ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04118374Updated Oct 28, 2025Results posted

A Study to Determine Iatrogenic Hyperinsulinemia's Contribution to Insulin Resistance and Endothelial Dysfunction in Type 1 Diabetes

An interventional study of Standard Carb Diet and Low Carb Diet in Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, sponsored by Vanderbilt University Medical Center. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-10-28.

Sponsored by Vanderbilt University Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
14
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The investigators will test the hypothesis that reducing insulin doses using a low carbohydrate diet (LCD) will be associated with with improved insulin sensitivity (Aim 1) and blood vessel health (Aim 2).

Read the detailed description

Insulin resistance (IR) is consistently found in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1DM) and pathophysiologically links T1DM with atherosclerotic disease. IR and nascent atherosclerosis, as characterized by endothelial dysfunction, are present early in T1DM. Although atherosclerosis leads to cardiovascular disease (CVD)-the predominant cause of death in T1DM-the early cardiometabolic processes driving atherosclerosis are not currently well-characterized. My overarching hypothesis is that IR and endothelial dysfunction in T1DM are, in part, iatrogenic, occurring as a function of nonphysiologic insulin delivery.

Previous research shows IR in T1DM is closely related to iatrogenic hyperinsulinemia. Iatrogenic hyperinsulinemia in T1DM results from injecting insulin into subcutaneous tissue rather than delivering insulin more physiologically into the hepatic portal vein. Hyperinsulinemia, per se, is closely linked with IR and independently predicts CVD in diabetic and nondiabetic populations. Thus, peripheral insulin delivery brings about unintended adverse cardiometabolic consequences in T1DM. The investigators propose a practical intervention to diminish iatrogenic hyperinsulinemia and thereby mitigate CVD risk. The investigators hypothesize that a reduction in iatrogenic hyperinsulinemia brought about by a low carbohydrate diet (LCD) will independently correlate with improved insulin sensitivity (Aim 1) and endothelial function (Aim 2).

In this pilot study, the investigators will mechanistically dissect the contribution of iatrogenic hyperinsulinemia to IR and endothelial dysfunction in 8 adults with T1DM using a crossover study of LCD vs. standard carbohydrate diet (SCD) to experimentally modify hyperinsulinemia. The investigators will quantify insulin sensitivity using hyperinsulinemic, euglycemic clamps and measure endothelium-dependent flow mediated vasodilation using high-resolution ultrasound.

02

Conditions studied

  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1

Keywords

  • low carbohydrate diet
  • hyperinsulinemia
  • insulin resistance
  • endothelial dysfunction
  • vascular health
03

In context

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1

3,754 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; 600 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 14 is below the median of 40 across 2,820 interventional studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1.

Browse Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 studies →

Lead sponsor

Vanderbilt University Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 833 studies on the registry; 155 are open to participants now.

Of its 125 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 92 (74%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age: 18-60
  • : 5.6-9.0%
  • Insulin delivery: must be on an insulin pump
  • Glucose Monitor: must use a continuous glucose monitor (CGM)
  • 18-33 kg/m\^2
  • Body Mass >/= 50 kg ( 110 lbs)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • severe hypoglycemia : >/= 1 episode in the past 3 months
  • diabetes comorbidities (>= 1 trip to emergency department for poor glucose control in the past 6 months,
  • Class II-IV cardiac functional status
  • SBP > 140 and DBP > 100 mmHg,
  • by MDRD equation of \<60 mL/min/1.73m\^2
  • or ALT > 2.5 times the
  • HCT \<35%

medications

  • any antioxidant vitamin supplement (\<2 weeks before STUDY visit)
  • any systemic
  • any antipsychotic
  • atenolol, metoprolol, propranolol
  • niacin
  • any thiazide diuretic
  • any OCP with > 35 mcg ethinyl estradiol,
  • growth hormone
  • any
  • any antihypertensive
  • any antihyperlipidemic

other:

  • pregnancy
  • Tanner stage \< 5
  • peri or woman
  • active smoker
  • gluten-free diet requirement

Additional exclusion criteria for T1DM subjects

  • any diabetes medication except insulin
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(9)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

HbA1c

A blood test of average blood sugar over the past two to three months, given as a percentage or in mmol/mol. 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) or more is the usual threshold for diabetes, normally confirmed by a second test.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Postmenopausal

Periods have stopped for good: usually no period for 12 months in a row without another medical reason, sometimes confirmed by a blood test (FSH).

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
14 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Standard Carb Diet then Low Carb Diet

    Other: Standard Carb Diet · Other: Low Carb Diet

  • Experimental
    Low Carb Diet then Standard Carb Diet

    Other: Standard Carb Diet · Other: Low Carb Diet

Interventions

  • OtherStandard Carb Diet

    Approximately 50% of caloric intake will come from carbohydrate consumption.

  • OtherLow Carb Diet

    Approximately 25% of caloric intake will come from carbohydrate consumption.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Insulin Sensitivity Assessed as Glucose Infusion Rates

    Participants completed both a one-week RCD and a one-week SCD, separated by a three-week washout. After each intervention, we measured insulin sensitivity using a hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp.To express GIR in mg of glucose per kg of fat-free mass per minute (mg/kg FFM/min), we divided the dextrose infusion rate by the fat-free mass determined by DEXA. Insulin sensitivity showed no significant difference between diets. GIR was 8.1 mg/kg FFM/min after the RCD and 8.6 mg/kg FFM/min after the SCD.

    Time frame: week 1 and week 5

07

Results

Posted Oct 28, 2025

Participant flow

14 patients were screened for eligibility between November 2021 and March 2024. We recruited adults with type 1 diabetes (age 18-60 years, BMI 18-33 kg/m2, HbA1c 5.9-9.0%) from the Vanderbilt Eskind Diabetes Clinic and community sources in Nashville, TN.

First Intervention (7 days)
Participant flow — First Intervention (7 days)
MilestoneStandard Carb Diet then Low Carb DietLow Carb Diet then Standard Carb Diet
Started66
Completed66
Not completed00
Washout Period (21 days)
Participant flow — Washout Period (21 days)
MilestoneStandard Carb Diet then Low Carb DietLow Carb Diet then Standard Carb Diet
Started66
Completed66
Not completed00
Second Intervention (7 days)
Participant flow — Second Intervention (7 days)
MilestoneStandard Carb Diet then Low Carb DietLow Carb Diet then Standard Carb Diet
Started66
Completed66
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in Insulin Sensitivity Assessed as Glucose Infusion Rates

Participants completed both a one-week RCD and a one-week SCD, separated by a three-week washout. After each intervention, we measured insulin sensitivity using a hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp.To express GIR in mg of glucose per kg of fat-free mass per minute (mg/kg FFM/min), we divided the dextrose infusion rate by the fat-free mass determined by DEXA. Insulin sensitivity showed no significant difference between diets. GIR was 8.1 mg/kg FFM/min after the RCD and 8.6 mg/kg FFM/min after the SCD.

Time frame:
week 1 and week 5
Reported as:
Median · mg/kg FFM/min
Change in Insulin Sensitivity Assessed as Glucose Infusion Rates
mg/kg FFM/minStandard Carb DietLow Carb Diet
Change in Insulin Sensitivity Assessed as Glucose Infusion Rates8.6 (7.0 to 11.0)8.1 (6.7 to 10.1)
Statistical analysis
  • Standard Carb Diet vs Low Carb Diet · ANOVA · p = <0.01 · Median difference (final values): 0.2 · 95% CI -0.5 to 1.8

Adverse events

Collected over through study completion, an average of 1 year. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Standard Carb Diet0/12 (0%)0/12 (0%)2/12 (16.7%)
Low Carb Diet0/12 (0%)0/12 (0%)1/12 (8.3%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventStandard Carb DietLow Carb Diet
HeadacheNervous system disorders2/120/12
ShakinessNervous system disorders0/121/12

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)All Study Participants
Median33.9 (25.0 to 39.0)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)All Study Participants
Female7
Male5
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)All Study Participants
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian0
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American1
White11
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)All Study Participants
United States12
BMI
BMI(kg/m^2)All Study Participants
Median26.5 (21.7 to 28.4)
Weight
Weight(kg)All Study Participants
Median75.3 (66.8 to 92.0)
Height
Height(m)All Study Participants
Median1.75 (1.68 to 1.88)
Waist-to-hip ratio
Waist-to-hip ratio(ratio)All Study Participants
Median0.83 (0.75 to 0.88)

7 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

1 site
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center
    Nashville, Tennessee 37232, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Gregory JM, Smith TJ, Duffus SH, Brooks D, Akbar MN, Huntley MA, Gottlieb JA, LeStourgeon LM, Wilson CS, Beckman JA, Cherrington AD. A one-week reduced-carbohydrate diet to mitigate iatrogenic peripheral hyperinsulinemia does not improve insulin sensitivity or endothelial function in a randomized, crossover trial in patients with type 1 diabetes. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2025 Mar 5;24(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12933-025-02658-z. PubMed 40045281 ↗
  • Akbar MN, Smith TJ, Chinnarasu S, Welch W, Zuofei W, Litts B, LeStourgeon LM, Saleem M, Khan MM, Kirabo A, Gregory JM. A one-week reduced-carbohydrate diet lowers insulin requirements and shifts the IGF axis with no detectable short-term change in endothelial function in a randomized, crossover trial of adults with type 1 diabetes. Cardiovasc Diabetol Endocrinol Rep. 2026 Mar 26;12(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s40842-026-00276-6. PubMed 41882799 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study can be available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Data sets can be made available beginning 3 months and ending 5 years following article publication. No applicable resources have yet been generated or analyzed during the current study.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Clinical study report

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Nov 2021 to primary completion in Jun 2024, 30 months.

Results were first posted in Oct 2025, 1 year 4 months after primary completion.

Of 844 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, half reached primary completion within 19 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 38. This study's 30 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 949 studies reached it within 18 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 35.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 2, 2019
First posted
Oct 8, 2019
StartActual
Nov 24, 2021
Primary completionActual
Jun 21, 2024
CompletionActual
Jun 21, 2024
Results first posted
Oct 28, 2025
Last update
Oct 28, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 28, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04118374
Responsible party
Justin Gregory (Assistant Professor, Vanderbilt University Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 8, 2019
Start date
Nov 24, 2021
Primary completion
Jun 21, 2024
Completion
Jun 21, 2024
Results posted
Oct 28, 2025
Last update
Oct 28, 2025

Study contacts

Justin M Gregory, MD, MSCI
principal investigator · Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion