ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04200833Updated May 5, 2022Results posted

Golimumab in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis-associated Uveitis Failing Adalimumab

An observational study in JIA Associated Uveitis, sponsored by Medical University of Graz. Completed. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-05-05.

Sponsored by Medical University of Graz · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
10
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To asses the use of golimumab, a fully humanized anti-TNF Alpha monoclonal antibody, in juvenile idiopathic Arthritis-associated uveitis refractory to adalimumab.

Read the detailed description

Background:

Uveitis is a potentially blinding complication of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Treatment remains a substantial challenge, even though the use of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α-antagonists has improved visual outcomes substantially. Among these agents, adalimumab has been recently approved for the treatment of non-infectious uveitis and is thus the first biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (bDMARD) approved for JIA-associated uveitis. However, some patients do not respond sufficiently or lose response over time. In these cases switching to another biologic DMARD is recommended. Recently golimumab, a fully humanized anti-TNF-α monoclonal antibody, demonstrated efficacy in a small case series, leading to uveitis inactivity in 4 of 7 patients Golimumab is approved for the treatment of polyarticular JIA.

Hypothesis:

Patients with JIA-associated uveitis failing treatment with adalimumab benefit from the treatment with golimumab.

Methods:

Study design and patient recruitment (retrospectively)

Retrospective single-center study in patients with JIA-associated active uveitis at the Medical University of Graz/Austria, in whom golimumab was started after failure of standard conventional immunosuppressive drugs and adalimumab. All patients that have started golimumab from March 2010 are included in the study. Uveitis is defined and anatomically classified according to the recommendations of the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) Working Group. Primary failure to adalimumab was diagnosed in patients without change in the SUN score and an entry grade of 3 or higher or with worsening activity, defined as either a two-grade increase in inflammation or an increase to grade 4. With bilateral disease, the eye with the higher grade of uveitis was analysed. Relapse of uveitis was defined as active inflammation after an inactivity for at least 3 months. Loss of response was defined as failure to improve under continued treatment with adalimumab despite intermitting intensifying concomitant therapy, such as local or systemic steroids.

Golimumab treatment was administered in the standard dose of 50 mg sc every 4 weeks in patients with a weight of at least 40 kg. Previous therapy with a conventional DMARD such as methotrexate (MTX) was continued, if tolerated.

The outcome measures of uveitis include the reduction in grade of intraocular inflammation, the best-corrected visual acuity, eye soreness, redness of eyes, light sensitivity and the steroid sparing potential. Response to treatment is classified as complete, partial or no response. Complete response constitute achieving inactive uveitis, defined as \<0.5 cell per field in the anterior chamber or posterior segment (grade 0) and absence of vitreous haze and macular edema. Partial response is diagnosed in patients with improved uveitis, defined as decrease of one grade in the level of inflammation, without a decrease to grade 0 in the anterior chamber (AC) and posterior segment. Primary failure, relapse and loss of response to golimumab is defined in the same way as for adalimumab.

Patients receiving Golimumab were evaluated clinically and immunologically at regular intervals. At each visit the laboratory analysis included complete blood cell counts, levels of creatinine, hepatobiliary-injury biomarkers, and C-reactive protein. Side effects were assessed by patient's reported history.

Statistical analysis Continuous variables will be analyzed by Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney U test. Correlations will be analyzed by Spearman's rank correlation test. Binary variables were analyzed using Fisher's exact test. Statistical significance was defined as p\<0.05. All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism V.6.0 (GraphPad, San Diego, CA).

02

Conditions studied

  • JIA Associated Uveitis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Biological
  • Uveitis
  • adalimumab
  • golimumab
03

In context

Uveitis

345 studies on the registry are indexed under Uveitis; 38 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 10 is below the median of 100 across 110 observational studies indexed under Uveitis.

Browse Uveitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Medical University of Graz is the lead sponsor of 470 studies on the registry; 98 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

JIA patients at a tertiary referal Center in Graz /Austria. University setting.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • JIA associated Uveitis
  • Treatment failure with adalimumab

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Uveitis due to other causes
  • Adalimumab Initiation because of non ocular reasons
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
10 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • group 1

    All JIA patients that were switched from adalimumab to golimumab because of Treatment failure of their JIA associated uveitis at the Medical University of Graz Austria from 2010 to 2019

    Drug: Golimumab

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants Reported as Complete Responders to Golimumab

    Response was classified as complete, partial, or none ("non-response", NR) at each timepoint separately." Complete response (CR) constituted achieving inactive uveitis, defined as 0+ cells in the AC (grade 0). Partial response (PR) was diagnosed in patients with improved uveitis, defined as a decrease in the level of inflammation, without achieving AC grade 0 status. Primary-NR was diagnosed in patients without change in SUN score and an entry grade of 3 or higher or in patients with worsening activity, defined as either a two-grade increase in inflammation or an increase in inflammation to grade 4. Relapse of uveitis was defined as active inflammation after at least 3 months of inactivity,

    Time frame: last follow up, up to 5 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA)

    best corrected visual acuity

    Time frame: up to 5 years

  2. Number of Patients With Ocular Discomfort

    eye soreness, photophobia

    Time frame: up to 5 years

  3. Steroid Sparing Potential

    Reduction in systemic steroid dose at the 12 month follow-up compared to baseline

    Time frame: Baseline, 12 Months Follow-Up

07

Results

Posted May 5, 2022

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneGroup 1
Started10
Completed10
Not completed0

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants Reported as Complete Responders to Golimumab

Response was classified as complete, partial, or none ("non-response", NR) at each timepoint separately." Complete response (CR) constituted achieving inactive uveitis, defined as 0+ cells in the AC (grade 0). Partial response (PR) was diagnosed in patients with improved uveitis, defined as a decrease in the level of inflammation, without achieving AC grade 0 status. Primary-NR was diagnosed in patients without change in SUN score and an entry grade of 3 or higher or in patients with worsening activity, defined as either a two-grade increase in inflammation or an increase in inflammation to grade 4. Relapse of uveitis was defined as active inflammation after at least 3 months of inactivity,

Time frame:
last follow up, up to 5 years
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Reported as Complete Responders to Golimumab
ParticipantsGroup 1
Number of Participants Reported as Complete Responders to Golimumab8
SecondaryBest Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA)

best corrected visual acuity

Time frame:
up to 5 years
Reported as:
Mean · LogMAR
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA)
LogMARGroup 1
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA)0.27 ± 0.33
SecondaryNumber of Patients With Ocular Discomfort

eye soreness, photophobia

Time frame:
up to 5 years
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Patients With Ocular Discomfort
ParticipantsGroup 1
Number of Patients With Ocular Discomfort0
SecondarySteroid Sparing Potential

Reduction in systemic steroid dose at the 12 month follow-up compared to baseline

Time frame:
Baseline, 12 Months Follow-Up
Reported as:
Mean · mg/kg per day
Steroid Sparing Potential
mg/kg per dayGroup 1
Steroid Sparing Potential0.19 (0 to 0.52)

Adverse events

Collected over Up to 66 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Group 10/10 (0%)0/10 (0%)0/10 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Group 1
<=18 years9
Between 18 and 65 years1
>=65 years0
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Group 1
Mean14.0 ± 6.4
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Group 1
Female10
Male0
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Group 1
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Group 1
Austria10
08

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Dec 14, 2021

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Mar 2010 to primary completion in Jul 2021, 136 months.

Results were first posted in May 2022, 10 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 6, 2019
First posted
Dec 16, 2019
StartActual
Mar 1, 2010
Primary completionActual
Jul 1, 2021
CompletionActual
Aug 1, 2021
Results first posted
May 5, 2022
Last update
May 5, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 5, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04200833
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 16, 2019
Start date
Mar 1, 2010
Primary completion
Jul 1, 2021
Completion
Aug 1, 2021
Results posted
May 5, 2022
Last update
May 5, 2022

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion