ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT04365400TRIAGEUpdated Jun 12, 2023Results posted

Assess Efficacy and Safety of Epeleuton in Patients With Hypertriglyceridemia and Type 2 Diabetes

A Phase 2 interventional study of DS102 and Placebo in Hypertriglyceridemia and Type 2 Diabetes, sponsored by Afimmune. Terminated at 56 sites in 6 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-06-12.

Sponsored by Afimmune · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Trial prematurely terminated on 03 May 2022 due to the results from an interim analysis indicating a lack of efficacy in the study population.
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
233
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-13

Among 150 studies in Hypertriglyceridemia with a site in United States — 10 open to participants now, 16 under way, 4 of them phase 3. Hypertriglyceridemia · United States.

Enrollment
25th of 145
233 · median 52
Started
2020
with 4 others
Phase 2
45 of 150
4 open now
Registered
119th of 150
by date

Among the 150 studies in Hypertriglyceridemia with a site in United States, this one is the 25th largest by enrollment of the 145 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 5 that started in 2020, is one of 45 in phase 2, and was the 119th registered.

Hypertriglyceridemia

324 studies on the registry are indexed under Hypertriglyceridemia; 38 are open to participants now.

Browse Hypertriglyceridemia studies →

Open to participants now

10 of the 150 studies in Hypertriglyceridemia with a site in United States are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

5 more — sign in →

All 10 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in United States have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in United States →

Who these studies take

Of the 22 Hypertriglyceridemia studies recruiting now, 9 (41%) set no upper age limit and 12 (55%) stop at 75 or younger; 2 take children under 18; 4 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 150 studies in Hypertriglyceridemia with a site in United States, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

To assess the efficacy and safety of orally administered Epeleuton capsules versus placebo, in the treatment of adult patients with hypertriglyceridemia and type 2 diabetes

Read the detailed description

This was a randomised, double-blind, Placebo-controlled, 3-arm, multi-centre Phase IIb study consisting of 26 weeks of active treatment and a 2-week post-treatment follow-up period in adult patients with hypertriglyceridemia and concomitant type 2 diabetes.

The screening period consisted of up to 6-weeks lead-in during which all patients were to undergo diet and lifestyle stabilisation, washout of disallowed medications and optimisation of statins.

After screening, patients were randomised (1:1:1) at the baseline visit into the following treatment groups:

  • Treatment Group A (Placebo): four Placebo capsules orally administered twice a day, i.e., eight capsules daily for 26 weeks.
  • Treatment Group B (Epeleuton 2g): two Epeleuton 500 mg capsules and two Placebo capsules orally administered twice a day, i.e., eight capsules daily for 26 weeks.
  • Treatment Group C (Epeleuton 4g): four Epeleuton 500 mg capsules orally administered twice a day, i.e., eight capsules daily for 26 weeks.

The observation period was 32-34 weeks (lead-in: 4-6 weeks, treatment duration: 26 weeks, follow-up period: 2 weeks). During the study, 10 visits to the clinic were scheduled: two screening visits (Visit 1 and Visit 2), one visit at the start of the comparative treatment period (baseline/Visit 3), six visits in the comparative treatment period (Visit 4/Week 4, Visit 5/Week 8, Visit 6/Week 12, Visit 7/Week 16, Visit 8/Week 20 and Visit 9/Week 26 or Early Termination) and one final safety follow-up visit (Visit 10/Week 28).

03

Conditions studied

  • Hypertriglyceridemia
  • Type 2 Diabetes
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus at least 90 days prior to the first screening visit.
  2. Patients with a (glycosylated ) between 7.0 - 10.0% (53-86 mmol/mol) (both inclusive)
  3. Patients with a fasting triglyceride level ≥200 mg/dL (2.26 mmol/L) and \<750mg/dL (8.46 mmol/L) at both screening visits.

    Note: If the triglyceride level is outside the required range at the second screening visit, an additional measurement can be obtained 1 week later, to confirm eligibility.

    Note: If a large difference in triglyceride level (>15%) is observed between screening 1 and screening 2, an additional measurement may be requested or patient may be deemed not eligible.

  4. Patients who have been educated regarding diet and exercise at or before visit 1 (screening 1) and are willing to maintain and not alter a stable diet and activity routine throughout the study.
  5. Patients who have been on a stable statin therapy at doses that are likely to achieve optimal LDL cholesterol and who are willing to continue this treatment throughout the study.

    Note: Stable statin therapy may consist of a statin with or without ezetimibe.

  6. Patients with an LDL cholesterol level \<130mg/dL (3.34 mmol/L) at both screening visits.
  7. Patients who have a (BMI) ≥ 25kg/m2 and \<50kg/m2.
  8. Patients who have been on a stable daily dose of metformin (at least 1500mg or maximum tolerated dose for metformin monotherapy as documented in the subject medical record) and/or a sulfonylurea and/or a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor and/or a sodium-glucose transport protein 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) and/or a GLP1-RA and/or basal insulin for at least 90 days prior to the day of first screening visit.

    Note: Dose of GLP1-RA must be stable for 6 months prior to baseline with no weight change >2kg for 3 months prior to baseline.

    Note: Dose of basal insulin must be stable for 4 months prior to baseline. All types of basal insulin are permitted, including insulin glargine, insulin degludec, insulin detemir, NPH insulin and pre-mixed insulin.

  9. Female patients and male patients with female partners of must use highly effective methods or have a sterilised partner for the duration of the study. Highly effective contraceptive methods are defined as methods that can achieve a failure rate of less than 1% per year when used consistently and correctly. Such methods include hormonal contraception, intrauterine device or sexual abstinence.

    Note: A woman is considered of childbearing potential (WOCBP), i.e. fertile, following menarche and until becoming unless permanently sterile. Permanent sterilisation methods include hysterectomy, bilateral salpingectomy and bilateral oophorectomy.

    Note: Hormonal contraceptives must be on a stable dose for at least one month before baseline.

    Note: Sexual abstinence is considered a highly effective method only if defined as refraining from heterosexual intercourse during the entire period of risk associated with the study treatments. The reliability of sexual abstinence needs to be evaluated in relation to the duration of the clinical trial and the preferred and usual lifestyle of the patient.

  10. Patients whose pre-study or screening clinical laboratory findings do not interfere with their participation in the study, in the opinion of the Investigator, and do not violate any inclusion or exclusion criteria
  11. Male or female patients aged 18 years and older on the day of signing the form (ICF).
  12. Patients who are able to communicate well with the Investigator, to understand and comply with the requirements of the study, and understand and sign the written informed consent prior to initiation of any study specific activities or procedures.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(7)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

HbA1c

A blood test of average blood sugar over the past two to three months, given as a percentage or in mmol/mol. 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) or more is the usual threshold for diabetes, normally confirmed by a second test.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Postmenopausal

Periods have stopped for good: usually no period for 12 months in a row without another medical reason, sometimes confirmed by a blood test (FSH).

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
233 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    DS102 2000mg

    Participants in this group received 1000mg DS102 capsules twice daily.

    Drug: DS102

  • Experimental
    DS102 4000mg

    Participants in this group received 2000mg DS102 capsules twice daily.

    Drug: DS102

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Participants in this group received placebo capsules twice daily.

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugDS102

    DS102 Epeleuton capsules

    Also known as: Epeleuton Capsules

  • DrugPlacebo

    Placebo capsules

    Also known as: Placebo Capsules

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percent Change in Triglycerides From Baseline to Week 16

    Analysis of changes and percentage changes of triglycerides was performed using a Wilcoxon rank sum test with the Hodges Lehmann median and 95% confidence intervals estimates. For analysis of triglycerides, baseline was defined as the mean of the Baseline (Visit 3) and Screening 2/Week -1 (Visit 2) measurements.

    Time frame: 16 weeks

  2. Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 26

    Changes from baseline of HbA1c at each visit were analysed using mixed model analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with baseline value as a covariate.

    Time frame: 26 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. % Change in Triglycerides From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12, 20 and 26

    Percent change in triglycerides from baseline to weeks 4, 8, 12, 20 and 26

    Time frame: 26 weeks

  2. Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20

    Change in HbA1c (glycosylated haemoglobin) from baseline to weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20

    Time frame: 20 weeks

07

Results

Posted Jun 1, 2023

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneDS102 2000mgDS102 4000mgPlacebo
Started797777
Completed495050
Not completed302727

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercent Change in Triglycerides From Baseline to Week 16

Analysis of changes and percentage changes of triglycerides was performed using a Wilcoxon rank sum test with the Hodges Lehmann median and 95% confidence intervals estimates. For analysis of triglycerides, baseline was defined as the mean of the Baseline (Visit 3) and Screening 2/Week -1 (Visit 2) measurements.

Time frame:
16 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · % Change in TG
Percent Change in Triglycerides From Baseline to Week 16
% Change in TGDS102 2000mgDS102 4000mgPlacebo
Percent Change in Triglycerides From Baseline to Week 16-7.886 ± 4.0965.273 ± 5.361-5.130 ± 4.945
Statistical analysis
  • DS102 4000mg vs Placebo · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.1148124 · Hodges lehmann median: 8.24 · 95% CI -2.01 to 18.19
  • DS102 2000mg vs Placebo · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.8668467 · Hodges lehmann median: -0.82 · 95% CI -10.16 to 7.96
PrimaryChange in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 26

Changes from baseline of HbA1c at each visit were analysed using mixed model analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with baseline value as a covariate.

Time frame:
26 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · % of HbA1c
Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 26
% of HbA1cDS102 2000mgDS102 4000mgPlacebo
Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 26-2.255 ± 1.412-0.524 ± 1.162-0.503 ± 1.446
Statistical analysis
  • DS102 4000mg vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.8658 · Difference in change in hba1c (%): 0.02516 · 95% CI -0.26658 to 0.316897
  • DS102 2000mg vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.6500 · Difference in change in hba1c (%): -0.07333 · 95% CI -0.39012 to 0.243455
Secondary% Change in Triglycerides From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12, 20 and 26

Percent change in triglycerides from baseline to weeks 4, 8, 12, 20 and 26

Time frame:
26 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · % Change in TG
% Change in Triglycerides From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12, 20 and 26
% Change in TGDS102 2000mgDS102 4000mgPlacebo
Week 4 - Baseline-9.301 ± 3.9945.965 ± 9.868-6.025 ± 4.479
Week 8 - Baseline-5.018 ± 3.843-4.500 ± 4.623-5.242 ± 4.411
Week 12 - Baseline-8.144 ± 4.071-4.215 ± 6.0814.022 ± 5.532
Week 20 - Baseline-5.666 ± 4.6651.889 ± 5.005-4.270 ± 4.494
Week26 - Baseline-8.213 ± 4.8827.456 ± 6.585-0.675 ± 5.538
SecondaryChange in HbA1c From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20

Change in HbA1c (glycosylated haemoglobin) from baseline to weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20

Time frame:
20 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · % HbA1c
Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20
% HbA1cDS102 2000mgDS102 4000mgPlacebo
Week 4 - Baseline-2.606 ± 0.618-1.980 ± 0.683-1.365 ± 0.657
Week 8 - Baseline-3.327 ± 0.978-2.933 ± 0.815-2.913 ± 0.861
Week 12 - Baseline-3.448 ± 1.229-2.331 ± 1.052-1.315 ± 1.143
Week 16 - Baseline-2.690 ± 1.338-1.733 ± 1.110-1.278 ± 1.216
Week 20 - Baseline-4.176 ± 1.414-0.733 ± 1.188-0.811 ± 1.372

Adverse events

Collected over Up to 28 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
DS102 2000mg0/79 (0%)1/79 (1.3%)49/79 (62%)
DS102 4000mg0/77 (0%)0/77 (0%)52/77 (67.5%)
Placebo0/77 (0%)1/77 (1.3%)42/77 (54.5%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventDS102 2000mgDS102 4000mgPlacebo
Acute Myocardial InfarctionCardiac disorders0/790/771/77
DizzinessNervous system disorders1/790/770/77
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 143
Most frequent other events
EventDS102 2000mgDS102 4000mgPlacebo
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders8/7913/776/77
COVID-19Infections and infestations7/792/775/77
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders2/796/773/77
HypertensionVascular disorders5/790/773/77
HypertriglyceridemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders0/794/770/77
Type 2 Diabetes MellitusMetabolism and nutrition disorders4/791/771/77
Abdominal PainGastrointestinal disorders1/793/771/77
EructationGastrointestinal disorders2/793/770/77
FlatulenceGastrointestinal disorders0/793/771/77
HyperglycaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders1/791/773/77

Baseline characteristics

Safety Analysis Set: The SAS consists of all patients who received at least one dose of the study medication.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)DS102 2000mgDS102 4000mgPlaceboTotal
Mean61.3 ± 9.358.9 ± 10.258.8 ± 10.159.7 ± 9.9
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)DS102 2000mgDS102 4000mgPlaceboTotal
Female34302892
Male454749141
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)DS102 2000mgDS102 4000mgPlaceboTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native0000
Asian1247
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0000
Black or African American2114
White757470219
More than one race0000
Unknown or Not Reported1023
08

Study locations

56 sites
  • US Site 5
    Little Rock, Arkansas 72204, United States
  • US Site 23
    Cerritos, California 90703, United States
  • US Site 18
    Huntington Park, California 90255, United States
  • US Site 19
    Los Angeles, California 90057, United States
  • US Site 20
    Panorama City, California 91402, United States
  • US Site 21
    Santa Ana, California 92704, United States
  • US Site 13
    Santa Ana, California 92705, United States
  • US Site 15
    Adairsville, Georgia 30103, United States
  • US Site 35
    Ames, Iowa 50010, United States
  • US Site 2
    Albany, New York 12203, United States
  • US Site 25
    Hickory, North Carolina 28601, United States
  • US Site 11
    Morehead City, North Carolina 28557, United States
  • US Site 34
    Raleigh, North Carolina 27609, United States
  • US Site 26
    Rocky Mount, North Carolina 27804, United States
  • US Site 28
    Salisbury, North Carolina 28144, United States
  • US Site 32
    Statesville, North Carolina 28625, United States
  • US Site 27
    Wilmington, North Carolina 28601, United States
  • US Site 22
    Edmond, Oklahoma 73013, United States
  • US Site 1
    Wyomissing, Pennsylvania 19610, United States
  • US Site 3
    Yardley, Pennsylvania 19067, United States
  • US Site 12
    Jackson, Tennessee 38301, United States
  • US Site 7
    Dallas, Texas 75231, United States
  • US Site 8
    Fort Worth, Texas 76107, United States
  • US Site 14
    Fort Worth, Texas 76164, United States
  • US Site 24
    Houston, Texas 77036, United States
  • US Site 30
    Houston, Texas 77061, United States
  • US Site 6
    Houston, Texas 77079, United States
  • US Site 33
    Houston, Texas 77099, United States
  • US Site 29
    Missouri City, Texas 77459, United States
  • US Site 31
    North Richland Hills, Texas 76180, United States
  • US Site 10
    Waco, Texas 76708, United States
  • US Site 17
    Winchester, Virginia 22601, United States
  • Georgia Site 1
    Batumi, Georgia
  • Georgia Site 2
    Kutaisi, Georgia
  • Georgia Site 3
    Kutaisi, Georgia
  • Georgia Site 4
    Tbilisi, Georgia
  • Germany Site 7
    Dresden, Germany
  • Germany Site 3
    Hamburg, Germany
  • Germany Site 1
    Heidelberg, Germany
  • Germany Site 5
    Lübeck, Germany
  • Israel Site 9
    Herzliya, Israel
  • Israel Site 1
    H̱olon, Israel
  • Israel Site 5
    Jerusalem, Israel
  • Israel Site 6
    Jerusalem, Israel
  • Israel Site 4
    Nahariya, Israel
  • Israel Site 8
    Sakhnīn, Israel
  • Israel Site 2
    Tel Aviv, Israel
  • Israel Site 3
    Tel Aviv, Israel
  • Latvia Site 4
    Ogre, Latvia
  • Latvia Site 1
    Riga, Latvia
  • Latvia Site 2
    Riga, Latvia
  • Latvia Site 3
    Riga, Latvia
  • Switzerland Site 3
    Lausanne, Switzerland
  • Switzerland Site 4
    Luzern, Switzerland
  • Switzerland Site 2
    Olten, Switzerland
  • Switzerland Site 1
    Saint Gallen, Switzerland
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Oct 2020 to primary completion in May 2022, 18 months.

Results were first posted in Jun 2023, 1 year after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 24, 2020
First posted
Apr 28, 2020
StartActual
Oct 13, 2020
Primary completionActual
May 3, 2022
CompletionActual
May 3, 2022
Results first posted
Jun 1, 2023
Last update
Jun 12, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 12, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04365400
Lead sponsor
Afimmune
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 28, 2020
Start date
Oct 13, 2020
Primary completion
May 3, 2022
Completion
May 3, 2022
Results posted
Jun 1, 2023
Last update
Jun 12, 2023

Study contacts

Markus Weissbach, MD
study director · Afimmune

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Jun 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: DS102

Start the discussion