An interventional study of Laparoscopy in Rectal Prolapse, sponsored by Al-Azhar University. Completed. Open to participants aged 5 Years to 12 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-10-08.
Sponsored by Al-Azhar University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care
Purpose: to compare Laparoscopic mesh rectopexy with laparoscopic suture rectopexy The operative time, recurrence rate, post-operative constipation, and effect on fecal incontinence, were reported and evaluated for each group Results:
Purpose: to compare Laparoscopic mesh rectopexy with laparoscopic suture rectopexy Patient and Methods: The prospective study was conducted at Pediatric Surgery Department, Al-Azhar university hospitals, Cairo, Egypt . The operative time, recurrence rate, post-operative constipation, and effect on fecal incontinence, were reported and evaluated for each group
55 studies on the registry are indexed under Rectal Prolapse; 12 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 64 is above the median of 55 across 34 interventional studies indexed under Rectal Prolapse.
Browse Rectal Prolapse studies →Al-Azhar University is the lead sponsor of 531 studies on the registry; 172 are open to participants now.
Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Children with persistant complete Rectal Prolapse.
Exclusion Criteria:
Using Laparoscopy
Device: Laparoscopy
Using Laparoscopy
Device: Laparoscopy
Laparoscopic Procedures for Rectopexy
Signs of improvement
No recurrence of Rectal Prolapse
Time frame: 12 weeks
Signs of improvement
Improvement of Fecal Incontinence score(Rintala score)
Time frame: 30 weeks
No study locations are listed for this record.
This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.