ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04265807Updated Feb 4, 2025Results posted

Remote Ischemic Conditioning to Enhance Resuscitation (RICE) Pilot

An interventional study of Active Remote Ischemic Conditioning and Sham Remote Ischemic Conditioning in Cardiac Arrest, sponsored by University of Washington. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-04.

Sponsored by University of Washington · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Following resuscitation from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), reperfusion injury can cause cell damage in the heart and brain. Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) consists of intermittent application of a device such as a blood pressure cuff to a limb to induce non-lethal ischemia. Studies in animals with cardiac arrest as well as in humans with acute myocardial infarction suggest that RIC before or after restoration of blood flow may reduce injury to the heart and improve outcomes but this has not been proven in humans who have had OHCA. The RICE pilot study is a single-center study to assess the feasibility of application of RIC in the emergency department setting for patients transported to the hospital after resuscitation from OHCA.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cardiac Arrest

Keywords

  • reperfusion injury
  • remote ischemic conditioning
03

In context

Heart Arrest

984 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Arrest; 227 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 30 is below the median of 100 across 563 interventional studies indexed under Heart Arrest.

Browse Heart Arrest studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Washington is the lead sponsor of 1,431 studies on the registry; 226 are open to participants now.

Of its 158 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 136 (86%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Included will be those with:

  1. Age 18 years or more;
  2. Defibrillation by laypersons or defibrillation and/or chest compressions by EMS providers dispatched to the scene;
  3. Non-traumatic etiology of arrest, defined as without concomitant blunt, penetrating, or burn-related injury, or uncontrolled bleeding or exsanguination;
  4. Spontaneous circulation upon emergency department arrival;
  5. No response to verbal commands; and
  6. Ongoing or planned induced hypothermia.

Excluded will be those with:

  1. STEMI indicated on first 12-lead ECG obtained after restoration of circulation, defined as ST-elevation of ≥2 mm in two or more contiguous ECG leads;
  2. Written do not attempt resuscitation (DNAR) reported to providers before randomization;
  3. Drowning or hypothermia as cause of arrest;
  4. Known prisoner or pregnant; or
  5. Dialysis fistula in either upper extremity; or
  6. Pre-existing amputation of upper extremity.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
30 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Intervention Group

    A standard non-invasive blood pressure cuff (e.g., American Diagnostics Corporation, Hauppauge, NY but any one can be used off the shelf) and disposable plastic clamp (e.g.,Medline Industries Incorporated, Mundelein, IL) can be used to apply RIC in patients resuscitated from OHCA via three cycles of 5-mins. inflation to 200 mmHg followed by 5-mins. deflation of a blood pressure cuff on an upper extremity. The cuff occludes the artery; the clamp maintains pressure in the air bladder of the cuff during the inflation periods.

    Device: Active Remote Ischemic Conditioning

  • Sham comparator
    Control Group

    The control group will have a sham package opened at the bedside as soon as feasible after ED arrival. This will be identical in size, weight and appearance as that in the intervention group, but will contain a sham device. Upon identification that the patient has been randomized to the control group, the care team will proceed with all other resuscitative measures as in the the intervention group.

    Device: Sham Remote Ischemic Conditioning

Interventions

  • DeviceActive Remote Ischemic Conditioning

    A standard non-invasive blood pressure cuff (e.g., American Diagnostics Corporation, Hauppauge, NY but any one can be used off the shelf) and disposable plastic clamp (e.g.,Medline Industries Incorporated, Mundelein, IL) can be used to apply RIC in patients resuscitated from OHCA via three cycles of 5-mins. inflation to 200 mmHg followed by 5-mins. deflation of a blood pressure cuff on a upper extremity. The cuff occludes the artery; the clamp maintains pressure in the air bladder of the cuff during the inflation periods.

  • DeviceSham Remote Ischemic Conditioning

    The control group will have a sham package opened at the bedside as soon as feasible after ED arrival. This will be identical in size, weight and appearance as that in the intervention group, but will contain a sham device. Upon identification that the patient has been randomized to the control group, the care team will proceed with all other resuscitative measures as in the the intervention group.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Attrition

    Attrition assessed as the proportion of randomized subjects who do not remain on allocated therapy for the intended study duration among subjects randomly allocated. On therapy for the intended study duration consists of completing three cycles of inflation-deflation.

    Time frame: Completion of their allocated study intervention, an average of 30 minutes from enrollment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Treatment Success

    Treatment Success assessed as the proportion of intervention group patients who remain alive and on their allocated therapy for the intended study duration.

    Time frame: 30 minutes from initiation of study intervention

  2. Cardiac Function

    Cardiac Function assessed as left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) using echocardiograms ordered for clinical indications.

    Time frame: Within 48 hours of index arrest

  3. Proportion With Cardiogenic Shock, %

    Cardiogenic Shock assessed as systolic BP \< 80 mmHg during any 6 h period within 48 h of the index arrest not due to a correctable cause, and treated with pressors or inotropes or placement of a mechanical cardiac assist device (e.g. intra-aortic balloon pump). Cardiogenic shock correlates with survival after resuscitation from cardiac arrest.

    Time frame: Within 48 hours of index arrest

  4. STEMI

    STEMI assessed as the presence of electrocardiographic (ECG) and biomarker criteria for acute myocardial infarction within 48 h of the index arrest. Note that ST-elevation on the first 12-lead ECG after resuscitation is a poor predictor of acute infarction in this population. These patients often develop infarctions during the subsequent 48 h.

    Time frame: Within 48 hours of index arrest

  5. Myocardial Injury

    Myocardial Injury assessed as peak serum troponin in ng/mL at any time point within 24 h of index arrest.

    Time frame: Within 24 hours of index arrest

  6. Renal Dysfunction

    Renal Dysfunction assessed using Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, End Stage criteria.

    Time frame: Within 24 hours of index arrest

  7. Hospital Free Survival

    Hospital Free Survival (HFS) assessed as number of days alive and permanently out of hospital up to 30 days post arrest

    Time frame: Within 30 days of index arrest

  8. Withdrawal of Care

    assessed as the reduction of support (i.e. reducing pressors, lab draws or medications) or withdrawal of support (i.e. extubation, stopping drips/meds, changing to comfort care only) during hospitalization.

    Time frame: Discharge or 30 days after index arrest

  9. Favourable Neurologic Status at Discharge

    Favourable Neurologic Status at Discharge assessed using modified Rankin Score (MRS) \< 3 at hospital discharge or 30 days after index arrest. Modified Rankin Scale is scored from zero to six. Higher values represent a worse outcome. Favorable neurologic status is defined as a modified Rankin score 0, 1 or 2.

    Time frame: Discharge or 30 days after index arrest

  10. Survival to Discharge

    Survival to Discharge assessed as alive when discharged from hospital to home, nursing facility or rehabilitation. Patients transferred to another acute care facility (e.g. to undergo implantable defibrillator placement) will be considered still hospitalized.

    Time frame: Discharge or 30 days after index arrest

  11. Clinical Instability at Discharge

    Clinical Instability at Discharge assessed using the Kosecoff Index measured at discharge based on the presence of nine symptoms and signs associated with increased risk of rehospitalization. Instability will be the presence of any of these. Clinical instability at discharge was defined by the Kosecoff Index. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2214063/ This was scored as 1 point for the presence and 0 for the absence of each of the following during the 24 h prior to discharge: Fever, temperature \>38.3°C Urinary incontinence Chest pain Shortness of breath Confusion Heart rate \>=130 beats/min Respiratory rate \>=30/min Diastolic blood pressure \>= 105 mmHg Systolic blood pressure \< 90 mmHg Heart rate \< 50 bpm Premature ventricular contractions on telemetry

    Time frame: Discharge or 30 days after index arrest

  12. Survival to 30 Days After Arrest

    Survival to 30 Days After Cardiac Arrest assessed as alive 30 days after the index cardiac arrest as confirmed by a brief telephone interview.

    Time frame: 30 days after index arrest

  13. Accrual

    Accrual is the proportion of eligible subjects who have the study device applied

    Time frame: Before leaving the emergency department

Other outcomes

  1. Device Failure

    device failure will be defined as discontinuation of use of the device prior to the end of allocated treatment interval because of mechanical failure as opposed to provider preference.

    Time frame: 30 minutes from initiation of study intervention

  2. Expected Adverse Event Related to Device- Pain

    Pain assessed using the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale at 30 and 60 minutes after randomization in control and intervention group patients. No gold standard exists for pain assessment in sedated and ventilated patients.

    Time frame: Within 24 hours of Enrollment

  3. Expected Adverse Event Related to Device- Thrombophlebitis

    Thrombophlebitis assessed as symptomatic non central nervous system venous or arterial thrombus documented radiographically or ultrasonographically in the upper extremity to which the study intervention was applied.

    Time frame: Within 1 week of Enrollment

  4. Expected Adverse Event Related to Device- Sepsis

    Sepsis assessed within one week of index arrest as either i) the presence of microbiologically proven, clinically proven, or suspected infection; or ii) presence of Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS); and iii) development of at least one organ dysfunction within the preceding 24 hours.

    Time frame: Within 1 week of Enrollment

  5. Expected Adverse Event Related to Cardiac Arrest

    Related to Cardiac Arrest The following are commonly observed in patients who experience cardiac arrest, and may or may not be attributable to specific resuscitation therapies. These will be monitored and reported but not classified as serious adverse events. Clinical diagnoses of pneumonia, cerebral bleeding, stroke, seizures, bleeding requiring transfusion or surgical intervention, rearrest, pulmonary edema, serious rib fractures, sternal fractures, internal thoracic or abdominal injuries as noted in the hospital discharge summary.

    Time frame: Discharge or 30 days after index arrest

  6. Unexpected Adverse Event

    These will be defined as any serious unexpected adverse effect on health or safety or any unexpected life-threatening problem caused by, or associated with, a device, if that effect or problem was not previously identified in nature, severity, or degree of incidence in the investigation plan or application, or any other unexpected serious problem associated with a device that relates to the rights, safety or welfare of subjects. Death or neurological impairment will not be considered an adverse event in this study, as it is an expected part of the natural history of the illness for a large proportion of the population.

    Time frame: Discharge or 30 days after index arrest

07

Results

Posted Feb 4, 2025
Limitations and caveats
This was a single-center pilot study. The rate of incomplete application of the intervention may be higher in a multi-center study. It lacked power to detect significant differences in outcomes, and did not include immunologic markers or markers of cardiac or brain injury. It assessed feasibility of the intervention rather than to assess whether RIC achieved a significant difference in biomarkers or clinical outcomes.

Participant flow

Study recruitment occurred from July 01, 2020, to February 03, 2022. Recruitment ceased when target enrollment (30 participants) was achieved. This study was conducted under exception from informed consent (EFIC) for emergency research. Eligible subjects were randomized with masked allocation to control (standard care) versus intervention (standard care and RIC) following OHCA at a single site.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneIntervention GroupControl Group
Started1614
Completed1614
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryAttrition

Attrition assessed as the proportion of randomized subjects who do not remain on allocated therapy for the intended study duration among subjects randomly allocated. On therapy for the intended study duration consists of completing three cycles of inflation-deflation.

Time frame:
Completion of their allocated study intervention, an average of 30 minutes from enrollment
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Attrition
ParticipantsIntervention GroupControl Group
Attrition00
SecondaryTreatment Success

Treatment Success assessed as the proportion of intervention group patients who remain alive and on their allocated therapy for the intended study duration.

Time frame:
30 minutes from initiation of study intervention
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Treatment Success
ParticipantsIntervention GroupControl Group
Treatment Success1614
SecondaryCardiac Function

Cardiac Function assessed as left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) using echocardiograms ordered for clinical indications.

Time frame:
Within 48 hours of index arrest
Reported as:
Mean · % of left ventricular ejection fraction
Cardiac Function
% of left ventricular ejection fractionIntervention GroupControl Group
Cardiac Function48.4 ± 2051.7 ± 12.8
SecondaryProportion With Cardiogenic Shock, %

Cardiogenic Shock assessed as systolic BP \< 80 mmHg during any 6 h period within 48 h of the index arrest not due to a correctable cause, and treated with pressors or inotropes or placement of a mechanical cardiac assist device (e.g. intra-aortic balloon pump). Cardiogenic shock correlates with survival after resuscitation from cardiac arrest.

Time frame:
Within 48 hours of index arrest
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Proportion With Cardiogenic Shock, %
ParticipantsIntervention GroupControl Group
Proportion With Cardiogenic Shock, %1311
SecondarySTEMI

STEMI assessed as the presence of electrocardiographic (ECG) and biomarker criteria for acute myocardial infarction within 48 h of the index arrest. Note that ST-elevation on the first 12-lead ECG after resuscitation is a poor predictor of acute infarction in this population. These patients often develop infarctions during the subsequent 48 h.

Time frame:
Within 48 hours of index arrest
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
STEMI
ParticipantsIntervention GroupControl Group
STEMI00
SecondaryMyocardial Injury

Myocardial Injury assessed as peak serum troponin in ng/mL at any time point within 24 h of index arrest.

Time frame:
Within 24 hours of index arrest
Reported as:
Mean · peak serum troponin level
Myocardial Injury
peak serum troponin levelIntervention GroupControl Group
Myocardial Injury3.7 ± 8.97.4 ± 16.2
SecondaryRenal Dysfunction

Renal Dysfunction assessed using Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, End Stage criteria.

Time frame:
Within 24 hours of index arrest
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Renal Dysfunction
ParticipantsIntervention GroupControl Group
Renal Dysfunction42
SecondaryHospital Free Survival

Hospital Free Survival (HFS) assessed as number of days alive and permanently out of hospital up to 30 days post arrest

Time frame:
Within 30 days of index arrest
Reported as:
Mean · days
Hospital Free Survival
daysIntervention GroupControl Group
Hospital Free Survival11.1 ± 14.37.3 ± 12.3
SecondaryWithdrawal of Care

assessed as the reduction of support (i.e. reducing pressors, lab draws or medications) or withdrawal of support (i.e. extubation, stopping drips/meds, changing to comfort care only) during hospitalization.

Time frame:
Discharge or 30 days after index arrest
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Withdrawal of Care
ParticipantsIntervention GroupControl Group
Withdrawal of Care67
SecondaryFavourable Neurologic Status at Discharge

Favourable Neurologic Status at Discharge assessed using modified Rankin Score (MRS) \< 3 at hospital discharge or 30 days after index arrest. Modified Rankin Scale is scored from zero to six. Higher values represent a worse outcome. Favorable neurologic status is defined as a modified Rankin score 0, 1 or 2.

Time frame:
Discharge or 30 days after index arrest
Reported as:
Median · Modified Rankin Score
Favourable Neurologic Status at Discharge
Modified Rankin ScoreIntervention GroupControl Group
Favourable Neurologic Status at Discharge6 (1 to 6)6 (1.5 to 6)
SecondarySurvival to Discharge

Survival to Discharge assessed as alive when discharged from hospital to home, nursing facility or rehabilitation. Patients transferred to another acute care facility (e.g. to undergo implantable defibrillator placement) will be considered still hospitalized.

Time frame:
Discharge or 30 days after index arrest
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Survival to Discharge
ParticipantsIntervention GroupControl Group
Survival to Discharge76
SecondaryClinical Instability at Discharge

Clinical Instability at Discharge assessed using the Kosecoff Index measured at discharge based on the presence of nine symptoms and signs associated with increased risk of rehospitalization. Instability will be the presence of any of these. Clinical instability at discharge was defined by the Kosecoff Index. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2214063/ This was scored as 1 point for the presence and 0 for the absence of each of the following during the 24 h prior to discharge: Fever, temperature \>38.3°C Urinary incontinence Chest pain Shortness of breath Confusion Heart rate \>=130 beats/min Respiratory rate \>=30/min Diastolic blood pressure \>= 105 mmHg Systolic blood pressure \< 90 mmHg Heart rate \< 50 bpm Premature ventricular contractions on telemetry

Time frame:
Discharge or 30 days after index arrest
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Clinical Instability at Discharge
ParticipantsIntervention GroupControl Group
Clinical Instability at Discharge32
SecondarySurvival to 30 Days After Arrest

Survival to 30 Days After Cardiac Arrest assessed as alive 30 days after the index cardiac arrest as confirmed by a brief telephone interview.

Time frame:
30 days after index arrest
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Survival to 30 Days After Arrest
ParticipantsIntervention GroupControl Group
Survival to 30 Days After Arrest76
SecondaryAccrual

Accrual is the proportion of eligible subjects who have the study device applied

Time frame:
Before leaving the emergency department
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Accrual
ParticipantsIntervention GroupControl Group
Accrual1614
Other pre-specifiedDevice Failure

device failure will be defined as discontinuation of use of the device prior to the end of allocated treatment interval because of mechanical failure as opposed to provider preference.

Time frame:
30 minutes from initiation of study intervention
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Device Failure
ParticipantsIntervention GroupControl Group
Device Failure00
Other pre-specifiedExpected Adverse Event Related to Device- Pain

Pain assessed using the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale at 30 and 60 minutes after randomization in control and intervention group patients. No gold standard exists for pain assessment in sedated and ventilated patients.

Time frame:
Within 24 hours of Enrollment
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Expected Adverse Event Related to Device- Pain
ParticipantsIntervention GroupControl Group
Expected Adverse Event Related to Device- Pain00
Other pre-specifiedExpected Adverse Event Related to Device- Thrombophlebitis

Thrombophlebitis assessed as symptomatic non central nervous system venous or arterial thrombus documented radiographically or ultrasonographically in the upper extremity to which the study intervention was applied.

Time frame:
Within 1 week of Enrollment
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Expected Adverse Event Related to Device- Thrombophlebitis
ParticipantsIntervention GroupControl Group
Expected Adverse Event Related to Device- Thrombophlebitis00
Other pre-specifiedExpected Adverse Event Related to Device- Sepsis

Sepsis assessed within one week of index arrest as either i) the presence of microbiologically proven, clinically proven, or suspected infection; or ii) presence of Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS); and iii) development of at least one organ dysfunction within the preceding 24 hours.

Time frame:
Within 1 week of Enrollment
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Expected Adverse Event Related to Device- Sepsis
ParticipantsIntervention GroupControl Group
Expected Adverse Event Related to Device- Sepsis00
Other pre-specifiedExpected Adverse Event Related to Cardiac Arrest

Related to Cardiac Arrest The following are commonly observed in patients who experience cardiac arrest, and may or may not be attributable to specific resuscitation therapies. These will be monitored and reported but not classified as serious adverse events. Clinical diagnoses of pneumonia, cerebral bleeding, stroke, seizures, bleeding requiring transfusion or surgical intervention, rearrest, pulmonary edema, serious rib fractures, sternal fractures, internal thoracic or abdominal injuries as noted in the hospital discharge summary.

Time frame:
Discharge or 30 days after index arrest
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Expected Adverse Event Related to Cardiac Arrest
ParticipantsIntervention GroupControl Group
Expected Adverse Event Related to Cardiac Arrest63
Other pre-specifiedUnexpected Adverse Event

These will be defined as any serious unexpected adverse effect on health or safety or any unexpected life-threatening problem caused by, or associated with, a device, if that effect or problem was not previously identified in nature, severity, or degree of incidence in the investigation plan or application, or any other unexpected serious problem associated with a device that relates to the rights, safety or welfare of subjects. Death or neurological impairment will not be considered an adverse event in this study, as it is an expected part of the natural history of the illness for a large proportion of the population.

Time frame:
Discharge or 30 days after index arrest
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Unexpected Adverse Event
ParticipantsIntervention GroupControl Group
Unexpected Adverse Event00

Adverse events

Collected over 30 days after cardiac arrest.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Intervention Group9/16 (56.3%)0/16 (0%)1/16 (6.3%)
Control Group8/14 (57.1%)0/14 (0%)0/14 (0%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventIntervention GroupControl Group
Temporary occlusion of IV in the Emergency DepartmentInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/160/14

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Intervention GroupControl GroupTotal
Mean51.5 ± 15.553.7 ± 17.452.5 ± 16.2
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Intervention GroupControl GroupTotal
Female448
Male121022
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Intervention GroupControl GroupTotal
Hispanic or Latino101
Not Hispanic or Latino101222
Unknown or Not Reported527
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Intervention GroupControl GroupTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native101
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American336
White101020
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported213
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Intervention GroupControl GroupTotal
Count of participants——0
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Graham Nichol
    Seattle, Washington 98104, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Aug 13, 2019

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Available upon request, subject to mutual agreement

Supporting information: Study protocol, Clinical study report

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jul 2020 to primary completion in Feb 2022, 19 months.

Results were first posted in Feb 2025, 3 years after primary completion.

Of 230 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Heart Arrest, half reached primary completion within 24 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 48. This study's 19 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 244 studies reached it within 24 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 48.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 15, 2020
First posted
Feb 12, 2020
StartActual
Jul 1, 2020
Primary completionActual
Feb 3, 2022
CompletionActual
Feb 3, 2022
Results first posted
Feb 4, 2025
Last update
Feb 4, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 4, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04265807
Collaborators
Charles F. Kettering Foundation
Responsible party
Graham Nichol (Professor, School of Medicine: Department of Medicine: General Internal Medicine, University of Washington) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 12, 2020
Start date
Jul 1, 2020
Primary completion
Feb 3, 2022
Completion
Feb 3, 2022
Results posted
Feb 4, 2025
Last update
Feb 4, 2025

Study contacts

Graham Nichol, MD, MPH
principal investigator · University of Washington
Emilby S Bartlett, MD MS
principal investigator · University of Washington

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion