ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04133467Updated Oct 22, 2019

Scalp Block Decreases Pain and Side Effects

An observational study in Craniosynostoses and Pain, Postoperative, sponsored by Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS. Completed at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 3 Months to 2 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-10-22.

Sponsored by Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
26
Ages
3 Months to 2 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Postoperative analgesia after corrective surgery of paediatric craniosynostosis is crucial in term of short and long-term outcomes. The objective of this observational case- control study was to evaluate the effectiveness of an analgesic technique based on the scalp block versus traditional pharmacological approach.

Read the detailed description

Several studies on craniosynostosis and the correlated risk factors have been published, the majority of them focusing on the perioperative management of blood losses and avoidance of haemorrhagic shock. Other issues related to anaesthetic management of the surgical correction of craniosynostosis are metabolic and electrolyte disturbances.

Even if craniosynostosis surgery is an invasive procedure, there is a current misconception that it would be associated with minimal pain, despite the extensive exhibition of the skull and periostea dissection. The Literature about the assessment and management of postoperative pain in this particular surgical setting is scarce. Assessment of pain in infants is challenging, and often relies on clinical observation. To date, there are no evaluative and therapeutic parameters globally accredited in this category of patients. The scalp nerve block (SNB) is a regional anaesthetic technique, performed since several years in children undergoing a variety of procedures, from neurosurgery to eye-nose-throat surgery.SNB has been proposed as a complement to the routine craniosynostosis anaesthetic protocol, and should be associated to a reduced need for opioids.

Thirteen patients, aged between 3 months and 2 years, undergoing cranioplasty for the correction of craniosynostosis were subjected to SNB (Group SB) with Levobupivacaine 0.125% (total dose 2 mg/kg), performed before awakening, in combination with intraoperative intravenous acetaminophen (15 mg/kg if body weight >10Kg, 7 mg/kg if body weight \< 10 kg). The SNB procedure was performed using the modified Pinosky technique, with levobupivacaine 0,125%(10). A targeted infiltration of 0,75-2ml of local anaesthetic (LA) solution was done at multiple sites with a 23G needle.

This Group of patients were compared with another group of 13 patients, derived from our database, and treated with the traditional pharmacological approach given intraoperatively (intravenous acetaminophen according to the body weight, plus intravenous tramadol 1 mg/kg).

02

Conditions studied

  • Craniosynostoses
  • Pain, Postoperative
03

In context

Craniosynostoses

51 studies on the registry are indexed under Craniosynostoses; 14 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 26 is below the median of 43 across 26 observational studies indexed under Craniosynostoses.

Browse Craniosynostoses studies →

Lead sponsor

Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS is the lead sponsor of 952 studies on the registry; 541 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
3 Months to 2 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

patients with aged between 3 months and 2 years, undergoing cranioplasty for the correction of craniosynostosis

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • patients undergoing cranioplasty for the correction of craniosynostosis

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • allergies to local anesthetics and/or analgesics
  • specific drug therapies (pain relievers, sedatives and/or epileptic)
  • denied consent to the study; development of postoperative intracranical bleeding and/or gastrointestinal bleeding
  • need of nasogastric tube
  • development of gastrointestinal infections.
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
26 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Group SB

    Scalp block performed with Levobupivacaine 0.125% (total dose 2 mg/kg) in combination with intraoperative intravenous acetaminophen (15 mg/kg if body weight \>10Kg, 7 mg/kg if body weight \< 10 kg).

    Other: scalp block

  • Group ST

    intravenous acetaminophen according to the body weight, plus intravenous tramadol 1 mg/kg

Interventions

  • Otherscalp block

    intravenous acetaminophen according to the body weight, plus intravenous tramadol 1 mg/kg)

    Also known as: intravenous pharmacological approach

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. pain intensity

    Objective Pain Score incorporates four pain behaviors (crying, movement, agitation, and verbalization) and was evaluated at following times: * 30 minutes after extubation (T0) * 2 hours after extubation (T1) * 4 hours after extubation (T2) * 8 hours after extubation (T3) * at discharge from Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (T4). * at in the Neurosurgical ward OPS was assessed every eight hours, until the fifth day of hospitalization.

    Time frame: OPS was assessed until the fifth day of hospitalization.

Secondary outcomes

  1. resumption of oral nutrition

    evaluation of post-operative feeding recovery time

    Time frame: first postoperative day

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Rossano Festa
    Roma, 00168, Italy
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Stricker PA, Goobie SM, Cladis FP, Haberkern CM, Meier PM, Reddy SK, Nguyen TT, Cai L, Polansky M, Szmuk P, Fiadjoe J, Soneru C, Falcon R, Petersen T, Kowalczyk-Derderian C, Dalesio N, Budac S, Groenewald N, Rubens D, Thompson D, Watts R, Gentry K, Ivanova I, Hetmaniuk M, Hsieh V, Collins M, Wong K, Binstock W, Reid R, Poteet-Schwartz K, Gries H, Hall R, Koh J, Bannister C, Sung W, Jain R, Fernandez A, Tuite GF, Ruas E, Drozhinin O, Tetreault L, Muldowney B, Ricketts K, Fernandez P, Sohn L, Hajduk J, Taicher B, Burkhart J, Wright A, Kugler J, Barajas-DeLoa L, Gangadharan M, Busso V, Stallworth K, Staudt S, Labovsky KL, Glover CD, Huang H, Karlberg-Hippard H, Capehart S, Streckfus C, Nguyen KT, Manyang P, Martinez JL, Hansen JK, Levy HM, Brzenski A, Chiao F, Ingelmo P, Mujallid R, Olutoye OA, Syed T, Benzon H, Bosenberg A; Pediatric Craniofacial Collaborative Group. Perioperative Outcomes and Management in Pediatric Complex Cranial Vault Reconstruction: A Multicenter Study from the Pediatric Craniofacial Collaborative Group. Anesthesiology. 2017 Feb;126(2):276-287. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001481. PubMed 27977460 ↗
  • Thomas K, Hughes C, Johnson D, Das S. Anesthesia for surgery related to craniosynostosis: a review. Part 1. Paediatr Anaesth. 2012 Nov;22(11):1033-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2012.03927.x. PubMed 22928738 ↗
  • Chiaretti A, Pietrini D, Piastra M, Polidori G, Savioli A, Velardi F, Ciano F, Di Rocco C. Safety and efficacy of remifentanil in craniosynostosis repair in children less than 1 year old. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2000 Aug;33(2):83-8. doi: 10.1159/000028981. PubMed 11070434 ↗
  • Teo JH, Palmer GM, Davidson AJ. Post-craniotomy pain in a paediatric population. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2011 Jan;39(1):89-94. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1103900115. PubMed 21375097 ↗
  • Guilfoyle MR, Helmy A, Duane D, Hutchinson PJA. Regional scalp block for postcraniotomy analgesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2013 May;116(5):1093-1102. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182863c22. Epub 2013 Mar 11. PubMed 23477962 ↗
  • Pinosky ML, Fishman RL, Reeves ST, Harvey SC, Patel S, Palesch Y, Dorman BH. The effect of bupivacaine skull block on the hemodynamic response to craniotomy. Anesth Analg. 1996 Dec;83(6):1256-61. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199612000-00022. PubMed 8942596 ↗
  • Pardey Bracho GF, Pereira de Souza Neto E, Grousson S, Mottolese C, Dailler F. Opioid consumption after levobupivacaine scalp nerve block for craniosynostosis surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan. 2014 Jun;52(2):64-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aat.2014.05.006. Epub 2014 Jun 21. PubMed 25016510 ↗
  • Phillips S, Gift M, Gelot S, Duong M, Tapp H. Assessing the relationship between the level of pain control and patient satisfaction. J Pain Res. 2013 Sep 9;6:683-9. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S42262. eCollection 2013. PubMed 24049457 ↗
  • Festa R, Tosi F, Pusateri A, Mensi S, Garra R, Mancino A, Frassanito P, Rossi M. The scalp block for postoperative pain control in craniosynostosis surgery: a case control study. Childs Nerv Syst. 2020 Dec;36(12):3063-3070. doi: 10.1007/s00381-020-04661-z. Epub 2020 May 17. PubMed 32418049 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jan 2016 to primary completion in Jun 2016, 5 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 17, 2019
First posted
Oct 21, 2019
StartActual
Jan 1, 2016
Primary completionActual
Jun 30, 2016
CompletionActual
Jun 30, 2016
Last update
Oct 22, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 22, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04133467
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 21, 2019
Start date
Jan 1, 2016
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2016
Completion
Jun 30, 2016
Last update
Oct 22, 2019

Study contacts

Rossano festa, MD
principal investigator · Fondazione Universitaria Policlinico Gemelli IRCCS roma Italia

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion