Study Site
ParticipantsPINGS 2Standard of Care
Sex (Female)103116
Education (Primary or less)112140
Income (GHS less than or equal to 500)210223
Religion (Christianity)221227
Language Home (Akan)168172
Occupation (Informal/Self-employed)153160
Study site level (Tertiary)7377
Study stie level (Primary/Secondary)171179
Other pre-specifiedBaseline Age

Mean age of participants at enrollment, reported in years. Age is a continuous baseline characteristic and is therefore reported separately from categorical sociodemographic variables. Higher values indicate older age.

Time frame:
Baseline
Reported as:
Mean · years
Baseline Age
yearsPINGS 2Standard of Care
Baseline Age58 ± 1159 ± 11

Adverse events

Collected over 12 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
PINGS 214/244 (5.7%)27/244 (11.1%)0/244 (0%)
Standard of Care14/256 (5.5%)18/256 (7%)0/256 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventPINGS 2Standard of Care
Death (All-cause)General disorders14/24414/256
Sudden Cardiac DeathCardiac disorders10/2449/256
HospitalizationGeneral disorders7/2443/256
Recurrent StrokeNervous system disorders6/2443/256

Baseline characteristics

Baseline characteristics include all randomized participants who started the trial and completed baseline assessments (PINGS 2: n=244; Standard of Care: n=256; total n=500). These correspond to the 244 and 256 participants listed as 'Started' in the Participant Flow module. Twelve-month outcomes were analyzed in the subset who completed follow-up (PINGS 2: n=200; SOC: n=210), as shown in the Participant Flow.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)PINGS 2Standard of CareTotal
Mean58 ± 1159 ± 1158 ± 11
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)PINGS 2Standard of CareTotal
Female103116219
Male141140281
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)PINGS 2Standard of CareTotal
Count of participants——0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)PINGS 2Standard of CareTotal
Ghana244256500
Systolic BP
Systolic BP(mmHg)PINGS 2Standard of CareTotal
Mean157 ± 18158 ± 20158 ± 19
Diastolic Blood Pressure
Diastolic Blood Pressure(mmHg)PINGS 2Standard of CareTotal
Mean94 ± 1396 ± 1595 ± 14
Hemoglobin A1C
Hemoglobin A1C(Percent)PINGS 2Standard of CareTotal
Median6 (5 to 7)6 (5 to 7)6 (5 to 7)
NIHSS Stroke Severity
NIHSS Stroke Severity(score on a scale)PINGS 2Standard of CareTotal
Median3 (0 to 7)3 (0 to 8)3 (0 to 8)

11 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

07

Study locations

10 sites
  • Ankaase Methodist Hospital
    Aboaso, Ghana
  • Korle Bu Teaching Hospital
    Accra, Ghana
  • Agogo Presbyterian Hospital
    Agogo, Ghana
  • Cape Coast Teaching Hospital
    Cape Coast, Ghana
  • Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital
    Kumasi, Ghana
  • Kumasi South Hospital
    Kumasi, Ghana
  • Kwadaso SDA Hospital
    Kumasi, Ghana
  • Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology
    Kumasi, Ghana
  • Manhyia Government Hospital
    Kumasi, Ghana
  • Tafo Government Hospital
    Kumasi, Ghana
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Sarfo FS, Akpalu A, Bockarie AS, Nguah SB, Ayisi-Boateng NK, Adu Gyamfi R, Arthur AA, Duah C, Fiattor T, Agyenim-Boateng KG, Achab E, Appiah LT, Opare-Addo PA, Adamu S, Agbenorku M, Adusei-Mensah N, Tagge R, Ampofo M, Asibey SO, Laryea R, MacCready E, Sam VA, Buadu KA, Adu S, Adu Darko N, Agbogbatey M, Amuasi JH, Ovbiagele B. Phone-Based Intervention Under Nurse Guidance for Control of Hypertension After Stroke: A Randomized Multicenter Phase 3 Trial in Ghana. Circulation. 2026 Jun 16;153(24):1890-1902. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.125.077424. Epub 2026 Apr 9. PubMed 41953982 ↗
  • Bockarie AS, Ayisi-Boateng NK, Nguah SB, Appiah LT, Fiattor T, Afriyie-Ansah S, MacCready E, Sam VA, Mensah NA, Tagge R, Agyenim-Boateng KG, Ampofo M, Laryea R, Gyamfi RA, Amuasi JH, Arthur AA, Duah C, Opare-Addo PA, Ovbiagele B, Sarfo FS, Akpalu A. The Significance of the WHO/ISH Absolute Cardiovascular Risk Prediction Scores among Recent Stroke Survivors in Ghana-Insights from the PINGS2 multicenter study. Res Sq [Preprint]. 2025 Mar 12:rs.3.rs-6175913. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6175913/v1. PubMed 40162227 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jun 13, 2019

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04404166
Lead sponsor
Northern California Institute of Research and Education
Collaborators
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
Responsible party
Bruce Ovbiagele (Chief of Staff, Northern California Institute of Research and Education) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 27, 2020
Start date
Oct 23, 2020
Primary completion
Apr 5, 2024
Completion
Apr 5, 2024
Results posted
Jan 30, 2026
Last update
Jan 30, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion