CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06322264Updated Sep 3, 2026

Promoting Children's Participation in Conventional X-ray Examinations

An observational study in Heart Rate Determination and Patient Participation, sponsored by Lund University. Recruiting at 1 site in Sweden. Open to participants aged 4 Years to 12 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-03.

Sponsored by Lund University · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Family-based
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
220
Ages
4 Years to 12 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this explorative observational study is to map the procedure and child centered approach in the examination for children that undergo conventional X-ray examinations. The main questions aim to answer:

  • How many images need to be retaken during conventional X-ray examinations?
  • What is the reason why the pictures need to be redone?
  • What is the time required for the various examinations?
  • What experience of the procedure of the examination is there among those involved?
  • Can the physical impact be observed through variation in heart rate in children that undergo conventional X-ray examinations?

Participants will answer questionnaires about the children's participation in the procedure and the variation in heart rate will be measured on the children who undergo the examinations.

Read the detailed description

Many children receive healthcare services during their childhood. In Sweden, approximately 330,000 children aged 0-15 require conventional X-ray examinations annually. It is imperative that the justification for conducting these X-ray examinations on children is carefully considered. Improper positioning during the image capturing process can result in inadequate images that do not provide necessary diagnostic information. This may require that the X-ray procedure must be repeated, leading to unnecessary exposure of children to radiation. This situation poses complexities as a means to minimize the occurrence of repeated imaging procedures and minimize unnecessary radiation exposure, children may be subject to some level of restraint.

Effective January 1, 2020, Sweden adopted the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child into law, with the aim of enhancing and elucidating the rights of children.

This entails that children are entitled to receive care from personnel who possess the expertise and qualifications necessary to uphold both the physical and mental well-being of children, as well as their rights, prior to, during, and following a procedure such as an X-ray examination.

The radiographer plays a significant role in determining the outcome of pediatric examinations, impacting both the child's experience and the quality of imaging as well as the radiation dose received. This study investigates the perceptions of health care professionals regarding pediatric examinations, focusing on procedure, child centered approach, and overall experience during conventional X-ray procedures. Additionally, it explores the experiences of children and their parents during examinations, including children's level of participation in the process. It is also essential to evaluate the physical indicators, this in the form of changes in the child's pulse rate.

To establish a standard baseline for normal variation, investigators will measure pulse rates before, during, and after an examination using portable heart rate monitors.

The questionnaires will be answered by the population -children, parents and the examining radiographer after each examination has been completed and will mainly consist of shorter multiple-choice options with the possibility of extended answers in cases where additions need to be made.

For the parts that are common between the three groups, the questions to the children are taken from a questionnaire about children's participation. Parents and radiographers receive the same questions and answers on a Likert scale.

A descriptive and comparative analysis will be done with the support of different software, Excel and SPSS.

02

Conditions studied

  • Heart Rate Determination
  • Patient Participation

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Children's participation
  • Conventional x-ray procedure
  • Variation in heart rate
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
4 Years to 12 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The population consists of the people who are involved with the child undergoing an X-ray examination.

Which are the children who are to undergo conventional x-rays and are between the ages of 4-12 years. Those who are accompanying this child and the radiographers who carry out the examination will also be there.

Inclusion criteria

  • Children ages 4-12 yrs who undergo standard x-ray examinations
  • parents to the child
  • assigned radiographers

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Children and parents who have cognitive and/or language difficulties
04

Study design

Observational model
Family-based
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
220 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Pediatric patients

    Pediatric patients between the ages of 4 and 12 undergoing conventional X-ray examinations.

    Diagnostic Test: Measurement of variation in heart rate

  • Parents

    Parents of the included pediatric patients between the ages of 4 and 12 undergoing conventional X-ray examinations.

  • Radiographers

    Radiographers who examine the included pediatric patients between the ages of 4 and 12 undergoing conventional X-ray examinations.

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testMeasurement of variation in heart rate

    The children will be given a portable device that will monitor their heart rate, enabling the recording of the rate of their pulse.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Variation in heart rate

    To compare the variations in pulse with the experience of the examination

    Time frame: The measurement is done through the examination total time 15 minutes (baseline before start 1-2 minutes, start of exam 2-10 minutes, end of exam after 10-15 minutes)

06

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • SUS
    Lund, Skåne County 221 00, Sweden
    Recruiting
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Hardy M, Armitage G. The child's right to consent to x-ray and imaging investigations: issues of restraint and immobilization from a multidisciplinary perspective. J Child Health Care. 2002 Jun;6(2):107-19. doi: 10.1177/136749350200600204. PubMed 12136815 ↗
  • Sahlberg S, Karlsson K, Darcy L. Children's rights as law in Sweden-every health-care encounter needs to meet the child's needs. Health Expect. 2020 Aug;23(4):860-869. doi: 10.1111/hex.13060. Epub 2020 Apr 22. PubMed 32319716 ↗
  • Gilljam BM, Arvidsson S, Nygren JM, Svedberg P. Child participation in health care (ChiPaC)-Development and psychometric evaluation of a self-report instrument for children's participation in health care. J Clin Nurs. 2020 Jan;29(1-2):107-118. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15063. Epub 2019 Oct 10. PubMed 31531995 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06322264
Lead sponsor
Lund University
Collaborators
Skane University Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 21, 2024
Start date
Nov 5, 2024
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 10, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 3, 2026

Study contacts

Camilla Viseu, MMedSci
Contact
camilla.viseu@med.lu.se
+46705425698
Carina Sjöberg, Phd
Contact
carina.sjoberg@med.lu.se
+46703636917
Pether Jildenstål, Assoc. Prof.
study director · Lund University

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion