ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02941549Updated Oct 12, 2022Results posted

Safety And Efficacy Study Of Orally Administered Epeleuton In Patients With NAFLD

A Phase 2 interventional study of Placebo capsules and Epeleuton in Non Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease, sponsored by Afimmune. Completed at 16 sites in 3 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-10-12.

Sponsored by Afimmune · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
96
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-13

Among 122 studies in Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease with a site in United Kingdom — 17 open to participants now, 27 under way, 9 of them phase 3. Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease · United Kingdom.

Enrollment
56th of 101
96 · median 104
Started
2016
with 8 others
Phase 2
38 of 122
1 open now
Registered
36th of 122
by date

Among the 122 studies in Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease with a site in United Kingdom, this one is the 56th largest by enrollment of the 101 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 9 that started in 2016, is one of 38 in phase 2, and was the 36th registered.

Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

1,618 studies on the registry are indexed under Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease; 323 are open to participants now.

Browse Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease studies →

Open to participants now

17 of the 122 studies in Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease with a site in United Kingdom are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

12 more — sign in →

All 17 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in United Kingdom have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in United Kingdom →

Who these studies take

Of the 220 Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease studies recruiting now, 66 (30%) set no upper age limit and 125 (57%) stop at 75 or younger; 27 take children under 18; 55 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years to 75 Years · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 122 studies in Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease with a site in United Kingdom, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The purpose of this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study is to assess the safety and efficacy of orally administered Epeleuton capsules versus placebo in the treatment of adult patients with Non Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD)

03

Conditions studied

  • Non Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patients diagnosed with NAFLD by the presence of hepatic steatosis on imaging or histology in the absence of any secondary causes.
  2. Patients with an ≥ 1.5 (ULN) and \< 5 ULN on two occasions 7 or more days apart during screening.
  3. Patients with historical liver showing NASH and/or ≥ F1 fibrosis OR NFS ≥ -1.455 OR Fib- 4 ≥ 1.3 OR Fibroscan ≥8kPa within 3 months of screening.
  4. Patients with a (BMI) between 25.0 and 40.0 kg/m² inclusive. Patients with a history of controlled obesity or controlled diabetes are allowed on the study.
  5. Patients whose pre-study clinical laboratory findings do not interfere with their participation in the study, in the opinion of the Investigator.
  6. Patients aged between 18 and 75 years inclusive.
  7. Female patients and male patients with female partners of child bearing potential must use adequate or have a sterilized partner for the duration of the study. Adequate contraception is defined as: systemic hormonal contraceptives; intrauterine device or barrier method of contraception in conjunction with spermicide; or agree to sexual abstinence, defined as a patient refraining from heterosexual intercourse during the entire period of risk associated with the study treatments and in line with their preferred and usual lifestyle. Hormonal contraceptives must be on a stable dose for at least one month before baseline.
  8. Patients who are able to communicate well with the Investigator, to understand and comply with the requirements of the study, and understand and sign the written .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with an unstable metabolic condition such as weight change > 5% in the 3 months prior to inclusion.
  2. Patients with medical/surgical history of gastric bypass surgery, orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) or listed for OLT.
  3. Patients with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus type 2, i.e. ≥ 9% (75 mmol/mol) at the time of screening.
  4. Patients with decompensated or severe liver disease as evidenced by one or more of the following: confirmed cirrhosis or suspicion of cirrhosis, esophageal varices, ascites, suspicion of portal hypertension, hospitalization for liver disease within 60 days of screening, ≥ 2 x , or or AST ≥ 5 x ULN. Patients with Gilbert's syndrome are eligible if the conjugated bilirubin is ≤ 1.5 x ULN.
  5. Patients with inflammatory bowel disease that is either active or requiring medical therapy.
  6. Patients with diagnosed or suspected diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus and/or rheumatoid arthritis.
  7. Patients with a history of or active non-liver other than curatively treated skin cancer (basal cell or squamous cell carcinomas).
  8. Patients with a significant systemic or major illness other than liver disease, including coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular disease, pulmonary disease, renal insufficiency, serious psychiatric disease, respiratory or hypertensive disease, as well as diabetes and arthritis that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would preclude the patient from participating in and completing the study.
  9. Patients requiring anti-diabetic treatment (including insulin sensitizing agents), and/or lipid lowering treatment, and who are not on a stable dose for at least 3 months prior to screening should be excluded. If patients are insulin dependent this treatment should have commenced at least 3 months prior to screening, however changes in dose are permitted.
  10. Patients with known to any ingredients of the study treatment.
  11. Patients with a positive test for antibodies, surface antigen or antibodies at screening.
  12. Patients with liver disease of other etiologies such as drug-induced, autoimmune hepatitis, primary biliary cholangitis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, haemochromatosis, alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency or Wilson's disease.
  13. Patients with a significant history of drug/solvent abuse, in the opinion of the investigator.
  14. Patients with a history of alcohol abuse in the opinion of the Investigator, or who currently drinks in excess of 21 units per week (males) or 14 units per week (females), whereby a unit consists of 10ml or 8mg of pure alcohol.
  15. Patients who have used dietary supplements rich in omega-3 or omega-6 fatty acids in the 4 weeks prior to baseline.
  16. Patients who have participated in any other clinical study with an drug within 3 months before the first day of administration of study treatment.
  17. Patients who are pregnant, planning pregnancy, breastfeeding and/or are unwilling to use adequate (as specified in inclusion criterion 7) during the study.
  18. Patients, in the opinion of the Investigator, not suitable to participate in the study.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(15)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

HbA1c

A blood test of average blood sugar over the past two to three months, given as a percentage or in mmol/mol. 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) or more is the usual threshold for diabetes, normally confirmed by a second test.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
96 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    2 x placebo 500 mg capsules orally administered twice a day (4 capsules daily) for 16 weeks

    Other: Placebo capsules

  • Experimental
    1000 mg Epeleuton

    1 x Epeleuton 500 mg capsule and 1 x placebo 500 mg capsule orally administered twice a day (4 capsules daily) for 16 weeks

    Drug: Epeleuton

  • Experimental
    2000 mg Epeleuton

    2 x Epeleuton 500 mg capsules orally administered twice a day (4 capsules daily) for 16 weeks

    Drug: Epeleuton

Interventions

  • OtherPlacebo capsules
  • DrugEpeleuton
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Serum ALT (Alanine Aminotransferase) From Baseline to Week 16

    Change in serum ALT from baseline to Week 16 using ANCOVA.

    Time frame: 16 Weeks

  2. Change in Liver Stiffness Measurements by Transient Elastography From Baseline to Week 16

    To evaluate change in liver stiffness measurements using Transient Elastography from baseline to Week 16 using FibroScan® 502 Touch model or equivalent.

    Time frame: 16 Weeks

  3. Number of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) in Each Treatment Group Leading to Treatment Discontinuation

    Subjects with at least 1 TEAE leading to treatment discontinuation

    Time frame: 20 Weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Serum ALT (Alanine Aminotransferase) From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12

    Change in serum ALT from baseline to weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12.

    Time frame: 12 Weeks

  2. Change in AST (Aspartate Aminotransferase) From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16

    Change in serum AST from baseline to weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16.

    Time frame: 16 Weeks

  3. Change in AST:ALT Ratio From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16

    Change in AST: ALT ratio from baseline to weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16.

    Time frame: 16 Weeks

  4. Change in FIB-4 Index From Baseline to Week 16

    Change in FIB-4 Index from baseline to week 16. This index is based on age, platelet count, ALT level, and AST level and will be assessed at Baseline (Visit 2) and week 16 (Visit 10). FIB-4 was calculated using the following formula: FIB4 = (Age (years) x AST (U/L))/(Platelet count (10\^9/L) x √ALT (U/L)). A decrease in FIB-4 represents a positive outcome. A FIB-4 Index of \<1.45 indicates none to moderate fibrosis and an Index of \>3.25 indicates advanced fibrosis.

    Time frame: 16 Weeks

  5. Change in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) Fibrosis Score (NFS) From Baseline to Week 16

    Change in NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS) from baseline to week 16. The NFS is based on age, hyperglycemia, BMI, platelet count, albumin level, and AST/ALT ratio. NFS was calculated using the following formula: NAFLD fibrosis score = -1.675 + 0.037 × age (years) + 0.094 × BMI (kg/m\^2) + 1.13 × IFG/diabetes (yes = 1, no = 0) + 0.99 × AST/ALT ratio - 0.013 × platelet (×10\^9/l) - 0.66 × albumin (g/dl). A decrease in NFS score represents a positive outcome. An NFS score of \<-1.455 indicates no advanced fibrosis and a score of \>0.676 indicates liver fibrosis.

    Time frame: 16 Weeks

  6. Change in ELF (Enhanced Liver Fibrosis Score) From Baseline to Week 16

    Change in ELF from baseline to week 16. Enhanced Liver Fibrosis score is an extracellular matrix marker set consisting of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 1 (TIMP-1), amino-terminal propeptide of type III procollagen (PIIINP) and hyaluronic acid (HA). A decrease in ELF score represents a positive outcome. The ELF score was calculated for the instrument based on the following equation: ELF score = 2.494 + 0.846 In (CHA) + 0.735 In (CPIIINP) + 0.391 In (CTIMP-1). An ELF score of less than 7.7 indicates no fibrosis. An ELF score greater than or equal to 9.8 indicates severe fibrosis. An ELF score of 11.3 or greater indicates cirrhosis.

    Time frame: 16 Weeks

  7. Change in HOMA-IR (Homeostatic Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance) From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16

    Change in HOMA-IR from baseline to weeks 2,4,8,12,16. Homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) was assessed as a measure of insulin resistance. HOMA-IR is calculated by multiplying fasting plasma insulin by fasting plasma glucose, then dividing by the constant 405. A decrease in HOMA-IR indicates a positive outcome. HOMA-IR values of greater than 1.9 indicates early insulin resistance and levels above 2.9 indicate significant insulin resistance.

    Time frame: 16 Weeks

  8. Change in Adipo-IR (Adipose Tissue Insulin Resistance) From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16.

    Change in Adipo-IR from baseline to weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16. Adipose tissue insulin resistance (Adipo-IR) was assessed as a measure of insulin resistance. Adipo- IR is calculated by multiplying fasting non-esterified fatty acids by fasting insulin. A decrease in Adipo-IR indicates a positive outcome.

    Time frame: 16 Weeks

  9. Change in Hepatic Fat Measured by CAP (Controlled Attenuation Parameter) From Baseline to Week 16.

    Change in hepatic fat measured by CAP (controlled attenuation parameter) from baseline to week 16 using FibroScan® 502 Touch model or equivalent. CAP score is measured in decibels per meter (dB/m). A reduction in hepatic fat measured non-invasively by CAP indicates an improvement in hepatic steatosis. CAP scores range from 100 to 400dB/m. 0 to 237 dB/M indicates no hepatic steatosis, 238 to 260 dB/m indicates mild hepatic steatosis, 260 to 290 dB/m indicates moderate steatosis and a CAP score greater than 290 dB/m indicates severe steatosis.

    Time frame: 16 Weeks

07

Results

Posted Apr 21, 2022

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePlacebo1000 mg Epeleuton2000mg Epeleuton
Started313233
Completed283131
Not completed312
Withdrew: Adverse event100
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject212

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in Serum ALT (Alanine Aminotransferase) From Baseline to Week 16

Change in serum ALT from baseline to Week 16 using ANCOVA.

Time frame:
16 Weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · U/L
Change in Serum ALT (Alanine Aminotransferase) From Baseline to Week 16
U/LPlacebo1000 mg Epeleuton2000 mg Epeleuton
Change in Serum ALT (Alanine Aminotransferase) From Baseline to Week 16-16.3 (-44.2 to 11.7)-6.9 (-34.5 to 20.7)-10.1 (-36.9 to 16.8)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs 1000 mg Epeleuton · ANCOVA · p = 0.5946 · Ls mean difference: -6.9 · 95% CI -34.5 to 20.7
  • Placebo vs 2000 mg Epeleuton · ANCOVA · p = 0.7309 · Ls mean difference: -10.1 · 95% CI -36.9 to 16.8
PrimaryChange in Liver Stiffness Measurements by Transient Elastography From Baseline to Week 16

To evaluate change in liver stiffness measurements using Transient Elastography from baseline to Week 16 using FibroScan® 502 Touch model or equivalent.

Time frame:
16 Weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · kPa
Change in Liver Stiffness Measurements by Transient Elastography From Baseline to Week 16
kPaPlacebo1000 mg Epeleuton2000 mg Epeleuton
Change in Liver Stiffness Measurements by Transient Elastography From Baseline to Week 16-2.226 (-3.07 to -1.38)-1.308 (-2.11 to -0.51)-0.727 (-1.55 to 0.100)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs 1000 mg Epeleuton · ANCOVA · p = 0.0763 · Ls mean difference: -1.308 · 95% CI -2.11 to -0.51
  • Placebo vs 2000 mg Epeleuton · ANCOVA · p = 0.0058 · Ls mean difference: -0.727 · 95% CI -1.554 to 0.100
PrimaryNumber of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) in Each Treatment Group Leading to Treatment Discontinuation

Subjects with at least 1 TEAE leading to treatment discontinuation

Time frame:
20 Weeks
Reported as:
Number · TEAEs
Number of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) in Each Treatment Group Leading to Treatment Discontinuation
TEAEsPlacebo1000 mg Epeleuton2000 mg Epeleuton
Number of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) in Each Treatment Group Leading to Treatment Discontinuation100
SecondaryChange in Serum ALT (Alanine Aminotransferase) From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12

Change in serum ALT from baseline to weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12.

Time frame:
12 Weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · U/L
Change in Serum ALT (Alanine Aminotransferase) From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12
U/LPlacebo1000 mg Epeleuton2000 mg Epeleuton
Change from Baseline to Week 2-0.4 (-13.3 to 12.4)-0.1 (-13.0 to 12.8)-5.8 (-18.2 to 6.6)
Change from Baseline to Week 4-3.4 (-14.9 to 8.2)4.0 (-7.6 to 15.7)-1.9 (-13.0 to 9.3)
Change from Baseline to Week 8-8.7 (-23.1 to 5.7)-12.7 (-27.1 to 1.6)-3.8 (-17.4 to 9.9)
Change from Baseline to Week 12-18.3 (-45.3 to 8.8)-19.2 (-45.3 to 6.9)-3.8 (-28.7 to 21.0)
SecondaryChange in AST (Aspartate Aminotransferase) From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16

Change in serum AST from baseline to weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16.

Time frame:
16 Weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · U/L
Change in AST (Aspartate Aminotransferase) From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
U/LPlacebo1000 mg Epeleuton2000 mg Epeleuton
Change from Baseline to Week 2-5.6 (-22.1 to 10.8)-4.9 (-21.3 to 11.5)4.9 (-11.3 to 21.1)
Change from Baseline to Week 4-4.0 (-12.5 to 4.6)-1.1 (-9.7 to 7.5)2.0 (-6.4 to 10.5)
Change from Baseline to Week 8-4.6 (-13.1 to 3.8)-9.9 (-18.2 to -1.6)-0.9 (-9.0 to 7.2)
Change from Baseline to Week 12-13.7 (-28.3 to 0.9)-11.2 (-25.3 to 2.8)-3.2 (-17.0 to 10.5)
Change from Baseline to Week 16-8.9 (-35.4 to 17.6)7.7 (-18.3 to 33.7)-4.6 (-32.5 to 23.4)
SecondaryChange in AST:ALT Ratio From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16

Change in AST: ALT ratio from baseline to weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16.

Time frame:
16 Weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Ratio
Change in AST:ALT Ratio From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
RatioPlacebo1000 mg Epeleuton2000 mg Epeleuton
Change from Baseline to Week 20.00 (-0.12 to 0.12)-0.04 (-0.15 to 0.07)0.05 (-0.06 to 0.16)
Change from Baseline to Week 40.02 (-0.06 to 0.09)-0.03 (-0.10 to 0.05)0.06 (-0.02 to 0.13)
Change from Baseline to Week 80.01 (-0.06 to 0.08)0.00 (-0.06 to 0.06)0.03 (-0.04 to 0.09)
Change from Baseline to Week 120.02 (-0.07 to 0.11)0.03 (-0.05 to 0.11)0.01 (-0.07 to 0.09)
Change from Baseline to Week 160.03 (-0.07 to 0.14)0.10 (0.01 to 0.19)0.02 (-0.08 to 0.13)
SecondaryChange in FIB-4 Index From Baseline to Week 16

Change in FIB-4 Index from baseline to week 16. This index is based on age, platelet count, ALT level, and AST level and will be assessed at Baseline (Visit 2) and week 16 (Visit 10). FIB-4 was calculated using the following formula: FIB4 = (Age (years) x AST (U/L))/(Platelet count (10\^9/L) x √ALT (U/L)). A decrease in FIB-4 represents a positive outcome. A FIB-4 Index of \<1.45 indicates none to moderate fibrosis and an Index of \>3.25 indicates advanced fibrosis.

Time frame:
16 Weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Scores on a scale
Change in FIB-4 Index From Baseline to Week 16
Scores on a scalePlacebo1000 mg Epeleuton2000 mg Epeleuton
Change in FIB-4 Index From Baseline to Week 16-0.109 (-0.398 to 0.181)0.114 (-0.196 to 0.424)-0.068 (-0.384 to 0.248)
SecondaryChange in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) Fibrosis Score (NFS) From Baseline to Week 16

Change in NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS) from baseline to week 16. The NFS is based on age, hyperglycemia, BMI, platelet count, albumin level, and AST/ALT ratio. NFS was calculated using the following formula: NAFLD fibrosis score = -1.675 + 0.037 × age (years) + 0.094 × BMI (kg/m\^2) + 1.13 × IFG/diabetes (yes = 1, no = 0) + 0.99 × AST/ALT ratio - 0.013 × platelet (×10\^9/l) - 0.66 × albumin (g/dl). A decrease in NFS score represents a positive outcome. An NFS score of \<-1.455 indicates no advanced fibrosis and a score of \>0.676 indicates liver fibrosis.

Time frame:
16 Weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Scores on a scale
Change in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) Fibrosis Score (NFS) From Baseline to Week 16
Scores on a scalePlacebo1000 mg Epeleuton2000 mg Epeleuton
Change in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) Fibrosis Score (NFS) From Baseline to Week 16-0.0073 (-0.2653 to 0.2507)0.2250 (-0.0529 to 0.5028)-0.0340 (-0.3149 to 0.2469)
SecondaryChange in ELF (Enhanced Liver Fibrosis Score) From Baseline to Week 16

Change in ELF from baseline to week 16. Enhanced Liver Fibrosis score is an extracellular matrix marker set consisting of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 1 (TIMP-1), amino-terminal propeptide of type III procollagen (PIIINP) and hyaluronic acid (HA). A decrease in ELF score represents a positive outcome. The ELF score was calculated for the instrument based on the following equation: ELF score = 2.494 + 0.846 In (CHA) + 0.735 In (CPIIINP) + 0.391 In (CTIMP-1). An ELF score of less than 7.7 indicates no fibrosis. An ELF score greater than or equal to 9.8 indicates severe fibrosis. An ELF score of 11.3 or greater indicates cirrhosis.

Time frame:
16 Weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Scores on a scale
Change in ELF (Enhanced Liver Fibrosis Score) From Baseline to Week 16
Scores on a scalePlacebo1000 mg Epeleuton2000 mg Epeleuton
Change in ELF (Enhanced Liver Fibrosis Score) From Baseline to Week 160.24 (-0.09 to 0.56)0.10 (-0.19 to 0.39)0.01 (-0.29 to 0.31)
SecondaryChange in HOMA-IR (Homeostatic Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance) From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16

Change in HOMA-IR from baseline to weeks 2,4,8,12,16. Homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) was assessed as a measure of insulin resistance. HOMA-IR is calculated by multiplying fasting plasma insulin by fasting plasma glucose, then dividing by the constant 405. A decrease in HOMA-IR indicates a positive outcome. HOMA-IR values of greater than 1.9 indicates early insulin resistance and levels above 2.9 indicate significant insulin resistance.

Time frame:
16 Weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · HOMA-IR
Change in HOMA-IR (Homeostatic Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance) From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
HOMA-IRPlacebo1000 mg Epeleuton2000 mg Epeleuton
Change from Baseline to Week 21.208 (-1.102 to 3.518)1.250 (-1.024 to 3.525)-0.569 (-2.762 to 1.623)
Change from Baseline to Week 42.175 (-1.393 to 5.743)-0.540 (-4.154 to 3.075)2.347 (-1.166 to 5.860)
Change from Baseline to Week 86.606 (0.563 to 12.649)1.817 (-4.280 to 7.913)4.283 (-1.707 to 10.273)
Change from Baseline to Week 12-0.045 (-1.769 to 1.680)0.00 (-1.677 to 1.678)-0.258 (-1.858 to 1.343)
Change from Baseline to Week 16-0.393 (-1.310 to 0.524)-0.326 (-1.234 to 0.582)-2.037 (-2.912 to -1.162)
SecondaryChange in Adipo-IR (Adipose Tissue Insulin Resistance) From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16.

Change in Adipo-IR from baseline to weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16. Adipose tissue insulin resistance (Adipo-IR) was assessed as a measure of insulin resistance. Adipo- IR is calculated by multiplying fasting non-esterified fatty acids by fasting insulin. A decrease in Adipo-IR indicates a positive outcome.

Time frame:
16 Weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Adipo-IR
Change in Adipo-IR (Adipose Tissue Insulin Resistance) From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16.
Adipo-IRPlacebo1000 mg Epeleuton2000 mg Epeleuton
Change from Baseline to Week 29.69 (-6.05 to 25.42)-5.55 (-21.08 to 9.97)-10.80 (-25.66 to 4.06)
Change from Baseline to Week 424.88 (1.94 to 47.82)3.45 (-19.86 to 26.75)4.19 (-18.09 to 26.47)
Change from Baseline to Week 825.52 (5.86 to 45.18)10.40 (-9.28 to 30.07)6.63 (-11.79 to 25.05)
Change from Baseline to Week 124.20 (-12.46 to 20.86)-6.28 (-22.88 to 10.32)-20.66 (-36.35 to -4.97)
Change from Baseline to Week 163.66 (-12.54 to 19.86)-10.68 (-26.80 to 5.43)-21.07 (-36.44 to -5.69)
SecondaryChange in Hepatic Fat Measured by CAP (Controlled Attenuation Parameter) From Baseline to Week 16.

Change in hepatic fat measured by CAP (controlled attenuation parameter) from baseline to week 16 using FibroScan® 502 Touch model or equivalent. CAP score is measured in decibels per meter (dB/m). A reduction in hepatic fat measured non-invasively by CAP indicates an improvement in hepatic steatosis. CAP scores range from 100 to 400dB/m. 0 to 237 dB/M indicates no hepatic steatosis, 238 to 260 dB/m indicates mild hepatic steatosis, 260 to 290 dB/m indicates moderate steatosis and a CAP score greater than 290 dB/m indicates severe steatosis.

Time frame:
16 Weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · dB/m
Change in Hepatic Fat Measured by CAP (Controlled Attenuation Parameter) From Baseline to Week 16.
dB/mPlacebo1000 mg Epeleuton2000 mg Epeleuton
Change in Hepatic Fat Measured by CAP (Controlled Attenuation Parameter) From Baseline to Week 16.-12.3 (-34.4 to 9.9)-16.3 (-36.8 to 4.1)-22.4 (-43.0 to -1.8)

Adverse events

Collected over Up to 20 Weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Placebo0/31 (0%)1/31 (3.2%)16/31 (51.6%)
1000 mg Epeleuton0/32 (0%)0/32 (0%)20/32 (62.5%)
2000 mg Epeleuton0/33 (0%)1/33 (3%)14/33 (42.4%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventPlacebo1000 mg Epeleuton2000 mg Epeleuton
Pilonidal CystInfections and infestations1/310/320/33
SchizophreniaPsychiatric disorders0/310/321/33
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 76
Most frequent other events
EventPlacebo1000 mg Epeleuton2000 mg Epeleuton
HeadacheNervous system disorders1/315/322/33
DiarrheaGastrointestinal disorders3/313/322/33
Blood creatine phosphokinase increasedInvestigations3/313/320/33
DizzinessNervous system disorders0/313/320/33
FatigueGeneral disorders1/313/320/33
DysgeusiaNervous system disorders0/310/323/33
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders2/312/320/33
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders2/311/320/33
Abdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disorders0/312/321/33
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations1/312/322/33

Baseline characteristics

The Full Analysis Set (FAS) includes all randomised patients who received at least one administration of study treatment and have at least one post-baseline measurement.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Placebo1000 mg Epeleuton2000 mg EpeleutonTotal
Mean48.4 ± 11.6750.8 ± 13.7246.1 ± 11.9248.4 ± 12.44
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Placebo1000 mg Epeleuton2000 mg EpeleutonTotal
Female9121233
Male22202163
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Placebo1000 mg Epeleuton2000 mg EpeleutonTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native0000
Asian2204
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0000
Black or African American0000
White28303391
More than one race0000
Unknown or Not Reported1001
08

Study locations

16 sites
  • Georgia Site 1
    Kutaisi, Georgia
  • Georgia Site 2
    Kutaisi, Georgia
  • Georgia Site 3
    Tbilisi, Georgia
  • Ukraine Site 3
    Dnipro, Ukraine
  • Ukraine Site 1
    Kharkiv, Ukraine
  • Ukraine Site 2
    Kyiv, Ukraine
  • Ukraine Site 4
    Kyiv, Ukraine
  • UK Site 1
    Birmingham, UK, United Kingdom
  • UK Site 5
    Birmingham, UK, United Kingdom
  • UK Site 6
    London, UK, United Kingdom
  • UK Site 7
    Norwich, UK, United Kingdom
  • UK Site 3
    Oxford, UK, United Kingdom
  • UK Site 4
    Plymouth, UK, United Kingdom
  • UK Site 2
    Portsmouth, UK, United Kingdom
  • UK Site 9
    Belfast, United Kingdom
  • UK Site 8
    Liverpool, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Climax J, Newsome PN, Hamza M, Weissbach M, Coughlan D, Sattar N, McGuire DK, Bhatt DL. Effects of Epeleuton, a Novel Synthetic Second-Generation n-3 Fatty Acid, on Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease, Triglycerides, Glycemic Control, and Cardiometabolic and Inflammatory Markers. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Aug 18;9(16):e016334. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.016334. Epub 2020 Aug 11. PubMed 32779505 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Dec 2016 to primary completion in Jan 2019, 24 months.

Results were first posted in Apr 2022, 3 years 3 months after primary completion.

Of 132 industry-sponsored phase 2 interventional studies under Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease, half reached primary completion within 22 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 30. This study's 24 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 185 studies reached it within 26 months; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 36.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 20, 2016
First posted
Oct 21, 2016
StartActual
Dec 20, 2016
Primary completionActual
Jan 2, 2019
CompletionActual
Mar 4, 2019
Results first posted
Apr 21, 2022
Last update
Oct 12, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 12, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02941549
Lead sponsor
Afimmune
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 21, 2016
Start date
Dec 20, 2016
Primary completion
Jan 2, 2019
Completion
Mar 4, 2019
Results posted
Apr 21, 2022
Last update
Oct 12, 2022

Study contacts

Philip Newsome, MBChB, FRCPE, Ph.D
principal investigator · University of Birmingham

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion