ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04005586Updated Jun 11, 2021Results posted

A Clinical Study to Evaluate The Safety and Effectiveness of Performing 0.50 Diopter Astigmatism Correction on the Commercially Available RxSight Light Adjustable Lens (LAL)

An interventional study of Light Delivery Device (LDD) in Aphakia and Cataract, sponsored by RxSight, Inc.. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-06-11.

Sponsored by RxSight, Inc. · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
25
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
40 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of performing 0.50 D cylinder correction on the RxSight Light Adjustable Lens (LAL) in patients who have undergone implantation with the FDA approved, commercially available LAL.

02

Conditions studied

  • Aphakia
  • Cataract

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Light Delivery Device
  • LDD
  • Intraocular lens
  • Light Adjustable Lens
  • LAL
03

In context

Aphakia

69 studies on the registry are indexed under Aphakia; 6 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 25 is below the median of 103 across 52 interventional studies indexed under Aphakia.

Browse Aphakia studies →

Lead sponsor

RxSight, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 9 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 5 (100%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • A study eye implanted with the commercially approved LAL that has not undergone any previous LDD treatments
  • A study eye with manifest refraction cylinder of 0.50 D measured by two independent examiners at the Adjustment #1 visit prior to the first light adjustment treatment.
  • Sign a written form and be willing to receive light treatment for their 0.50 D of cylinder.
  • Between the ages of 40 and 80 inclusive on the day the informed consent form is signed.
  • Good vision in the fellow eye with best corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA) 20/40 or better.
  • Willing and able to comply with the requirements for study specific procedures and visits

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pre-existing macular disease in the study eye.
  • History of uveitis in the study eye.
  • Has undergone previous corneal or intraocular surgery in the study eye, except for the cataract surgery and eyes with previous pterygium excision are permitted as long as the pterygium did not extend more than 2mm onto the cornea from the limbus.
  • Subjects taking systemic medication that may increase sensitivity to UV light.
  • Subjects taking a systemic medication that is considered toxic to the retina such as tamoxifen.
  • History of ocular herpes simplex virus in the study eye.
  • Subject who has participated within another ophthalmic clinical trial within the last 3 months.
  • Sutures used at the time of surgery to close the incision wound in the study eye
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
25 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Light Delivery Device (LDD)

    Patient's study eye will undergo light delivery treatments to the commercially available light adjustable lens.

    Device: Light Delivery Device (LDD)

Interventions

  • DeviceLight Delivery Device (LDD)

    Study eye will undergo Light delivery Device treatments

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean Manifest Refraction Cylinder (MRCYL) Compared Between the Three Study Groups, LAL Treatment Group and Historical Control Groups

    Time frame: Post Op Month 3

  2. Change in Manifest Refraction Cylinder (MRCYL) Compared Between the Three Study Groups, LAL Treatment Group and Historical Control Groups

    Time frame: Post Op Month 3

Other outcomes

  1. Safety: ISO 11979-7 Number of Eyes With Ocular Adverse Events (Device Related and Unrelated)

    Number of study eyes experiencing Ocular adverse events (device related and unrelated)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 months

07

Results

Posted Jun 11, 2021

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneLight Delivery Device (LDD)
Started25
Completed25
Not completed0

Outcome measures

PrimaryMean Manifest Refraction Cylinder (MRCYL) Compared Between the Three Study Groups, LAL Treatment Group and Historical Control Groups
Time frame:
Post Op Month 3
Reported as:
Mean · Diopter (D)
Mean Manifest Refraction Cylinder (MRCYL) Compared Between the Three Study Groups, LAL Treatment Group and Historical Control Groups
Diopter (D)Light Delivery Device (LDD)
Mean Manifest Refraction Cylinder (MRCYL) Compared Between the Three Study Groups, LAL Treatment Group and Historical Control Groups-0.14 ± 0.21
Statistical analysis
  • Light Delivery Device (LDD) ·
PrimaryChange in Manifest Refraction Cylinder (MRCYL) Compared Between the Three Study Groups, LAL Treatment Group and Historical Control Groups
Time frame:
Post Op Month 3
Reported as:
Mean · Diopter (D)
Change in Manifest Refraction Cylinder (MRCYL) Compared Between the Three Study Groups, LAL Treatment Group and Historical Control Groups
Diopter (D)Light Delivery Device (LDD)
Change in Manifest Refraction Cylinder (MRCYL) Compared Between the Three Study Groups, LAL Treatment Group and Historical Control Groups0.36 ± 0.21
Statistical analysis
  • Light Delivery Device (LDD) ·
Other pre-specifiedSafety: ISO 11979-7 Number of Eyes With Ocular Adverse Events (Device Related and Unrelated)

Number of study eyes experiencing Ocular adverse events (device related and unrelated)

Time frame:
Through study completion, an average of 3 months
Reported as:
Number · eyes
Safety: ISO 11979-7 Number of Eyes With Ocular Adverse Events (Device Related and Unrelated)
eyesLight Delivery Device (LDD)
Safety: ISO 11979-7 Number of Eyes With Ocular Adverse Events (Device Related and Unrelated)4

Adverse events

Collected over Through study completion, an average of 3 months.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Light Delivery Device (LDD)0/25 (0%)0/25 (0%)4/25 (16%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventLight Delivery Device (LDD)
Posterior Capsular Opacity (PCO) that requires YAG Capsulotomy treatmentEye disorders3/25
Non-clinically significant cystoid macular edemaEye disorders1/25
Non-clinically significant cystoid macular edema in non-study eyeEye disorders1/25

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Light Delivery Device (LDD)
Mean67.2 ± 5.4
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Light Delivery Device (LDD)
Female11
Male14
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Light Delivery Device (LDD)
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian0
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American0
White25
More than one raceNA
Unknown or Not Reported0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Light Delivery Device (LDD)
United States25
08

Study locations

2 sites
  • Cleveland Eye Clinic
    Brecksville, Ohio 44141, United States
  • Vance Thompson Vision Clinic
    Sioux Falls, South Dakota 57108, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jul 2019 to primary completion in Mar 2020, 8 months.

Results were first posted in Jun 2021, 1 year 3 months after primary completion.

Of 32 industry-sponsored interventional studies with no phase under Aphakia, half reached primary completion within 17 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 23. This study's 8 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 37 studies reached it within 17 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 26.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 26, 2019
First posted
Jul 2, 2019
StartActual
Jul 1, 2019
Primary completionActual
Mar 1, 2020
CompletionActual
Mar 1, 2020
Results first posted
Jun 11, 2021
Last update
Jun 11, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 11, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04005586
Lead sponsor
RxSight, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 2, 2019
Start date
Jul 1, 2019
Primary completion
Mar 1, 2020
Completion
Mar 1, 2020
Results posted
Jun 11, 2021
Last update
Jun 11, 2021

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion