CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT04135183Updated Oct 22, 2019

Assessing Effectiveness of Community Acquired Pneumonia Treatment by Continuous Pneumonia Severity Score

An interventional study of changes of Pneumonia Severity Score in Community-acquired Pneumonia, sponsored by Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University. Status unknown at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-10-22.

Sponsored by Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Oct 2019), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
2,000
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Community acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a common respiratory infection and is the main cause of ICU admission and death in adults. Because of most patients were treated empirically against suspected causative microorganism, it is important to assess the effectiveness of treatment after 3 days of anti-infective therapy. However, the criteria for treatment failure is lack of a clear-cut and validated definition from the CAP guidelines.

Pneumonia severity scores is a wide-used severity rating system for treatment selection and outcome prediction for CAP. So far, the pneumonia severity scores only used once before the treatment started. Considering the pneumonia severity scores could reflect the severity of pneumonia, it is reasonable to assume that the change of pneumonia severity scores could reflect the patients' condition and the effectiveness of the treatment. This trail will be designed to validate the feasibility of assessing effectiveness of CAP treatment by using continuous pneumonia severity score.

Read the detailed description

The applicant has established a CAP patients database and found a new effective pneumonia severity score: Expand-CURB. According to the retrospective study results, applicant found the changes of pneumonia severity score could reflect the patients'condition and was the independent risk factor for 30-day mortality. More specifically, if the patients'Expand-CURB score was not improved after 3-5 days of initial treatment, the odds ratio of 30-day mortality was 5.571 and 5.249 (95%CI 1.831-15.051, P=0.002) by univariate analysis and multivariate analysis (the multivariate was adjusted by the initial severity of pneumonia).

In addition, the applicant found the changes of serum CRP(C reactive protein ) before and after initial treatment also associated the patients'outcomes. If the serum CRP decreased less than 40% or not lower than 20mg/dl after the initial treatment, the odds ratio of 30-day mortality will be 3.692 and 3.806 (95%CI 1.867-7.756, P\<0.001) by univariate analysis and multivariate analysis.

In conclusion, the applicant established three criteria for assessing effectiveness of CAP treatment:

  1. Effective treatment by PSI: the PSI score decreased after 3-5 days the initial treatment.
  2. Effective treatment by Expand-CURB: the Expand-CURB score decreased after 3-5 days the initial treatment.
  3. Effective treatment by serum CRP: the serum CRP decreased more than 40% or lower than 20mg/dl after 3-5 days the initial treatment.

Furthermore, the applicant found combined pneumonia severity scores with CRP could predict the 30-day mortality more efficiently. The OR for both CRP and PSI treatment failure was 2.377 (95%CI 1.100-5.136, P=0.028). And the OR for both CRP and Expand-CURB treatment failure was 7.332 (95%CI 1.563-34.385, P=0.012). Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that the change of pneumonia severity scores and CRP could reflect the patients'condition and the effectiveness of the treatment.

To validate the feasibility of assessing effectiveness of CAP treatment by using continuous pneumonia severity score and changes of CRP, applicant intend to randomly allocate the patients into three arms: Comprehensive evaluation group, PSI evaluation group and Expand-CURB evaluation group. Patients who did not agree to participate the randomized controlled study will be asked whether they agree to provide their clinical data for prospective observational studies.

The primary outcomes will be 30-day mortality and ICU admission. The second outcome is length of hospital stay.

02

Conditions studied

  • Community-acquired Pneumonia

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Community-acquired Pneumonia
  • Pneumonia severity scores
03

In context

Pneumonia

2,044 studies on the registry are indexed under Pneumonia; 283 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 2,000 is above the median of 106 across 1,247 interventional studies indexed under Pneumonia.

Browse Pneumonia studies →

Lead sponsor

Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University is the lead sponsor of 1,058 studies on the registry; 511 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • community acquired pneumonia(by CTS or IDSA/ATS guidelines)
  • severe community acquired pneumonia(PSI scores >= 90 or Expand-CURB scores >= 4);

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • HIV patients
  • Other immunodeficiency disorders (neutropenia, hematologic and solid tumors undergoing chemoradiotherapy, organ transplantation, and long-term treatment with glucocorticoid and cytokine antagonists).
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
2,000 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Comprehensive evaluation group

    The effectiveness of initial treatment and the next treatment plan were determined based on the CAP guidelines of Chinese Thoracic Society (CTS) or Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society(IDSA/ATS). The evaluation process was independently evaluated and documented by at least two clinicians. In case of disagreement, the final determination shall vote on the majority of votes.

    Procedure: changes of Pneumonia Severity Score

  • Experimental
    PSI evaluation group

    The changes of PSI scores and serum CRP were used to evaluate the therapeutic effects. If both PSI scores and CRP suggest that treatment is effective, the initial treatment will be maintained. If either of PSI scores or serum CRP suggest that treatment is effective, the initial treatment can be maintained, but need to be reviewed in the next 3-5 days. If both PSI scores and serum CRP suggest that the treatment is failed, the initial treatment should be changed. The change of initial treatment is not limited to antibiotics, but also include using glucocorticoid, ICU admission, mechanical ventilation according to the patients' condition.

    Procedure: changes of Pneumonia Severity Score

  • Experimental
    Expand-CURB evaluation group

    The changes of Expand-CURB scores and serum CRP were used to evaluate the therapeutic effects. If both Expand-CURB scores and CRP suggest that treatment is effective, the initial treatment will be maintained. If either of Expand-CURB scores or serum CRP suggest that treatment is effective, the initial treatment can be maintained, but need to be reviewed in the next 3-5 days. If both Expand-CURB scores and serum CRP suggest that the treatment is failed, the initial treatment should be changed. The change of initial treatment is not limited to antibiotics, but also include using glucocorticoid, ICU admission, mechanical ventilation according to the patients' condition.

    Procedure: changes of Pneumonia Severity Score

  • No intervention
    Prospective observational group

    Patients' Expand-CURB scores, PSI scores and serum CRP before and after 3-5 days of initial treatment will be recorded. And the initial treatment, whether the initial treatment was changed 3-5 days of initial treatment and the final outcomes (ICU admission, 30-day mortality, average length of stay) will be recorded.

Interventions

  • Procedurechanges of Pneumonia Severity Score

    assessing effectiveness of CAP treatment by using continuous pneumonia severity score

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Rate of patients for ICU admission

    Rate of patients who received ICU treatment during hospitalization. The numerator is the number of patients who received ICU treatment during hospitalization. The denominator is the number of all the enrolled patients.

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 10 days

  2. Rate of all-caused mortality within 30 days.

    Rate of all-caused death occurring within 30 days during hospitalization. The numerator is the number of patients who defined as death occurring within 30 days of hospitalization. The denominator is the number of enrolled patients.

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 10 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Length of stay for patients

    The duration of a single episode of hospitalization. Inpatient days are calculated by subtracting day of admission from day of discharge.

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 10 days

07

Study locations

1 site
  • SAHZhejiangU
    Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310000, China
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Mandell LA, Wunderink RG, Anzueto A, Bartlett JG, Campbell GD, Dean NC, Dowell SF, File TM Jr, Musher DM, Niederman MS, Torres A, Whitney CG; Infectious Diseases Society of America; American Thoracic Society. Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society consensus guidelines on the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults. Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Mar 1;44 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S27-72. doi: 10.1086/511159. No abstract available. PubMed 17278083 ↗
  • Fine MJ, Auble TE, Yealy DM, Hanusa BH, Weissfeld LA, Singer DE, Coley CM, Marrie TJ, Kapoor WN. A prediction rule to identify low-risk patients with community-acquired pneumonia. N Engl J Med. 1997 Jan 23;336(4):243-50. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199701233360402. PubMed 8995086 ↗
  • Liu JL, Xu F, Zhou H, Wu XJ, Shi LX, Lu RQ, Farcomeni A, Venditti M, Zhao YL, Luo SY, Dong XJ, Falcone M. Expanded CURB-65: a new score system predicts severity of community-acquired pneumonia with superior efficiency. Sci Rep. 2016 Mar 18;6:22911. doi: 10.1038/srep22911. Erratum In: Sci Rep. 2018 Aug 09;8:47005. doi: 10.1038/srep47005. PubMed 26987602 ↗
  • Welte T, Kohnlein T. Global and local epidemiology of community-acquired pneumonia: the experience of the CAPNETZ Network. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2009 Apr;30(2):127-35. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1202941. Epub 2009 Mar 18. PubMed 19296412 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 22, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04135183
Lead sponsor
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 22, 2019
Start date
Jul 1, 2020 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2022 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2022 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 22, 2019

Study contacts

Jinliang Liu, MD
Contact
2511063@zju.edu.cn
+86 13867496840

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Oct 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion