CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04324359Updated Jan 15, 2025Results posted

Study to See How Well an Eye Drop, SURF-201, Works and What Side Effects There Are in Cataract Surgery Subjects

A Phase 2 interventional study of SURF-201 and Placebo in Post-surgical Ocular Inflammation and Post-surgical Ocular Pain, sponsored by Surface Ophthalmics, Inc.. Completed at 10 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-01-15.

Sponsored by Surface Ophthalmics, Inc. · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
91
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

SURF-201 is being studied for the treatment of eye inflammation and pain in people who are undergoing cataract surgery. SURF-201 is an investigational drug (which means the study drug is currently being tested) in the form of a sterile eye drop.

The purpose of this research study is to see how well SURF-201 works and what side effects there are, and to compare it with Vehicle (placebo). This study will involve about 80 study participants at several different research sites in the United States.

02

Conditions studied

  • Post-surgical Ocular Inflammation
  • Post-surgical Ocular Pain
03

In context

Cataract

1,701 studies on the registry are indexed under Cataract; 230 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 91 is above the median of 80 across 1,155 interventional studies indexed under Cataract.

Browse Cataract studies →

Lead sponsor

Surface Ophthalmics, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Adult subjects age 18 years or older scheduled for uncomplicated unilateral cataract surgery with posterior chamber intraocular lens (IOL) implantation.
  2. Subjects must be able to understand and sign the Informed Consent Form (ICF).
  3. Female subjects of childbearing potential must agree to and submit a negative urine pregnancy test before any study-specific procedures are performed. The subjects must be using and continue to use a suitable method of contraception for the duration of the study: spermicide with barrier, oral contraceptive, transdermal contraceptive, injectable or implantable contraceptive, intrauterine device (IUD), abstinence or surgical sterilization of a partner. If a subject is not of childbearing potential (e.g., has been postmenopausal for at least 12 months or is premenarchal, or has undergone a hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy or a bilateral tubal ligation), a urine pregnancy test and use of a suitable method of contraception for the duration of the study will not be required.
  4. Subjects must have a best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of at least +1.0 log of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) (Snellen equivalent of 20/200) in the non-study eye (fellow eye).
  5. Subjects must have an intraocular pressure (IOP) of >8 mmHg and ≤22 mmHg in the study eye (surgery eye).
  6. Subject must agree to maintain their current dosing regimen throughout the study period (from Screening through Day 32) if they are currently using topical cyclosporin-A or Xiidra (lifitegrast 5%).
  7. Subjects must be willing and able to attend all study visits and follow all instructions.
  8. Subjects must be able to self-instill the study drug (if unable, a caregiver must be available to instill all doses of the study drug).
  9. Subjects must agree to avoid any medications which are disallowed (as defined by the protocol).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject has any intraocular inflammation (cells and flare in the anterior chamber) or ocular pain (pain score of >0) in either eye prior to surgery.
  2. Subject has any extraocular inflammation in the study eye prior to surgery (blepharitis is allowed if only scurf is present without any concurrent conjunctivitis or lid erythema/edema) or ongoing uveitis.
  3. Subject has a history of diabetic retinopathy and/or previous vitrectomy in the study eye within the last 2 years prior to Screening which, in the investigator's opinion, is clinically significant and could impact the normal outcome of an uncomplicated cataract surgery.
  4. Subject has a diagnosis of severe dry eye in the study eye.
  5. Subject has any sign of iritis or scleritis in the study eye.
  6. Subject has a history of glaucoma surgery in the study eye within the last 2 years prior to Screening.
  7. Subject has a history of retinal surgery in the study eye within the last 2 years or plans to undergo retinal surgery in the study eye during the study period (from Screening through Day 32)
  8. Subject has a history of Fuchs' dystrophy in the study eye.
  9. Subject has guttata or chalazion in the study eye.
  10. Subject has undergone radial keratotomy, photorefractive keratotomy, advanced surface ablation, corneal transplant, or LASIK in the study eye within the last 2 years prior to Screening.
  11. Subject plans to undergo cataract surgery in the non-study (fellow) eye during the study period (from Screening through Day 32).
  12. Subject plans to undergo additional ocular surgery (including femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery, minimally invasive glaucoma surgery, astigmatic keratotomy, limbal relaxing incision surgery, mechanical pupillary expanders, conjunctival incisions, and vitrectomy) in either eye during the study period (from Screening through Day 32).
  13. Subject has a history of intraocular injections in the study eye within 6 months prior to Screening.
  14. Subject has a history of herpes simplex infection in either eye.
  15. Subject has active corneal, conjunctival or canalicular pathology (including ocular infection [bacterial, viral or fungal]) in the study eye. Specifically, active viral diseases of the cornea and conjunctiva including epithelial herpes simplex keratitis (dendritic keratitis), vaccinia, and varicella, and also in mycobacterial infection of the eye and fungal diseases of the ocular structures (such as fungal keratitis).
  16. Subject has thinning of the cornea or sclera.
  17. Subject plans to undergo uncomplicated unilateral cataract surgery with the aid of anterior capsular staining products (e.g., Trypan blue) or with the aid of a femto (femtosecond) laser.
  18. Subject has undergone anti-neoplastic therapy within the last 2 years prior to Screening or plans to undergo anti-neoplastic therapy during the study period.
  19. Subject has a history of use of medications to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia that, in the opinion of the investigator, limits adequate dilation of the pupil to safely perform uncomplicated cataract removal and IOL implantation.
  20. Subject has a history of liver disease within the last 5 years prior to Screening.
  21. Subject has a history of previous ocular trauma in the study eye that places the study eye at risk of increased post-surgical complications or inflammation.
  22. Subject has or had a known blood dyscrasia or bone marrow suppression.
  23. Subject has an active or chronic/recurrent ocular or systemic disease that is not controlled and may have an impact on would healing (e.g., diabetes mellitus, systemic connective tissue disease, severe atopic disease).
  24. Subject is suffering from alcohol and/or drug abuse.
  25. Subject has a known hypersensitivity or poor tolerance to corticosteroids or any component of the study drug or any of the procedural medications such as anesthetic and/or fluorescein drops, dilating drops, etc.
  26. Female subjects who are currently pregnant or nursing or are planning to become pregnant during the study or have a positive pregnancy test.
  27. Subject has previously participated in this study protocol.
  28. Subject used (within 30 days of initiation of study treatment) or is anticipating concurrent use of an investigational drug or device.
  29. Subject has a condition or a situation which, in the investigator's opinion, might put the subject at increased risk, confound the study data or interfere significantly with the subject's study participation.
  30. Subject would be wearing contact lens in either eye during the dosing period of Day -1 to Day 14.
  31. Subject is taking a medication that the investigator feels might interfere with the study parameters.
  32. Subject tests positive for the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) virus prior to Visit 1 (Day -14 to Day -2).
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
91 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    SURF-201

    0.2% topical preservative-free corticosteroid solution (0.2% betamethasone sodium phosphate)

    Drug: SURF-201

  • Placebo comparator
    Vehicle

    Topical preservative-free vehicle (Placebo)

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugSURF-201

    One drop twice daily (BID) in the study eye for 16 days.

    Also known as: 0.2% topical corticosteroid solution

  • DrugPlacebo

    One drop twice daily (BID) in the study eye for 16 days.

    Also known as: Vehicle

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Anterior Chamber Cell (ACC) Grade: Number of Participants Achieving an ACC Grade of 0

    The Investigator used a slit lamp biomicroscope to assess ACCs in the study (surgery) eye. ACC counts were graded as follows: ACC Grade 0 = 0 cells were seen ACC Grade higher than 0 = 1 or more cells were seen

    Time frame: Day 15

Secondary outcomes

  1. Post-surgical Ocular Pain Score: Number of Participants Achieving an Ocular Pain Score of 0

    Ocular pain was assessed and graded by the participants using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS was scored from 0 to 100 using a mark on the 100 mm line (0=absent \[no pain\], 100=maximum \[severe pain\]).

    Time frame: Day 1

  2. Post-surgical Ocular Pain Score: Number of Participants Achieving an Ocular Pain Score of 0

    Ocular pain was assessed and graded by the participants using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS was scored from 0 to 100 using a mark on the 100 mm line (0=absent \[no pain\], 100=maximum \[severe pain\]).

    Time frame: Day 8

  3. Post-surgical Ocular Pain Score: Number of Participants Achieving an Ocular Pain Score of 0

    Ocular pain was assessed and graded by the participants using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS was scored from 0 to 100 using a mark on the 100 mm line (0=absent \[no pain\], 100=maximum \[severe pain\]).

    Time frame: Day 15

  4. Post-surgical Ocular Pain Score: Number of Participants Achieving an Ocular Pain Score of 0

    Ocular pain was assessed and graded by the participants using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS was scored from 0 to 100 using a mark on the 100 mm line (0=absent \[no pain\], 100=maximum \[severe pain\]).

    Time frame: Day 22

  5. Post-surgical Ocular Pain Score: Number of Participants Achieving an Ocular Pain Score of 0

    Ocular pain was assessed and graded by the participants using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS was scored from 0 to 100 using a mark on the 100 mm line (0=absent \[no pain\], 100=maximum \[severe pain\]).

    Time frame: Day 32

07

Results

Posted Oct 18, 2023

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneSURF-201Vehicle
Started4043
Completed3941
Not completed12

Outcome measures

PrimaryAnterior Chamber Cell (ACC) Grade: Number of Participants Achieving an ACC Grade of 0

The Investigator used a slit lamp biomicroscope to assess ACCs in the study (surgery) eye. ACC counts were graded as follows: ACC Grade 0 = 0 cells were seen ACC Grade higher than 0 = 1 or more cells were seen

Time frame:
Day 15
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Anterior Chamber Cell (ACC) Grade: Number of Participants Achieving an ACC Grade of 0
ParticipantsSURF-201Vehicle
Anterior Chamber Cell (ACC) Grade: Number of Participants Achieving an ACC Grade of 0229
Statistical analysis
  • SURF-201 vs Vehicle · z-test for proportions · p = <0.001Other: z-test for proportions, 2-sided test at alpha = 5% level. P-value: based on the normal approximation test for differences between proportions.
SecondaryPost-surgical Ocular Pain Score: Number of Participants Achieving an Ocular Pain Score of 0

Ocular pain was assessed and graded by the participants using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS was scored from 0 to 100 using a mark on the 100 mm line (0=absent \[no pain\], 100=maximum \[severe pain\]).

Time frame:
Day 1
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Post-surgical Ocular Pain Score: Number of Participants Achieving an Ocular Pain Score of 0
ParticipantsSURF-201Vehicle
Post-surgical Ocular Pain Score: Number of Participants Achieving an Ocular Pain Score of 02721
Statistical analysis
  • SURF-201 vs Vehicle · Other: z-test for proportions · p = 0.066Other: z-test for proportions, 2-sided test at alpha = 5% level. P-value: based on Barnard's exact test for differences between proportions.
SecondaryPost-surgical Ocular Pain Score: Number of Participants Achieving an Ocular Pain Score of 0

Ocular pain was assessed and graded by the participants using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS was scored from 0 to 100 using a mark on the 100 mm line (0=absent \[no pain\], 100=maximum \[severe pain\]).

Time frame:
Day 8
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Post-surgical Ocular Pain Score: Number of Participants Achieving an Ocular Pain Score of 0
ParticipantsSURF-201Vehicle
Post-surgical Ocular Pain Score: Number of Participants Achieving an Ocular Pain Score of 03232
Statistical analysis
  • SURF-201 vs Vehicle · z-test for proportions · p = 0.716Other: z-test for proportions, 2-sided test at alpha = 5% level. P-value: based on Barnard's exact test for differences between proportions.
SecondaryPost-surgical Ocular Pain Score: Number of Participants Achieving an Ocular Pain Score of 0

Ocular pain was assessed and graded by the participants using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS was scored from 0 to 100 using a mark on the 100 mm line (0=absent \[no pain\], 100=maximum \[severe pain\]).

Time frame:
Day 15
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Post-surgical Ocular Pain Score: Number of Participants Achieving an Ocular Pain Score of 0
ParticipantsSURF-201Vehicle
Post-surgical Ocular Pain Score: Number of Participants Achieving an Ocular Pain Score of 03533
Statistical analysis
  • SURF-201 vs Vehicle · z-test for proportions · p = 0.528Other: z-test for proportions, 2-sided test at alpha = 5% level P-value: based on Barnard's exact test for differences between proportions.
SecondaryPost-surgical Ocular Pain Score: Number of Participants Achieving an Ocular Pain Score of 0

Ocular pain was assessed and graded by the participants using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS was scored from 0 to 100 using a mark on the 100 mm line (0=absent \[no pain\], 100=maximum \[severe pain\]).

Time frame:
Day 22
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Post-surgical Ocular Pain Score: Number of Participants Achieving an Ocular Pain Score of 0
ParticipantsSURF-201Vehicle
Post-surgical Ocular Pain Score: Number of Participants Achieving an Ocular Pain Score of 03537
Statistical analysis
  • SURF-201 vs Vehicle · z-test for proportions · p = 0.766Other: z-test for proportions, 2-sided test at alpha = 5% level. P-value: based on Barnard's exact test for differences between proportions.
SecondaryPost-surgical Ocular Pain Score: Number of Participants Achieving an Ocular Pain Score of 0

Ocular pain was assessed and graded by the participants using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS was scored from 0 to 100 using a mark on the 100 mm line (0=absent \[no pain\], 100=maximum \[severe pain\]).

Time frame:
Day 32
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Post-surgical Ocular Pain Score: Number of Participants Achieving an Ocular Pain Score of 0
ParticipantsSURF-201Vehicle
Post-surgical Ocular Pain Score: Number of Participants Achieving an Ocular Pain Score of 03539
Statistical analysis
  • SURF-201 vs Vehicle · z-test for proportions · p = 0.619Other: z-test for proportions, 2-sided test at alpha = 5% level. P-value: based on Barnard's exact test for differences between proportions.

Adverse events

Collected over Overall study period. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
SURF-2010/40 (0%)3/40 (7.5%)26/40 (65%)
Vehicle0/43 (0%)0/43 (0%)23/43 (53.5%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventSURF-201Vehicle
Intraocular pressure increasedInvestigations2/400/43
Cystoid macular edemaEye disorders1/400/43
Posterior caple ruptureEye disorders1/400/43
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 12
Most frequent other events
EventSURF-201Vehicle
Visual acuity reducedEye disorders6/4010/43
Eye inflammationEye disorders6/408/43
Posterior capsule opacificationEye disorders5/406/43
Eye painEye disorders5/404/43
Intraocular pressure increasedInvestigations4/401/43
Corneal edemaEye disorders2/404/43
IritisEye disorders3/401/43
Vitreous detachmentEye disorders3/401/43
Eye irritationEye disorders3/400/43
PhotophobiaEye disorders2/403/43

Baseline characteristics

Randomized participants who underwent routine uncomplicated cataract surgery.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)SURF-201VehicleTotal
Mean68.3 ± 6.8268.4 ± 9.9068.4 ± 8.53
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)SURF-201VehicleTotal
Female272552
Male121830
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)SURF-201VehicleTotal
Hispanic or Latino358
Not Hispanic or Latino363874
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)SURF-201VehicleTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian112
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American7916
White313364
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
Anterior Chamber Cell (ACC) Grade at Baseline
Anterior Chamber Cell (ACC) Grade at Baseline(Participants)SURF-201VehicleTotal
Count of participants394382
Ocular Pain Score at Baseline
Ocular Pain Score at Baseline(Participants)SURF-201VehicleTotal
Count of participants394382
08

Study locations

10 sites
  • Inland Eye Specialists
    Hemet, California 92545, United States
  • LoBue Laser and Eye Medical Center
    Murrieta, California 92562, United States
  • Hernando Eye Institute
    Brooksville, Florida 34613, United States
  • Levenson Eye Associates
    Jacksonville, Florida 32204, United States
  • East Florida Eye Institute
    Stuart, Florida 34994, United States
  • Alterman, Modi & Wolter
    Poughkeepsie, New York 12603, United States
  • Eye Care Specialists
    Kingston, Pennsylvania 18704, United States
  • VRF Eye Specialty Group
    Memphis, Tennessee 38120, United States
  • Texan Eye Care, PA - Keystone Research, Ltd.
    Austin, Texas 78731, United States
  • R and R Eye Research, LLC
    San Antonio, Texas 78229, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Hosseini K, Gollamudi S, Reiser H, Walters T, Lindstrom RL. 0.2% Betamethasone Sodium Phosphate: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Masked Study to Compare Its Ocular Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy to Vehicle in Cataract Surgery Subjects. Clin Ophthalmol. 2023 Aug 5;17:2219-2230. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S419857. eCollection 2023. PubMed 37564159 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Oct 9, 2020

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 15, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04324359
Lead sponsor
Surface Ophthalmics, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 27, 2020
Start date
Mar 3, 2020
Primary completion
Nov 3, 2020
Completion
Nov 20, 2020
Results posted
Oct 18, 2023
Last update
Jan 15, 2025

Study contacts

Kamran Hosseini, MD, PhD
study chair · Surface Ophthalmics, Inc.

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion