A Phase 2 interventional study of SURF-201 and Placebo in Post-surgical Ocular Inflammation and Post-surgical Ocular Pain, sponsored by Surface Ophthalmics, Inc.. Completed at 10 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-01-15.
Sponsored by Surface Ophthalmics, Inc. · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment
SURF-201 is being studied for the treatment of eye inflammation and pain in people who are undergoing cataract surgery. SURF-201 is an investigational drug (which means the study drug is currently being tested) in the form of a sterile eye drop.
The purpose of this research study is to see how well SURF-201 works and what side effects there are, and to compare it with Vehicle (placebo). This study will involve about 80 study participants at several different research sites in the United States.
1,701 studies on the registry are indexed under Cataract; 230 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 91 is above the median of 80 across 1,155 interventional studies indexed under Cataract.
Browse Cataract studies →Surface Ophthalmics, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
0.2% topical preservative-free corticosteroid solution (0.2% betamethasone sodium phosphate)
Drug: SURF-201
Topical preservative-free vehicle (Placebo)
Drug: Placebo
One drop twice daily (BID) in the study eye for 16 days.
Also known as: 0.2% topical corticosteroid solution
One drop twice daily (BID) in the study eye for 16 days.
Also known as: Vehicle
Anterior Chamber Cell (ACC) Grade: Number of Participants Achieving an ACC Grade of 0
The Investigator used a slit lamp biomicroscope to assess ACCs in the study (surgery) eye. ACC counts were graded as follows: ACC Grade 0 = 0 cells were seen ACC Grade higher than 0 = 1 or more cells were seen
Time frame: Day 15
Post-surgical Ocular Pain Score: Number of Participants Achieving an Ocular Pain Score of 0
Ocular pain was assessed and graded by the participants using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS was scored from 0 to 100 using a mark on the 100 mm line (0=absent \[no pain\], 100=maximum \[severe pain\]).
Time frame: Day 1
Post-surgical Ocular Pain Score: Number of Participants Achieving an Ocular Pain Score of 0
Ocular pain was assessed and graded by the participants using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS was scored from 0 to 100 using a mark on the 100 mm line (0=absent \[no pain\], 100=maximum \[severe pain\]).
Time frame: Day 8
Post-surgical Ocular Pain Score: Number of Participants Achieving an Ocular Pain Score of 0
Ocular pain was assessed and graded by the participants using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS was scored from 0 to 100 using a mark on the 100 mm line (0=absent \[no pain\], 100=maximum \[severe pain\]).
Time frame: Day 15
Post-surgical Ocular Pain Score: Number of Participants Achieving an Ocular Pain Score of 0
Ocular pain was assessed and graded by the participants using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS was scored from 0 to 100 using a mark on the 100 mm line (0=absent \[no pain\], 100=maximum \[severe pain\]).
Time frame: Day 22
Post-surgical Ocular Pain Score: Number of Participants Achieving an Ocular Pain Score of 0
Ocular pain was assessed and graded by the participants using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS was scored from 0 to 100 using a mark on the 100 mm line (0=absent \[no pain\], 100=maximum \[severe pain\]).
Time frame: Day 32
| Milestone | SURF-201 | Vehicle |
|---|---|---|
| Started | 40 | 43 |
| Completed | 39 | 41 |
| Not completed | 1 | 2 |
The Investigator used a slit lamp biomicroscope to assess ACCs in the study (surgery) eye. ACC counts were graded as follows: ACC Grade 0 = 0 cells were seen ACC Grade higher than 0 = 1 or more cells were seen
| Participants | SURF-201 | Vehicle |
|---|---|---|
| Anterior Chamber Cell (ACC) Grade: Number of Participants Achieving an ACC Grade of 0 | 22 | 9 |
Ocular pain was assessed and graded by the participants using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS was scored from 0 to 100 using a mark on the 100 mm line (0=absent \[no pain\], 100=maximum \[severe pain\]).
| Participants | SURF-201 | Vehicle |
|---|---|---|
| Post-surgical Ocular Pain Score: Number of Participants Achieving an Ocular Pain Score of 0 | 27 | 21 |
Ocular pain was assessed and graded by the participants using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS was scored from 0 to 100 using a mark on the 100 mm line (0=absent \[no pain\], 100=maximum \[severe pain\]).
| Participants | SURF-201 | Vehicle |
|---|---|---|
| Post-surgical Ocular Pain Score: Number of Participants Achieving an Ocular Pain Score of 0 | 32 | 32 |
Ocular pain was assessed and graded by the participants using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS was scored from 0 to 100 using a mark on the 100 mm line (0=absent \[no pain\], 100=maximum \[severe pain\]).
| Participants | SURF-201 | Vehicle |
|---|---|---|
| Post-surgical Ocular Pain Score: Number of Participants Achieving an Ocular Pain Score of 0 | 35 | 33 |
Ocular pain was assessed and graded by the participants using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS was scored from 0 to 100 using a mark on the 100 mm line (0=absent \[no pain\], 100=maximum \[severe pain\]).
| Participants | SURF-201 | Vehicle |
|---|---|---|
| Post-surgical Ocular Pain Score: Number of Participants Achieving an Ocular Pain Score of 0 | 35 | 37 |
Ocular pain was assessed and graded by the participants using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS was scored from 0 to 100 using a mark on the 100 mm line (0=absent \[no pain\], 100=maximum \[severe pain\]).
| Participants | SURF-201 | Vehicle |
|---|---|---|
| Post-surgical Ocular Pain Score: Number of Participants Achieving an Ocular Pain Score of 0 | 35 | 39 |
Collected over Overall study period. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| SURF-201 | 0/40 (0%) | 3/40 (7.5%) | 26/40 (65%) |
| Vehicle | 0/43 (0%) | 0/43 (0%) | 23/43 (53.5%) |
| Event | SURF-201 | Vehicle |
|---|---|---|
| Intraocular pressure increasedInvestigations | 2/40 | 0/43 |
| Cystoid macular edemaEye disorders | 1/40 | 0/43 |
| Posterior caple ruptureEye disorders | 1/40 | 0/43 |
| Event | SURF-201 | Vehicle |
|---|---|---|
| Visual acuity reducedEye disorders | 6/40 | 10/43 |
| Eye inflammationEye disorders | 6/40 | 8/43 |
| Posterior capsule opacificationEye disorders | 5/40 | 6/43 |
| Eye painEye disorders | 5/40 | 4/43 |
| Intraocular pressure increasedInvestigations | 4/40 | 1/43 |
| Corneal edemaEye disorders | 2/40 | 4/43 |
| IritisEye disorders | 3/40 | 1/43 |
| Vitreous detachmentEye disorders | 3/40 | 1/43 |
| Eye irritationEye disorders | 3/40 | 0/43 |
| PhotophobiaEye disorders | 2/40 | 3/43 |
Randomized participants who underwent routine uncomplicated cataract surgery.
| Age, Continuous(Years) | SURF-201 | Vehicle | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 68.3 ± 6.82 | 68.4 ± 9.90 | 68.4 ± 8.53 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | SURF-201 | Vehicle | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 27 | 25 | 52 |
| Male | 12 | 18 | 30 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants) | SURF-201 | Vehicle | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hispanic or Latino | 3 | 5 | 8 |
| Not Hispanic or Latino | 36 | 38 | 74 |
| Unknown or Not Reported | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants) | SURF-201 | Vehicle | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Black or African American | 7 | 9 | 16 |
| White | 31 | 33 | 64 |
| More than one race | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unknown or Not Reported | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Anterior Chamber Cell (ACC) Grade at Baseline(Participants) | SURF-201 | Vehicle | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Count of participants | 39 | 43 | 82 |
| Ocular Pain Score at Baseline(Participants) | SURF-201 | Vehicle | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Count of participants | 39 | 43 | 82 |
Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.
This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Surface Ophthalmics, Inc.