CClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT04088981Updated Jun 27, 2025

Effect of a Dietary Intervention on Intracellular Lipid Levels, Insulin Sensitivity, and Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetes

An interventional study of Dietary intervention in Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, sponsored by Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine. Withdrawn at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-06-27.

Sponsored by Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was withdrawn
The study was not initiated due to COVID-19 restrictions during the original study start date. After the restrictions were lifted, the study was redesigned and entered as a different study.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
0
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of a low-fat, plant-based dietary intervention and a portion-controlled dietary intervention (compliant with current American Diabetes Association (ADA) guidelines) on changes in intramyocellular and hepatocellular lipid content in adults with type 2 diabetes. Changes in insulin sensitivity and glycemic control will also be assessed in this study. The study duration is 44 weeks.

Read the detailed description

Type 2 diabetes is a disease characterized by discordance between the amount of insulin produced by pancreatic β-cells and the amount of insulin required to overcome insulin resistance in the liver and peripheral tissues. The development of insulin resistance has been strongly associated with the prolonged accumulation of lipids (fats) in the liver cells ("hepatocellular lipid") and muscle cells ("intramyocellular lipid"). Conventional pharmacologic therapeutics for type 2 diabetes, like metformin, are designed to reduce the accumulation of hepatocellular and intramyocellular lipids and, thereby, augment insulin sensitivity. Research has shown that a low-fat, plant-based diet, in which the consumption of lipids is limited, is a similarly effective therapeutic intervention for the reduction of hepatocellular and intramyocellular lipid content and the improvement of insulin sensitivity in type 2 diabetes.

The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of low-fat, plant-based dietary intervention and a portion-controlled dietary intervention (compliant with current American Diabetes Association (ADA) guidelines) on hepatocellular and intramyocellular lipid content in adults with type 2 diabetes. Using a cross-over design, participants with type 2 diabetes will be randomly assigned to start with a plant-based or a portion-controlled diet for 22 weeks. The two groups will then switch to the opposite diet regimen for an additional 22 weeks. Before and after each intervention period, the investigators will measure intramuscular and liver fat content. The investigators will also assess the relationship between these variables, insulin sensitivity, and glycemic control.

The investigators hypothesize that both dietary interventions will result in reductions in intramuscular and liver fat content, and that these changes will be associated with improvements in insulin sensitivity and glycemic control in individuals with type 2 diabetes. The investigators further hypothesize that the low-fat, plant-based dietary intervention will elicit greater changes in intracellular lipid concentration, compared with the portion-controlled dietary intervention.

02

Conditions studied

  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Keywords

  • insulin sensitivity
  • glycemic control
  • intramyocellular
  • nutrition
  • hepatocellular
03

In context

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

9,359 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; 1,318 are open to participants now.

Browse Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 studies →

Lead sponsor

Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine is the lead sponsor of 32 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Men and women with type 2 diabetes treated by diet and/or oral hypoglycemic agents other that sulfonylureas
  2. Age ≥18 years
  3. Body mass index 26-40 kg/m2
  4. Medications (antidiabetic, antihypertensive, and lipid-lowering) have been stable for the past 3 months
  5. HbA1c between 6-10.5% (42-88 mmol/mol)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria are as follows:

  1. Diabetes mellitus, type 1 and/or treatment with insulin or sulfonylureas
  2. Metal implants, such as a cardiac pacemaker or an aneurysm clip
  3. History of any endocrine condition that would affect body weight, such as thyroid disease, pituitary abnormality, or Cushing's syndrome
  4. Smoking during the past six months
  5. Alcohol consumption of more than 2 drinks per day or the equivalent, episodic increased drinking (e.g., more than 2 drinks per day on weekends), or a history of alcohol abuse or dependency followed by any current use
  6. Use of recreational drugs in the past 6 months
  7. Use within the preceding six months of medications that affect appetite or body weight, such as estrogens or other hormones, thyroid medications, systemic steroids, antidepressants (tricyclics, MAOIs, SSRIs), antipsychotics, lithium, anticonvulsants, appetite suppressants or other weight-loss drugs, herbs for weight loss or mood, St. John's wort, ephedra, beta blockers
  8. Pregnancy or intention to become pregnant during the study period
  9. Unstable medical or psychiatric illness
  10. Evidence of an eating disorder
  11. Likely to be disruptive in group sessions
  12. Already following a low-fat, vegan diet
  13. Lack of English fluency
  14. Inability to maintain current medication regimen
  15. Inability or unwillingness to participate in all components of the study
  16. Intention to follow another weight-loss method during the trial

Participants will also review and complete the Yale MRI Safety Questionnaire to determine eligibility for the study.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Low-fat, vegan diet

    For a 22-week period, participants will be asked to follow a low-fat vegan diet which consists of whole grains, vegetables, legumes, and fruits, with no restriction on energy intake. Animal products and added oils will be excluded. In choosing grain products and starchy vegetables (e.g., bread, potatoes), participants will be encouraged to select those retaining their natural fiber and having a glycemic index \<70, using tables standardized to a value of 100 for glucose.

    Behavioral: Dietary intervention

  • Active comparator
    Portion-controlled diet

    For a 22-week period, participants will be asked to follow a portion-controlled diet which will include individualized diet plans that reduce daily energy intake by 500 kcal for overweight participants, and keep carbohydrate intake reasonably stable over time. It will derive 50% of total energy from carbohydrates, 20% from protein, and less than 30% from fat (≤7% saturated fat), with less than 200 mg/day of cholesterol/day.

    Behavioral: Dietary intervention

Interventions

  • BehavioralDietary intervention

    Low-fat, plant-based diet and a portion-controlled diet

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Intramyocellular lipid content

    Proton magnetic resonance (MR) spectroscopy at 4T (Bruker) will be implemented to quantify intramyocellular lipid concentrations.

    Time frame: 1.) Change from week 0 to week 22; 2.) Change from week 22 to week 44

  2. Hepatocellular lipid content

    Proton magnetic resonance (MR) spectroscopy at 4T (Bruker) will be implemented to quantify intramyocellular lipid concentrations.

    Time frame: 1.) Change from week 0 to week 22; 2.) Change from week 22 to week 44

  3. Insulin sensitivity

    Insulin resistance will be assessed by the Homeostatic Model Assessment (HOMA) PREDIM indexes

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 22 weeks and change from 22 weeks to 44 weeks

  4. Concentration of glucose

    Concentration of glucose will be assessed during a standard meal test (Boost Plus, Nestle, Vevey, Switzerland; 720 kcal, 34% of energy from fat, 16% protein, 50% carbohydrate). Plasma concentrations of glucose will be measured at 0, 30, 60, 120, and 180 min.

    Time frame: 1.) Change from week 0 to week 22; 2.) Change from week 22 to week 44

  5. Concentration of C-peptide

    Concentration of C-peptide be assessed during a standard meal test (Boost Plus, Nestle, Vevey, Switzerland; 720 kcal, 34% of energy from fat, 16% protein, 50% carbohydrate). Concentration of C-peptide will be measured at 0, 30, 60, 120, and 180 min.

    Time frame: 1.) Change from week 0 to week 22; 2.) Change from week 22 to week 44

  6. Rate of glycemic control

    Rate of glycemic control will be assessed through HbA1C.

    Time frame: 1.) Change from week 0 to week 22; 2.) Change from week 22 to week 44

Secondary outcomes

  1. Resting energy expenditure

    Resting energy expenditure REE (pulse, respiratory rate and body temperature) will be measured for 20 minutes through indirect calorimetry utilizing a ventilated hood system in fasting participants.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 22 weeks and change from 22 weeks to 44 weeks

  2. Postprandial metabolism

    Postprandial metabolism will be measured by indirect calorimetry. Participants will be asked to report to the laboratory within 60 minutes of waking and after a 12-hour fast. Following 30 minutes of quiet rest in a dimly lit room, pulse, respiratory rate, and body temperature will be measured. Resting energy expenditure will be measured for 20 minutes through indirect calorimetry utilizing a ventilated hood system. Postprandial metabolism will be measured four times, 20 minutes each time, over the course of 3 hours after the standard breakfast.

    Time frame: Change from Baseline to 22 weeks and change from 22 weeks to 44 weeks

  3. Body Composition

    Body composition will be measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (Lunar iDXA, GE Healthcare; Madison WI), assessing visceral adipose tissue volume and mass.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 22 weeks and change from 22 weeks to 44 weeks

  4. Gut microbiome composition

    Quantitative determination of microorganisms and global analysis of microbial diversity from stool sample. The mean of the change between time points in bacteria counts.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 22 weeks and change from 22 weeks to 44 weeks

  5. Concentration of plasma lipids

    Change in plasma cholesterol \& triglycerides.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 22 weeks and change from 22 weeks to 44 weeks

  6. Body weight

    Change in body weight measured on a calibrated scale.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 22 weeks and change from 22 weeks to 44 weeks

Other outcomes

  1. Advanced Glycation Endproducts (AGEs)

    Advanced Glycation Endproducts (AGEs) will be measured using the AGE Reader mu by Diagnoptics.

    Time frame: 1.) Change from week 0 to week 22; 2.) Change from week 22 to week 44

  2. Endothelial function

    Endothelial function will be measured through use of the itamar EndoPAT, which quantifies the endothelium-mediated changes in vascular tone elicited by a 5-minute occlusion of the brachial artery.

    Time frame: 1.) Change from week 0 to week 22; 2.) Change from week 22 to week 44

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine
    Washington D.C., District of Columbia 20016, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Ferrannini E, Gastaldelli A, Miyazaki Y, Matsuda M, Pettiti M, Natali A, Mari A, DeFronzo RA. Predominant role of reduced beta-cell sensitivity to glucose over insulin resistance in impaired glucose tolerance. Diabetologia. 2003 Sep;46(9):1211-9. doi: 10.1007/s00125-003-1169-6. Epub 2003 Jul 23. PubMed 12879253 ↗
  • Krssak M, Falk Petersen K, Dresner A, DiPietro L, Vogel SM, Rothman DL, Roden M, Shulman GI. Intramyocellular lipid concentrations are correlated with insulin sensitivity in humans: a 1H NMR spectroscopy study. Diabetologia. 1999 Jan;42(1):113-6. doi: 10.1007/s001250051123. PubMed 10027589 ↗
  • Perseghin G, Scifo P, De Cobelli F, Pagliato E, Battezzati A, Arcelloni C, Vanzulli A, Testolin G, Pozza G, Del Maschio A, Luzi L. Intramyocellular triglyceride content is a determinant of in vivo insulin resistance in humans: a 1H-13C nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy assessment in offspring of type 2 diabetic parents. Diabetes. 1999 Aug;48(8):1600-6. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.48.8.1600. PubMed 10426379 ↗
  • Shulman GI. Ectopic fat in insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, and cardiometabolic disease. N Engl J Med. 2014 Sep 18;371(12):1131-41. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1011035. No abstract available. PubMed 25229917 ↗
  • Goodpaster BH, Theriault R, Watkins SC, Kelley DE. Intramuscular lipid content is increased in obesity and decreased by weight loss. Metabolism. 2000 Apr;49(4):467-72. doi: 10.1016/s0026-0495(00)80010-4. PubMed 10778870 ↗
  • Sinha R, Dufour S, Petersen KF, LeBon V, Enoksson S, Ma YZ, Savoye M, Rothman DL, Shulman GI, Caprio S. Assessment of skeletal muscle triglyceride content by (1)H nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy in lean and obese adolescents: relationships to insulin sensitivity, total body fat, and central adiposity. Diabetes. 2002 Apr;51(4):1022-7. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.51.4.1022. PubMed 11916921 ↗
  • Thamer C, Machann J, Bachmann O, Haap M, Dahl D, Wietek B, Tschritter O, Niess A, Brechtel K, Fritsche A, Claussen C, Jacob S, Schick F, Haring HU, Stumvoll M. Intramyocellular lipids: anthropometric determinants and relationships with maximal aerobic capacity and insulin sensitivity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003 Apr;88(4):1785-91. doi: 10.1210/jc.2002-021674. PubMed 12679474 ↗
  • Machado MV, Ferreira DM, Castro RE, Silvestre AR, Evangelista T, Coutinho J, Carepa F, Costa A, Rodrigues CM, Cortez-Pinto H. Liver and muscle in morbid obesity: the interplay of fatty liver and insulin resistance. PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31738. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031738. Epub 2012 Feb 16. PubMed 22359625 ↗
  • Larson-Meyer DE, Newcomer BR, Ravussin E, Volaufova J, Bennett B, Chalew S, Cefalu WT, Sothern M. Intrahepatic and intramyocellular lipids are determinants of insulin resistance in prepubertal children. Diabetologia. 2011 Apr;54(4):869-75. doi: 10.1007/s00125-010-2022-3. Epub 2010 Dec 23. PubMed 21181394 ↗
  • Wang C, Liu F, Yuan Y, Wu J, Wang H, Zhang L, Hu P, Li Z, Li Q, Ye J. Metformin suppresses lipid accumulation in skeletal muscle by promoting fatty acid oxidation. Clin Lab. 2014;60(6):887-96. doi: 10.7754/clin.lab.2013.130531. PubMed 25016691 ↗
  • Sanchez-Munoz V, Salas-Romero R, Del Villar-Morales A, Martinez-Coria E, Pegueros-Perez A, Franco-Sanchez JG. [Decrease of liver fat content by aerobic exercise or metformin therapy in overweight or obese women]. Rev Invest Clin. 2013 Jul-Aug;65(4):307-17. Spanish. PubMed 24304731 ↗
  • Bajaj M, Baig R, Suraamornkul S, Hardies LJ, Coletta DK, Cline GW, Monroy A, Koul S, Sriwijitkamol A, Musi N, Shulman GI, DeFronzo RA. Effects of pioglitazone on intramyocellular fat metabolism in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010 Apr;95(4):1916-23. doi: 10.1210/jc.2009-0911. Epub 2010 Feb 15. PubMed 20157197 ↗
  • Phielix E, Brehm A, Bernroider E, Krssak M, Anderwald CH, Krebs M, Schmid AI, Nowotny P, Roden M. Effects of pioglitazone versus glimepiride exposure on hepatocellular fat content in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2013 Oct;15(10):915-22. doi: 10.1111/dom.12112. Epub 2013 May 1. PubMed 23574533 ↗
  • Marchesini G, Petta S, Dalle Grave R. Diet, weight loss, and liver health in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Pathophysiology, evidence, and practice. Hepatology. 2016 Jun;63(6):2032-43. doi: 10.1002/hep.28392. Epub 2016 Jan 22. PubMed 26663351 ↗
  • Greco AV, Mingrone G, Giancaterini A, Manco M, Morroni M, Cinti S, Granzotto M, Vettor R, Camastra S, Ferrannini E. Insulin resistance in morbid obesity: reversal with intramyocellular fat depletion. Diabetes. 2002 Jan;51(1):144-51. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.51.1.144. PubMed 11756334 ↗
  • Fabris R, Mingrone G, Milan G, Manco M, Granzotto M, Dalla Pozza A, Scarda A, Serra R, Greco AV, Federspil G, Vettor R. Further lowering of muscle lipid oxidative capacity in obese subjects after biliopancreatic diversion. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004 Apr;89(4):1753-9. doi: 10.1210/jc.2003-031343. PubMed 15070941 ↗
  • Johansson L, Roos M, Kullberg J, Weis J, Ahlstrom H, Sundbom M, Eden Engstrom B, Karlsson FA. Lipid mobilization following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass examined by magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy. Obes Surg. 2008 Oct;18(10):1297-304. doi: 10.1007/s11695-008-9484-0. Epub 2008 Apr 8. PubMed 18392897 ↗
  • Bachmann OP, Dahl DB, Brechtel K, Machann J, Haap M, Maier T, Loviscach M, Stumvoll M, Claussen CD, Schick F, Haring HU, Jacob S. Effects of intravenous and dietary lipid challenge on intramyocellular lipid content and the relation with insulin sensitivity in humans. Diabetes. 2001 Nov;50(11):2579-84. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.50.11.2579. PubMed 11679437 ↗
  • Sparks LM, Xie H, Koza RA, Mynatt R, Hulver MW, Bray GA, Smith SR. A high-fat diet coordinately downregulates genes required for mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation in skeletal muscle. Diabetes. 2005 Jul;54(7):1926-33. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.54.7.1926. PubMed 15983191 ↗
  • Petersen KF, Dufour S, Morino K, Yoo PS, Cline GW, Shulman GI. Reversal of muscle insulin resistance by weight reduction in young, lean, insulin-resistant offspring of parents with type 2 diabetes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 May 22;109(21):8236-40. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1205675109. Epub 2012 Apr 30. PubMed 22547801 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Upon request individual participant data will be available to other researchers.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 27, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04088981
Lead sponsor
Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine
Collaborators
Yale University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 13, 2019
Start date
Jul 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jul 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 27, 2025

Study contacts

Hana Kahleova, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in Jun 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion