ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04332861eIOUUpdated Dec 13, 2023

Evaluation of Infection in Obstructing Urolithiasis

An observational study in Kidney Stone, Kidney Calculi and Urinary Tract Obstruction, sponsored by University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-12-13.

Sponsored by University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
477
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Obstructing urolithiasis can be life-threatening in the setting of urinary tract infection. The purpose of this study is to identify and validate risk factors and markers for the presence of infection and development of sepsis among patients with obstructing urolithiasis.

Read the detailed description

An obstructing stone and suspected urinary tract infection is an indication for drainage of the renal collecting system. In this setting, decompression with a ureteral stent or percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) is associated with decreased mortality and both methods have similar efficacy. At the time of initial evaluation, it is sometimes uncertain whether infection is present, resulting in difficult management decisions. It is also difficult to identify infected patients at greatest risk of developing sepsis, defined as life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection.

There are currently no widely adopted criteria for the accurate diagnosis of infection in the setting of an obstructing stone. Abnormal vital signs, leukocytosis, and abnormal urinalysis are relied upon, but these findings are often indeterminate. Most studies to date addressing this problem have retrospectively evaluated associations of single variables with infection including pyuria and bacteriuria, or performance of sepsis screening tools such as the Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA).

More accurate diagnostic measures for infected obstructing urolithiasis and a better understanding of its natural history are needed in order to improve patient outcomes. While early recognition of patients at significant risk of developing sepsis is essential, treatment of patients who are not clinically infected with antibiotics and decompression procedures is unnecessarily morbid. Therefore, the investigators aim to develop and validate diagnostic criteria to predict development of life-threatening infection in a prospective observational fashion.

02

Conditions studied

  • Kidney Stone
  • Kidney Calculi
  • Urinary Tract Obstruction
  • Infection
  • Sepsis

Keywords

  • Kidney Stone
  • Kidney Calculi
  • Urinary Tract Obstruction
  • Infection
  • Sepsis
03

In context

Kidney Calculi

605 studies on the registry are indexed under Kidney Calculi; 164 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 477 is above the median of 146 across 114 observational studies indexed under Kidney Calculi.

Browse Kidney Calculi studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 1,009 studies on the registry; 201 are open to participants now.

Of its 138 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 105 (76%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Subjects will be men and women presenting to the emergency department or already admitted to the hospital with a new diagnosis of obstructing urolithiasis on computed tomography (CT).

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Men and women 18 and older
  • Acute presentation of obstructing urolithiasis diagnosed on CT

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Indwelling nephrostomy tubes or ureteral stents
  • Staghorn calculi or evidence of xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
477 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Prospective observational cohort

    For data analysis, the cohort will be subdivided as follows: * Identification and Validation cohorts * Patients with and without complicating factors * Patients with and without measured inflammatory marker levels

    Other: Initial clinical and laboratory evaluation

Interventions

  • OtherInitial clinical and laboratory evaluation

    Initial evaluation, prior to administration of any antibiotics if possible, includes history, physical exam, and labs including: * Urinalysis * Urine culture * Blood cultures * Complete blood count with differential * Comprehensive metabolic panel * Lactate * Procalcitonin * Other inflammatory markers

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Urinary tract infection (positive urine culture)

    Urinary tract infection, defined as a positive urine culture

    Time frame: Within 24-72 hours of initial clinical and laboratory evaluation

  2. Intensive care unit admission and/or death due to sepsis during inpatient encounter

    Intensive care unit admission and/or death secondary to sepsis, occurring during the inpatient incounter.

    Time frame: On average within 24-72 hours after initial clinical and laboratory evaluation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Bacteremia (at least one positive blood culture)

    Bacteremia, defined as at least one positive blood culture

    Time frame: Within 24-72 hours of initial clinical and laboratory evaluation

  2. Pyonephrosis (drainage of pus from the involved kidney) during inpatient encounter

    Pyonephrosis, defined as drainage of pus from the involved kidney at any point during the inpatient encounter

    Time frame: On average within 24-72 hours after initial clinical and laboratory evaluation

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Parkland Memorial Hospital
    Dallas, Texas 75235, United States
  • UT Southwestern Medical Center Clements University Hospital
    Dallas, Texas 75235, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Assimos D, Krambeck A, Miller NL, Monga M, Murad MH, Nelson CP, Pace KT, Pais VM Jr, Pearle MS, Preminger GM, Razvi H, Shah O, Matlaga BR. Surgical Management of Stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline, PART I. J Urol. 2016 Oct;196(4):1153-60. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.090. Epub 2016 May 27. PubMed 27238616 ↗
  • Borofsky MS, Walter D, Shah O, Goldfarb DS, Mues AC, Makarov DV. Surgical decompression is associated with decreased mortality in patients with sepsis and ureteral calculi. J Urol. 2013 Mar;189(3):946-51. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.09.088. Epub 2012 Sep 24. PubMed 23017519 ↗
  • Pearle MS, Pierce HL, Miller GL, Summa JA, Mutz JM, Petty BA, Roehrborn CG, Kryger JV, Nakada SY. Optimal method of urgent decompression of the collecting system for obstruction and infection due to ureteral calculi. J Urol. 1998 Oct;160(4):1260-4. PubMed 9751331 ↗
  • Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, Bellomo R, Bernard GR, Chiche JD, Coopersmith CM, Hotchkiss RS, Levy MM, Marshall JC, Martin GS, Opal SM, Rubenfeld GD, van der Poll T, Vincent JL, Angus DC. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287. PubMed 26903338 ↗
  • Abrahamian FM, Krishnadasan A, Mower WR, Moran GJ, Talan DA. Association of pyuria and clinical characteristics with the presence of urinary tract infection among patients with acute nephrolithiasis. Ann Emerg Med. 2013 Nov;62(5):526-533. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2013.06.006. Epub 2013 Jul 11. PubMed 23850311 ↗
  • Cheung F, Loeb CA, Croglio MP, Waltzer WC, Weissbart SJ. Bacteria on Urine Microscopy Is Not Associated with Systemic Infection in Patients with Obstructing Urolithiasis. J Endourol. 2017 Sep;31(9):942-945. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0157. Epub 2017 Jun 27. PubMed 28558478 ↗
  • Fukushima H, Kobayashi M, Kawano K, Morimoto S. Performance of Quick Sequential (Sepsis Related) and Sequential (Sepsis Related) Organ Failure Assessment to Predict Mortality in Patients with Acute Pyelonephritis Associated with Upper Urinary Tract Calculi. J Urol. 2018 Jun;199(6):1526-1533. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.12.052. Epub 2017 Dec 29. PubMed 29291417 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 13, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04332861
Responsible party
Margaret Pearle (Professor of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 3, 2020
Start date
Sep 3, 2019
Primary completion
Jul 28, 2020
Completion
Jul 28, 2020
Last update
Dec 13, 2023

Study contacts

Jodi Antonelli, MD
principal investigator · University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Margaret S Pearle, MD PhD
principal investigator · University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion