An interventional study of Rapid diagnostic test (RDT); Serological and molecular tests on DBS in Human African Trypanosomiasis, Sleeping Sickness and Trypanosoma Brucei Gambiense; Infection, sponsored by Institut de Recherche pour le Developpement. Completed at 3 sites in 3 countries. Open to participants aged 4 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-04-15.
Sponsored by Institut de Recherche pour le Developpement · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic
This study determines the feasibility, diagnostic performance and cost for monitoring of eliminated human African trypanosomiasis (HAT) foci using diagnostic algorithms of serological and molecular high throughput tests with and without previous rapid diagnostic test blood screening for early detection of Trypanosoma brucei gambiense HAT re-emergence.
In the last decade, the prevalence of Trypanosoma brucei gambiense (Tbg) human African trypanosomiasis (HAT) has fallen and HAT has been targeted for elimination. At low disease prevalence, HAT control is increasingly integrated into routine activities of peripheral health centres. However, the weak capacity of fixed health structures to implement control activities, lack of coverage, the unspecific clinical picture of HAT, and the existence of asymptomatic cases and animal reservoirs may result in under detection of HAT. To ensure sustainability of zero transmission and to avoid re-emergence caused by remaining Tbg reservoirs, continued post-elimination monitoring is therefore required.
Health workers performing house to house visits in foci with very low HAT prevalence can easily collect blood on filter paper and send it to regional HAT reference centres for analysis. The objective of the DiTECT-HAT-WP3 study is to determine the feasibility and cost of diagnostic algorithms of serological and molecular high-throughput tests on blood on filter paper for post-elimination monitoring, with or without a previous screening with rapid diagnostic tests.
In villages in low to zero prevalence foci in Democratic Republic (DR) Congo, Côte d'Ivoire and Burkina Faso, a health worker will go from house to house to 1) register all consenting inhabitants in a Personal Digital Assistant; 2) take a blood sample on filter paper 3) perform 3 rapid diagnostic tests. All dried blood spots (DBS) are sent to the reference laboratory for high-throughput testing (ELISA, trypanolysis, loop-mediated isothermal amplification method (LAMP) and real time (RT) -PCR). Subjects positive in at least 1 test - the RDTs or high-throughput tests - are revisited twice for parasitological confirmation.
In each country, blood specimens of 6000 persons will be tested. The relative effectiveness and overall cost of the different diagnostic algorithms will be investigated. We will quantify the break-even point for an imperfect test algorithm by formulating a decision criterion to assess how many false negatives, but particularly how many false positives can be tolerated while still achieving an intervention with a reasonable cost burden. The results will enable us to propose a test algorithm and a threshold to send out specialised mobile teams for stopping HAT re-emergence, without unnecessarily raising the alarm.
26 studies on the registry are indexed under Trypanosomiasis, African; 1 is open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 13,747 is above the median of 155 across 24 interventional studies indexed under Trypanosomiasis, African.
Browse Trypanosomiasis, African studies →Institut de Recherche pour le Developpement is the lead sponsor of 49 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Diagnostic tests: Rapid diagnostic test (RDT); Serological and molecular tests on DBS
Diagnostic Test: Rapid diagnostic test (RDT); Serological and molecular tests on DBS
The population of low to zero prevalence HAT foci will be actively screened for HAT by taking a blood sample for performing 3 rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) and for preparing dried blood spots to perform 4 serological and molecular high throughput reference tests. If at least one of the RDTs, serological or molecular reference tests is positive, parasitological examination is performed twice. The combined results of parasitological examinations serve as reference standard. Other Names: rHAT Sero-Strip (Coris Bioconcept, Belgium) SD Bioline HAT 1.0 (Standard Diagnostics Korea) HAT Sero-K-Set (Coris Bioconcept, Belgium) Immune trypanolysis: presence of antibodies ELISA: on native LiTat 1.3 + LiTat 1.5 variant surface glycoprotein (VSG) LAMP T. brucei Detection Kit (Eiken) RT-PCR: Trypanozoon 18S, Tbg Trypanosoma gambiense specific glycoprotein (TgsGP)
Sensitivity for HAT diagnosis of RDT, RDT combinations, algorithms of RDT and serological and/or molecular tests on the population at risk
Index tests: 3 RDTs on fresh blood, immune trypanolysis on DBS, ELISA on DBS, LAMP on DBS, RT-PCR on DBS. Reference standard: for index test positives only: combined results of 2 parasitological examinations. Subjects negative in all index tests are considered HAT negative.
Time frame: 6 months
Specificity for HAT diagnosis of RDT, RDT combinations, algorithms of RDT and serological and/or molecular tests on the population at risk
Index tests: 3 RDTs on fresh blood, immune trypanolysis on DBS, ELISA on DBS, LAMP on DBS, RT-PCR on DBS. Reference standard: for index test positives only: combined results of 2 parasitological examinations. Subjects negative in all index tests are considered HAT negative.
Time frame: 6 months
Plan to share: Yes
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Ran from Sep 2019 to primary completion in Jan 2021, 16 months.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Institut de Recherche pour le Developpement