CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT04395807COVID HELMETUpdated Apr 15, 2021

Helmet CPAP Versus HFNC in COVID-19

An interventional study of Helmet CPAP and HFNC in COVID and Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure, sponsored by Lund University. Terminated at 1 site in Sweden. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-04-15.

Sponsored by Lund University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
1. Few eligible patients at study start 2. Patients received HFNC prior to intermediate care ward admission 3. NIV was locally considered a step-up therapy to HFNC 4. Full-face masks replaced the Helmet interface as local NIV standard
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
2
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

We aim to investigate whether the use of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure using a Helmet device (Helmet CPAP) will increase the number of days alive and free of ventilator within 28 days compared to the use of a High Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) in patients admitted to Helsingborg Hospital, Sweden, suffering from COVID-19 and an acute hypoxic respiratory failure.

Read the detailed description

A detailed description can be found in the study protocol published in Trials in Dec 2020:

Tverring, J., Åkesson, A. \& Nielsen, N. Helmet continuous positive airway pressure versus high-flow nasal cannula in COVID-19: a pragmatic randomised clinical trial (COVID HELMET). Trials 21, 994 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04863-5

02

Conditions studied

  • COVID
  • Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure
03

In context

Respiratory Insufficiency

1,650 studies on the registry are indexed under Respiratory Insufficiency; 296 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 2 is below the median of 55 across 1,043 interventional studies indexed under Respiratory Insufficiency.

Browse Respiratory Insufficiency studies →

Lead sponsor

Lund University is the lead sponsor of 230 studies on the registry; 37 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age ≥ 18 years
  2. Sars-Cov-2 found in the upper or lower respiratory tract by PCR during the current disease episode
  3. Peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) \< 92 % despite conventional low-flow oxygen therapy of at least 6 L /min for at least 15 min
  4. A decision to initiate HFNC or Helmet CPAP by the attending ward physician
  5. The patient has given written informed consent to participate.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria (any of the following):

  1. Need for direct admission to the intensive care unit for mechanical ventilation
  2. Unconsciousness or drowsiness
  3. Pneumothorax
  4. Carbon dioxide pressure (pCO2) > 6 kPa in venous blood gas (VBG)
  5. Underlying chronic obstructive pulmonary disease stage III-IV
  6. A decision not to participate
  7. Inability to comprehend the study content and give informed consent
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
2 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Helmet CPAP

    Helmet Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CaStar hood for CPAP therapy by Starmed/Intersurgical) driven by high-flow blender (Bio-Med Devices).

    Device: Helmet CPAP

  • Active comparator
    HFNC

    High-Flow Nasal Cannula (OptiflowTM nasal high-flow interface) driven by AIRVO 2 humidification system (Fisher and Paykel)

    Device: HFNC

Interventions

  • DeviceHelmet CPAP

    Start-up air flow 40 L/min. Start-up PEEP 5 cmH2O. Max PEEP 20 cmH2O. Oxygen flow / FiO2% according to 92% SpO2 target. Titrations at physician's choice.

  • DeviceHFNC

    Start-up air flow 30 L/min. Max air flow 60 L/min. Oxygen flow / FiO2% according to 92% SpO2 target. Titrations at physician's choice.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Ventilator-Free Days (VFD)

    Number of days alive and free of mechanical ventilation within 28 days. Patients who die within 28 days will be counted as 0 VFD. Time in ventilator will be counted in hours and rounded to whole days.

    Time frame: 28 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. SpO2/FiO2-ratio

    Peripheral oxygen saturation divided by fraction of inspired oxygen

    Time frame: 1 hour after randomisation

  2. Patient comfort

    Visual scale (1-10)

    Time frame: 24 hours after randomisation

  3. Frequency of endotracheal intubation

    Min 0, Max 1

    Time frame: 28 days

  4. Frequency of carbon dioxide rebreathing

    Defined as pCO2 \> 6 kPa in a venous blood gas. Min 0, Max ∞

    Time frame: 28 days

  5. Days alive within

    All-cause mortality. (180 days endpoint not in primary publication)

    Time frame: 28 days and 180 days

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Helsingborg's Hospital
    Helsingborg, Region Skane 252 23, Sweden
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Tverring J, Akesson A, Nielsen N. Helmet continuous positive airway pressure versus high-flow nasal cannula in COVID-19: a pragmatic randomised clinical trial (COVID HELMET). Trials. 2020 Dec 3;21(1):994. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04863-5. PubMed 33272319 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 15, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04395807
Lead sponsor
Lund University
Collaborators
Region Skane
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 20, 2020
Start date
Jun 3, 2020
Primary completion
Apr 12, 2021
Completion
Apr 12, 2021
Last update
Apr 15, 2021

Study contacts

Jonas Tverring, MD
principal investigator · Lund University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Apr 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion