A Phase 2/3 interventional study of Acoziborole in Trypanosomiasis, African, Trypanosoma Brucei Gambiense; Infection and Sleeping Sickness, sponsored by Drugs for Neglected Diseases. Completed at 6 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 1 Year to 14 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-06.
Sponsored by Drugs for Neglected Diseases · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Treatment
Acoziborole has been studied in an open-label pivotal Phase II/III trial (DNDi-OXA-02-HAT) in the DRC and Guinea. As the numbers of reported cases diminish, resources for surveillance and specialised screening will also taper. This decrease, coupled with the loss of diagnostic skills and disease management expertise, will lead to a weak and less specialised HAT technical environment. The history of g-HAT has shown that outbreaks or re-emergence of the disease have already happened under different circumstances when surveillance was relaxed or simply because the populations at risk live in areas of political instability, limiting access to specialised care. Even with a steady decrease of reported incidence, no model can currently predict that HAT could not re-emerge.
Although g-HAT is predominantly a disease of adults, children are also affected at diverse rates depending on the geographical and behavioural characteristics in the different areas of disease transmission. Hence efforts are needed to develop a paediatric formulation from a new generation of oral HAT treatments.
Human African trypanosomiasis (HAT), or sleeping sickness, is a life-threatening disease transmitted by tsetse flies and caused by a single-celled extracellular parasite that lives free in the bloodstream and other body fluids, including lymph and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). There are many species of African trypanosomes; however, only two subspecies of the Trypanosoma brucei (T.b.) species are causative of HAT. T.b. gambiense is endemic in West and Central Africa and causes over 98% of current cases. It progresses at a more indolent pace than that of T.b. rhodesiense.
Approximately 5 million people live in areas, mainly in rural parts of 24 disease endemic countries in West and Central Africa, where HAT due to T.b. gambiense (g-HAT) is still considered a public health problem; whereas, 51 million people are estimated to be at risk of infection on the African continent. With 864 cases of g-HAT reported in 2019, the global goal of sustainable disease elimination by 2030, including the interruption of the transmission of g-HAT, is foreseeable. Consistently falling numbers of cases are thanks to efforts from national control programmes, supported by the World Health Organization (WHO), non-governmental organisations, bilateral cooperation, the private sector (including pharmaceutical companies), and philanthropic organisations.
As the numbers of reported cases diminish, resources for surveillance and specialised screening will also taper. This decrease, coupled with the loss of diagnostic skills and disease management expertise, will lead to a weak and less specialised HAT technical environment. The history of g-HAT has shown that outbreaks or re-emergence of the disease have already happened under different circumstances when surveillance was relaxed, e.g. South Sudan and the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) or simply because the populations at risk live in areas of political instability, limiting access to specialised care. Even with a steady decrease of reported incidence, no model can currently predict that HAT could not re-emerge.
Although g-HAT is predominantly a disease of adults, children are also affected at diverse rates depending on the geographical and behavioural characteristics in the different areas of disease transmission. Globally, the WHO Expert Committee on control and surveillance report states: "rates in children are usually less than half of those in adults, reflecting less exposure to flies during daily activities". In data from the Médecins Sans Frontières Database on HAT control projects, out of 684 second stage HAT patients included, 17.5% were children under the age of 15 hence efforts are needed to develop a paediatric formulation from a new generation of oral HAT treatments. The majority of signs and symptoms associated with HAT occur at similar frequencies in paediatric patients with first and second stage disease compared with adults, including sleep disturbances. The presence of trypanosomes in cervical lymph nodes is less frequent in preschool children than in older children and adults. More infants are seen at the second stage, most likely due to delayed diagnosis and the immaturity of the blood-brain barrier. In some studies, fever, hepatomegaly, splenomegaly and facial oedema were observed more frequently in children aged 2 to 15 years than in adults.
As per the WHO 2019 interim guidelines for the treatment of HAT, the choice treatment is determined by a two-step assessment. The first step is the clinical assessment and the second step is the CSF examination (lumbar puncture), which is required only for patients with clinical symptoms and signs suggestive of the severe meningo-encephalitic stage.
For children \<6 years old and \<20 kg body weight who are second stage g-HAT, a 7-day, twice a day intravenous course of NECT or eflornithine is the sole treatment option. Treatment in first stage g-Hat involves intramuscular injections of pentamidine for 7 days. Both treatments require pre-treatment lumbar puncture and hospitalisation with a specialised health care environment that is not always possible in remote rural African areas where g-HAT is prevalent.
The aim of the current study is to validate the weight-based exposure based on the population pharmacokinetic (pop-PK) modelling, efficacy, and safety of acoziborole in first and second stage g-HAT paediatric patients from 1 to 14 years of age enabling a paradigm shift in the management of paediatric g-HAT patients reducing the subsequent burden on families (i.e. mothers and the entire family will spend less time providing care). Furthermore, if the clinical status permits, administering a single-dose oral drug at the point of diagnosis will avoid the need for costly hospitalisation in specialised health centres, lumbar puncture and parenteral treatments. Compliance and adherence of children to treatment will be more straightforward and will shorten the delay between diagnosis and effective treatment, which will contribute to stopping disease progression and the avoidance of neurological sequelae in this population.
Achieving the challenging objective of g-HAT elimination by 2030 requires a safe, effective, and easy-to-use tool that enables treatment at the point-of-diagnosis for all individuals, including children. As a single administration oral drug, acoziborole would facilitate treatment access for children.
26 studies on the registry are indexed under Trypanosomiasis, African; 1 is open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 35 is below the median of 155 across 24 interventional studies indexed under Trypanosomiasis, African.
Browse Trypanosomiasis, African studies →Drugs for Neglected Diseases is the lead sponsor of 58 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Clinically significant laboratory test abnormality, with:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).
Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.
Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.
Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.
Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.
Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.
Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.
The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.
“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.
A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.
Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Childbearing potential
Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).
Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Contraception
Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.
Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Clinically significant
Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
ALT and AST (liver enzymes)
Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.
Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
ULN (upper limit of normal)
The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.
“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Bilirubin
A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.
Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Single dose administration Two different mode of administration will be used depending on the body weight and on the step of the study: * In step 1: 2 tablets of 320 mg (whole) for paediatric patients weighing 30 to 40 kg * In step 2 : whole or crushed tablets (1 or 2 tablets depending on the weight) for paediatric patients weighing 10 to 40 kg. Tablets will be crushed for paediatric patients \< 6 years old and for paediatric patients ≥ 6 years old who are unable to swallow tablets * Initially, recruitment will be limited to paediatric patients weighing 30 to 40 kg who will receive the 2 tablets of 320 mg. * Once the PK data from the first six patients have been analysed and the dosing regimen confirmed or adapted, inclusion will resume and be extended to allow enrolment of paediatric patients weighing \>10 kg.
Drug: Acoziborole
Two different mode of administration will be used during the study depending on the body weight and on the step of the study: whole tablets of 320 mg dose for paediatric patients weighing 30 to 40 kg in step 1 whole or crushed tablets for paediatric patients weighing 10 to 40 kg in step 2
Maximum concentration (Cmax)
Primary PK parameters in blood
Time frame: From time 0 to 96 hours
Area under the curve (AUC0-96h)
Primary PK parameters in blood
Time frame: From time 0 to 96 hours
Time to maximum concentration (Tmax)
Primary PK parameters in blood
Time frame: From time 0 to 96 hours
Area under curve (AUC0-∞)
Secondary PK parameters in blood
Time frame: Day 1 Hour 0, Day 1 Hour 4, Day 1 Hour 9, Day 2 Hour 24, Day 3 Hour 48, Day 4 Hour 72, Day 5 Hour 96, Day 11 Hour 264, month 3 any time
Clearance
Secondary PK parameters in blood
Time frame: Day 1 Hour 0, Day 1 Hour 4, Day 1 Hour 9, Day 2 Hour 24, Day 3 Hour 48, Day 4 Hour 72, Day 5 Hour 96, Day 11 Hour 264, month 3 any time
Volume of distribution (Vd)
Secondary PK parameters in blood
Time frame: Day 1 Hour 0, Day 1 Hour 4, Day 1 Hour 9, Day 2 Hour 24, Day 3 Hour 48, Day 4 Hour 72, Day 5 Hour 96, Day 11 Hour 264, month 3 any time
Half-life (t1/2)
Secondary PK parameters in blood
Time frame: Day 1 Hour 0, Day 1 Hour 4, Day 1 Hour 9, Day 2 Hour 24, Day 3 Hour 48, Day 4 Hour 72, Day 5 Hour 96, Day 11 Hour 264, month 3 any time
CSF concentration
Acoziborole concentration in CSF
Time frame: Day 11
Success or failure
Assess efficacy of acoziborole. Failure defined as death, if rescue medication is required, if evidence of trypanosome in any body fluid, if WBC in CSF \>20 cells, clinical signs or symptoms evoking a failure, lost to follow-up, if post treatment LPs refused
Time frame: 6 and 12 months post-treatment
Cumulative risk of proven failure over time (Kaplan-Meyer estimate)
Assess efficacy of acoziborole. Failure defined as death, if rescue medication is required, if evidence of trypanosome in any body fluid, if WBC in CSF \>20 cells, clinical signs or symptoms evoking a failure, lost to follow-up, if post treatment LPs refused
Time frame: 6 and 12 months post-treatment
Occurrence of any treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) (any grade) during the observation period
Assess the safety profile of acoziborole
Time frame: Day 1 to month 6
Occurrence of any TEAEs (grade ≥3 or severe) and relatedness to medication during the observation period
Assess the safety profile of acoziborole
Time frame: Day 1 to month 6
Occurrence of any serious adverse events (SAEs) during the study
Assess the safety profile of acoziborole
Time frame: Day 1 to month 12
Corrected QT interval (QTc)
Assess the potential relationship between concentration of acoziborole and corrected QT interval (QTc)
Time frame: Day 1 Hour 0, Day 1 Hour 4, Day 1 Hour 9, Day 2 Hour 24, Day 3 Hour 48, Day 4 Hour 72, Day 5 Hour 96, Day 11 Hour 264
Palatability questionnaire
Assess the palatability of the paediatric formulation in paediatric patients (only in step 2), questionnaire to be completed by the patient. Scores of the 5-point hedonic scale
Time frame: Day 1
Acceptability questionnaire
Assess the acceptability of the paediatric formulation in paediatric patients (only in step 2), questionnaire to be completed by the caregiver. Scores of the 5-point hedonic scale
Time frame: Day 1
This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Studies of the drug tested here: SCYX 7158
Drugs for Neglected Diseases