ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT04289805fAMHOPEUpdated Jan 31, 2025

Controlled Ovarian Stimulation in Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer PatiEnts (fAMHOPE)

A Phase 4 interventional study of Letrozole and standard-stimulated cohort in Breast Neoplasm Malignant Female, sponsored by Erasme University Hospital. Terminated at 6 sites in 3 countries. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 40 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-01-31.

Sponsored by Erasme University Hospital · Phase 4, Interventional, and Prevention

Why this study was terminated
The study had to be terminated due to the new European legislation on drug studies. This legislation requires all studies aimed at evaluating treatments to be registered as such, even in the context of Standard of Care.

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 4 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Feb 2019, registered Jul 2019).
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
96
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years to 40 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This is a multicenter hospital-based prospective cohort study conducted in institutions with known expertise in performing oocytes/embryo freezing for fertility preservation. The study aims at refining the understanding of the efficacy and safety of controlled ovarian stimulation with or without letrozole in young women with newly diagnosed breast cancer who are candidates to receive (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy.

Read the detailed description

Patients enrolled in this study undergo standard or "random start" ovarian stimulation with Gonadotropins using antagonist protocol before the beginning of chemotherapy. Ovulation is triggered in all patients with a Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone-GnRH agonist.

After retrieval, oocytes are denuded and matured oocytes are subjected to fertilization before embryo freezing or direct vitrification.

Primary objective is to evaluate the efficacy of performing a controlled ovarian stimulation with or without letrozole in young women with newly diagnosed breast cancer who are candidates to receive (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy in terms of mature oocytes collected.

02

Conditions studied

  • Breast Neoplasm Malignant Female

Keywords

  • Fertility preservation
  • Letrozole
  • Ovarian stimulation
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Erasme University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 180 studies on the registry; 34 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 40 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of invasive non-metastatic breast cancer (i.e. stage I to III);
  • Breast cancer diagnosis ≥18 and ≤ 40 years;
  • No prior history of gonadotoxic treatments;
  • Fertility preservation counseling for fertility preservation;
  • Written inform consent;
  • FSH \< 20 UI/L and/or antra-follicular count ≥ 6 (follicles of 2-9 mm) and/or AMH ≥ 6 pmol (only applicable for patients who undergo controlled ovarian stimulation for embryo/oocyte cryopreservation).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Newly diagnosed stage IV breast cancer (i.e. de novo metastatic breast cancer);
  • Prior diagnosis of other malignancies before breast cancer.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
96 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    standard-stimulated cohort

    this cohort includes all newly diagnosed breast cancer patients who are candidates to receive (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy and wish to preserve their fertility by undergoing oocyte/embryo cryopreservation at the French participating centres.

    Other: standard-stimulated cohort

  • Experimental
    letrozole-stimulated cohort

    this cohort includes all newly diagnosed breast cancer patients who are candidates to receive (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy and wish to preserve their fertility by undergoing oocyte/embryo cryopreservation at the Belgian participating centres.

    Drug: Letrozole

  • No intervention
    non-stimulated cohort

    this cohort includes all newly diagnosed breast cancer patients who are candidates to receive (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy and who have access to the Fertility Clinics in all the participating centres but are not willing to preserve their fertility by undergoing oocyte/embryo cryopreservation.

Interventions

  • Patients start ovarian stimulation protocol according to their menstrual cycle phase at enrollment (standard or "random start"). Ovarian stimulation includes gonadotropins administration in a GnRH antagonist protocol. "Standard Protocol": letrozole is orally administered (5mg/d) from cycle day 2-3 throughout the ovarian stimulation with gonadotropins protocol until ovulation triggering. "Random start" protocol: letrozole is administered throughout the stimulation together with gonadotropins. GnRH antagonist is administered at cycle day 7 or as soon as at least one follicle reaches 12-14 mm. Oocytes are collected 36h after ovulation triggering with GnRH agonist.

    Also known as: Controlled Ovarian Stimulation (COS)

  • Otherstandard-stimulated cohort

    Patients start ovarian stimulation protocol according to their menstrual cycle phase at enrollment (standard or "random start"). Ovarian stimulation includes gonadotropins administration in a GnRH antagonist protocol. "Standard Protocol": Gonadotrophins started from cycle day 2-3 throughout the ovarian stimulation until ovulation triggering. "Random start" protocol: Gonadotrophins started at any time of the cycle and throughout the stimulation. GnRH antagonist is administered at cycle day 7 or as soon as at least one follicle reaches 12-14 mm. Oocytes are collected 36h after ovulation triggering with GnRH agonist.

    Also known as: COS

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Efficacy of the ovarian stimulation and oocyte collection procedure: Number of mature oocytes collected

    Number of mature oocytes collected

    Time frame: an average of 2 weeks after inclusion

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of patient with adverse events due to COS: OHSS

    Adverse events reporting during COS (Ovarian Hyperstimulation syndrome-OHSS)

    Time frame: Through treatment procedure, an average of 2 weeks after inclusion

  2. Characteristics of Ovarian stimulation: total gonadotropin doses

    Total gonadotropin doses (International Unit- IU)

    Time frame: An average of 2 weeks after inclusion

  3. Characteristics of Ovarian stimulation: duration of the COS

    duration of the COS (days)

    Time frame: An average of 2 weeks after inclusion

  4. Characteristics of Ovarian stimulation: type of stimulation

    type of stimulation (standard or random-start).

    Time frame: An average of 2 weeks after inclusion

  5. Efficacy of the ovarian stimulation and oocyte collection: Maturation rate

    Maturation rate (number of total oocyte collected/number of mature oocytes)

    Time frame: An average of 2 weeks after inclusion

  6. Outcomes of assisted reproductive technology procedures

    Number of pregnancies and outcomes (premature delivery, miscarriage, abortion, delivery healthy babies, congenital malformation).

    Time frame: Through study completion, 5 years

  7. Anticancer therapies effect on ovarian function: progesterone

    Hormonal measurements Progesterone ng/ml

    Time frame: Inclusion, an average of 2 weeks, 6 months, 18 months, 30 months, 60 months

  8. Anticancer therapies effect on ovarian function: AMH

    Anti-Mullerian Hormone (AMH) measurements AMH ng/ml

    Time frame: Inclusion, an average of 2 weeks, 6 months, 18 months, 30 months, 60 months

  9. Anticancer therapies effect on ovarian function: FSH

    Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH) measurements FSH IU/L

    Time frame: Inclusion, an average of 2 weeks, 6 months, 18 months, 30 months, 60 months

  10. Anticancer therapies effect on ovarian function: E2

    Hormonal measurements E2 pg/ml

    Time frame: Inclusion, an average of 2 weeks, 6 months, 18 months, 30 months, 60 months

  11. Anticancer therapies effect on ovarian function

    Amenorrhea rate (6months without spontaneous menstruation)

    Time frame: An average 18 months, 30 months, 60 months after inclusion

  12. Oncological outcomes 1

    Invasive disease-free survival (iDFS)

    Time frame: 5 years

  13. Oncological outcomes 2

    breast cancer-free interval (BCFI)

    Time frame: 5 years

  14. Oncological outcomes 3

    overall survival (OS)

    Time frame: 5 years

  15. Circulating breast cancer cells level before stimulation

    circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)

    Time frame: Inclusion

  16. Circulating breast cancer cells level after stimulation

    circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)

    Time frame: average of 2weeks after inclusion

  17. Number of patient with adverse events due to egg collection

    bleeding

    Time frame: An average of 2 weeks after inclusion

  18. Number of patient with adverse events due to egg collection

    pelvic infection

    Time frame: An average of 2 weeks after inclusion

  19. Efficacy of the in vitro fertilization procedure: Fertilization rate

    Fertilization rate (number of oocyte fertilized/number of embryo obtained)

    Time frame: Through study completion, 5 years

07

Study locations

6 sites
  • CUB-Hôpital Erasme
    Brussels, 1070, Belgium
  • CHIREC- Hospital Delta
    Brussels, 1160, Belgium
  • CHC-Saint Vincent
    Liège, 4000, Belgium
  • Centre Oscar Lambret
    Lille, 59000, France
  • CHRU Lille
    Lille, 59037, France
  • Ospedale San Martino
    Genova, 16132, Italy
08

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Feb 10, 2018

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Feb 2019 to primary completion in Jan 2025, 70 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 17, 2019
First posted
Feb 28, 2020
StartActual
Feb 25, 2019
Primary completionActual
Jan 15, 2025
CompletionActual
Jan 15, 2025
Last update
Jan 31, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 31, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04289805
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 28, 2020
Start date
Feb 25, 2019
Primary completion
Jan 15, 2025
Completion
Jan 15, 2025
Last update
Jan 31, 2025

Study contacts

Isabelle Demeestere, MD, PhD
study director · CUB-Hôpital Erasme
Matteo Lambertini, MD, PhD
study chair · ULB
Christine Decanter, MD
study chair · CHRU LILLE

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Dec 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Letrozole

Start the discussion