CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT04109885Updated Aug 1, 2024

Paracervical Injection for Headache in the Emergency Department

A Phase 2 interventional study of Paracervical injection and prochlorperazine and diphenhydramine.(Standard Treatment) in Headache Disorders, Primary, Pain Management and Emergency Department, sponsored by Christian Fromm, MD. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 64 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-08-01.

Sponsored by Christian Fromm, MD · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Insufficient recruitment.
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
19
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 64 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Headache is one of the most common presenting complaints in the emergency department.1 By the time patients with benign headaches present for treatment in the ED, they often have exhausted non-invasive treatments, and physicians are left with few therapeutic options. The investigators therefore propose to study the use of paracervical injection as a novel approach to managing headache in the emergency department. This procedure has great potential, if efficacious, to provide a safe, rapidly effective, non-sedating treatment for headache that does not involve intravenous line placement and systemic medication administration. To date, there are no published trials that evaluate this technique in this setting. The investigators intend to compare the efficacy of paracervical injection to standard first-line therapy (intravenous prochlorperazine and diphenhydramine) for the treatment of benign headache of any etiology in the emergency department.

Read the detailed description

Headache is one of the most common presenting complaints in the emergency department.1 By the time patients with benign headaches present for treatment in the ED, they often have exhausted non-invasive treatments, and physicians are left with few therapeutic options.

Amongst the array of medications used by physicians to manage benign headache, dopamine antagonists have demonstrated the best efficacy in trials. A number of studies have demonstrated the efficacy of dopamine antagonists in treating migraine, tension, cluster-type, and other benign headaches2,3 Dopamine antagonists have shown superiority over opioids4, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs5, triptans6, and anti-epileptics7. Prochlorperazine is probably the most studied and most commonly clinically utilized in this regard in the ED setting.

Despite the preponderance of evidence supporting the use of dopamine antagonists as first-line therapeutic agents in the ED management of benign headache, more than half of the 1.2 million patients treated in U.S. emergency departments for acute migraine are treated with opioids despite the known risks and recommendations to the contrary.12 In addition, there is tremendous variation in the medications chosen by ED physicians for managing benign headache.13 Most of these regimens involve administration of systemic medications that have considerable side effect profiles. Moreover, many of these headache cocktails require prolonged durations of treatment with sedative side effects. This results in prolonged ED lengths of stay that occupy valuable bed space in increasingly busy and crowded emergency departments.

A less well-known approach to managing benign headache is bilateral, paracervical, intramuscular injection of a long-acting anesthetic. The mechanism of action is not entirely understood, however it is postulated to involve neuronal pathways in the trigeminocervical complex thought to play a central role in headache physiology. This is similar in concept to the mechanism proposed for the occipital nerve blocks performed by neurologists.

Paracervical injection was first described by Mellick et al.8 This method has the advantage of ease of administration, favorable safety profile, lack of need for intravenous access, lack of sedative side effects, and swiftness of therapeutic response. In Mellick's case series, he treated 417 patients who presented with all manner of benign headaches with a 65% rate of complete relief of pain and a 20% rate of partial relief. Many patients had rapid relief of headache within 5 minutes and the remainder in less than 30 minutes. This study was limited by possible selection bias, given it is unclear why the specific patients enrolled were chosen for this treatment. The study was also limited by its observational nature and lack of a control group.

In recent years this procedure has gained popularity amongst emergency physicians, and it has been widely discussed in emergency medicine blogs and podcasts. Numerous online videos demonstrate the ease with which the procedure is performed by physicians and tolerated by patients. Many physicians have called for clinical trials to assess its efficacy.

The investigators therefore propose to study the use of paracervical injection as a novel approach to managing headache in the emergency department. This procedure has great potential, if efficacious, to provide a safe, rapidly effective, non-sedating treatment for headache that does not involve intravenous line placement and systemic medication administration. To date, there are no published trials that evaluate this technique in this setting. The investigators intend to compare the efficacy of paracervical injection to standard first-line therapy (intravenous prochlorperazine and diphenhydramine) for the treatment of benign headache of any etiology in the emergency department.

02

Conditions studied

  • Headache Disorders, Primary
  • Pain Management
  • Emergency Department
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 64 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 to 64 years
  • Suspected diagnosis of benign or primary headache

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Treating attending physician is suspicious of a serious secondary cause of headache
  • History of brain disease, concussion, stroke, intracranial mass or tumor, hemorrhage, increased intracranial pressure, head trauma in last 2 weeks, status post intracranial surgery
  • History of neck disease, cervical spine or disc abnormality, history of vertebral or carotid artery dissection, torticollis, status post cervical spine surgery or hardware in place
  • Hypersensitivity or allergy to bupivacaine (amide anesthetics) or prochlorperazine (dopamine receptor antagonists)
  • Overlying signs of infection at site of injection (erythema, purulence, open skin)
  • History of extrapyramidal symptoms, dystonia, parkinsonism, tardive dyskinesia or neuroleptic malignant syndrome
  • Pregnancy
  • History of schizophrenia or bipolar disorder
  • Narcotic seeking patients as determined by the treating attending physician with optional assistance from medical record and online database review
  • Weight more than 150 kg or less than 40 kg
  • Received pain medication in the ED or less than 6 hours prior to enrollment
  • Temperature greater than 38 degrees Celcius
  • Previous enrollment
04

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
19 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Paracervical injection

    1.5 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine will be will be injected bilaterally in the paraspinal musculature of the cervical spine.

    Drug: Paracervical injection

  • Active comparator
    Standard treatment

    Intravenous administration of prochlorperazine and diphenhydramine.

    Drug: prochlorperazine and diphenhydramine.(Standard Treatment)

Interventions

  • DrugParacervical injection

    1.5 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine will be will be injected bilaterally in the paraspinal musculature of the cervical spine.

  • Drugprochlorperazine and diphenhydramine.(Standard Treatment)

    Intravenous administration of prochlorperazine and diphenhydramine.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Rate of symptom improvement

    Patient asked if symptoms are improved enough for patient to be discharged to home.

    Time frame: 30 minutes

Secondary outcomes

  1. Reduction in pain scale

    Pain scale measurement (1-10)

    Time frame: 30 minutes

  2. Re-presentation for medical care

    Patient asked if re-presented for medical care in the previous 72 hours (yes/no)

    Time frame: 72 hours

  3. Headache recurrence

    Patient asked if headache recurred (yes/no)

    Time frame: 72 hours

06

Study locations

1 site
  • Albert Einstein Medical Center
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19141, United States
07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04109885
Lead sponsor
Christian Fromm, MD
Responsible party
Christian Fromm, MD (Director of Clinical Trials, Albert Einstein Healthcare Network) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Oct 1, 2019
Start date
Sep 15, 2020
Primary completion
Jan 30, 2024
Completion
Jan 30, 2024
Last update
Aug 1, 2024

Study contacts

Christian Fromm, MD
principal investigator · Einstein Healthcare Network

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Jul 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion