ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT04400994Updated Jul 8, 2025

IVIG With Rituximab vs Rituximab as First Line Treatment of Pemphigus

A Phase 2 interventional study of Rituximab and IVIg in Pemphigus, sponsored by The University of Hong Kong. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in Hong Kong. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-07-08.

Sponsored by The University of Hong Kong · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2025, 10 months ago, but the record still lists the study as active, not recruiting.
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Pemphigus is a rare acquired autoimmune disease in which immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies target desmosomal proteins to produce intraepithelial, and mucocutaneous blisters. It is potentially fatal and the average mortality of pemphigus vulgaris (PV) was 75% before the introduction of corticosteroids in the early 1950s.

Traditionally, treatment of pemphigus included high dose systemic corticosteroids with or without adjuvant immunosuppressants. However; the prolonged use of high dose steroids carries significant side effects. A recent randomized trial has proved the efficacy of Rituximab, a monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody against B-lymphocytes, as an efficacious therapy for pemphigus. Early use of rituximab was associated with better clinical outcomes, hence combination treatment of rituximab and intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) has shown to be effective for refractory pemphigus cases and can potentially induce long-term complete remission and lower risks infectious complications.

In this study, investigators will evaluate the efficacy and safety of early use of rituximab with or without IVIG in patients with moderate to severe pemphigus using protocols that were similar to those previously published, investigators will also aim to measure the impact of health care economics and in doing so, assess the cost and benefits of both treatment arms.

Read the detailed description

Pemphigus is a rare acquired autoimmune disease in which immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies target desmosomal proteins to produce intraepithelial, and mucocutaneous blisters. It is potentially fatal and the average mortality of pemphigus vulgaris (PV) was 75% before the introduction of corticosteroids in the early 1950s.

Traditionally, treatment of pemphigus included high dose systemic corticosteroids with or without adjuvant immunosuppressants. However; the prolonged use of high dose steroids carries significant side effects. A recent randomized trial has proved the efficacy of Rituximab, a monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody against B-lymphocytes, as an efficacious therapy for pemphigus. Furthermore, early use of rituximab was associated with associated with better clinical outcomes. Moreover, combination treatment of rituximab and intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) has shown to be effective for refractory pemphigus cases and can potentially induce long-term complete remission and lower risks infectious complications.

Cost effectiveness is an important issue and while combination of IVIG and rituximab has been advocated, the cost of such treatment is substantial and whether it poses any benefit over rituximab alone, or with other more conventional immunosuppressive agents, has not been established. Both treatment approaches have been previously published in high impact journals.

In this study, investigators aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of early use of rituximab with or without IVIG in patients with moderate to severe pemphigus using protocols that were similar to those previously published. Apart from complete remission and adverse effects, investigators will also aim to measure the impact of health care economics and in doing so, assess the cost and benefits of both treatment arms.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pemphigus

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Pemphigus
  • intravenous immunoglobulins
  • rituximab
03

In context

Pemphigus

76 studies on the registry are indexed under Pemphigus; 18 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 20 is below the median of 30 across 53 interventional studies indexed under Pemphigus.

Browse Pemphigus studies →

Lead sponsor

The University of Hong Kong is the lead sponsor of 1,292 studies on the registry; 348 are open to participants now.

Of its 9 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Written obtained from patient
  • Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)
  • Newly or recently diagnosed (less than 18 months) diagnosed pemphigus vulgaris or pemphigus foliaceus based on clinical features; histological features of acantholysis via skin or mucosal ; and intercellular staining pattern of indirect immunofluorescence or serological detection of DSG 1 or DSG 3 by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)
  • Moderate to severe active disease, as defined by overall PDAI >= 15 or skin involvement BSA>= 5%. 9 [Annex 1]
  • Receiving standard-of-care oral prednisolone up to 1.5 mg/kg/day
  • Women who are sexually active and not , agreement to remain abstinent or use 2 effective methods of .
  • Ability to comply with study protocol as deemed by investigator's assessment

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  • Age \<18 or >75
  • Pregnant women or nursing mother
  • Already diagnosed pemphigus patients diagnosed > 18 months
  • Non-consenting patients, or patient who cannot be followed up regularly
  • Patient with history of serious allergy or anaphylactic reaction to monoclonal antibody treatment
  • Severe heart failure ( Class III or IV)
  • Unstable angina or myocardiac infarction within last 3 months or post-infarction heart failure
  • Anaemia ( \<10g/dL), Neutropenia (\<1000/mm3), Lymphopenia (\<900/mm3), thrombocytopenia (\<100,000/mm3)
  • Renal insufficiency \<60
  • Liver insufficiency of /ALT > 2 times normal limit range
  • Positive test results for (HCV) serology at screening *Patients who are HepBs Ag positive, or HepBs Ag negative and anti-HepBc Ab - positive: Patients who are HepBs Ag positive - will be started on entecavir 0.5mg daily, and will be referred to a gastroenterologist for further follow up.

Patients who are HepBs Ag negative, and HBc Ab positive, with detectable HepB DNA levels - will be started on entecavir 0.5mg daily, and will be referred to a gastroenterologist for further follow up.

Patients who are HepBs Ag negative, HBc Ab positive, with no detectable HepB DNA levels - will be started on entecavir 0.5mg daily, and will be continued on entecavir for at least 18 months after completion of last dose of rituximab.

  • Blood test positive for
  • Signs of active infection on CXR
  • Positive interferon gamma release assay Quantiferon or T.Spot TB test: must be treated with at least 4 weeks post initiation of isoniazid or other TB therapy
  • Inherited or acquired severe immunodeficiency
  • History of
  • Patient with active severe infection (excluding fungal infections of the nail), which has required antibiotic treatment within 2 week prior to study enrolment
  • Infection requiring hospitalisation or intravenous antibiotic treatment within the last 8 weeks prior to enrolment
  • Past history of osteomyelitis, or fasciitis, septic arthritis within the last one year
  • Patients with drug induced pemphigus. A thorough medication history will be taken to rule out drug induced pemphigus including D-penicillamine, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers and cephalosporins
  • Evidence of any new or uncontrolled concomitant disease that in the investigators' judgement would preclude the patients participation
  • Patients with history of allergy or adverse events to IVIG or rituximab treatment10
  • Treatment with intravenous immunoglobulins, plasmaphoresis within the last 8 weeks prior to randomization
  • Previous treatment with rituximab or any monoclonal antibody inducing profound lymphopenia
  • Treatment with live or attenuated vaccine within the last 28 days prior to randomization
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(11)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

Postmenopausal

Periods have stopped for good: usually no period for 12 months in a row without another medical reason, sometimes confirmed by a blood test (FSH).

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
20 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Rituximab only

    * Rituximab infusion 375mg/m2 body surface area (BSA) weekly for 4 weeks from baseline (week 0, 1, 2, 3) * Rituximab infusion 375mg/m2 BSA weekly for 4 weeks at week 24 (week 24, 25, 26, 27) * Rituximab infusion 375mg/m2 BSA weekly for 2 weeks at week 52 (week 52, 53) * Rituximab infusion 375mg/m2 BSA weekly for 4 weeks at week 76 (week 76, 77) * A total of 12 doses of rituximab will be given in 55 weeks

    Drug: Rituximab

  • Experimental
    Rituximab and IVIG

    * Rituximab (375 mg/m2 BSA) once a week for 4 weeks (week 1, 2, 3); * Week 4: Rituximab + IVIG 2g per kg * Week 5, 6, 7: Above treatment repeated for 2nd cycle, infusion of rituximab (375 mg/m2 BSA) once a week for 4 weeks (week 5, 6, 7); * Week 8: Rituximab + IVIG 2g/kg * In months 3, 4, 5, 6, patients received a single infusion of rituximab (375 mg/m2 BSA) plus infusion of 2g/kg IVIG * Thus in 6-month period patients received a total of 12 infusions of rituximab and 7 infusions of IVIG * If a patient was clinically free of disease at end of 6 months, additional infusions of IVIG will be given at week 30, 38, 48, 60 and 76 * A total of 12 doses of rituximab and 12 cycles of IVIG will be given

    Drug: Rituximab · Other: IVIg

Interventions

  • Rituximab would be given intravenously. * IV Rituximab is prediluted at a dose of 500mg in 500ml of 0.9% normal saline (i.e. 1:1 dilution, 1 mg/ml) * Initial infusion rate starts at a rate of 50mg/hr (50ml/hr) * If no hypersensitivity/anaphylaxis reaction occurs, increase infusion rate in 50mg/hr (50 ml/hr) increments every 30 minutes * Maximum infusion rate is 400 mg/hr (400 ml/hr) * Subsequent infusion: start at rate of 100mg/hr (100 ml/hr), increase 100mg/hr (100 ml/hr) increments every 30 minutes * Monitor temperature, BP HR, respiratory rate and SpO2 every 30 minutes

    Also known as: MabThera

  • OtherIVIg

    IVIg would be given in combination with Rituximab intravenously. Infusion plan of IVIg: 0 min: 50ml/hour 15 min: 75ml/hour 30 min: 100ml/hour 45 min: 125ml/hour 60 min: 150ml/hour 75 min \& beyond: 180ml/hour

    Also known as: Privigen

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. relapse-free complete remission

    Percentage of participants who achieve relapse-free complete remission

    Time frame: From baseline up to 208 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to protocol defined disease flare

    Time to protocol defined disease flare

    Time frame: From baseline up to 208 weeks

  2. Duration of complete remission

    Duration of complete remission, evaluated by the PDAI activity score

    Time frame: From baseline up to 208 weeks

  3. Number of protocol defined disease flares

    Number of protocol defined disease flares

    Time frame: From baseline up to 208 weeks

  4. Time to initial complete remission

    Time to initial complete remission, evaluated by the PDAI activity score

    Time frame: From baseline up to 208 weeks

  5. Change in health-related quality of life: Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score

    Change in health-related quality of life as measured by the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score. The DLQI is calculated by summing the score of each question resulting in maximum of 30 and a minimum of 0. The higher the score, the more quality of life is impaired.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192

  6. Occurrence of severe treatment adverse events

    Safety endpoints: Occurrence of treatment adverse events, serious adverse events (grade 3 or 4) based on common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE). Death from any cause. Adverse events leading to discontinuation, vital signs, and laboratory tests

    Time frame: Baseline, week 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192

  7. Blood DSG 1 and 3 levels

    Blood DSG 1 and 3 levels

    Time frame: Baseline week 0, week 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192

  8. Blood lymphocyte level (CBC)

    Blood lymphocyte level (CBC)

    Time frame: Baseline week 0, week 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192

  9. Blood CD19/20 mean B cell counts percentage

    Blood CD19/20 mean B cell counts percentage

    Time frame: Week 0, week 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192

  10. Number of rescue therapy given

    Number of rescue therapy given

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 208

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Department of Medicine
    Central, Hong Kong
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Harman KE, Brown D, Exton LS, Groves RW, Hampton PJ, Mohd Mustapa MF, Setterfield JF, Yesudian PD. British Association of Dermatologists' guidelines for the management of pemphigus vulgaris 2017. Br J Dermatol. 2017 Nov;177(5):1170-1201. doi: 10.1111/bjd.15930. No abstract available. PubMed 29192996 ↗
  • Hertl M, Jedlickova H, Karpati S, Marinovic B, Uzun S, Yayli S, Mimouni D, Borradori L, Feliciani C, Ioannides D, Joly P, Kowalewski C, Zambruno G, Zillikens D, Jonkman MF. Pemphigus. S2 Guideline for diagnosis and treatment--guided by the European Dermatology Forum (EDF) in cooperation with the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV). J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015 Mar;29(3):405-14. doi: 10.1111/jdv.12772. Epub 2014 Oct 22. PubMed 25338479 ↗
  • Joly P, Maho-Vaillant M, Prost-Squarcioni C, Hebert V, Houivet E, Calbo S, Caillot F, Golinski ML, Labeille B, Picard-Dahan C, Paul C, Richard MA, Bouaziz JD, Duvert-Lehembre S, Bernard P, Caux F, Alexandre M, Ingen-Housz-Oro S, Vabres P, Delaporte E, Quereux G, Dupuy A, Debarbieux S, Avenel-Audran M, D'Incan M, Bedane C, Beneton N, Jullien D, Dupin N, Misery L, Machet L, Beylot-Barry M, Dereure O, Sassolas B, Vermeulin T, Benichou J, Musette P; French study group on autoimmune bullous skin diseases. First-line rituximab combined with short-term prednisone versus prednisone alone for the treatment of pemphigus (Ritux 3): a prospective, multicentre, parallel-group, open-label randomised trial. Lancet. 2017 May 20;389(10083):2031-2040. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30070-3. Epub 2017 Mar 22. PubMed 28342637 ↗
  • Lunardon L, Tsai KJ, Propert KJ, Fett N, Stanley JR, Werth VP, Tsai DE, Payne AS. Adjuvant rituximab therapy of pemphigus: a single-center experience with 31 patients. Arch Dermatol. 2012 Sep;148(9):1031-6. doi: 10.1001/archdermatol.2012.1522. PubMed 22710375 ↗
  • Ahmed AR, Spigelman Z, Cavacini LA, Posner MR. Treatment of pemphigus vulgaris with rituximab and intravenous immune globulin. N Engl J Med. 2006 Oct 26;355(17):1772-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa062930. PubMed 17065638 ↗
  • Feldman RJ, Christen WG, Ahmed AR. Comparison of immunological parameters in patients with pemphigus vulgaris following rituximab and IVIG therapy. Br J Dermatol. 2012 Mar;166(3):511-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2011.10658.x. Epub 2012 Jan 19. PubMed 21967407 ↗
  • Ahmed AR, Kaveri S. Reversing Autoimmunity Combination of Rituximab and Intravenous Immunoglobulin. Front Immunol. 2018 Jul 18;9:1189. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01189. eCollection 2018. PubMed 30072982 ↗
  • Ahmed AR, Nguyen T, Kaveri S, Spigelman ZS. First line treatment of pemphigus vulgaris with a novel protocol in patients with contraindications to systemic corticosteroids and immunosuppressive agents: Preliminary retrospective study with a seven year follow-up. Int Immunopharmacol. 2016 May;34:25-31. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2016.02.013. Epub 2016 Feb 23. PubMed 26919279 ↗
  • Boulard C, Duvert Lehembre S, Picard-Dahan C, Kern JS, Zambruno G, Feliciani C, Marinovic B, Vabres P, Borradori L, Prost-Squarcioni C, Labeille B, Richard MA, Ingen-Housz-Oro S, Houivet E, Werth VP, Murrell DF, Hertl M, Benichou J, Joly P; International Pemphigus Study Group. Calculation of cut-off values based on the Autoimmune Bullous Skin Disorder Intensity Score (ABSIS) and Pemphigus Disease Area Index (PDAI) pemphigus scoring systems for defining moderate, significant and extensive types of pemphigus. Br J Dermatol. 2016 Jul;175(1):142-9. doi: 10.1111/bjd.14405. Epub 2016 Apr 3. PubMed 26800395 ↗
  • US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute. Common terminology criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 5.0: Nov 27, 2017.
  • Murrell DF, Pena S, Joly P, Marinovic B, Hashimoto T, Diaz LA, Sinha AA, Payne AS, Daneshpazhooh M, Eming R, Jonkman MF, Mimouni D, Borradori L, Kim SC, Yamagami J, Lehman JS, Saleh MA, Culton DA, Czernik A, Zone JJ, Fivenson D, Ujiie H, Wozniak K, Akman-Karakas A, Bernard P, Korman NJ, Caux F, Drenovska K, Prost-Squarcioni C, Vassileva S, Feldman RJ, Cardones AR, Bauer J, Ioannides D, Jedlickova H, Palisson F, Patsatsi A, Uzun S, Yayli S, Zillikens D, Amagai M, Hertl M, Schmidt E, Aoki V, Grando SA, Shimizu H, Baum S, Cianchini G, Feliciani C, Iranzo P, Mascaro JM Jr, Kowalewski C, Hall R, Groves R, Harman KE, Marinkovich MP, Maverakis E, Werth VP. Diagnosis and management of pemphigus: Recommendations of an international panel of experts. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020 Mar;82(3):575-585.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.02.021. Epub 2018 Feb 10. PubMed 29438767 ↗
  • Liu KSH, Seto WK, Lau EHY, Wong DK, Lam YF, Cheung KS, Mak LY, Ko KL, To WP, Law MWK, Wu JT, Lai CL, Yuen MF. A Territorywide Prevalence Study on Blood-Borne and Enteric Viral Hepatitis in Hong Kong. J Infect Dis. 2019 May 24;219(12):1924-1933. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiz038. PubMed 30668746 ↗
  • Seto WK, Chan TS, Hwang YY, Wong DK, Fung J, Liu KS, Gill H, Lam YF, Lie AK, Lai CL, Kwong YL, Yuen MF. Hepatitis B reactivation in patients with previous hepatitis B virus exposure undergoing rituximab-containing chemotherapy for lymphoma: a prospective study. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Nov 20;32(33):3736-43. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.56.7081. Epub 2014 Oct 6. PubMed 25287829 ↗
  • Tsai YF, Yang CI, Du JS, Lin MH, Tang SH, Wang HC, Cho SF, Liu YC, Su YC, Dai CY, Hsiao HH. Rituximab increases the risk of hepatitis B virus reactivation in non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients who are hepatitis B surface antigen-positive or have resolved hepatitis B virus infection in a real-world setting: a retrospective study. PeerJ. 2019 Sep 9;7:e7481. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7481. eCollection 2019. PubMed 31565551 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Jun 2020 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2025, 66 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 27, 2020
First posted
May 26, 2020
StartActual
Jun 20, 2020
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2025
CompletionEst.
Jun 30, 2026
Last update
Jul 8, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 8, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04400994
Responsible party
Dr. Sze-Man Wong (Honorary Clinical Assistant Professor, The University of Hong Kong) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 26, 2020
Start date
Jun 20, 2020
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 30, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 8, 2025

Study contacts

Sze Man Wong, MBBS
principal investigator · The University of Hong Kong

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Jul 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion