CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04330443ECOSURFUpdated May 15, 2020

Lung Ultrasound to Guide Surfactant Therapy

An interventional study of Surfactant therapy in Respiratory Distress Syndrome, sponsored by Institut Investigacio Sanitaria Pere Virgili. Completed at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 24 Weeks to 32 Weeks. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-05-15.

Sponsored by Institut Investigacio Sanitaria Pere Virgili · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year after the study started (first participant enrolled Mar 2019, registered Mar 2020).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
24 Weeks to 32 Weeks
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Inclusion criteria are premature newborns under the gestational age (GA) of 32 weeks old with RDS, defined as the need of non invasive mechanical ventilation to keep peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) >90% and clinical signs of respiratory distress (polypnea, chest retractions, nasal flutter).

Exclusion criteria are non-acceptance of the informed consent, chromosomal abnormalities, complex congenital malformations, signs of congenital septic shock and mechanical ventilation or endotracheal surfactant prior to the lung ultrasound.

The main objective of the study is to determine if a diagnostic of respiratory distress syndrome guided by a lung ultrasound algorithm allow an earlier surfactant therapy (within the first 2 hours of life) comparing to chest X ray Secondary objectives were to assess FiO2 reached before surfactant therapy in patients surfacted according to the lung ultrasound score, the influence of the lung ultrasound algorithm regarding the respiratory evolution, and its differences comparing to the FiO2group. Respiratory evolution was defined as the need of mechanical ventilation, second dose of surfactant, duration of non invasive ventilation, number of days with oxygen requirements, length of stay in the neonatal intensive care unit, evolution to bronchopulmonary dysplasia and their progression to discharge from hospital.

Patients who met the inclusion criteria were randomly assigned to two groups. using the "random" function in MS-Excel XP® program. A total of 6 physicians enrolled participants, all them fully trained for the use of lung ultrasound. The principal investigator assigned participants to interventions, depending on the randomized list.

  • Experimental Group 1: The neonatologist-researcher (NR) performed the lung ultrasond at admission during the first hour of life. The neonatologist-assistant (NA) of the baby was not blinded to the result of the lung ultrasound. If the patient had a lung ultrasound score higher than >8 or when FiO2 exceeded 30% patient received surfactant therapy during in the first 72 hours of life . This lung ultrasound threshold is the one with best diagnostic accuracy.
  • Control Group 2: The NR performed the at admission/suspicion during the first hour of life. The NA was not blinded to the result of the ultrasound. Patient received surfactant therapy only when FiO2 exceeded 30% during the first 72 hours of life
Read the detailed description

Inclusion criteria are premature newborns under the gestational age (GA) of 32 weeks old with RDS, defined as the need of non invasive mechanical ventilation to keep peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) >90% and clinical signs of respiratory distress (polypnea, chest retractions, nasal flutter).

Exclusion criteria are non-acceptance of the informed consent, chromosomal abnormalities, complex congenital malformations, signs of congenital septic shock and mechanical ventilation or endotracheal surfactant prior to the lung ultrasound.

The main objective of the study is to determine if a diagnostic of respiratory distress syndrome guided by a lung ultrasound algorithm allow an earlier surfactant therapy (within the first 2 hours of life) comparing to chest X ray Secondary objectives were to assess FiO2 reached before surfactant therapy in patients surfacted according to the lung ultrasound score, the influence of the lung ultrasound algorithm regarding the respiratory evolution, and its differences comparing to the FiO2group. Respiratory evolution was defined as the need of mechanical ventilation, second dose of surfactant, duration of non invasive ventilation, number of days with oxygen requirements, length of stay in the neonatal intensive care unit, evolution to bronchopulmonary dysplasia and their progression to discharge from hospital.

Patients who met the inclusion criteria were randomly assigned to two groups. using the "random" function in MS-Excel XP® program. A total of 6 physicians enrolled participants, all them fully trained for the use of lung ultrasound. The principal investigator assigned participants to interventions, depending on the randomized list.

  • Experimental Group 1: The neonatologist-researcher (NR) performed the lung ultrasond at admission during the first hour of life. The neonatologist-assistant (NA) of the baby was not blinded to the result of the lung ultrasound. If the patient had a lung ultrasound score higher than >8 or when FiO2 exceeded 30% patient received surfactant therapy during in the first 72 hours of life . This lung ultrasound threshold is the one with best diagnostic accuracy.
  • Control Group 2: The NR performed the at admission/suspicion during the first hour of life. The NA was not blinded to the result of the ultrasound. Patient received surfactant therapy only when FiO2 exceeded 30% during the first 72 hours of life
02

Conditions studied

03

In context

Respiratory Distress Syndrome

1,597 studies on the registry are indexed under Respiratory Distress Syndrome; 312 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 40 is below the median of 60 across 961 interventional studies indexed under Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Browse Respiratory Distress Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Institut Investigacio Sanitaria Pere Virgili is the lead sponsor of 35 studies on the registry; 15 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
24 Weeks to 32 Weeks
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • premature newborns under the gestational age (GA) of 32 weeks old with respiratory distress syndrome

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • non-acceptance of the informed consent, chromosomal abnormalities, complex congenital malformations, signs of congenital septic shock and mechanical ventilation or endotracheal surfactant prior to the ultrasoundLUS
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
40 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Ultrasound group

    The neonatologist-researcher (NR) performed the lung ultrasound at admission during the first hour of life. The neonatologist-assistant (NA) of the baby was not blinded to the result of the lung ultrasound. If the patient had a lung ultrasound score higher than \>8 or when FiO2 exceeded 30% patient received surfactant therapy during in the first 72 hours of life

    Procedure: Surfactant therapy

  • No intervention
    Chest X Ray

    The NR performed the LUS at admission/suspicion during the first hour of life. The NA was not blinded to the result of the LUS. Patient received surfactant therapy only when FiO2 exceeded 30% during the first 72 hours of life

Interventions

  • ProcedureSurfactant therapy

    To study if lung ultrasound allows an earlier surfactant therapy (within the first 2 hours of life) compare to FiO2 and Chest X Ray

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Precocious surfactant administration

    Number of patients which receive surfactant therapy during the first 2 hours of life

    Time frame: 2 monthts

Secondary outcomes

  1. assess FiO2 reached before surfactant therapy in patients surfacted according to the LUS score

    assess FiO2 reached before surfactant therapy in patients surfacted according to the LUS score

    Time frame: 2 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hospital Joan XXIII
    Tarragona, Spain
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 15, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04330443
Lead sponsor
Institut Investigacio Sanitaria Pere Virgili
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 1, 2020
Start date
Mar 1, 2019
Primary completion
May 1, 2020
Completion
May 10, 2020
Last update
May 15, 2020

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion