CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04192851Updated Jul 28, 2020

Evaluation of "Tent-Pole" Grafting Technique for Reconstruction of Mandibular Ridge Vertical Defects

An interventional study of Tent Pole Technique in Jaw Deformity, sponsored by Nourhan M.Aly. Completed at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-07-28.

Sponsored by Nourhan M.Aly · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 10 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2019, registered Dec 2019).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
12
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
40 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate clinically and radio-graphically the efficiency of "Tent- Pole "grafting technique for reconstruction of anterior or posterior mandibular ridge defects using synthetic bone graft and Platelet Rich Fibrin (PRF) membrane.

Read the detailed description

Various techniques have been described for the reconstruction of large vertical defects before implant placement . In this study we assessed the efficacy of tenting the periosteum and soft tissue matrix with titanium screws maintaining a space for the graft material in order to augment large vertical defects of mandibular ridge (anterior or posterior region) using data from 12 patients . After 6 months we assessed the increase in bone height and density.

02

Conditions studied

  • Jaw Deformity
03

In context

Congenital Abnormalities

980 studies on the registry are indexed under Congenital Abnormalities; 177 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 12 is below the median of 49 across 491 interventional studies indexed under Congenital Abnormalities.

Browse Congenital Abnormalities studies →

Lead sponsor

Nourhan M.Aly is the lead sponsor of 48 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with missing lower tooth or teeth and have a related large vertical bony defect .
  • Patients with about 7mm residual bone hight and requiring about 5 mm increase in the vertical height of the mandibular alveolar ridge for future prosthetic rehabilitation.
  • Patients with an acceptable oral hygiene and willing to improve it

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of infection or local lesions.
  • Parafunctional habits.
  • Current chemotherapy or radiotherapy.
  • Heavy smokers.
  • Alcohol or drug abuse.
  • Medically compromised patients with diseases that affect passively the clinical procedure or result.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
12 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Tent Pole Grafting Technique

    * Bone graft \[NanoBone® granulate 0,6 mm (24% Silica / 76% Hydroxylapatite)\] is mixed with the patient blood and placed to cover the screws completely, the defect is overcorrected with particulate material in anticipation of future graft resorption. * PRF membrane is prepared by: Ten milliliters of whole venous blood will be collected in sterile glass test tubes without anticoagulant. Then the test tubes will be placed in a table centrifuge machine at 3000 revolutions per minute (rpm) for 10 minutes.After separation of PRF, the membrane is prepared compression device.

    Procedure: Tent Pole Technique

Interventions

  • ProcedureTent Pole Technique

    * All patients were operated under local or general anaesthesia according to the case and patient tolerability. * The oral cavity was prepared by 0.12% chlorhexidine mouthrinses solution\* for thirty seconds. * Full thickness incision down to the bone with blade no.15. * A periosteal elevator was used to perform mucoperiosteal flap. * Gentle elevation of the flap * Fixation of the screws over the alveolar ridge with about 5 mm of the screw threads will be exposed * Bone graft was mixed with the patient blood and placed to cover the screws completely. * PRF membrane was be placed over the grafted sites. * Repositioning of the flap and suturing with 3/0 black silk suture material

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain assessment using Visual Analogue Scale

    Pain was assessed through on a 10-point Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). (0-1= None, 2-4= Mild, 5-7= Moderate, 8-10= Severe)

    Time frame: 2 weeks

  2. Postoperative edema

    Edema was evaluated by its ability to pit.The examiner fingers pressed into dependent area of the patient skin for 5 seconds. The finger sinks into the tissue and leave an impression when they are removed. The pitting was graded on a scale of +1 to +4 as follows: * 1 (trace) slight indentation rapid return to normal. * 2 (mild) the indentation returns to normal in a few seconds. * 3 (moderate) 6 mm indentation rebounds in 10-20 seconds. * 4 (severe) 8 mm indentation rebounds in more than 30 seconds.

    Time frame: 2 weeks

  3. Radiographic Evaluation for Bone Density using Cone Beam CT

    A Cone Beam Computerized Tomography was obtained to assess the gained bone height \&density.

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University
    Alexandria, 21512, Egypt
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Jensen SS, Terheyden H. Bone augmentation procedures in localized defects in the alveolar ridge: clinical results with different bone grafts and bone-substitute materials. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24 Suppl:218-36. PubMed 19885447 ↗
  • Chiapasco M, Casentini P, Zaniboni M. Bone augmentation procedures in implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24 Suppl:237-59. PubMed 19885448 ↗
  • Aghaloo TL, Moy PK. Which hard tissue augmentation techniques are the most successful in furnishing bony support for implant placement? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007;22 Suppl:49-70. Erratum In: Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008 Jan-Feb;23(1):56. PubMed 18437791 ↗
  • Le B, Burstein J, Sedghizadeh PP. Cortical tenting grafting technique in the severely atrophic alveolar ridge for implant site preparation. Implant Dent. 2008 Mar;17(1):40-50. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e318166d503. PubMed 18332757 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 28, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04192851
Lead sponsor
Nourhan M.Aly
Collaborators
Alexandria University
Responsible party
Nourhan M.Aly (Instructor of Dental Public Health, University of Alexandria) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Dec 10, 2019
Start date
Jan 20, 2019
Primary completion
Nov 15, 2019
Completion
Nov 30, 2019
Last update
Jul 28, 2020

Study contacts

Asmaa M Abd ElFattah, BDS
principal investigator · Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt
Abd El Aziz F Khalil, PhD
study chair · Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt
Lydia N.F Melek, PhD
study director · Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion