CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04108429Updated Mar 31, 2022Results posted

IntelliCare in College Students - Implementation (ICCS-I)

An interventional study of IntelliCare for College Students in Depression and Anxiety, sponsored by Northwestern University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-03-31.

Sponsored by Northwestern University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
117
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is a hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial of the smartphone student stress-management app IntelliCare for college students. This intervention will be tested with University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC) and Northern Illinois University (NIU) students. During the study, participants will complete measures of depressive and anxious symptoms, as well as measures of mental health literacy, within the app.

Read the detailed description

In this study, students will be recruited to use the IntelliCare Hub app and encouraged to use it daily.The overall aim of this study is to pilot the program, evaluation metrics, implementation strategies, data collection and assessment procedures for a larger implementation trial. During the trial, participants will be prompted to complete the PHQ-8 and GAD-7 every week. At monthly intervals, participants will be prompted within the app to complete the Depression Literacy Questionnaire and Anxiety Literacy Questionnaire to measure mental health literacy, the Knowledge and Beliefs about Services scale to measure knowledge of campus mental health services, the Barriers to Mental Health Help-Seeking questionnaire to measure treatment barriers, and the Cognitive and Behavioral Response to Stress Scale to measure cognitive and behavioral coping skills. Counseling center utilization data will be extracted from the participating counseling centers' electronic medical records.

02

Conditions studied

  • Depression
  • Anxiety

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Mental health
  • App
  • Mobile phone
  • Stress management
03

In context

Depression

8,057 studies on the registry are indexed under Depression; 1,641 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 117 is above the median of 84 across 6,720 interventional studies indexed under Depression.

Browse Depression studies →

Lead sponsor

Northwestern University is the lead sponsor of 1,396 studies on the registry; 199 are open to participants now.

Of its 102 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 73 (72%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Participant is a student at the University of Illinois in Chicago or Northern Illinois University. *Participant owns a smartphone capable of running Android 7 (or higher) or iOS11 (or higher).
  • Participant is 18 years of age or older

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

*None

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
117 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Mobile self-help intervention

    Participants will have open access to the IntelliCare system.

    Behavioral: IntelliCare for College Students

Interventions

  • BehavioralIntelliCare for College Students

    Participants will receive access to the IntelliCare system, which consists of apps with a variety of resources, including lessons and tools designed to teach skills for mood management. It is suggested that participants utilize the mobile phone tools every day

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Patient Health Questionnaire - 9 (PHQ-9) - Depression Severity Module

    The PHQ-9 measures degree of depression severity. Possible range of scores for the PHQ-9 is 0-27. Higher values represent a worse outcome. Specifically, scores of 0-4 indicate minimal or no depression; 5-9 is mild; 10-14 is moderate; 15-19 is moderately severe; and 20-27 is severe

    Time frame: Weekly symptom reports at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8

  2. Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale - 7 (GAD-7)

    The GAD-7 is a self-administered 7 item instrument that uses some of the DSM-V criteria for GAD (General Anxiety Disorder) to identify probable cases of GAD along with measuring anxiety symptom severity. GAD-7 total score for the seven items ranges from 0 to 21. Higher values represent a worse outcome. Specifically, scores of 1-4 indicate minimal anxiety symptoms; 5-9 is mild anxiety symptoms; 10-14 is moderate anxiety symptoms; and 15-21 is severe anxiety symptoms.

    Time frame: Weekly symptom reports at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8

  3. Counseling Center Utilization Data (e.g. Counts of Individual Counseling Appointments)

    Counseling session utilization data were examined on a biweekly basis to determine if the introduction of the IntelliCare for College Students program impacts counseling center utilization. Counts of types of sessions (e.g. intake appointments, individual counseling appointments, crisis appointments) attended by students were examined over time to look at potential changes. These data were collected from the university in aggregate, thus, there are not participant-level data.

    Time frame: Biweekly session utilization from August 1, 2018 (start of pre-implementation data collection; prior to the implementation trial) to December 18, 2020 (end of implementation period)

  4. Average Number of Days of App Usage

    The mean number of days the app was used was drawn from the study app over the course of the study

    Time frame: Days of app use through study completion, up to 10 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Anxiety Literacy Questionnaire

    This is a measure of mental health literacy, specifically about symptoms of anxiety. Participants respond "True" or "False" to statements about anxiety and the correct responses are tallied to create total score. The range of score is range of scores is 0-22 with higher scores indicating greater literacy.

    Time frame: Monthly questionnaire scores at baseline, one month and two months

  2. Depression Literacy Questionnaire

    This is a measure of mental health literacy, specifically about symptoms of depression. Participants respond "True" or "False" to statements about depression and the correct responses are tallied to create total score. The range of scores is 0-22 with higher scores indicating greater literacy.

    Time frame: Monthly questionnaire scores at baseline, one month and two months

  3. Cognitive and Behavioral Response to Stress Scale (CB-RSS)

    The CB-RSS is a 9 item measure of the frequency and perceived helpfulness of cognitive and behavioral coping skills. There are 4 subscales representing "Cognitive frequency" "Cognitive helpfulness" "Behavioral frequency" and "Behavioral helpfulness." Participants respond to the frequency items on a scale of 0 = Never to 6 = Always and to the helpfulness items on a scale of 0 = Not at all helpful to 6 = Extremely helpful. The scores range from 0-24 on the Cognitive subscales and from 0-30 on the Behavioral subscales. Higher values represent a better outcome.

    Time frame: Monthly questionnaire scores at baseline, one month and two months

07

Results

Posted Mar 31, 2022
Limitations and caveats
Due to COVID-19-related changes and ongoing uncertainty surrounding operations on the university campuses with which we partnered, many of the program implementation plans were unable to be enacted. Due to the in-app nature of assessments, there was a high degree of data missingness on the mental health symptom data and the intervention target data.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneMobile Self-help Intervention
Started117
Completed117
Not completed0

Outcome measures

PrimaryPatient Health Questionnaire - 9 (PHQ-9) - Depression Severity Module

The PHQ-9 measures degree of depression severity. Possible range of scores for the PHQ-9 is 0-27. Higher values represent a worse outcome. Specifically, scores of 0-4 indicate minimal or no depression; 5-9 is mild; 10-14 is moderate; 15-19 is moderately severe; and 20-27 is severe

Time frame:
Weekly symptom reports at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Patient Health Questionnaire - 9 (PHQ-9) - Depression Severity Module
units on a scaleMobile Self-help Intervention
Week 111.2 ± 15.5
Week 29.5 ± 15.4
Week 410.9 ± 17.5
Week 69.4 ± 17.7
Week 89.1 ± 15.4
Statistical analysis
  • Mobile Self-help Intervention · Mixed Models Analysis · p = .830
PrimaryGeneralized Anxiety Disorder Scale - 7 (GAD-7)

The GAD-7 is a self-administered 7 item instrument that uses some of the DSM-V criteria for GAD (General Anxiety Disorder) to identify probable cases of GAD along with measuring anxiety symptom severity. GAD-7 total score for the seven items ranges from 0 to 21. Higher values represent a worse outcome. Specifically, scores of 1-4 indicate minimal anxiety symptoms; 5-9 is mild anxiety symptoms; 10-14 is moderate anxiety symptoms; and 15-21 is severe anxiety symptoms.

Time frame:
Weekly symptom reports at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale - 7 (GAD-7)
units on a scaleMobile Self-help Intervention
Week 110.0 ± 7.7
Week 28.6 ± 10.6
Week 49.0 ± 6.9
Week 69.4 ± 14.2
Week 810.3 ± 10.9
Statistical analysis
  • Mobile Self-help Intervention · Mixed Models Analysis · p = .759
PrimaryCounseling Center Utilization Data (e.g. Counts of Individual Counseling Appointments)

Counseling session utilization data were examined on a biweekly basis to determine if the introduction of the IntelliCare for College Students program impacts counseling center utilization. Counts of types of sessions (e.g. intake appointments, individual counseling appointments, crisis appointments) attended by students were examined over time to look at potential changes. These data were collected from the university in aggregate, thus, there are not participant-level data.

Time frame:
Biweekly session utilization from August 1, 2018 (start of pre-implementation data collection; prior to the implementation trial) to December 18, 2020 (end of implementation period)
Reported as:
Mean · Appointments
Counseling Center Utilization Data (e.g. Counts of Individual Counseling Appointments)
AppointmentsUniversity AUniversity B
Intake - pre-implementation25.4 ± 18.2117.1 ± 60.7
Intake - implementation9.7 ± 13.199.8 ± 37.4
Individual therapy - pre-implementation224.6 ± 138.3531.5 ± 166.2
Individual therapy - implementation149.3 ± 85.1442 ± 122.6
Crisis - pre-implementation3.3 ± 2.912.8 ± 10.1
Crisis - implementation1.7 ± 2.17 ± 4.2
Statistical analysis
  • University A vs University B · Simulation Modeling Analysis (SMA) for T · p = .275
PrimaryAverage Number of Days of App Usage

The mean number of days the app was used was drawn from the study app over the course of the study

Time frame:
Days of app use through study completion, up to 10 months
Reported as:
Mean · days
Average Number of Days of App Usage
daysMobile Self-help Intervention
Average Number of Days of App Usage6.29 ± 11
SecondaryAnxiety Literacy Questionnaire

This is a measure of mental health literacy, specifically about symptoms of anxiety. Participants respond "True" or "False" to statements about anxiety and the correct responses are tallied to create total score. The range of score is range of scores is 0-22 with higher scores indicating greater literacy.

Time frame:
Monthly questionnaire scores at baseline, one month and two months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Anxiety Literacy Questionnaire
units on a scaleMobile Self-help Intervention
Baseline14.4 ± 3.3
1 month15.6 ± 4.2
2 month14.1 ± 5.5
Statistical analysis
  • Mobile Self-help Intervention · Mixed Models Analysis · p = .002
SecondaryDepression Literacy Questionnaire

This is a measure of mental health literacy, specifically about symptoms of depression. Participants respond "True" or "False" to statements about depression and the correct responses are tallied to create total score. The range of scores is 0-22 with higher scores indicating greater literacy.

Time frame:
Monthly questionnaire scores at baseline, one month and two months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Depression Literacy Questionnaire
units on a scaleMobile Self-help Intervention
Baseline16.2 ± 2.9
1 month17.0 ± 3.5
2 month16.7 ± 2.9
Statistical analysis
  • Mobile Self-help Intervention · Mixed Models Analysis · p = .489
SecondaryCognitive and Behavioral Response to Stress Scale (CB-RSS)

The CB-RSS is a 9 item measure of the frequency and perceived helpfulness of cognitive and behavioral coping skills. There are 4 subscales representing "Cognitive frequency" "Cognitive helpfulness" "Behavioral frequency" and "Behavioral helpfulness." Participants respond to the frequency items on a scale of 0 = Never to 6 = Always and to the helpfulness items on a scale of 0 = Not at all helpful to 6 = Extremely helpful. The scores range from 0-24 on the Cognitive subscales and from 0-30 on the Behavioral subscales. Higher values represent a better outcome.

Time frame:
Monthly questionnaire scores at baseline, one month and two months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Cognitive and Behavioral Response to Stress Scale (CB-RSS)
score on a scaleMobile Self-help Intervention
CB-RSS Cognitive Frequency Baseline9.9 ± 5.1
CB-RSS Cognitive Frequency 1 month11.2 ± 6.4
CB-RSS Cognitive Frequency 2 month8.02 ± 5.8
CB-RSS Cognitive Usefulness Baseline9.5 ± 5.7
CB-RSS Cognitive Usefulness 1 month9.7 ± 6.8
CB-RSS Cognitive Usefulness 2 month7.3 ± 8.7
CB-RSS Behavioral Frequency Baseline11.6 ± 4.9
CB-RSS Behavioral Frequency 1 month11.0 ± 8.4
CB-RSS Behavioral Frequency 2 month8.5 ± 5.4
CB-RSS Behavioral Usefulness Baseline14.9 ± 6.8
CB-RSS Behavioral Usefulness 1 month17.0 ± 11.0
CB-RSS Behavioral Usefulness 2 month8.4 ± 8.6
Statistical analysis
  • Mobile Self-help Intervention · Mixed Models Analysis · p = .001

Adverse events

Collected over 10 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Mobile Self-help Intervention0/117 (0%)0/117 (0%)0/117 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Mobile Self-help Intervention
Mean24.27 ± 5.93
Sex/Gender, Customized
Sex/Gender, Customized(Participants)Mobile Self-help Intervention
Female96
Male17
Other2
Declined to respond2
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Mobile Self-help Intervention
Hispanic or Latino24
Not Hispanic or Latino92
Unknown or Not Reported1
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Mobile Self-help Intervention
American Indian or Alaska Native2
Asian25
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American12
White56
More than one race15
Unknown or Not Reported7
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Mobile Self-help Intervention
United States117
Patient Health Questionnaire 8 (PHQ-8) depression score
Patient Health Questionnaire 8 (PHQ-8) depression score(units on a scale)Mobile Self-help Intervention
Median10.5 (1 to 24)
Generalized Anxiety Disorder - 7-item questionnaire (GAD-7) score
Generalized Anxiety Disorder - 7-item questionnaire (GAD-7) score(units on a scale)Mobile Self-help Intervention
Median10 (0 to 21)
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Northwestern University
    Chicago, Illinois 60642, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol, analysis plan and consent form · Nov 23, 2021

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 31, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04108429
Lead sponsor
Northwestern University
Collaborators
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
Responsible party
Emily G Lattie (Assistant Professor, Northwestern University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 30, 2019
Start date
Feb 5, 2020
Primary completion
Dec 18, 2020
Completion
Dec 18, 2020
Results posted
Mar 31, 2022
Last update
Mar 31, 2022

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion