ClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT04015310BISECTUpdated Jul 21, 2021

Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Biliary Disease: Health Economics Study

An observational study in Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis and PSC, sponsored by Perspectum. Withdrawn. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-07-21.

Sponsored by Perspectum · Observational

Why this study was withdrawn
Delays due to COVID prevented the start of recruitment and funding was no longer available.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
0
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a health economic study on using quantitative magnetic resonance imaging in biliary disease. It is an observational study aiming to recruit 40 patients with Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis (PSC) in 12 months. The aim of the study is to assess the effect of result of enhanced Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography (MRCP+) on the physicians' diagnosis and/or plans for patients with suspected or confirmed PSC, compared with usual standard of care. This study also aims to identify the cost-effectiveness of adding MRCP+ to the standard care pathway.

Read the detailed description

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is the greatest unmet need in modern liver medicine. There continue to be no direct bio-markers for the diagnosis and monitoring of biliary diseases such as PSC, constituting a major barrier to drug development and to poor patient outcomes. This project aims to validate an imaging platform, enhanced Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography, MRCP+, to improve the standard of care for patients by generating the real-world evidence needed to support clinical adoption.

Biliary diseases significantly increase the likelihood of developing sclerosing cholangitis (SC), causing major morbidity and mortality. Sclerosing cholangitis, a chronic inflammatory cholestatic condition, is exemplified by the primary idiopathic autoimmune condition PSC. In the absence of effective therapies, hindered by a lack of measurable trial endpoints (bio-markers), liver transplantation is the only life-extending intervention, with PSC accounting for 15% of all European liver transplantations. Furthermore, biliary complications occur in 5-32% of all liver transplantations. MRCP+ has the potential to significantly improve the outlook for patients.

At present, diagnosis requires cholangiopancreatography, either magnetic resonance (MRCP) or endoscopic retrograde (ERCP). The current standard ERCP is expensive, invasive, and associated with a high risk of morbidity. MRCP is less invasive and cheaper. However, both result in inconsistent qualitative interpretations. MRCP+ is the first device to enable direct quantitative measurement of biliary disease and addresses both European and US Liver society (EASL and AASLD) concerns that early changes of PSC are missed by MRCP, necessitating adequate visualisation and quantitative assessment.

MRCP+ both enhances MRCP images and yields advanced quantitative biliary measures. Initial experience shows significant clinical potential. This project will provide substantive evidence for clinical adoption via a real-world study including heath economics to evaluate the cost-effectiveness and impact on the clinical care pathway.

To achieve this, 40 patients were recruited from the University Hospitals Birmingham (UHB) who are attending the centre for either a review or diagnosis of PSC. The patients will follow their usual care pathway, being seen by the consultant who will document their care plan. Following this appointment, and their consent, they will be asked to undergo a non-invasive, pain-free Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scan. MRCP+ reports generated from these scans will be returned to the consultant who will review the documented standard care treatment plan and ascertain whether any amendments would have been made in light of these further quantitative metrics gained from MRI.

The study team alongside the Oxford Academic Health Science Network (OAHSN), will use the clinical data generated by the 40 patients and create a health economic model, which can be used to generate a business case for adoption, an impact case study for dissemination across the network of 15 centres in the Academic Health Science Networks (AHSN) and contribute to a submission for Human Tissue Authority (HTA) as part of the evidence required to gain health technology adoption via the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Medical Technologies Evaluation Programme (MTEP) route.

02

Conditions studied

  • Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis
  • PSC

Keywords

  • MRCP
  • MRCP+
  • PSC
  • Health economic
03

In context

Cholangitis, Sclerosing

149 studies on the registry are indexed under Cholangitis, Sclerosing; 39 are open to participants now.

Browse Cholangitis, Sclerosing studies →

Lead sponsor

Perspectum is the lead sponsor of 27 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

40 adult participants will be recruited who are over the age of 18 and are attending a hepatology appointment at UHB and are either being investigated for PSC or have confirmed PSC.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients aged 18 years or over
  • Patient due to attend the hepatology clinic for PSC diagnostics/review
  • Participant is willing and able to give

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The participants may not enter the study if they have any to magnetic resonance imaging (including pregnancy, extensive tattoos, pacemaker, shrapnel injury, severe claustrophobia).
  • Any other cause, including a significant disease or disorder which, in the opinion of the investigator, may either put the participant at risk because of participation in the study, or may influence the result of the study, or the participant's ability to participate in the study
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • PSC patients attending outpatient

    Primary sclerosing cholangitis, as defined by EASL and AASLD guidelines.

    Device: Quantitative Multi parametric MRI and enhanced MRCP

Interventions

  • DeviceQuantitative Multi parametric MRI and enhanced MRCP

    Patients will have quantitative MRI and enhanced MRCP on addition to their standard of care

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. quantitative measurements using Enhance MRCP (MRCP+) and Physicians' decision making

    To assess the effect of quantitative data from MRCP+ results on a physicians' diagnosis and/or plans for care of patients with suspected or confirmed PSC compared with usual standard of care.

    Time frame: 8 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Cost effectiveness of using enhanced MRCP (MRCP+) for diagnosis and monitoring of PSC patients

    To quantify the potential reduction in patient management costs by reducing unnecessary appointments in secondary care by using MRCP+ technology quantitative reports in diagnosis and monitoring of PSC patients more accurately.

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Dec 2020 to primary completion in Mar 2021, 3 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 8, 2019
First posted
Jul 10, 2019
StartActual
Dec 21, 2020
Primary completionActual
Mar 31, 2021
CompletionActual
Mar 31, 2021
Last update
Jul 21, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 21, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04015310
Lead sponsor
Perspectum
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 10, 2019
Start date
Dec 21, 2020
Primary completion
Mar 31, 2021
Completion
Mar 31, 2021
Last update
Jul 21, 2021

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in Jul 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion