CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04021953Updated Sep 1, 2021

The People Like Us Evaluation Study

An interventional study of People Like Us Online Video Series Intervention and Sexual Health Pamphlet (Standard of Care) in HIV/AIDS, Sexually Transmitted Infection and Homosexuality, sponsored by National University of Singapore. Completed at 1 site in Singapore. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 29 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-09-01.

Sponsored by National University of Singapore · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
300
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 29 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The study is a pragmatic, randomized controlled trial design to evaluate an online video series developed by a community-based organization in Singapore for gay, bisexual and queer men.

A total of 300 HIV-negative, gay, bisexual and queer men in Singapore aged 18 to 29 years old will be recruited with the assistance of the partner community-based organization (CBO), Action for AIDS Singapore. Recruitment will utilize both online and offline channels, and with the help of other CBOs in Singapore. Participants should also not have watched the video prior to their participation in this study, which will be ascertained through a questionnaire.

Participants will subsequently be randomized into the intervention arm (n=150) and the control arm (n=150). The treatment group (n=150) will be assigned the intervention along with sexual health information via a pamphlet, while the control group (n=150) will be assigned only the sexual health information via a pamphlet. This will be conducted through block randomization.

02

Conditions studied

  • HIV/AIDS
  • Sexually Transmitted Infection
  • Homosexuality
  • Health Behavior
  • Stigma, Social
  • Health Care Seeking Behavior

Keywords

  • HIV Testing
  • STI Testing
  • Homophobia
  • eHealth
  • Singapore
03

In context

Sexually Transmitted Diseases

424 studies on the registry are indexed under Sexually Transmitted Diseases; 71 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 300 is below the median of 470 across 346 interventional studies indexed under Sexually Transmitted Diseases.

Browse Sexually Transmitted Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

National University of Singapore is the lead sponsor of 206 studies on the registry; 52 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 29 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Self-reported HIV-negative status, or unsure of HIV status
  • Self-reported gay, bisexual or queer sexual orientation
  • Self-reported male gender, regardless of sex assigned at birth
  • Self-reported age of 18 to 29 years old at point of recruitment
  • Singapore citizen or permanent resident at the point of recruitment
  • Self-reported as never having watched an online video drama series by Gayhealth.sg or Action for AIDS in the last year

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants who have watched the People Like Us Series prior to study
  • Participants who have self-reported being HIV-positive
  • Participants who are not English-literate
  • Participants aged below 18 or above 29 at baseline recruitment
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
300 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention Group

    The online intervention comprises a series of six videos, each about 10-minutes in length, entitled the People Like Us series. The intervention was developed by gayhealth.sg and Action for AIDS Singapore in 2018. The series follow the love and sex lives of four ethnically-diverse GBQ men of varying socioeconomic backgrounds, as they negotiate issues of sexual health, mental health, and relationships throughout the six-part miniseries. The intervention group will also be provided with an e-pamphlet on sexual wellness catered to GBMSM. This e-pamphlet has been developed by the National Skin Centre and Department of Sexually Transmitted Infections Clinic specifically for information on sexual wellness among GBMSM. It comprises segments on HIV/STI symptoms, etiology, information on how to seek help for HIV/STI, behavioral and biomedical methods of HIV prevention.

    Behavioral: People Like Us Online Video Series Intervention · Behavioral: Sexual Health Pamphlet (Standard of Care)

  • Active comparator
    Control Group

    The control group will be provided with an e-pamphlet on sexual wellness catered to GBMSM. This e-pamphlet has been developed by the National Skin Centre and Department of Sexually Transmitted Infections Clinic specifically for information on sexual wellness among GBMSM. It comprises segments on HIV/STI symptoms, etiology, information on how to seek help for HIV/STI, behavioral and biomedical methods of HIV prevention.

    Behavioral: Sexual Health Pamphlet (Standard of Care)

Interventions

  • BehavioralPeople Like Us Online Video Series Intervention

    People Like Us miniseries incorporates key sexual health messages to: 1. Increase viewers' knowledge and perceptions of HIV and other STI risk; 2. Address homophobia and sexual orientation disclosure; 3. Increase safer-sex negotiation self-efficacy; 4. Promote positive attitudes towards condom use and other safe sex behaviors; 5. Build skills and self-efficacy for practicing safer sex; 6. Provide information on HIV and other STI testing and its benefits; 7. Provide information on resources for HIV/STI testing and other mental health services; 8. Model appropriate behaviors around practicing safer sex. Each video in the six-part series ends with an educational video segment featuring the managers of Action for AIDS and Gayhealth.sg, who provide a brief synopsis of the episode and cover key points relevant to mental and sexual health for GBQ men.

  • BehavioralSexual Health Pamphlet (Standard of Care)

    The control group will be provided with an e-pamphlet on sexual wellness catered to GBMSM. This e-pamphlet has been developed by the National Skin Centre and Department of Sexually Transmitted Infections Clinic specifically for information on sexual wellness among GBMSM. It comprises segments on HIV/STI symptoms, etiology, information on how to seek help for HIV/STI, behavioral and biomedical methods of HIV prevention.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in intention to test for HIV at 3 months

    Participants are asked: "How likely are you to get tested for HIV in the next three months?"; to which they may respond: 1. Extremely unlikely to get tested 2. Very unlikely to get tested 3. Somewhat unlikely to get tested 4. Somewhat likely to get tested 5. Very likely to get tested 6. Extremely likely to get tested

    Time frame: 3 months

  2. Change in intention to test for HIV at 6 months

    Participants are asked: "How likely are you to get tested for HIV in the next three months?"; to which they may respond: 1. Extremely unlikely to get tested 2. Very unlikely to get tested 3. Somewhat unlikely to get tested 4. Somewhat likely to get tested 5. Very likely to get tested 6. Extremely likely to get tested

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Change in intention to test for Syphilis at 3 months

    Participants are asked: "How likely are you to get tested for Syphilis in the next three months?"; to which they may respond: 1. Extremely unlikely to get tested 2. Very unlikely to get tested 3. Somewhat unlikely to get tested 4. Somewhat likely to get tested 5. Very likely to get tested 6. Extremely likely to get tested

    Time frame: 3 months

  4. Change in intention to test for Syphilis at 6 months

    Participants are asked: "How likely are you to get tested for Syphilis in the next three months?"; to which they may respond: 1. Extremely unlikely to get tested 2. Very unlikely to get tested 3. Somewhat unlikely to get tested 4. Somewhat likely to get tested 5. Very likely to get tested 6. Extremely likely to get tested

    Time frame: 6 months

  5. Change in intention to test for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea at 3 months

    Participants are asked: "How likely are you to get tested for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea in the next three months?"; to which they may respond: 1. Extremely unlikely to get tested 2. Very unlikely to get tested 3. Somewhat unlikely to get tested 4. Somewhat likely to get tested 5. Very likely to get tested 6. Extremely likely to get tested

    Time frame: 3 months

  6. Change in intention to test for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea at 6 months

    Participants are asked: "How likely are you to get tested for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea in the next three months?"; to which they may respond: 1. Extremely unlikely to get tested 2. Very unlikely to get tested 3. Somewhat unlikely to get tested 4. Somewhat likely to get tested 5. Very likely to get tested 6. Extremely likely to get tested

    Time frame: 6 months

  7. HIV testing at 3 months

    Participants are asked: "When did you go for you last (most recent) voluntary HIV test?"; to which they may respond: 1. Never 2. In the last 3 months 3. In the last 6 months 4. 6 to 12 months ago 5. More than 1 year ago

    Time frame: 3 months

  8. HIV testing at 6 months

    Participants are asked: "When did you go for you last (most recent) voluntary HIV test?"; to which they may respond: 1. Never 2. In the last 3 months 3. In the last 6 months 4. 6 to 12 months ago 5. More than 1 year ago

    Time frame: 6 months

  9. Syphilis testing at 3 months

    Participants are asked: "When did you go for you last (most recent) voluntary Syphilis test?"; to which they may respond: 1. Never 2. In the last 3 months 3. In the last 6 months 4. 6 to 12 months ago 5. More than 1 year ago

    Time frame: 3 months

  10. Syphilis testing at 6 months

    Participants are asked: "When did you go for you last (most recent) voluntary Syphilis test?"; to which they may respond: 1. Never 2. In the last 3 months 3. In the last 6 months 4. 6 to 12 months ago 5. More than 1 year ago

    Time frame: 6 months

  11. Chlamydia and Gonorrhea testing at 3 months

    Participants are asked: "When did you go for you last (most recent) voluntary Chlamydia or Gonorrhea test?"; to which they may respond: 1. Never 2. In the last 3 months 3. In the last 6 months 4. 6 to 12 months ago 5. More than 1 year ago

    Time frame: 3 months

  12. Chlamydia and Gonorrhea testing at 6 months

    Participants are asked: "When did you go for you last (most recent) voluntary Chlamydia or Gonorrhea test?"; to which they may respond: 1. Never 2. In the last 3 months 3. In the last 6 months 4. 6 to 12 months ago 5. More than 1 year ago

    Time frame: 6 months

  13. Self-reported regularity of HIV testing at 3 months

    Participants are asked: "On average, how regularly do you test for HIV?"; to which they may respond: 1. I do not test regularly 2. Once every few years 3. Once a year 4. Once every 6 months 5. Once every 3 months 6. Once a month

    Time frame: 3 months

  14. Self-reported regularity of HIV testing at 6 months

    Participants are asked: "On average, how regularly do you test for HIV?"; to which they may respond: 1. I do not test regularly 2. Once every few years 3. Once a year 4. Once every 6 months 5. Once every 3 months 6. Once a month

    Time frame: 6 months

  15. Self-reported regularity of Syphilis testing at 3 months

    Participants are asked: "On average, how regularly do you test for Syphilis?"; to which they may respond: 1. I do not test regularly 2. Once every few years 3. Once a year 4. Once every 6 months 5. Once every 3 months 6. Once a month

    Time frame: 3 months

  16. Self-reported regularity of Syphilis testing at 6 months

    Participants are asked: "On average, how regularly do you test for Syphilis?"; to which they may respond: 1. I do not test regularly 2. Once every few years 3. Once a year 4. Once every 6 months 5. Once every 3 months 6. Once a month

    Time frame: 6 months

  17. Self-reported regularity of Chlamydia and Gonorrhea testing at 3 months

    Participants are asked: "On average, how regularly do you test for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea?"; to which they may respond: 1. I do not test regularly 2. Once every few years 3. Once a year 4. Once every 6 months 5. Once every 3 months 6. Once a month

    Time frame: 3 months

  18. Self-reported regularity of Chlamydia and Gonorrhea testing at 6 months

    Participants are asked: "On average, how regularly do you test for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea?"; to which they may respond: 1. I do not test regularly 2. Once every few years 3. Once a year 4. Once every 6 months 5. Once every 3 months 6. Once a month

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Risk perception for HIV

    Risk perception is measures through a questions (slider scale) that asks participants: "How much risk do you think you are at of getting HIV?". Participants will rate this from 0 to 10 (0=no risk at all; 10=very high risk)

    Time frame: 3 months and 6 months

  2. Risk perception for other sexually transmitted infections

    Risk perception is measures through a questions (slider scale) that asks participants: "How much risk do you think you are at of getting other sexually transmitted infections?". Participants will rate this from 0 to 10 (0=no risk at all; 10=very high risk)

    Time frame: 3 months and 6 months

  3. Knowledge of HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis

    Participants are tested on their knowledge of HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis by providing a response (1=True; 2=False; 3=I do not know) to two questions: "HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis is an effective means of preventing HIV infection". The correct answer is "True". "HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis can also reduce the chances of acquiring other STIs". The correct answer is "False". Each correct answer provides a score of 1 point.

    Time frame: 3 months and 6 months

  4. Knowledge of risks associated with acquiring other sexually transmitted infections

    Participants are tested on their knowledge of other sexually transmitted infections by providing a response (1=True; 2=False; 3=I do not know) to three questions: "Gonorrhea can be transmitted through oral sex". The correct answer is "True". "Chemsex, or the use of substances during sex, often increases a person's risk of engaging in risky sexual behavior and acquiring HIV or other STIs" The correct answer is "True". "There is a/are clinics in Singapore where I can test anonymously for HIV and Syphilis". The correct answer is "True". Each correct answer provides a score of 1 point.

    Time frame: 3 months and 6 months

  5. Knowledge of HIV

    Participants are tested on their knowledge of HIV by providing a response (1=True; 2=False; 3=I do not know) to two questions: "An HIV-positive individual who has achieved viral suppression or an 'undetectable' viral load has almost zero chances of transmitting the virus to someone else through sexual intercourse". The correct answer is "True". "An HIV-positive individual on effective treatment can live a long, healthy, and productive life". The correct answer is "True". Each correct answer provides a score of 1 point.

    Time frame: 3 months and 6 months

  6. Connectedness to LGBT Community

    This is an 8-item scale adapted from Frost \& Meyer (2012) that measures a participant's self-perceived connectedness to the LGBT community on a 4-point Likert Scale. The measure is a sum score of all 8 items.

    Time frame: 3 months and 6 months

  7. Modified Self-Concealment Scale

    This is a 7-item scale adapted from Scrimshaw (2013) that measures a participant's self-concealment of their sexual orientation on a 5-point Likert Scale. The measure is a sum score of all 7 items.

    Time frame: 3 months and 6 months

  8. Consistent condom use for anal sex with casual partners or sex workers

    This is assessed by the question, "In the last 3 months, how often did you use a condom when having anal sex with a casual partner?" or "In the last 3 months, how often did you use a condom when having anal sex with a sex worker/money boy?" (Options are always, more than half the time, about half the time, less than half the time, never used a condom). Participants who give the answer 'Always' are classified as having consistent condom usage for anal sex with causal partners or sex workers.

    Time frame: 3 months and 6 months

  9. Incidence of sexually transmitted infections

    This is defined as self-reporting a diagnosis of Syphilis, Chlamydia, Genital Herpes, Genital Warts, Hepatitis C, or Gonorrhea at the 3-month or 6-month follow-up.

    Time frame: 3 months and 6 months

  10. Perceived Homophobia

    This is a 6-item scale adapted from Smolenski, Ross, Risser, and Rosser (2009) that measures a participant's self-concealment of their sexual orientation. The measure is a sum score of all 6 items.

    Time frame: 3 months and 6 months

  11. Internalized Homophobia

    This is a 5-item scale adapted from Frost and Meyer (2013) that measures a participant's internalized homophobia on a 4-point Likert Scale. The measure is a sum score of all 5 items.

    Time frame: 3 months and 6 months

  12. HIV testing self-efficacy

    This is a 10-item scale adapted from Jamil and colleagues (2015) that measures a participant's self-efficacy in HIV testing on a 5-point Likert Scale. The measure is a sum score of all 10 items.

    Time frame: 3 months and 6 months

  13. HIV testing social norms

    This is a 9-item scale adapted from Pettifor and colleagues (2010) that measures a participant's perceptions on norms around HIV testing on a 4-point Likert Scale. The measure is a sum score of all 9 items.

    Time frame: 3 months and 6 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • National University of Singapore
    Singapore, Singapore
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Tan RKJ, Koh WL, Le D, Banerjee S, Chio MT, Chan RKW, Wong CM, Tai BC, Wong ML, Cook AR, Chen MI, Wong CS. Effect of a Popular Web Drama Video Series on HIV and Other Sexually Transmitted Infection Testing Among Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex With Men in Singapore: Community-Based, Pragmatic, Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res. 2022 May 6;24(5):e31401. doi: 10.2196/31401. PubMed 35522470 ↗
  • Tan RKJ, Koh WL, Le D, Tan A, Tyler A, Tan C, Banerjee S, Wong CS, Wong ML, Chio MT, Chen MI. Effect of a web drama video series on HIV and other sexually transmitted infection testing among gay, bisexual and queer men: study protocol for a community-based, pragmatic randomised controlled trial in Singapore: the People Like Us (PLU) Evaluation Study. BMJ Open. 2020 Apr 7;10(4):e033855. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033855. PubMed 32269026 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 1, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04021953
Lead sponsor
National University of Singapore
Collaborators
National Centre for Infectious Diseases, Singapore, Action for AIDS Singapore
Responsible party
TAN KAY JIN RAYNER (Principal Investigator, National University of Singapore) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 16, 2019
Start date
Oct 13, 2019
Primary completion
Jul 6, 2020
Completion
Jul 6, 2020
Last update
Sep 1, 2021

Study contacts

Rayner Kay Jin Tan, B.Soc.Sci
principal investigator · National University of Singapore

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion