CClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT04065516ARATUpdated Apr 25, 2025

ARAT for Reflux Disease After Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy in Patients With Achalasia

An interventional study of ARAT technique in Achalasia and Gastroesophageal Reflux, sponsored by Coordinación de Investigación en Salud, Mexico. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in Mexico. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-25.

Sponsored by Coordinación de Investigación en Salud, Mexico · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
44
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of achalasia is associated with a higher incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease compared with Heller's myotomy. Remodeling of the esophagogastric junction with hybrid argon plasma could decrease the passage of gastric or gastroduodenal content into the esophagus.

Read the detailed description

Achalasia is the inability of the lower esophageal sphincter to relax in the context of dysfunction of esophageal peristalsis. Peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of achalasia has an efficacy above 90%, being comparable with Heller's myotomy. The treatment of achalasia by peroral endoscopic myotomy is associated with a higher incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease, compared with alternative therapies such as Heller's myotomy or pneumatic dilatation. Hybrid argon plasma at the level of the esophagogastric junction could generate remodeling of this region generating a partial stenosis and thereby decrease the passage of gastric or gastroduodenal content into the esophagus.

A clinical trial will be carried out, including all patients with achalasia, treated by peroral myotomy older than 18 years old, with abnormal acid exposure in the pHmetry test 3 months or more after treatment, who accept the management of ablation with hybrid argon plasma. To whom the ablation will be performed with Hybrid Argon Plasma and its effectiveness will be evaluated by clinical questionnaires, endoscopy and pHmetry measurement at the beginning, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after the procedure.

Demographic and clinical data will be recorded in a data collection sheet, detailing the reflux questionnaire(GERDQ), Eckardt score, endoscopic findings of esophagitis according to Los Angeles classification and abnormal acid exposure in each evaluation. The data will be condensed into a database for subsequent statistical analysis and publication of results.

02

Conditions studied

  • Achalasia
  • Gastroesophageal Reflux

Keywords

  • Achalasia
  • Gastroesophageal Reflux
  • Argon Plasma Coagulation
  • Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Achalasia type I, II, III
  • Treatment with POEM (Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy)
  • Abnormal acid exposure (>6%) in the 24h-pHmetry test more than three months after the procedure
  • Signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who do not accept the treatment
  • Previous antireflux surgery
  • Previous Heller's Myotomy
  • Hiatal hernia greater than 3 centimeters
  • Hill's Classification Grade IV
  • Pregnancy
  • Patients with any contraindication for an endoscopy
  • Patients with esophageal or gastric varices
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
44 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Argon Plasma Coagulation of the gastroesophageal junction

    Participants with abnormal acid exposure after peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia, will be treated by ablation of the gastroesophageal junction with hybrid argon plasma coagulation

    Procedure: ARAT technique

Interventions

  • ProcedureARAT technique

    After an initial endoscopic evaluation, ARAT technique will be performed with marking, submucosal elevation at esophagogastric junction and then ablation with 100-120w of 270-300 degrees at esophagogastric junction, once the application of the therapy is performed mucosal lavage and immersion technique will be made to corroborate integrity and continuity of the gastrointestinal tract and rule out immediate complications.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. A change in erosive esophagitis grade assessed by upper endoscopy after ARAT

    Upper endoscopy is going to be used to measure the erosive esophagitis grade using the Los Angeles Esophagitis scale(grade A=mild, Grade B=moderate, Grade C=moderate high and Grade D=severe) after after ARAT

    Time frame: measures will be performed at 3,6 and 12 months after ARAT

  2. A change in esophageal acid exposure assessed by pHmetry study after ARAT

    A 24-hours pHmetry study is going to be used to measure esophageal acid exposure in esophagus after ARAT. DeMeester Score and the percentage of esophagic acid exposure will be used to assess pathologic reflux (\>14.73 and \> 6%, respectively)

    Time frame: measures will be performed at 3,6 and 12 months after ARAT

  3. A change in clinical symptoms of reflux disease assessed with a gastroesophageal reflux questionnaire after ARAT

    The clinical evaluation of reflux disease is going to be assessed by the use of a clinical gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire (GERD-Q) after ARAT. Reflux disease was considered positive when \>4 points is observed

    Time frame: measures will be performed at 3,6 and 12 months after ARAT

06

Study locations

1 site
  • Centro Medico Nacional Siglo XXI Hospital de Especialidades
    Mexico City, 06700, Mexico
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Pandolfino JE, Gawron AJ. Achalasia: a systematic review. JAMA. 2015 May 12;313(18):1841-52. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.2996. PubMed 25965233 ↗
  • Boeckxstaens GE, Zaninotto G, Richter JE. Achalasia. Lancet. 2014 Jan 4;383(9911):83-93. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60651-0. Epub 2013 Jul 17. PubMed 23871090 ↗
  • Vaezi MF, Pandolfino JE, Vela MF. ACG clinical guideline: diagnosis and management of achalasia. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Aug;108(8):1238-49; quiz 1250. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.196. Epub 2013 Jul 23. PubMed 23877351 ↗
  • Akintoye E, Kumar N, Obaitan I, Alayo QA, Thompson CC. Peroral endoscopic myotomy: a meta-analysis. Endoscopy. 2016 Dec;48(12):1059-1068. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-114426. Epub 2016 Sep 12. PubMed 27617421 ↗
  • Zaninotto G, Bennett C, Boeckxstaens G, Costantini M, Ferguson MK, Pandolfino JE, Patti MG, Ribeiro U Jr, Richter J, Swanstrom L, Tack J, Triadafilopoulos G, Markar SR, Salvador R, Faccio L, Andreollo NA, Cecconello I, Costamagna G, da Rocha JRM, Hungness ES, Fisichella PM, Fuchs KH, Gockel I, Gurski R, Gyawali CP, Herbella FAM, Holloway RH, Hongo M, Jobe BA, Kahrilas PJ, Katzka DA, Dua KS, Liu D, Moonen A, Nasi A, Pasricha PJ, Penagini R, Perretta S, Sallum RAA, Sarnelli G, Savarino E, Schlottmann F, Sifrim D, Soper N, Tatum RP, Vaezi MF, van Herwaarden-Lindeboom M, Vanuytsel T, Vela MF, Watson DI, Zerbib F, Gittens S, Pontillo C, Vermigli S, Inama D, Low DE. The 2018 ISDE achalasia guidelines. Dis Esophagus. 2018 Sep 1;31(9). doi: 10.1093/dote/doy071. PubMed 30169645 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04065516
Lead sponsor
Coordinación de Investigación en Salud, Mexico
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 22, 2019
Start date
Jul 3, 2019
Primary completion
Jul 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 1, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 25, 2025

Study contacts

Oscar V Hernandez, MD
principal investigator · Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion