CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04374565Updated Apr 1, 2022Results posted

Convalescent Plasma for Treatment of COVID-19 Patients With Pneumonia

A Phase 2 interventional study of High-Titer Anti-SARS-CoV-2 (COVID 19) Convalescent Plasma in Corona Virus Infection, SARS-CoV 2 and SARS Pneumonia, sponsored by University of Virginia. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-04-01.

Sponsored by University of Virginia · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
29
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a single arm phase II trial to assess efficacy and confirm safety of infusions of anti-SARS-CoV-2 convalescent plasma in hospitalized patients with acute respiratory symptoms,with or without confirmed interstitial COVID-19 pneumonia by chest Xray or CT. A total of 29 eligible subjects will be enrolled to receive anti-SARS-CoV-2 plasma.Outcomes will be compared to hospitalized controls with confirmed COVID-19 disease through retrospective chart review.

Read the detailed description

There are no proven treatments for coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and associated pneumonia caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Recent experience in China suggests that convalescent immune plasma(CIP)may be an effective treatment for COVID-19. In the pandemic situation where there are no vaccines for COVID-19, specific antibodies in convalescent plasma induced by infection may provide passive protective immunity. Passive antibody therapy was the first immunotherapy dating back to the 1890's for the treatment of infectious diseases before the development of antibiotics 1940's. Experience from prior outbreaks with other coronaviruses, such as SARS-CoV-1 shows that such convalescent plasma contains neutralizing antibodies to the relevant virus. In SARS-CoV-2, passive antibody therapy from CIP probably provided protection by viral neutralization. CIP was also used in the 2013 Ebola epidemic. A small non-randomized study in Sierra Leone revealed a significant increase in survival for who received CIP4. CIP administration is the only approach that provides immediate immunity to patients who have been exposed or who have active disease.

This approach is immediately available from individuals who have recovered, are viral free,and can donate immune plasma (IP) containing high titer neutralizing antibodies. Passive antibody therapy can be given to a patient recently exposed or a patient who is developing an infection with COVID-19 by obtaining plasma units from immune individuals by standard plasmapheresis using FDA-approved blood banking procedures, cross matching the unit(s) to the recipients and infusing the unit(s) using standard transfusion procedures for blood products. Based on the safety and long-term experience with plasma infusions, plasma exchanges, and other procedures involving plasma or plasma product, this protocol was designed as a phase II single arm trial that involves the administration of antibodies to a given agent to a susceptible individual for the purpose of preventing or treating an infectious disease due to that agent.

The only antibody formulation that is available for emergent use is that found in convalescent plasma. As more individuals contract COVID-19 and recover, the number of potential donors will increase.

The principle of passive antibody therapy is that it is more effective when used for prophylaxis than for treatment of disease. When used for therapy, antibody is most effective when administered shortly after the onset of symptoms. The reason for temporal variation in efficacy is not well understood but could reflect that passive antibody works by neutralizing the initial inoculum, which is likely to be much smaller than that of established disease. Alternatively, antibodies may dampen the early inflammatory response leaving the infected individual asymptomatic. For example, antibody therapy for pneumococcal pneumonia was most effective when given shortly after the onset of symptoms and was of no benefit if antibody therapy was delayed beyond the third day of disease. For passive antibody therapy to be effective, a sufficient amount of antibody must be infused. The antibody will circulate in the blood, reach tissues,and provide protection against infection. Depending on the type of antibody, amount, and composition, the half-life can vary from weeks to months. It is under these circumstances, the investigators plan to treat patients who are sick enough to be hospitalized before the onset of overwhelming disease involving a systemic inflammatory response, sepsis, and/or ARDS.

02

Conditions studied

  • Corona Virus Infection
  • SARS-CoV 2
  • SARS Pneumonia
  • Pneumonia
03

In context

Infections

6,687 studies on the registry are indexed under Infections; 807 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 29 is below the median of 120 across 4,200 interventional studies indexed under Infections.

Browse Infections studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Virginia is the lead sponsor of 653 studies on the registry; 134 are open to participants now.

Of its 60 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 41 (68%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients must be 18 years of age or older
  • Patients hospitalized with COVID-19 respiratory symptoms within 72 hours of admission to a"floor" bed (non-ICU bed) and confirmation via SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing.
  • Patient and/or surrogate is willing and able to provide written informed consent and comply with all protocol requirements.
  • Patients with hematologic malignancies or solid tumors are eligible.
  • Patients with autoimmune disorders are eligible.
  • Patients with immunodeficiency and organ or stem cell transplant recipients are eligible.
  • Patients who have received or are receiving hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine are eligible (but will be taken off the drug)
  • Prior use of IVIG is allowed but the investigator should consider the potential for a hypercoagulable state.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients requiring mechanical ventilation or >6 liters per minute nasal cannula oxygen
  • Patients on other anti-COVID-19 trials being treated with tocilizumab (anti-IL-6 receptor), Siltuximab (anti-IL-2), Remdesivir, or other pharmacological trials that may be initiated hereafter.
  • A pre-existing condition or use of a medication that, in the opinion of the site investigator, may place the individual at a substantially increased risk of thrombosis (e.g., cryoglobulinemia, severe refractory hypertriglyceridemia, or clinically significant monoclonal gammopathy).
  • Contraindication to transfusion or history of prior reactions to transfusion blood products.
  • Medical conditions for which receipt of 500-600 mL of intravenous fluid may be dangerous to the subject (e.g., decompensated congestive heart failure).
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
29 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Study participants

    A total of 29 eligible subjects will be enrolled to receive high titer anti-SARS-CoV-2 plasma. Participants will be compared to a historical control group via retrospective chart review.

    Drug: High-Titer Anti-SARS-CoV-2 (COVID 19) Convalescent Plasma

Interventions

  • DrugHigh-Titer Anti-SARS-CoV-2 (COVID 19) Convalescent Plasma

    Pathogen reduced SARS-CoV-2 convalescent plasma (1-2 units; \~200 mL each for a total of 200-400mls) given preferably in one day, but allowable to be given over 2 days if clinical circumstances delay infusions in 1 day), with titer to be determined after the unit has been infused.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants Transferred to Intensive Care Unit (ICU)

    Will be done by comparing the admission rate to the ICU between patients who received convalescent plasma and a control group who did not enroll in the study, or receive another experimental therapy.

    Time frame: Days 0 - 60

  2. 28 Day Mortality

    Will be done by comparing the 28 day mortality rate between enrolled subjects and the control group.

    Time frame: Days 0 - 28

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events

    Will be collected from time of enrollment until completion of the study. The adverse events will be evaluated by CTCAE V5.0 and MedDRA.

    Time frame: Days 0 - 60

  2. Duration of SARS-CoV-2 Positivity

    Respiratory tract swabs will be collected on days, 0, 7, 14, and 21 and will be tested for SARS-CoV-2. The outcome measurement is determining the duration from date of infection until date of first documented negative PCR test, which was assed up to 21 days

    Time frame: Days 0 - 21

  3. Serum of Plasma Antibody Titer to SARS-CoV-2

    Serum or plasma will be collected and analyzed for SARS-CoV-2 antibody.

    Time frame: Day 28

  4. Cellular and Humoral Immune Response

    Blood will be collected and analyzed for for Spike IgG levels.

    Time frame: Day 28

  5. Supplemental Oxygen Free Days

    All days where a supplemental oxygen is needed will be recorded as a concomitant medication and will be subtracted from total days the participant is alive and enrolled in the study up to day 28 to determine the supplemental oxygen free days.

    Time frame: Days 0-28

  6. Ventilator Free Days

    All days where a ventilator is needed will be recorded as a concomitant procedure and will be subtracted from total days the participant is alive and enrolled in the study up to day 28 to determine the ventilator free days.

    Time frame: Days 0 - 28

  7. ICU Free Days

    All days where the participant is admitted to the ICU will be recorded and subtracted from total days the participant is alive and enrolled in the study up to day 28 to determine the ICU free days.

    Time frame: Days 0 - 28

  8. Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score Improvement

    Throughout the study, participants were evaluated by study physician using the sequential organ failure assessment score. This outcome measurement is looking for the number of participants who's score improved over the duration of the study.

    Time frame: days 0-28

  9. Number of Participants Who Needed for Vasopressors

    Concomitant medications will be recorded throughout the patients participation in the study and vasopressors will be recorded, if they are needed.

    Time frame: Days 0 - 60

  10. Number of Participants Who Needed Renal Replacement Therapy

    Renal function will be assessed throughout the patients participation in the study. If renal replacement therapy is needed, it will be captured as a concomitant procedure.

    Time frame: Days 0 - 60

  11. Number of Participants Who Needed Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO)

    Respiratory function will be assessed throughout the patients participation in the study. If ECMO is needed, it will be captured as a concomitant procedure.

    Time frame: Days 0 - 60

  12. Hospital Length of Stay (LOS)

    Will be calculated from the date the patient entered the hospital until they were discharged.

    Time frame: Days 0-60

  13. ICU LOS

    Will be calculated from the date the patient entered the ICU until they were discharged from the ICU.

    Time frame: days 0 - 60

  14. Number of Participants Who Had a Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events (AEs)

    All adverse events will be recorded and evaluated by CTCAE v.5.0. All grade 3 and 4 AEs will be calculated to determine safety of convalescent plasma.

    Time frame: Adverse events were collected from day 0 to 7 days post infusion.

07

Results

Posted Apr 1, 2022

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneStudy Participants
Started29
Completed29
Not completed0

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants Transferred to Intensive Care Unit (ICU)

Will be done by comparing the admission rate to the ICU between patients who received convalescent plasma and a control group who did not enroll in the study, or receive another experimental therapy.

Time frame:
Days 0 - 60
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Transferred to Intensive Care Unit (ICU)
ParticipantsStudy Participants
Number of Participants Transferred to Intensive Care Unit (ICU)4
Primary28 Day Mortality

Will be done by comparing the 28 day mortality rate between enrolled subjects and the control group.

Time frame:
Days 0 - 28
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
28 Day Mortality
ParticipantsStudy Participants
28 Day Mortality2
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events

Will be collected from time of enrollment until completion of the study. The adverse events will be evaluated by CTCAE V5.0 and MedDRA.

Time frame:
Days 0 - 60
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events
ParticipantsStudy Participants
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events4
SecondaryDuration of SARS-CoV-2 Positivity

Respiratory tract swabs will be collected on days, 0, 7, 14, and 21 and will be tested for SARS-CoV-2. The outcome measurement is determining the duration from date of infection until date of first documented negative PCR test, which was assed up to 21 days

Time frame:
Days 0 - 21
Reported as:
Mean · days
Duration of SARS-CoV-2 Positivity
daysStudy Participants
Duration of SARS-CoV-2 Positivity20.4 ± 1.57
SecondarySerum of Plasma Antibody Titer to SARS-CoV-2

Serum or plasma will be collected and analyzed for SARS-CoV-2 antibody.

Time frame:
Day 28
Reported as:
Median · ug/mL
Serum of Plasma Antibody Titer to SARS-CoV-2
ug/mLStudy Participants
Serum of Plasma Antibody Titer to SARS-CoV-27.7 (0.1 to 112.1)
SecondaryCellular and Humoral Immune Response

Blood will be collected and analyzed for for Spike IgG levels.

Time frame:
Day 28
Reported as:
Median · ug/mL
Cellular and Humoral Immune Response
ug/mLStudy Participants
Cellular and Humoral Immune Response58.0 (34.0 to 90.0)
SecondarySupplemental Oxygen Free Days

All days where a supplemental oxygen is needed will be recorded as a concomitant medication and will be subtracted from total days the participant is alive and enrolled in the study up to day 28 to determine the supplemental oxygen free days.

Time frame:
Days 0-28
Reported as:
Mean · Days
Supplemental Oxygen Free Days
DaysStudy Participants
Supplemental Oxygen Free Days23.5 (21 to 26)
SecondaryVentilator Free Days

All days where a ventilator is needed will be recorded as a concomitant procedure and will be subtracted from total days the participant is alive and enrolled in the study up to day 28 to determine the ventilator free days.

Time frame:
Days 0 - 28
Reported as:
Mean · days
Ventilator Free Days
daysStudy Participants
Ventilator Free Days24.93 ± 1.46
SecondaryICU Free Days

All days where the participant is admitted to the ICU will be recorded and subtracted from total days the participant is alive and enrolled in the study up to day 28 to determine the ICU free days.

Time frame:
Days 0 - 28
Reported as:
Mean · days
ICU Free Days
daysStudy Participants
ICU Free Days24.59 ± 1.61
SecondarySequential Organ Failure Assessment Score Improvement

Throughout the study, participants were evaluated by study physician using the sequential organ failure assessment score. This outcome measurement is looking for the number of participants who's score improved over the duration of the study.

Time frame:
days 0-28
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score Improvement
ParticipantsStudy Participants
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score Improvement27
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Needed for Vasopressors

Concomitant medications will be recorded throughout the patients participation in the study and vasopressors will be recorded, if they are needed.

Time frame:
Days 0 - 60
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Who Needed for Vasopressors
ParticipantsStudy Participants
Number of Participants Who Needed for Vasopressors4
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Needed Renal Replacement Therapy

Renal function will be assessed throughout the patients participation in the study. If renal replacement therapy is needed, it will be captured as a concomitant procedure.

Time frame:
Days 0 - 60
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Who Needed Renal Replacement Therapy
ParticipantsStudy Participants
Number of Participants Who Needed Renal Replacement Therapy1
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Needed Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO)

Respiratory function will be assessed throughout the patients participation in the study. If ECMO is needed, it will be captured as a concomitant procedure.

Time frame:
Days 0 - 60
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Who Needed Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO)
ParticipantsStudy Participants
Number of Participants Who Needed Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO)1
SecondaryHospital Length of Stay (LOS)

Will be calculated from the date the patient entered the hospital until they were discharged.

Time frame:
Days 0-60
Reported as:
Mean · days
Hospital Length of Stay (LOS)
daysStudy Participants
Hospital Length of Stay (LOS)9.39 ± 1.56
SecondaryICU LOS

Will be calculated from the date the patient entered the ICU until they were discharged from the ICU.

Time frame:
days 0 - 60
Reported as:
Mean · days
ICU LOS
daysStudy Participants
ICU LOS2.93 ± 1.72
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Had a Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events (AEs)

All adverse events will be recorded and evaluated by CTCAE v.5.0. All grade 3 and 4 AEs will be calculated to determine safety of convalescent plasma.

Time frame:
Adverse events were collected from day 0 to 7 days post infusion.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Who Had a Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events (AEs)
ParticipantsStudy Participants
Number of Participants Who Had a Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events (AEs)6

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events were collected from day 0 to 7 days post infusion.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Study Participants2/29 (6.9%)4/29 (13.8%)11/29 (37.9%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventStudy Participants
Respiratory FailureRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders3/29
SepsisBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/29
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventStudy Participants
Pulmonary EdemaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders5/29
feverInfections and infestations3/29
HypoxiaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/29
Hypertension urgencyCardiac disorders1/29
hypotensionCardiac disorders1/29
syncopeVascular disorders1/29
epistaxisGeneral disorders1/29
creatine increasedHepatobiliary disorders1/29
ALT/AST increasedHepatobiliary disorders1/29
atrial fibrillationCardiac disorders1/29

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Study Participants
Mean57.6 ± 2.5
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Study Participants
Female14
Male15
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Study Participants
Hispanic or Latino12
Not Hispanic or Latino17
Unknown or Not Reported0
08

Study locations

2 sites
  • University of Virginia Medical Center
    Charlottesville, Virginia 22903, United States
  • University of Virginia
    Charlottesville, Virginia 22903, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Casadevall A, Scharff MD. Return to the past: the case for antibody-based therapies in infectious diseases. Clin Infect Dis. 1995 Jul;21(1):150-61. doi: 10.1093/clinids/21.1.150. PubMed 7578724 ↗
  • Casadevall A, Dadachova E, Pirofski LA. Passive antibody therapy for infectious diseases. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004 Sep;2(9):695-703. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro974. PubMed 15372080 ↗
  • Zhang JS, Chen JT, Liu YX, Zhang ZS, Gao H, Liu Y, Wang X, Ning Y, Liu YF, Gao Q, Xu JG, Qin C, Dong XP, Yin WD. A serological survey on neutralizing antibody titer of SARS convalescent sera. J Med Virol. 2005 Oct;77(2):147-50. doi: 10.1002/jmv.20431. PubMed 16121363 ↗
  • Sahr F, Ansumana R, Massaquoi TA, Idriss BR, Sesay FR, Lamin JM, Baker S, Nicol S, Conton B, Johnson W, Abiri OT, Kargbo O, Kamara P, Goba A, Russell JB, Gevao SM. Evaluation of convalescent whole blood for treating Ebola Virus Disease in Freetown, Sierra Leone. J Infect. 2017 Mar;74(3):302-309. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2016.11.009. Epub 2016 Nov 17. PubMed 27867062 ↗
  • Casadevall A, Pirofski LA. Antibody-mediated regulation of cellular immunity and the inflammatory response. Trends Immunol. 2003 Sep;24(9):474-8. doi: 10.1016/s1471-4906(03)00228-x. No abstract available. PubMed 12967670 ↗
  • Casadevall A, Scharff MD. Serum therapy revisited: animal models of infection and development of passive antibody therapy. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994 Aug;38(8):1695-702. doi: 10.1128/AAC.38.8.1695. No abstract available. PubMed 7985997 ↗
  • Cheng Y, Wong R, Soo YO, Wong WS, Lee CK, Ng MH, Chan P, Wong KC, Leung CB, Cheng G. Use of convalescent plasma therapy in SARS patients in Hong Kong. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2005 Jan;24(1):44-6. doi: 10.1007/s10096-004-1271-9. PubMed 15616839 ↗
  • Yeh KM, Chiueh TS, Siu LK, Lin JC, Chan PK, Peng MY, Wan HL, Chen JH, Hu BS, Perng CL, Lu JJ, Chang FY. Experience of using convalescent plasma for severe acute respiratory syndrome among healthcare workers in a Taiwan hospital. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005 Nov;56(5):919-22. doi: 10.1093/jac/dki346. Epub 2005 Sep 23. PubMed 16183666 ↗
  • Ko JH, Seok H, Cho SY, Ha YE, Baek JY, Kim SH, Kim YJ, Park JK, Chung CR, Kang ES, Cho D, Muller MA, Drosten C, Kang CI, Chung DR, Song JH, Peck KR. Challenges of convalescent plasma infusion therapy in Middle East respiratory coronavirus infection: a single centre experience. Antivir Ther. 2018;23(7):617-622. doi: 10.3851/IMP3243. Epub 2018 Jun 20. PubMed 29923831 ↗
  • Arabi YM, Hajeer AH, Luke T, Raviprakash K, Balkhy H, Johani S, Al-Dawood A, Al-Qahtani S, Al-Omari A, Al-Hameed F, Hayden FG, Fowler R, Bouchama A, Shindo N, Al-Khairy K, Carson G, Taha Y, Sadat M, Alahmadi M. Feasibility of Using Convalescent Plasma Immunotherapy for MERS-CoV Infection, Saudi Arabia. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016 Sep;22(9):1554-61. doi: 10.3201/eid2209.151164. PubMed 27532807 ↗
  • Wan Y, Shang J, Sun S, Tai W, Chen J, Geng Q, He L, Chen Y, Wu J, Shi Z, Zhou Y, Du L, Li F. Molecular Mechanism for Antibody-Dependent Enhancement of Coronavirus Entry. J Virol. 2020 Feb 14;94(5):e02015-19. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02015-19. Print 2020 Feb 14. PubMed 31826992 ↗
  • Mair-Jenkins J, Saavedra-Campos M, Baillie JK, Cleary P, Khaw FM, Lim WS, Makki S, Rooney KD, Nguyen-Van-Tam JS, Beck CR; Convalescent Plasma Study Group. The effectiveness of convalescent plasma and hyperimmune immunoglobulin for the treatment of severe acute respiratory infections of viral etiology: a systematic review and exploratory meta-analysis. J Infect Dis. 2015 Jan 1;211(1):80-90. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiu396. Epub 2014 Jul 16. PubMed 25030060 ↗
  • China puts 245 COVID-19 patients on convalescent plasma therapy. In: Huaxia, (ed): XinhuaNet, 2020.
  • Crowe JE Jr, Firestone CY, Murphy BR. Passively acquired antibodies suppress humoral but not cell-mediated immunity in mice immunized with live attenuated respiratory syncytial virus vaccines. J Immunol. 2001 Oct 1;167(7):3910-8. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.167.7.3910. PubMed 11564809 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Dec 11, 2020

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 1, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04374565
Lead sponsor
University of Virginia
Responsible party
Jeffrey Sturek, MD, PhD (Assistant Professor of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Virginia) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 5, 2020
Start date
May 5, 2020
Primary completion
Mar 5, 2021
Completion
Mar 5, 2021
Results posted
Apr 1, 2022
Last update
Apr 1, 2022

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion