ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03974178Updated Jan 30, 2025Results posted

Fexinidazole in Human African Trypanosomiasis Due to T. b. Rhodesiense

A Phase 2/3 interventional study of Fexinidazole in Trypanosomiasis, African, Sleeping Sickness and Trypanosoma Brucei Rhodesiense; Infection, sponsored by Drugs for Neglected Diseases. Completed at 2 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 6 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-01-30.

Sponsored by Drugs for Neglected Diseases · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2/3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
45
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
6 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The ultimate goal of this study is to show that fexinidazole offers an alternative over the existing treatments of Human African trypanosomiasis due to Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense (r-HAT): melarsoprol in patients with stage 2 r-HAT and suramin in patients with stage 1 r-HAT. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Is the short-term fatality rate and failure rate associated with fexinidazole lower than those of melarsoprol in patients with stage 2 r-HAT?
  • Is the long-term failure rate associated with fexinidazole lower than that of melarsoprol in patients with stage 2 r-HAT?
  • Can fexinidazole in patients with stage 1 r-HAT replace the treatment with suramin?
  • Is fexinidazole treatment safe in patient with r-HAT, regardless of stage?

Participants will receive fexinidazole oral treatment for 10 days. Regular blood draws and lumbar punctures will be performed over 12 months to confirm the cure of the disease. Other assessments will include the recording of adverse events, signs and symptoms of the disease, laboratory tests, vital signs, electrocardiograms.

02

Conditions studied

  • Trypanosomiasis, African
  • Sleeping Sickness
  • Trypanosoma Brucei Rhodesiense; Infection

Keywords

  • Trypanosoma Brucei (T. b.) rhodesiense
  • HAT
  • Neglected Tropical Disease
03

In context

Trypanosomiasis, African

26 studies on the registry are indexed under Trypanosomiasis, African; 1 is open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 45 is below the median of 155 across 24 interventional studies indexed under Trypanosomiasis, African.

Browse Trypanosomiasis, African studies →

Lead sponsor

Drugs for Neglected Diseases is the lead sponsor of 58 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Signed Form (plus assent for children)
  • ≥ 6 years old
  • ≥ 20 kg body weight
  • Ability to ingest at least one complete meal per day (or at least one Plumpy'Nut® sachet)
  • index ≥ 40
  • Parasitological confirmation of T. b. rhodesiense infection
  • Having a permanent address or being traceable by others and willing and able to comply with follow-up visit schedule
  • Agreement to be hospitalised for a minimum of 13 days and to receive the study treatment

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active medical conditions other than HAT that may jeopardize subject safety or at the investigator discretion may interfere with participation in the study.
  • Compromised general health or severely deteriorated general condition, such as severe malnutrition, cardiovascular shock, respiratory distress, or terminal illness
  • Patients with severe hepatic impairment (e.g.: clinical signs of cirrhosis or jaundice)
  • Known to fexinidazole, to any nitroimidazole drugs (e.g. metronidazole, tinidazole), or to any of the
  • Patients previously enrolled in the study or having already received fexinidazole
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Karnofsky performance status (KPS)

A 0–100 scale of how well someone can carry out everyday activities. 100 is no complaints and no signs of illness; 70 is able to look after yourself but not to work or keep up normal activity; 50 is needing considerable help and frequent medical care.

Studies often ask for 60 or 70 and above. Your doctor gives the score.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Excipients

The other ingredients in a medicine besides the active drug, such as fillers, colours or preservatives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
45 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Patients with stage 1 r-HAT

    Patients with stage 1 r-HAT were patients without trypanosomes in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) but with trypanosomes in the blood and/or lymph and CSF white blood cells (WBC) ≤5 cells/µL. Patients were to receive fexinidazole orally for 10 days.

    Drug: Fexinidazole

  • Experimental
    Patients with stage 2 r-HAT

    Patients with stage 2 r-HAT were patients with trypanosomes in the CSF (and/or in blood/lymph) and/or CSF WBC \>5 cells/µL. Patients were to receive fexinidazole orally for 10 days.

    Drug: Fexinidazole

Interventions

  • Tablets of 600 mg; Participants with a weight between 20 and 34 kg received 1200 mg (2 tablets) for 4 days, then 600 mg (1 tablet) for 6 days (with food); Participants with a weight of 35 kg and above received 1800 mg (3 tablets) for 4 days, then 1200 mg (2 tablets) for 6 days (with food)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Evaluable Patients With Stage 2 r-HAT Who Died by the End of Hospitalization, Considering Only Deaths Possibly Related to r-HAT or Fexinidazole

    The percentage of patients who died between the first intake of fexinidazole until the End-of-Hospitalization Visit (Day 12-18), considering only deaths possibly related to r-HAT or study treatment as assessed by the Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB), was calculated. The World Health Organization(WHO) verbal autopsy questionnaire was used since anatomopathological techniques were not available at the study sites (unless the death occurred at the hospital, in which case the investigator was present). In case of death that was not related to r-HAT nor to the study treatment during the hospitalization, the patient is considered as non-evaluable for efficacy purposes. Any patient who left the hospital without being medically discharged by the site Investigator before the planned End-of-Hospitalization Visit, and for whom no outcome could be retrieved, is also to be considered as non-evaluable.

    Time frame: 12 to 18 days after start of treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Evaluable Patients With Stage 2 r-HAT, Whose Treatment Outcome is a Failure at the End of Hospitalization

    Treatment outcome at end of hospitalization (Day 12-18) is categorized as success or failure. Failure is defined as any of the following: presence of trypanosomes in any body fluid at end of treatment (Day 11), death related to r-HAT or fexinidazole at end of hospitalization according to the DSMB, or absence of clinical improvement leading to the use of rescue medication. Unrelated deaths are neither success nor failure (the patient is considered non-evaluable for efficacy purposes).

    Time frame: 12 to 18 days after start of treatment

  2. Percentage of Evaluable Patients With Stage 2 r-HAT, Whose Treatment Outcome is a Failure at 12 Months

    Treatment outcome at test of cure (Month 12) is categorized as success or failure. Failure is defined as any of the following: presence of trypanosomes in any body fluid, death related to r-HAT or fexinidazole according to the DSMB, absence of clinical improvement leading to the use of rescue medication, or WBC count in the CSF \>20 cells/μL which was unlikely due to causes other than HAT. Unrelated deaths are neither success nor failure (the patient is considered non-evaluable for efficacy purposes).

    Time frame: 12 months after start of treatment

  3. Percentage of Evaluable Patients With Stage 1 r-HAT, Whose Treatment Outcome is a Failure at the End of Hospitalization

    Treatment outcome at end of hospitalization (Day 12-18) is categorized as success or failure. Failure is defined as any of the following: presence of trypanosomes in any body fluid at end of treatment (Day 11), death related to r-HAT or fexinidazole at end of hospitalization according to the DSMB, or absence of clinical improvement leading to the use of rescue medication. Unrelated deaths are neither success nor failure (the patient is considered non-evaluable for efficacy purposes).

    Time frame: 12 to 18 days after start of treatment

  4. Percentage of Evaluable Patients With Stage 1 r-HAT, Whose Treatment Outcome is a Failure at 12 Months

    Treatment outcome at test of cure (Month 12) is categorized as success or failure. Failure is defined as any of the following: presence of trypanosomes in any body fluid, death related to r-HAT or fexinidazole according to the DSMB, absence of clinical improvement leading to the use of rescue medication, or WBC count in the CSF \>20 cells/μL which was unlikely due to causes other than HAT. Unrelated deaths are neither success nor failure (the patient is considered non-evaluable for efficacy purposes).

    Time frame: 12 months after start of treatment

  5. Percentage of Evaluable Patients With Any r-HAT Stage Who Died by the End of Hospitalization, Considering Only Deaths Possibly Related to r-HAT or Fexinidazole

    The percentage of patients who died between the first intake of fexinidazole until the End-of-Hospitalization Visit (Day 12-18), considering only deaths possibly related to r-HAT or study treatment as assessed by the DSMB, was calculated. The WHO verbal autopsy questionnaire was used since anatomopathological techniques were not available at the study sites (unless the death occurred at the hospital, in which case the investigator was present). In case of death that was not related to r-HAT nor to the study treatment during the hospitalization, the patient is considered as non-evaluable for efficacy purposes. Any patient who left the hospital without being medically discharged by the site Investigator before the planned End-of-Hospitalization Visit, and for whom no outcome could be retrieved, is also to be considered as non-evaluable.

    Time frame: 12 to 18 days after start of treatment

  6. Percentage of Evaluable Patients With Any r-HAT Stage, Whose Treatment Outcome is a Failure at the End of Hospitalization

    Treatment outcome at end of hospitalization (Day 12-18) is categorized as success or failure. Failure is defined as any of the following: presence of trypanosomes in any body fluid at end of treatment (Day 11), death related to r-HAT or fexinidazole at end of hospitalization according to the DSMB, or absence of clinical improvement leading to the use of rescue medication. Unrelated deaths are neither success nor failure (the patient is considered non-evaluable for efficacy purposes).

    Time frame: 12 to 18 days after start of treatment

  7. Percentage of Evaluable Patients With Any r-HAT Stage, Whose Treatment Outcome is a Failure at 12 Months

    Treatment outcome at test of cure (Month 12) is categorized as success or failure. Failure is defined as any of the following: presence of trypanosomes in any body fluid, death related to r-HAT or fexinidazole according to the DSMB, absence of clinical improvement leading to the use of rescue medication, or WBC count in the CSF \>20 cells/μL which was unlikely due to causes other than HAT. Unrelated deaths are neither success nor failure (the patient is considered non-evaluable for efficacy purposes).

    Time frame: 12 months after start of treatment

  8. Number of Participants With Any AE (Including Abnormal Laboratory or ECG Finding if Considered Clinically Significant) Until the End of Hospitalization

    Treatment-emergent AEs during the observation period were recorded from the first intake of fexinidazole (Day 1) until the End-of-Hospitalization Visit (between Day 12 and Day 18).

    Time frame: 12 to 18 days (between Day 1 and Day 12-18)

  9. Number of Participants With Any AE Considered as Serious Until the End of the Follow-up Period

    Treatment-emergent AEs considered as serious were collected from the first intake of fexinidazole (Day 1) until the End-of-Study Visit (Month 12). An AE was considered as serious if resulted in death, was life-threatening, required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, was a congenital anomaly or birth defect, or was an important medical event.

    Time frame: 12 months (between Day 1 and Month 12)

  10. Number of Participants With Any AE Considered as Possibly Related to Fexinidazole Until the End of the Follow-up Period

    Treatment-emergent AEs considered as possibly related to fexinidazole were collected from the first intake of fexinidazole (Day 1) until the End-of-Study Visit (Month 12).

    Time frame: 12 months (between Day 1 and Month 12)

07

Results

Posted Jan 30, 2025
Limitations and caveats
The main limitation is the benchmark study design. A direct comparison with melarsoprol was impossible due to its toxicity (5% of patients die due to treatment-related encephalopathy) and the rarity of r-HAT cases. The annual number of r-HAT cases in all endemic countries decreased from 110 patients in 2012 to 27 in 2017. Although the primary endpoint required a subjective assessment of the cause of death, this was performed by independent experts from the safety committee to ensure robustness.

Participant flow

The study was conducted at 1 center in Malawi (Rumphi District Hospital) and 1 center in Uganda (Lwala Hospital). 46 participants were screened and signed informed consent. The screening pool was enlarged to other hospitals and centres in Uganda, Rumphi/Mzimba North District (Malawi), and Nkhotakota District (Malawi), from where patients could be referred to Lwala and Rumphi Hospitals for treatment. 45 participants were enrolled between 29 Sep 2019 and 17 Nov 2021.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePatients With Stage 1 r-HATPatients With Stage 2 r-HAT
Started1035
Completed1034
Not completed01
Withdrew: Death01

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Evaluable Patients With Stage 2 r-HAT Who Died by the End of Hospitalization, Considering Only Deaths Possibly Related to r-HAT or Fexinidazole

The percentage of patients who died between the first intake of fexinidazole until the End-of-Hospitalization Visit (Day 12-18), considering only deaths possibly related to r-HAT or study treatment as assessed by the Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB), was calculated. The World Health Organization(WHO) verbal autopsy questionnaire was used since anatomopathological techniques were not available at the study sites (unless the death occurred at the hospital, in which case the investigator was present). In case of death that was not related to r-HAT nor to the study treatment during the hospitalization, the patient is considered as non-evaluable for efficacy purposes. Any patient who left the hospital without being medically discharged by the site Investigator before the planned End-of-Hospitalization Visit, and for whom no outcome could be retrieved, is also to be considered as non-evaluable.

Time frame:
12 to 18 days after start of treatment
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Evaluable Patients With Stage 2 r-HAT Who Died by the End of Hospitalization, Considering Only Deaths Possibly Related to r-HAT or Fexinidazole
percentage of participantsPatients With Stage 2 r-HAT
Percentage of Evaluable Patients With Stage 2 r-HAT Who Died by the End of Hospitalization, Considering Only Deaths Possibly Related to r-HAT or Fexinidazole0 (0 to 8.43)
Statistical analysis
  • Patients With Stage 2 r-HAT · one-sided exact test · p = 0.0488 (The rate of deaths possibly related to r-HAT or to fexinidazole at the end of hospitalization was compared to the predefined unacceptable rate of 8.5%.) · Fatality rate: 0 · 90% CI 0 to 8.43Clopper Pearson exact method
SecondaryPercentage of Evaluable Patients With Stage 2 r-HAT, Whose Treatment Outcome is a Failure at the End of Hospitalization

Treatment outcome at end of hospitalization (Day 12-18) is categorized as success or failure. Failure is defined as any of the following: presence of trypanosomes in any body fluid at end of treatment (Day 11), death related to r-HAT or fexinidazole at end of hospitalization according to the DSMB, or absence of clinical improvement leading to the use of rescue medication. Unrelated deaths are neither success nor failure (the patient is considered non-evaluable for efficacy purposes).

Time frame:
12 to 18 days after start of treatment
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Evaluable Patients With Stage 2 r-HAT, Whose Treatment Outcome is a Failure at the End of Hospitalization
percentage of participantsPatients With Stage 2 r-HAT
Percentage of Evaluable Patients With Stage 2 r-HAT, Whose Treatment Outcome is a Failure at the End of Hospitalization0 (0 to 8.43)
Statistical analysis
  • Patients With Stage 2 r-HAT · one-sided exact test · p = 0.0405 (The rate of failures at the end of hospitalization was compared to the predefined unacceptable rate of 9%.) · Failure rate: 0 · 90% CI 0 to 8.43Clopper Pearson exact method
SecondaryPercentage of Evaluable Patients With Stage 2 r-HAT, Whose Treatment Outcome is a Failure at 12 Months

Treatment outcome at test of cure (Month 12) is categorized as success or failure. Failure is defined as any of the following: presence of trypanosomes in any body fluid, death related to r-HAT or fexinidazole according to the DSMB, absence of clinical improvement leading to the use of rescue medication, or WBC count in the CSF \>20 cells/μL which was unlikely due to causes other than HAT. Unrelated deaths are neither success nor failure (the patient is considered non-evaluable for efficacy purposes).

Time frame:
12 months after start of treatment
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Evaluable Patients With Stage 2 r-HAT, Whose Treatment Outcome is a Failure at 12 Months
percentage of participantsPatients With Stage 2 r-HAT
Percentage of Evaluable Patients With Stage 2 r-HAT, Whose Treatment Outcome is a Failure at 12 Months2.94 (0.15 to 13.21)
Statistical analysis
  • Patients With Stage 2 r-HAT · one-sided exact test · p = 0.0730 (The rate of failures at 12 months was compared to the predefined unacceptable rate of 12%.) · Failure rate: 2.94 · 90% CI 0.15 to 13.21Clopper Pearson exact method
SecondaryPercentage of Evaluable Patients With Stage 1 r-HAT, Whose Treatment Outcome is a Failure at the End of Hospitalization

Treatment outcome at end of hospitalization (Day 12-18) is categorized as success or failure. Failure is defined as any of the following: presence of trypanosomes in any body fluid at end of treatment (Day 11), death related to r-HAT or fexinidazole at end of hospitalization according to the DSMB, or absence of clinical improvement leading to the use of rescue medication. Unrelated deaths are neither success nor failure (the patient is considered non-evaluable for efficacy purposes).

Time frame:
12 to 18 days after start of treatment
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Evaluable Patients With Stage 1 r-HAT, Whose Treatment Outcome is a Failure at the End of Hospitalization
percentage of participantsPatients With Stage 1 r-HAT
Percentage of Evaluable Patients With Stage 1 r-HAT, Whose Treatment Outcome is a Failure at the End of Hospitalization0
SecondaryPercentage of Evaluable Patients With Stage 1 r-HAT, Whose Treatment Outcome is a Failure at 12 Months

Treatment outcome at test of cure (Month 12) is categorized as success or failure. Failure is defined as any of the following: presence of trypanosomes in any body fluid, death related to r-HAT or fexinidazole according to the DSMB, absence of clinical improvement leading to the use of rescue medication, or WBC count in the CSF \>20 cells/μL which was unlikely due to causes other than HAT. Unrelated deaths are neither success nor failure (the patient is considered non-evaluable for efficacy purposes).

Time frame:
12 months after start of treatment
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Evaluable Patients With Stage 1 r-HAT, Whose Treatment Outcome is a Failure at 12 Months
percentage of participantsPatients With Stage 1 r-HAT
Percentage of Evaluable Patients With Stage 1 r-HAT, Whose Treatment Outcome is a Failure at 12 Months0
SecondaryPercentage of Evaluable Patients With Any r-HAT Stage Who Died by the End of Hospitalization, Considering Only Deaths Possibly Related to r-HAT or Fexinidazole

The percentage of patients who died between the first intake of fexinidazole until the End-of-Hospitalization Visit (Day 12-18), considering only deaths possibly related to r-HAT or study treatment as assessed by the DSMB, was calculated. The WHO verbal autopsy questionnaire was used since anatomopathological techniques were not available at the study sites (unless the death occurred at the hospital, in which case the investigator was present). In case of death that was not related to r-HAT nor to the study treatment during the hospitalization, the patient is considered as non-evaluable for efficacy purposes. Any patient who left the hospital without being medically discharged by the site Investigator before the planned End-of-Hospitalization Visit, and for whom no outcome could be retrieved, is also to be considered as non-evaluable.

Time frame:
12 to 18 days after start of treatment
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Evaluable Patients With Any r-HAT Stage Who Died by the End of Hospitalization, Considering Only Deaths Possibly Related to r-HAT or Fexinidazole
percentage of participantsPatients With Any r-HAT Stage
Percentage of Evaluable Patients With Any r-HAT Stage Who Died by the End of Hospitalization, Considering Only Deaths Possibly Related to r-HAT or Fexinidazole0 (0 to 6.58)
Statistical analysis
  • Patients With Any r-HAT Stage · one-sided exact test · p = 0.0201 (The rate of deaths possibly related to r-HAT or to fexinidazole at the end of hospitalization was compared to the predefined unacceptable rate of 8.5%.) · Fatality rate: 0 · 90% CI 0 to 6.58Clopper Pearson exact method
SecondaryPercentage of Evaluable Patients With Any r-HAT Stage, Whose Treatment Outcome is a Failure at the End of Hospitalization

Treatment outcome at end of hospitalization (Day 12-18) is categorized as success or failure. Failure is defined as any of the following: presence of trypanosomes in any body fluid at end of treatment (Day 11), death related to r-HAT or fexinidazole at end of hospitalization according to the DSMB, or absence of clinical improvement leading to the use of rescue medication. Unrelated deaths are neither success nor failure (the patient is considered non-evaluable for efficacy purposes).

Time frame:
12 to 18 days after start of treatment
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Evaluable Patients With Any r-HAT Stage, Whose Treatment Outcome is a Failure at the End of Hospitalization
percentage of participantsPatients With Any r-HAT Stage
Percentage of Evaluable Patients With Any r-HAT Stage, Whose Treatment Outcome is a Failure at the End of Hospitalization0 (0 to 6.58)
Statistical analysis
  • Patients With Any r-HAT Stage · one-sided exact test · p = 0.0158 (The rate of failures at the end of hospitalization was compared to the predefined unacceptable rate of 9%.) · Failure rate: 0 · 90% CI 0 to 6.58Clopper Pearson exact method
SecondaryPercentage of Evaluable Patients With Any r-HAT Stage, Whose Treatment Outcome is a Failure at 12 Months

Treatment outcome at test of cure (Month 12) is categorized as success or failure. Failure is defined as any of the following: presence of trypanosomes in any body fluid, death related to r-HAT or fexinidazole according to the DSMB, absence of clinical improvement leading to the use of rescue medication, or WBC count in the CSF \>20 cells/μL which was unlikely due to causes other than HAT. Unrelated deaths are neither success nor failure (the patient is considered non-evaluable for efficacy purposes).

Time frame:
12 months after start of treatment
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Evaluable Patients With Any r-HAT Stage, Whose Treatment Outcome is a Failure at 12 Months
percentage of participantsPatients With Any r-HAT Stage
Percentage of Evaluable Patients With Any r-HAT Stage, Whose Treatment Outcome is a Failure at 12 Months2.27 (0.12 to 10.34)
Statistical analysis
  • Patients With Any r-HAT Stage · one-sided exact test · p = 0.0253 (The rate of failures at 12 months was compared to the predefined unacceptable rate of 12%.) · Failure rate: 2.27 · 90% CI 0.12 to 10.34Clopper Pearson exact method
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Any AE (Including Abnormal Laboratory or ECG Finding if Considered Clinically Significant) Until the End of Hospitalization

Treatment-emergent AEs during the observation period were recorded from the first intake of fexinidazole (Day 1) until the End-of-Hospitalization Visit (between Day 12 and Day 18).

Time frame:
12 to 18 days (between Day 1 and Day 12-18)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Any AE (Including Abnormal Laboratory or ECG Finding if Considered Clinically Significant) Until the End of Hospitalization
ParticipantsPatients With Any r-HAT Stage
Number of Participants With Any AE (Including Abnormal Laboratory or ECG Finding if Considered Clinically Significant) Until the End of Hospitalization22
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Any AE Considered as Serious Until the End of the Follow-up Period

Treatment-emergent AEs considered as serious were collected from the first intake of fexinidazole (Day 1) until the End-of-Study Visit (Month 12). An AE was considered as serious if resulted in death, was life-threatening, required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, was a congenital anomaly or birth defect, or was an important medical event.

Time frame:
12 months (between Day 1 and Month 12)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Any AE Considered as Serious Until the End of the Follow-up Period
ParticipantsPatients With Any r-HAT Stage
Number of Participants With Any AE Considered as Serious Until the End of the Follow-up Period3
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Any AE Considered as Possibly Related to Fexinidazole Until the End of the Follow-up Period

Treatment-emergent AEs considered as possibly related to fexinidazole were collected from the first intake of fexinidazole (Day 1) until the End-of-Study Visit (Month 12).

Time frame:
12 months (between Day 1 and Month 12)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Any AE Considered as Possibly Related to Fexinidazole Until the End of the Follow-up Period
ParticipantsPatients With Any r-HAT Stage
Number of Participants With Any AE Considered as Possibly Related to Fexinidazole Until the End of the Follow-up Period5

Adverse events

Collected over Non-serious treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were recorded from the first intake of fexinidazole (Day 1) until the End-of-Hospitalization Visit (Day 12-18). Treatment-emergent AEs considered as serious or related to fexinidazole treatment were collected from the first intake of fexinidazole (Day 1) until the End-of-Study Visit (Month 12). The population of analysis includes all patients who received at least one dose of fexinidazole.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Patients With Stage 1 r-HAT0/10 (0%)0/10 (0%)6/10 (60%)
Patients With Stage 2 r-HAT1/35 (2.9%)3/35 (8.6%)16/35 (45.7%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventPatients With Stage 1 r-HATPatients With Stage 2 r-HAT
Acute kidney injuryRenal and urinary disorders0/101/35
PneumoniaInfections and infestations0/101/35
Urinary tract infectionInfections and infestations0/101/35
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 24
Most frequent other events
EventPatients With Stage 1 r-HATPatients With Stage 2 r-HAT
HypertensionVascular disorders2/101/35
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders1/105/35
GastritisGastrointestinal disorders1/100/35
Electrocardiogram U-wave abnormalityInvestigations1/102/35
Haemoglobin decreasedInvestigations1/100/35
HypoalbuminaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders1/102/35
MalariaInfections and infestations1/101/35
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/100/35
ChromaturiaRenal and urinary disorders1/100/35
Neck painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/100/35

Baseline characteristics

All patients who took at least one dose of fexinidazole

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Patients With Stage 1 r-HATPatients With Stage 2 r-HATTotal
Mean33.2 ± 18.325.2 ± 15.227.0 ± 16.1
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Patients With Stage 1 r-HATPatients With Stage 2 r-HATTotal
Female11314
Male92231
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Patients With Stage 1 r-HATPatients With Stage 2 r-HATTotal
Sub-Saharan African103545
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Patients With Stage 1 r-HATPatients With Stage 2 r-HATTotal
Malawi93443
Uganda112
r-HAT stage: Stage 1, Stage 2
r-HAT stage: Stage 1, Stage 2(Participants)Patients With Stage 1 r-HATPatients With Stage 2 r-HATTotal
Stage 110010
Stage 203535
White blood cells (WBC) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)
White blood cells (WBC) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)(cells/µL)Patients With Stage 1 r-HATPatients With Stage 2 r-HATTotal
Mean1.7 ± 1.679.3 ± 103.262.1 ± 96.4
08

Study locations

2 sites
  • Rumphi District Hospital
    Rumphi, PO Box 225, Malawi
  • Lwala Hospital
    Lwala, Kadeberamaido PO Box 650, Uganda
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 30, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03974178
Lead sponsor
Drugs for Neglected Diseases
Collaborators
European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership (EDCTP)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 4, 2019
Start date
Sep 29, 2019
Primary completion
Nov 30, 2021
Completion
Oct 12, 2022
Results posted
Jan 30, 2025
Last update
Jan 30, 2025

Study contacts

Enock Matovu, Prof
principal investigator · Makerere University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Fexinidazole

Start the discussion