CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07836166NOV-AUpdated Sep 23, 2026

Noninvasive High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation Versus Nasal Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation After Extubation in Neonates

An interventional study of Noninvasive High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation and Nasal Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation in Extubation Failure in Neonates, sponsored by Aga Khan University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 1 Day to 18 Weeks. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-23.

Sponsored by Aga Khan University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
172
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
1 Day to 18 Weeks
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn which breathing support works better after removing a newborn's breathing tube. Researchers will study newborns born at 26 weeks of gestation or later. Each newborn will have received breathing support through a tube for at least 24 hours.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does noninvasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (nHFOV) lower the need to replace the breathing tube within 72 hours? What breathing, feeding, or other medical problems occur with each type of support?

Researchers will compare nHFOV with nasal intermittent mandatory ventilation (NIMV). nHFOV provides very rapid pressure waves through the nose. NIMV provides regular, timed breaths through the nose. The researchers will compare these methods to see which works better after breathing tube removal.

Participants will:

Be assigned by chance to receive either nHFOV or NIMV Receive the assigned breathing support immediately after tube removal Have their breathing, oxygen level, and general condition closely monitored Have blood tests at 1, 12, and 24 hours post extubation to assess their breathing Be monitored for breathing pauses, feeding problems, and other medical problems during hospitalization

Read the detailed description

Extubation failure, defined as the need to replace an endotracheal breathing tube after planned removal, is associated with longer hospitalization and increased illness and death in newborns. Noninvasive respiratory support may help newborns transition safely from invasive mechanical ventilation. Nasal intermittent mandatory ventilation (NIMV) delivers regular positive pressure breaths through a nasal interface. Noninvasive high frequency oscillatory ventilation (nHFOV) delivers rapid pressure oscillations through a nasal interface and may improve carbon dioxide removal without requiring synchronization with the newborn's breathing. Although both methods are used in neonatal care, evidence directly comparing them in Pakistan is limited.

NOV-A is a prospective, single center, open label, parallel group superiority randomized clinical trial. It will evaluate whether nHFOV lowers extubation failure compared with NIMV after the first planned extubation. Participants will be assigned in a 1:1 ratio using stratified permuted block randomization based on gestational age. An independent biostatistician will generate the allocation sequence. Allocation will remain concealed in sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes until eligibility and parental consent are confirmed.

Blinding of the treating clinicians is not possible because the two respiratory support methods use different ventilator settings. To limit bias, prespecified clinical and laboratory criteria will guide decisions to replace the breathing tube. The biostatistician will remain unaware of group identities until the primary analysis is complete.

The primary analysis will follow the intention to treat principle. The treatment effect will be reported as the difference between the proportions of participants requiring replacement of the breathing tube, with a two sided 95% confidence interval. A per protocol analysis will be conducted as a sensitivity analysis. An independent Data Safety Monitoring Board will review safety information after approximately 25%, 50%, and 75% of planned enrollment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Extubation Failure in Neonates
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
1 Day to 18 Weeks
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Gestational age at birth ≥26 weeks (inborn or outborn)
  • Postmenstrual age \<44 weeks at enrollment according to NICU AKUH admission criteria
  • Intubation for respiratory distress or respiratory failure
  • Intubated for ≥24 hours
  • Undergoing first planned extubation
  • Meets prespecified extubation readiness criteria
  • Written informed consent from a parent or legal guardian

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria

  • Birth weight \<500 g
  • Major congenital anomaly affecting cardiac or respiratory function
  • Upper airway anomaly
  • Neuromuscular disorder affecting respiration
  • Requirement for surgical intervention during the study period
  • Grade IV intraventricular hemorrhage diagnosed before randomization
  • Intubation solely for an elective procedure in an otherwise healthy neonate previously breathing room air
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
172 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Noninvasive High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation (nHFOV)

    Participants assigned to this arm will receive noninvasive high frequency oscillatory ventilation immediately after their first planned extubation. Respiratory support will be delivered through binasal prongs or a nasal mask. Initial mean airway pressure will be 10-12 cm H₂O, amplitude will be 15-25 cm H₂O, frequency will be 8-12 Hz, and the inspiratory to expiratory ratio will be 1:1. Settings may be adjusted according to the participant's clinical condition. Oxygen will be adjusted to maintain oxygen saturation between 90% and 95%.

    Device: Noninvasive High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation

  • Active comparator
    Nasal Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation (NIMV)

    Participants assigned to this arm will receive nasal intermittent mandatory ventilation immediately after their first planned extubation. Respiratory support will be delivered through binasal prongs or a nasal mask. Positive end expiratory pressure will be 8-12 cm H₂O, peak inspiratory pressure will be 18-24 cm H₂O, the initial breathing rate will be 30 breaths per minute, and inspiratory time will be 0.5 seconds. The breathing rate may be increased in steps of 5 to a maximum of 50 breaths per minute according to the participant's clinical condition. Oxygen will be adjusted to maintain oxygen saturation between 90% and 95%. Synchronization will not be used.

    Device: Nasal Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation

Interventions

  • DeviceNoninvasive High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation

    nHFOV will begin immediately after planned extubation and will be delivered through binasal prongs or a nasal mask. Initial mean airway pressure will be 10-12 cm H₂O and may be increased in 1 cm H₂O steps to a maximum of 20 cm H₂O. Initial amplitude will be 15-25 cm H₂O and may be increased in 5 cm H₂O steps to a maximum of 35 cm H₂O. Frequency will be 8-12 Hz, and the inspiratory to expiratory ratio will be 1:1. Oxygen will be adjusted to maintain oxygen saturation between 90% and 95%. Settings will be adjusted according to the participant's clinical condition.

    Also known as: nHFOV, Nasal High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation

  • DeviceNasal Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation

    NIMV will begin immediately after planned extubation and will be delivered through binasal prongs or a nasal mask. Positive end expiratory pressure will be 8-12 cm H₂O, and peak inspiratory pressure will be 18-24 cm H₂O. The initial breathing rate will be 30 breaths per minute and may be increased in steps of 5 to a maximum of 50 breaths per minute according to carbon dioxide levels and clinical assessment. Inspiratory time will be 0.5 seconds. Oxygen will be adjusted to maintain oxygen saturation between 90% and 95%. Synchronization will not be used.

    Also known as: NIMV, Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation, NIPPV

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of Participants With Extubation Failure Within 72 Hours

    Extubation failure is defined as reintubation and return to invasive mechanical ventilation within 72 hours after planned extubation. Reintubation will be based on at least one prespecified criterion: pH below 7.20 with carbon dioxide above 65 mmHg, need for 60% or more oxygen to maintain the target oxygen saturation, an episode requiring bag mask ventilation, severe respiratory distress or a Silverman Anderson score of 7 or higher or cardiorespiratory arrest requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The outcome will be reported as the number and percentage of participants with extubation failure in each group.

    Time frame: Within 72 hours after planned extubation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of Participants With Clinically Significant Apnea

    Clinically significant apnea is defined as three or more breathing pauses within 72 hours after planned extubation that require tactile stimulation. The outcome will be reported as the number and percentage of participants meeting this criterion in each group.

    Time frame: Within 72 hours after planned extubation

  2. Proportion of Participants With Feeding Intolerance

    Feeding intolerance is defined as two consecutive gastric residual volumes greater than 50% of the previous feed volume, abdominal distension or vomiting that requires enteral feeding to be interrupted or modified for more than 24 hours while the participant is receiving the assigned respiratory support. The outcome will be reported as the number and percentage of participants with feeding intolerance in each group.

    Time frame: Within 72 hours after planned extubation

  3. Post-extubation blood pH

    Blood pH measured using an arterial or capillary blood gas sample. Values will be recorded and reported separately at 1, 12, and 24 hours after planned extubation. This is a component of the prespecified secondary outcome assessing post-extubation gas exchange and oxygenation.

    Time frame: At 1, 12, and 24 hours after planned extubation

  4. Post-extubation partial pressure of carbon dioxide

    Partial pressure of carbon dioxide (pCO₂), measured in mmHg using an arterial or capillary blood gas sample. Values will be recorded and reported separately at 1, 12, and 24 hours after planned extubation. This is a component of the prespecified secondary outcome assessing post-extubation gas exchange and oxygenation.

    Time frame: At 1, 12, and 24 hours after planned extubation

  5. Post-extubation SpO₂/FiO₂ ratio

    The ratio of peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO₂) to the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO₂). The ratio is unitless. Values will be recorded and reported separately at 1, 12, and 24 hours after planned extubation. This is a component of the prespecified secondary outcome assessing post-extubation gas exchange and oxygenation.

    Time frame: At 1, 12, and 24 hours after planned extubation

Other outcomes

  1. Time to Extubation Failure

    Time in hours from planned extubation to reintubation and return to invasive mechanical ventilation during the first 72 hours. Participants who are not reintubated within 72 hours will be censored at 72 hours for this time-to-event analysis. Reintubation occurring after 72 hours and within 7 days will be recorded separately as an exploratory outcome.

    Time frame: From planned extubation through 72 hours after extubation

  2. Proportion of Participants With Air Leak Syndrome

    The number and percentage of participants who develop an air-leak syndrome after planned extubation while receiving the assigned respiratory support. Air-leak syndromes include pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, pulmonary interstitial emphysema, pneumopericardium, and subcutaneous emphysema confirmed radiologically or clinically. Events will be recorded until 7 days after planned extubation or discontinuation of the assigned intervention, whichever occurs first.

    Time frame: Up to 7 days after planned extubation or until discontinuation of the assigned nHFOV or NIMV support, whichever occurs first

  3. Proportion of Participants With Nasal Injury During the Assigned Intervention

    The number and percentage of participants who develop nasal injury while receiving the assigned respiratory support. Nasal injury will be assessed using the Fischer grading system, ranging from grade 0 (no injury) to grade 3 (severe injury). Any injury of grade 1 or higher will be recorded.

    Time frame: Up to 7 days after planned extubation or until discontinuation of the assigned nHFOV or NIMV support, whichever occurs first

  4. Proportion of Participants Requiring Reintubation After 72 Hours and Within 7 Days

    The number and percentage of participants who remain successfully extubated during the first 72 hours but subsequently require reintubation and return to invasive mechanical ventilation more than 72 hours and within 7 days after planned extubation.

    Time frame: At 7 days after planned extubation

  5. Duration of Invasive Mechanical Ventilation

    Cumulative duration of all invasive mechanical ventilation delivered through an endotracheal tube in the NICU, including the initial period before planned extubation and any subsequent periods following reintubation. The durations of all IMV episodes will be summed and reported in days.

    Time frame: From initiation of invasive mechanical ventilation in the NICU until NICU discharge or 44 weeks postmenstrual age, whichever occurs first.

  6. Total Duration of Noninvasive Ventilation

    Cumulative number of days the participant receives noninvasive ventilation after randomization, including the assigned nHFOV or NIMV intervention and any subsequent noninvasive positive-pressure respiratory support. HHHFNC will not be included.

    Time frame: From randomization until discharge from NICU or 44 weeks postmenstrual age, whichever occurs first.

  7. Total Duration of Respiratory Support

    Total number of days from the first use of respiratory support until the participant permanently stops all invasive ventilation, noninvasive ventilation, and supplemental oxygen whether provided in the NICU, step-down unit, or at home. A calendar day during which more than one modality is used will be counted only once.

    Time frame: From the first initiation of respiratory support after birth until final discontinuation of all respiratory support or 44 weeks postmenstrual age, whichever occurs first.

  8. Ventilator Free Days After Randomization

    Cumulative number of calendar days after randomization during which the participant is alive and does not receive invasive mechanical ventilation through an endotracheal tube. Days on noninvasive respiratory support, supplemental oxygen, or no respiratory support will be counted as ventilator-free days. Any calendar day during which invasive mechanical ventilation is received will not be counted.

    Time frame: From randomization until final hospital disposition or 44 weeks postmenstrual age, whichever occurs first.

  9. Proportion of Participants With Severe Intraventricular Hemorrhage

    The number and percentage of participants diagnosed with severe intraventricular hemorrhage, defined as grade III or IV according to the Papile classification, on cranial ultrasound after randomization will be recorded at final hospital disposition. Final hospital disposition is defined as discharge from AKUH, transfer to another facility, leaving against medical advice, or in-hospital death.Cranial ultrasound will be performed as part of routine clinical care for neonates born at \<32 weeks' gestation and for neonates born at ≥32 weeks when clinically indicated at the discretion of the treating team. All scans will be reported by a pediatric radiologist. Participants with grade IV intraventricular hemorrhage diagnosed before randomization will be excluded.

    Time frame: From randomization through final hospital disposition or 44 weeks postmenstrual age, whichever occurs first.

  10. Proportion of Participants With Necrotizing Enterocolitis Stage II or Higher

    The number and percentage of participants diagnosed with definite or advanced necrotizing enterocolitis corresponding to stage II or stage III according to the modified Bell staging criteria after randomization and before final hospital disposition. Final hospital disposition includes discharge, transfer, leaving against medical advice, or in-hospital death. Stage I NEC will not be counted. Surgical treatment, including peritoneal drainage or laparotomy, will be documented.

    Time frame: From randomization until final hospital disposition or 44 weeks postmenstrual age, whichever occurs first.

  11. Duration of Hospitalization

    Total number of days from admission to Aga Khan University Hospital until hospital discharge, transfer to another facility, leaving against medical advice, or in-hospital death.

    Time frame: From admission to Aga Khan University Hospital until final hospital disposition or 44 weeks postmenstrual age, whichever occurs first.

  12. Proportion of Participants With All Cause In Hospital Mortality

    The number and percentage of participants who die from any cause after randomization and before final hospital disposition. Participants discharged alive, transferred to another facility, or leaving against medical advice will not be classified as in-hospital deaths.

    Time frame: From randomization until final hospital disposition or 44 weeks postmenstrual age, whichever occurs first.

  13. Desirability of Outcome Ranking Analysis

    Each participant will be assigned a Desirability of Outcome Ranking (DOOR) at final hospital disposition.Final hospital disposition is defined as discharge from AKUH, transfer to another facility, leaving against medical advice, or in-hospital death. Rank 1: extubation success without any listed major or minor complication. Rank 2: extubation success with minor complications only (nasal injury, feeding intolerance, or clinically significant apnea). Rank 3: extubation success with at least one major complication (grade III-IV intraventricular hemorrhage, stage II-III necrotizing enterocolitis, or air-leak syndrome). Rank 4: reintubation within 72 hours without in-hospital death. Rank 5: in-hospital death. Lower ranks represent better outcomes. The probability that a participant receiving nHFOV has a better outcome than one receiving NIMV will be estimated; a probability \>0.50 favors nHFOV.

    Time frame: From randomization until final hospital disposition or 44 weeks postmenstrual age, whichever occurs first.

06

Study locations

1 site
  • Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi Stadium Road, P.O.Box 3500 Karachi 74800, Pakistan
    Karachi, Sindh 74800, Pakistan
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Mei Z, Ming L, Wu Z, Zhu Y. Use of NHFOV vs. NIPPV for the respiratory support of preterm newborns after extubation: A meta-analysis. Front Pediatr. 2023 Jan 11;10:1063387. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.1063387. eCollection 2022. PubMed 36714640 ↗
  • Zhu X, Qi H, Feng Z, Shi Y, De Luca D; Nasal Oscillation Post-Extubation (NASONE) Study Group. Noninvasive High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation vs Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure vs Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation as Postextubation Support for Preterm Neonates in China: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2022 Jun 1;176(6):551-559. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2022.0710. PubMed 35467744 ↗
  • Seth S, Saha B, Saha AK, Mukherjee S, Hazra A. Nasal HFOV versus nasal IPPV as a post-extubation respiratory support in preterm infants-a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Pediatr. 2021 Oct;180(10):3151-3160. doi: 10.1007/s00431-021-04084-1. Epub 2021 Apr 23. PubMed 33890156 ↗
  • Li Y, Wei Q, Zhao D, Mo Y, Yao L, Li L, Tan W, Pan X, Yao J, Dai W, Zhong D. Non-invasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in preterm infants after extubation: a randomized, controlled trial. J Int Med Res. 2021 Feb;49(2):300060520984915. doi: 10.1177/0300060520984915. PubMed 33641473 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — There is no current plan to share individual participant data with external researchers. Participants are newborn infants, and the study will collect sensitive clinical information. The consent and data protection procedures do not provide for unrestricted public release of participant level data. Study findings will be reported in aggregate form through scientific presentations, trial registries, and peer-reviewed publications. Any future request for de-identified participant data would require review and approval by the study investigators, Aga Khan University Ethics Review Committee, and relevant institutional data governance authorities.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07836166
Lead sponsor
Aga Khan University
Responsible party
Ali S. Hussain (Assistant Professor of Paediatrics, Aga Khan University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 23, 2026
Start date
Oct 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 3, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 21, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 23, 2026

Study contacts

Hafsah Naz, fellow Paediatric Neonatology
Contact
hafsah.naz@aku.edu
+92 21 33103390
Ali S Hussain, MBBS, FCPS Paediatrics,NICU
Contact
ali.hussain@aku.edu
+92 300 2424206 ext. 4234
Ali S Hussain, FCPS Paediatrics, Neonatology
principal investigator · Aga Khan University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion