ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04102579KINECT-HDUpdated Oct 11, 2023Results posted

Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Valbenazine for the Treatment of Chorea Associated With Huntington Disease

A Phase 3 interventional study of Valbenazine and Placebo in Chorea, Huntington, sponsored by Neurocrine Biosciences. Completed at 46 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-10-11.

Sponsored by Neurocrine Biosciences · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
128
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of valbenazine to treat chorea in participants with Huntington disease.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chorea, Huntington

Keywords

  • Huntington's
  • Huntington
  • Chorea
  • Movement disorder
  • Valbenazine
  • HD
  • Tetrabenazine
  • VMAT2-Inhibitor
03

In context

Huntington Disease

293 studies on the registry are indexed under Huntington Disease; 54 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 128 is above the median of 40 across 207 interventional studies indexed under Huntington Disease.

Browse Huntington Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

Neurocrine Biosciences is the lead sponsor of 86 studies on the registry; 16 are open to participants now.

Of its 35 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 23 (66%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Have a clinical diagnosis of Huntington Disease (HD) with chorea
  2. Be able to walk, with or without the assistance of a person or device
  3. Participants of who do not practice total abstinence must agree to use hormonal or two forms of nonhormonal (dual contraception) consistently while participating in the study until 30 days (females) or 90 days (males) after the last dose of the study drug
  4. Be able to read and understand English

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Have a history of previously established therapy with a VMAT2 inhibitor, in the judgement of the investigator
  2. Have difficulty swallowing
  3. Are currently pregnant or breastfeeding
  4. Have a known history of long syndrome, cardiac tachyarrhythmia, left bundle-branch block, atrioventricular block, uncontrolled bradyarrhythmia, or heart failure
  5. Have an unstable or serious medical or psychiatric illness
  6. Have a significant risk of suicidal behavior
  7. Have a history of substance dependence or substance (drug) or alcohol abuse, within 1 year of screening
  8. If taking antidepressant therapy, be on a stable regimen
  9. Have received gene therapy at any time
  10. Have received an drug in a clinical study within 30 days of the baseline visit or plan to use such investigational drug (other than valbenazine) during the study
  11. Have had a blood loss ≥550 milliliters (mL) or donated blood within 30 days before the baseline visit
  12. Had a medically significant illness within 30 days before baseline, or any history of neuroleptic malignant syndrome
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

QT and QTc

On an ECG, the QT interval is the time the heart’s lower chambers take to activate electrically and recover in each beat. QTc is that time adjusted for heart rate (QTcF by Fridericia’s formula, QTcB by Bazett’s). Some medicines lengthen it, and a long QTc can raise the risk of a dangerous heart rhythm.

The study may name a correction formula and a limit in milliseconds, often around 450–480.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
128 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Valbenazine

    Capsule, administered orally once daily for 12 weeks.

    Drug: Valbenazine

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Capsule, administered orally once daily for 12 weeks.

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • vesicular monoamine transporter 2 (VMAT2) inhibitor

    Also known as: NBI-98854

  • DrugPlacebo

    non-active dosage form

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Screening Period Baseline to Maintenance Period in the Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale (UHDRS) Total Maximal Chorea (TMC) Score.

    The TMC is part of the motor assessment of the UHDRS and measures chorea in 7 different body parts including the face, oral-buccal-lingual region, trunk and each limb independently. The TMC score is the sum of the individual scores and ranges from 0 to 28. A decrease in TMC scores indicates improvement in chorea symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline (average of screening and Day -1), maintenance (average of Weeks 10 and 12)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percent of Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) Responders at Week 12

    The CGI-C is a 7-point scale that rates the overall global change in chorea symptoms since the initiation of study drug dosing, ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse), as assessed by the investigator or qualified clinician designee. Participants whose CGI-C score was either a 1 (very much improved) or a 2 (much improved) were classified as responders.

    Time frame: Week 12

  2. Percent of Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Responders at Week 12

    The PGI-C is a 7-point scale that rates the overall global change in chorea symptoms since the initiation of study drug dosing, ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse), as assessed by the participant. Participants whose PGI-C score was either a 1 (very much improved) or a 2 (much improved) were classified as responders.

    Time frame: Week 12

  3. Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QoL) Upper Extremity Function T-Score

    The Neuro-QoL Upper Extremity Function Short Form consists of 8 questions about physical abilities, rated from 1 (unable to do) to 5 (without any difficulty). The Neuro-QoL scores were standardized as T-scores with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10. Scores below 50 indicated below average upper extremity function. The change from baseline to Week 12 in the Neuro-QoL Upper Extremity Function T-score are presented here. An increase in score indicates increased function.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

  4. Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Neuro-QoL Lower Extremity Function T-Score

    The Neuro-QoL Lower Extremity Function Short Form consists of 8 questions about physical abilities, rated from 1 (unable to do) to 5 (without any difficulty). The Neuro-QoL scores were standardized as T-scores with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10. Scores below 50 indicated below average upper extremity function. The change from baseline to Week 12 in the Neuro-QoL Upper Extremity Function T-score are presented here. An increase in score indicates better function.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

07

Results

Posted Oct 11, 2023

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneValbenazinePlacebo
Started6464
Received at least 1 dose of study drug6463
Completed5754
Not completed710
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject34
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up01
Withdrew: Discontinued due to covid-19-related study pause34
Withdrew: Other than specified10
Withdrew: Not dosed with study drug01

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange From Screening Period Baseline to Maintenance Period in the Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale (UHDRS) Total Maximal Chorea (TMC) Score.

The TMC is part of the motor assessment of the UHDRS and measures chorea in 7 different body parts including the face, oral-buccal-lingual region, trunk and each limb independently. The TMC score is the sum of the individual scores and ranges from 0 to 28. A decrease in TMC scores indicates improvement in chorea symptoms.

Time frame:
Baseline (average of screening and Day -1), maintenance (average of Weeks 10 and 12)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change From Screening Period Baseline to Maintenance Period in the Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale (UHDRS) Total Maximal Chorea (TMC) Score.
units on a scaleValbenazinePlacebo
Change From Screening Period Baseline to Maintenance Period in the Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale (UHDRS) Total Maximal Chorea (TMC) Score.-4.60 ± 0.43-1.44 ± 0.44
Statistical analysis
  • Valbenazine vs Placebo · MMRM · p = <0.0001 (Statistical significance achieved if p-value \<0.05.) · Least squares (ls) means difference: -3.16 · 95% CI -4.37 to -1.95LS Means Difference = Valbenazine - Placebo
SecondaryPercent of Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) Responders at Week 12

The CGI-C is a 7-point scale that rates the overall global change in chorea symptoms since the initiation of study drug dosing, ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse), as assessed by the investigator or qualified clinician designee. Participants whose CGI-C score was either a 1 (very much improved) or a 2 (much improved) were classified as responders.

Time frame:
Week 12
Reported as:
Number · percentage of responders
Percent of Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) Responders at Week 12
percentage of respondersValbenazinePlacebo
Percent of Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) Responders at Week 1242.913.2
Statistical analysis
  • Valbenazine vs Placebo · Fisher Exact · p = 0.0007 (Statistical significance achieved if p-value \<0.05.) · Percent difference in responders: 29.65 · 95% CI 10.77 to 45.37Percent Difference in Responders (%) = Valbenazine - Placebo
SecondaryPercent of Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Responders at Week 12

The PGI-C is a 7-point scale that rates the overall global change in chorea symptoms since the initiation of study drug dosing, ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse), as assessed by the participant. Participants whose PGI-C score was either a 1 (very much improved) or a 2 (much improved) were classified as responders.

Time frame:
Week 12
Reported as:
Number · percentage of responders
Percent of Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Responders at Week 12
percentage of respondersValbenazinePlacebo
Percent of Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Responders at Week 1252.726.4
Statistical analysis
  • Valbenazine vs Placebo · Fisher Exact · p = 0.0062 (Statistical significance achieved if p-value \<0.05.) · Percent difference in responders: 26.31 · 95% CI 6.32 to 43.74Percent Difference in Responders (%) = Valbenazine - Placebo
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 12 in the Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QoL) Upper Extremity Function T-Score

The Neuro-QoL Upper Extremity Function Short Form consists of 8 questions about physical abilities, rated from 1 (unable to do) to 5 (without any difficulty). The Neuro-QoL scores were standardized as T-scores with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10. Scores below 50 indicated below average upper extremity function. The change from baseline to Week 12 in the Neuro-QoL Upper Extremity Function T-score are presented here. An increase in score indicates increased function.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QoL) Upper Extremity Function T-Score
units on a scaleValbenazinePlacebo
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QoL) Upper Extremity Function T-Score-1.58 ± 1.01-3.00 ± 1.04
Statistical analysis
  • Valbenazine vs Placebo · MMRM · p = 0.3304 (Statistical significance achieved if p-value \<0.05.) · Ls means difference: 1.42 · 95% CI -1.46 to 4.31LS Means Difference = Valbenazine - Placebo
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 12 in the Neuro-QoL Lower Extremity Function T-Score

The Neuro-QoL Lower Extremity Function Short Form consists of 8 questions about physical abilities, rated from 1 (unable to do) to 5 (without any difficulty). The Neuro-QoL scores were standardized as T-scores with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10. Scores below 50 indicated below average upper extremity function. The change from baseline to Week 12 in the Neuro-QoL Upper Extremity Function T-score are presented here. An increase in score indicates better function.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Neuro-QoL Lower Extremity Function T-Score
units on a scaleValbenazinePlacebo
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Neuro-QoL Lower Extremity Function T-Score-0.27 ± 0.820.61 ± 0.84

Adverse events

Collected over Day 1 (after dosing) through Week 14. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Valbenazine0/64 (0%)1/64 (1.6%)35/64 (54.7%)
Placebo1/63 (1.6%)2/63 (3.2%)17/63 (27%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventValbenazinePlacebo
Psychotic disorderPsychiatric disorders0/641/63
Colon cancerCardiac disorders0/641/63
AngioedemaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/640/63
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventValbenazinePlacebo
SomnolenceNervous system disorders10/642/63
FatigueGeneral disorders9/646/63
FallInjury, poisoning and procedural complications8/648/63
RashSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders5/640/63
UrticariaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders5/640/63
AkathisiaNervous system disorders4/643/63

Baseline characteristics

All participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)ValbenazinePlaceboTotal
Mean54.1 ± 10.153.6 ± 11.653.8 ± 10.8
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)ValbenazinePlaceboTotal
Female333669
Male312758
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)ValbenazinePlaceboTotal
Hispanic or Latino538
Not Hispanic or Latino5960119
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)ValbenazinePlaceboTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian101
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American101
White6062122
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported213
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)ValbenazinePlaceboTotal
Canada279
United States6256118
08

Study locations

46 sites
  • Neurocrine Clinical Site
    Birmingham, Alabama 35233, United States
  • Neurocrine Clinical Site
    Little Rock, Arkansas 72205, United States
  • Neurocrine Clinical Site
    La Jolla, California 92037, United States
  • Neurocrine Clinical Site
    Sacramento, California 95817, United States
  • Neurocrine Clinical Site
    Aurora, Colorado 80045, United States
  • Neurocrine Clinical Site
    Englewood, Colorado 80113, United States
  • Neurocrine Clinical Site
    Washington, District of Columbia 20007, United States
  • Neurocrine Clinical Site
    Gainesville, Florida 32608, United States
  • Neurocrine Clinical Site
    Miami, Florida 33136, United States
  • Neurocrine Clinical Site
    Atlanta, Georgia 30329, United States
  • Neurocrine Clinical Site
    Chicago, Illinois 60611, United States
  • Neurocrine Clinical Site
    Chicago, Illinois 60612, United States
  • Neurocrine Clinical Site
    Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, United States
  • Neurocrine Clinical Site
    Iowa City, Iowa 52242, United States
  • Neurocrine Clinical Site
    Kansas City, Kansas 66160, United States
  • Neurocrine Clinical Site
    Wichita, Kansas 67226, United States
  • Neurocrine Clinical Site
    Louisville, Kentucky 40202, United States
  • Neurocrine Clinical Site
    New Orleans, Louisiana 70121, United States
  • Neurocrine Clinical Site
    Boston, Massachusetts 02118, United States
  • Neurocrine Clinical Site
    Boston, Massachusetts 02215, United States
  • Neurocrine Clinical Site
    Charlestown, Massachusetts 02129, United States
  • Neurocrine Clinical Site
    Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States
  • Neurocrine Clinical Site
    West Bloomfield, Michigan 48322, United States
  • Neurocrine Clinical Site
    Omaha, Nebraska 68198, United States
  • Neurocrine Clinical Site
    Rochester, New York 14618, United States
  • Neurocrine Clinical Site
    Williamsville, New York 14221, United States
  • Neurocrine Clinical Site
    Durham, North Carolina 27705, United States
  • Neurocrine Clinical Site
    Fargo, North Dakota 58103, United States
  • Neurocrine Clinical Site
    Cleveland, Ohio 44195, United States
  • Neurocrine Clinical Site
    Columbus, Ohio 43210, United States
  • Neurocrine Clinical Site
    Toledo, Ohio 43614, United States
  • Neurocrine Clinical Site
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States
  • Neurocrine Clinical Site
    Charleston, South Carolina 29425, United States
  • Neurocrine Clinical Site
    Columbia, South Carolina 29203, United States
  • Neurocrine Clinical Site
    Greenville, South Carolina 29615, United States
  • Neurocrine Clinical Site
    Nashville, Tennessee 37212, United States
  • Neurocrine Clinical Site
    Houston, Texas 77054, United States
  • Neurocrine Clinical Site
    Salt Lake City, Utah 84108, United States
  • Neurocrine Clinical Site
    Burlington, Vermont 05401, United States
  • Neurocrine Clinical Site
    Charlottesville, Virginia 22908, United States
  • Neurocrine Clinical Site
    Seattle, Washington 98195, United States
  • Neurocrine Clinical Site
    Spokane, Washington 99202, United States
  • Neurocrine Clinical Site
    Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 2B5, Canada
  • Neurocrine Clinical Site
    Ottawa, Ontario K1Y 4E9, Canada
  • Neurocrine Clinical Site
    Toronto, Ontario M2K 1E1, Canada
  • Neurocrine Clinical Site
    Toronto, Ontario M3B 2S7, Canada
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Furr Stimming E, Claassen DO, Kayson E, Goldstein J, Mehanna R, Zhang H, Liang GS, Haubenberger D; Huntington Study Group KINECT-HD Collaborators. Safety and efficacy of valbenazine for the treatment of chorea associated with Huntington's disease (KINECT-HD): a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2023 Jun;22(6):494-504. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(23)00127-8. Erratum In: Lancet Neurol. 2023 Sep;22(9):e10. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(23)00279-X. Lancet Neurol. 2023 Sep;22(9):e10. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(23)00282-X. PubMed 37210099 ↗
  • Rodrigues FB, Wild EJ. Huntington's Disease Clinical Trials Corner: April 2020. J Huntingtons Dis. 2020;9(2):185-197. doi: 10.3233/JHD-200002. PubMed 32250312 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Nov 2019 to primary completion in Oct 2021, 23 months.

Results were first posted in Oct 2023, 1 year 11 months after primary completion. A results delay was requested in Sep 2022.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 23, 2019
First posted
Sep 25, 2019
StartActual
Nov 13, 2019
Primary completionActual
Oct 15, 2021
CompletionActual
Oct 26, 2021
Results delay requested
Sep 29, 2022
Results first posted
Oct 11, 2023
Last update
Oct 11, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 11, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04102579
Collaborators
Huntington Study Group
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 25, 2019
Start date
Nov 13, 2019
Primary completion
Oct 15, 2021
Completion
Oct 26, 2021
Results posted
Oct 11, 2023
Last update
Oct 11, 2023

Study contacts

Chief Medical Officer
study director · Chief Medical Officer

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Valbenazine

Start the discussion