CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04123106Updated Aug 23, 2021

Bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Local Anesthetic Infiltration for Perioperative Analgesia in Spine Surgery.

An interventional study of ESP block and Wound infiltration in Pain, Postoperative, SPINAL Fracture and Spondylolisthesis, sponsored by Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS. Completed at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-08-23.

Sponsored by Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
24
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Postoperative pain still represents an important perioperative issue, affecting more than 80% of patients undergoing surgery. A suboptimal pain management doesn't just affects quality of life, but can compromise rehabilitation plan, increase morbidity and determine the development of chronic pain. Last but not least, far from being just an obligation for physicians, a good analgesia is a fundamental right of every patient.

In order to meet these important demands, a great number of guidelines has been provided, all of these underlying that the centerpiece of postoperative analgesia lies in the multimodality management, thereby combining different medications and different ways of delivering them, with the aim of targeting distinct receptor systems and improving efficacy, while limiting side effects.

In 2018, the investigators conducted a case-series analysis on 17 patients undergoing lumbar surgery to find out the role of Sublingual Sufentanil Tablet System (SSTS) in a multimodal analgesia regimen. Patients expressed a good pain relief, with most benefit during physiotherapy sessions and early discharges, in absence of side effects. Since then, SSTS has been part of regular clinical practice in our hospital.

The aim of this randomized trial is to examine the analgesic efficacy and the opioid sparing role in spine surgery of a recently developed regional anesthesia technique, the Erector Spinae Plane block (ESP block), as opposed to Local Anaesthetic (LA) wound infiltration.

The latter is a widespread, simple and unexpensive mean of providing postoperative analgesia. On the other hand, ESP block is an ultrasound-guided interfascial plain block, in which LA is injected below the erector spine muscle, closer to costotransverse foramina and origin of dorsal and ventral rami. It does provide an efficient multidermatomal sensory blockade (according to craniocaudal LA spread), with the advantage of being simple and safe.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pain, Postoperative
  • SPINAL Fracture
  • Spondylolisthesis

Keywords

  • Analgesia, Patient-Controlled
  • Anesthetics, Local
  • Pain, Postoperative
03

In context

Spondylolisthesis

237 studies on the registry are indexed under Spondylolisthesis; 47 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 24 is below the median of 60 across 149 interventional studies indexed under Spondylolisthesis.

Browse Spondylolisthesis studies →

Lead sponsor

Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS is the lead sponsor of 920 studies on the registry; 529 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients scheduled for lumbar fusion surgery on account of vertebral fractures or degenerative spondylolisthesis.
  • Patients consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Opioid tolerance;
  • Documented sleep apnoea or home oxygen therapy;
  • History of alcohol or drug abuse;
  • Patients with an allergy or hypersensitivity to opioids.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
24 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    ESP block

    Ultrasound-guided, performed below erector spinae plane (ropivacaine 0.5% 20 mL each side).

    Procedure: ESP block

  • Active comparator
    Wound infiltration

    Ropivacaine 0.5% 20-40 mL, performed by surgeon.

    Procedure: Wound infiltration

Interventions

  • ProcedureESP block

    ESP block bilaterally performed at the level of the surgical site prior to surgery.

  • ProcedureWound infiltration

    Wound infiltration performed at the surgical site at the end of surgery.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) arrival

    NRS scale is a 11-point scale (0-11), with which patients self-report and rate level of breakthrough pain, where 0 is no pain and 10 the worst pain imaginable.

    Time frame: At the end of surgery, at PACU arrival.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Difference in Pain Intensity Difference (PID) at PACU arrival, at 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 60 minutes, 2 hours, 6 hours from PACU arrival.

    PID summarizes treatment response over a clinically relevant period. It represents a raw difference in pain intensity (i.e. the difference between the NRS value at each time point from the NRS at PACU arrival) and it is based on NRS data. It ranges from 0 to 10. The higher the value, the better the pain relief, since the greater is the pain intensity difference.

    Time frame: At the end of surgery, at PACU arrival; at 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 60 minutes, 2 hours, 6 hours from PACU arrival

  2. Difference in Sum of Pain Intensity Difference (SPID) at 12, 24, 48, 72 hours from PACU arrival.

    SPID is calculated multiplying the PID score at each time point by the duration (in hours) since the preceding time point, and then summing the values over the relevant time period. SPID represents the sum of the absolute difference in pain intensity. It ranges from 0 to an undefined value, variable according to the time weighted sum. The higher the value, the better the pain relief, since the greater is the pain intensity difference.

    Time frame: 12 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours from PACU arrival.

  3. Number of Sublingual Sufentanil Tablets taken

    All patients eligible will be provided with Sufentanil Sublingual Tablet System.

    Time frame: 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours from PACU arrival.

  4. Safety profile (incidence of adverse events)

    Report of any adverse effect (sickness, vomiting, itching, numbness, respiratory side effects, procedure-related complications,..)

    Time frame: Anytime during the study.

  5. Patients satisfaction

    All patients will fill out an Ease-Of-Care (EOC) Questionnaire, highlighting satisfaction with level of pain control and satisfaction with method of administration of pain medication.

    Time frame: Before discharge, an average of 48 hours from the end of surgery.

  6. Length of hospital stay

    Length of hospital stay after surgery

    Time frame: At discharge, an average of 48 hours from the end of surgery.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Policlinico A. Gemelli
    Rome, 00168, Italy
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 23, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04123106
Lead sponsor
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS
Collaborators
Prof. Marco Rossi, Dr. Roberta Nestorini, Dr. Mariangela Di Muro
Responsible party
VERGARI ALESSANDRO (Principal Investigator, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 10, 2019
Start date
May 11, 2020
Primary completion
Sep 28, 2020
Completion
Sep 28, 2020
Last update
Aug 23, 2021

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion