CClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT04174846Updated May 19, 2021

Comparison of Treatment of SAM in Children 6-59 Months With RUTF and RUSF in Umerkot, Sindh, Pakistan

An interventional study of Ready-to-use therapeutic food (RUTF) and Ready-to-use-supplementary food (RUSF) in Severe Acute Malnutrition, sponsored by Aga Khan University. Withdrawn at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 6 Months to 59 Months. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-05-19.

Sponsored by Aga Khan University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was withdrawn
Due to COVID-19
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
0
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
6 Months to 59 Months
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In Pakistan, around 15% of children under five are wasted, which is almost twice that of the global prevalence 7.5%. There is a demand for a reliable and consistent locally available severe acute malnutrition (SAM) treatment option since currently the only option is to use an imported ready-to-use-therapeutic food (RUTF). While imported RUTF is successful for treatment of children with SAM, Pakistan is often faced with supply chain issues and consequentially management of SAM with RUTF is unreliable. The World Food Programme (WFP)'s work in Pakistan supports government-led efforts to improve food and nutrition security, including the development of Acha Mum, a chickpea containing lipid-based ready-to-use-food. Acha Mum replaces the peanut in standard RUTF formulation with chickpea, a locally available legume. Acha Mum is well accepted by children in Pakistan and is currently being used as a treatment for children with moderate acute malnutrition (MAM) in targeted supplementary feeding programs (TSFP) throughout the country. The broad objective of this clinical trial is to test the effectiveness of a chickpea-based specialized nutritious food Acha Mum, compared to a standard RUTF for the treatment of SAM. The study will be conducted in 10 basic health units (BHUs) operating by PPHI in Umerkot district of Sindh, Pakistan. This will be an individual randomized, double-blinded, controlled clinical non-inferiority trial assessing the treatment of SAM with one of two therapeutic foods. A total of 1700 children will be part of the study (850 children in RUTF and 850 children in Acha Mum group). Children aged 6-59 months with SAM, i.e. MUAC \<11.5 cm and/or with bilateral pitting oedema (+, ++), with appetite and without medical complications presenting at selected rural therapeutic feeding clinics. The primary outcome is recovery from SAM, defined as: MUAC ≥ 11.5cm (for two consecutive weekly visits), clinically well, no bilateral pitting oedema (for two consecutive weekly visits). The secondary outcomes include neurocognitive performance after first 4 weeks of treatment as assessed by eye tracking and infant problem solving; changes in MUAC, weight, and length; time to recovery from SAM; time to recovery from MAM defined as achieved a MUAC ≥12.5 cm; relapse into MAM; relapse into SAM and any adverse events.

Read the detailed description

Rationale: In Pakistan, around 15% of children under five are wasted, which is almost twice that of the global prevalence 7.5%. There is a demand for a reliable and consistent locally available severe acute malnutrition (SAM) treatment option since currently the only option is to use an imported ready-to-use-therapeutic food (RUTF). While imported RUTF is successful for treatment of children with SAM, Pakistan is often faced with supply chain issues and consequentially management of SAM with RUTF is unreliable. The World Food Programme (WFP)'s work in Pakistan supports government-led efforts to improve food and nutrition security, including the development of Acha Mum, a chickpea containing lipid-based ready-to-use-food. Acha Mum replaces the peanut in standard RUTF formulation with chickpea, a locally available legume. Acha Mum is well accepted by children in Pakistan and is currently being used as a treatment for children with moderate acute malnutrition (MAM) in targeted supplementary feeding programs (TSFP) throughout the country.

Objectives: The broad objective of this clinical trial is to test the effectiveness of a chickpea-based specialized nutritious food Acha Mum, compared to a standard RUTF for the treatment of SAM.

Study Area: The study will be conducted in 10 basic health units (BHUs) operating by PPHI in Umerkot district of Sindh, Pakistan.

Study Design: This will be an individual randomized, double-blinded, controlled clinical non-inferiority trial assessing the treatment of SAM with one of two therapeutic foods.

Sample Size: A total of 1700 children will be part of the study (850 children in RUTF and 850 children in Acha Mum group).

Study Population: Children aged 6-59 months with SAM, i.e. MUAC \<11.5 cm and/or with bilateral pitting oedema (+, ++), with appetite and without medical complications presenting at selected rural therapeutic feeding clinics.

Timeline: The duration of study will be 24 months (3 months for protocol and tool development, 18 months for enrollment and follow-ups and 3 months for data cleaning, analysis and report writing.

Expected outcomes: The primary outcome is recovery from SAM, defined as: MUAC ≥ 11.5cm (for two consecutive weekly visits), clinically well, no bilateral pitting oedema (for two consecutive weekly visits). The secondary outcomes include neurocognitive performance after first 4 weeks of treatment as assessed by eye tracking and infant problem solving; changes in MUAC, weight, and length; time to recovery from SAM; time to recovery from MAM defined as achieved a MUAC ≥12.5 cm; relapse into MAM; relapse into SAM and any adverse events.

02

Conditions studied

  • Severe Acute Malnutrition
03

In context

Malnutrition

1,587 studies on the registry are indexed under Malnutrition; 237 are open to participants now.

Browse Malnutrition studies →

Lead sponsor

Aga Khan University is the lead sponsor of 290 studies on the registry; 44 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Months to 59 Months
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Children aged 6-59 months with SAM, i.e. MUAC \<11.5 cm
  • Bilateral pitting oedema (+,++)
  • Appetite
  • Without medical complications

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Children will be excluded if they were simultaneously involved in another research trial or supplemental feeding program
  • Developmentally delayed
  • Have a chronic debilitating illness such as cerebral palsy (not including HIV or TB)
  • Had a history of milk or peanut allergy.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Care provider)
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Treatment of SAM children with RUTF

    Treatment of severe acute malnutrition (SAM) in children 6-59 months old with standard ready-to-use therapeutic food (RUTF)

    Dietary Supplement: Ready-to-use therapeutic food (RUTF)

  • Experimental
    Treatment of SAM children with RUSF

    Treatment of severe acute malnutrition (SAM) in children 6-59 months old with ready-to-use-supplementary food (RUSF)

    Dietary Supplement: Ready-to-use-supplementary food (RUSF)

Interventions

  • Dietary supplementReady-to-use therapeutic food (RUTF)

    SAM children will receive approximately 190 kcal/kg/day of standard RUTF

  • Dietary supplementReady-to-use-supplementary food (RUSF)

    SAM children will receive approximately 190 kcal/kg/day of Acha Mum (AM-RUSF)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Recovery rate from SAM

    Number of children recovered from SAM, defined as: MUAC ≥ 11.5cm (for two consecutive weekly visits), clinically well, no bilateral pitting oedema (for two consecutive weekly visits)

    Time frame: 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Neurocognitive performance after first 4 weeks of treatment

    Neurocognitive performance after first 4 weeks of treatment as assessed by eye tracking and infant problem solving

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  2. Changes in mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC)

    Changes in MUAC will be assessed by cm \& mm

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  3. Changes in weight

    Changes in weight will be assessed by grams

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  4. Changes in length

    Changes in length will be assessed by cm

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  5. Time to recovery from SAM

    Time to recovery from MAM defined as achieved a MUAC ≥12.5 cm

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  6. Relapse rate into SAM

    Number of relapse in SAM will be identified after 3 months of follow-up

    Time frame: 24 weeks

  7. Non-responder children

    Number of children who non-responded will be assessed in follow-up visits

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  8. Defaulter children

    Number of defaulter children during the study will be assessed by follow-up visits

    Time frame: 24 weeks

  9. Adverse events

    Number of adverse events (if any) will be identified in follow-up visits

    Time frame: 24 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • 10 Basic Health Units (BHUs) operating by People's Primary Healthcare Initiative (PPHI)
    Umerkot, Sindh, Pakistan
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — De-identified data will be shared

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 19, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04174846
Lead sponsor
Aga Khan University
Collaborators
United Nations World Food Programme (WFP), People's Primary Healthcare Initiative (PPHI), Sindh
Responsible party
Dr Sajid Bashir Soofi (Professor & Associate Director, Aga Khan University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 22, 2019
Start date
Jan 2021 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jul 31, 2021 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 31, 2021 (estimated)
Last update
May 19, 2021

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in May 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion