ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03895034Updated May 12, 2022Results posted

Exploratory Study to Evaluate the Use of the RxSight Light Adjustable Lens (LAL) and the Light Delivery Device (LDD) to Improve Visual Outcomes

An interventional study of Light Adjustable lens (LAL) and Light Delivery Device (LDD) in Aphakia and Cataract, sponsored by RxSight, Inc.. Completed at 1 site in Mexico. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-05-12.

Sponsored by RxSight, Inc. · Interventional and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 9 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jun 2018, registered Mar 2019).
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
66
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
40 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The objective of this study is to evaluate, for the visual correction of aphakia, whether the RxSight Light Adjustable Lens (LAL) and Light Delivery Device (LDD) can be used to improve visual outcomes after performing adjustments of the LAL with the LDD. This is an exploratory study. No primary effectiveness endpoints will be identified.

02

Conditions studied

  • Aphakia
  • Cataract

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Light Adjustable Lens
  • Intraocular lens
  • LAL
03

In context

Aphakia

69 studies on the registry are indexed under Aphakia; 6 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 66 is below the median of 103 across 52 interventional studies indexed under Aphakia.

Browse Aphakia studies →

Lead sponsor

RxSight, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 9 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 5 (100%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Must sign a written form and be willing to undergo cataract surgery for unilateral or bilateral implantation of the RxLAL.
  • Between the ages of 40 and 80 inclusive on the day the cataract surgery is performed.
  • Study eye must have cataract causing reduction in best corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA) to a level of 20/32 or worse with or without a glare source.
  • Willing and able to comply with the requirements for study specific procedures and visits.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Study eye with pseudoexfoliation.
  • Study eye with diabetes with any evidence of retinopathy.
  • Study eye with evidence of glaucomatous optic neuropathy.
  • Study eye with history of uveitis.
  • Study eye with prior history of Intacs, Radial keratotomy (RK), Conductive keratoplasty (CK), Astigmatic keratotomy (AK), Phakic Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL), Corneal Inlay, or with previous pterygium excision unless the pterygium did not extend more than 2mm onto the cornea from the limbus.
  • Subjects taking systemic medication that may increase sensitivity to UV light.
  • Subjects taking a systemic medication that is considered toxic to the retina such as tamoxifen.
  • Study eye with history of ocular herpes simplex virus.
  • Study eye with history of a congenital color vision defect
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
66 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Light adjustable lens (LAL) and Light Delivery Device (LDD)

    Device: Light Adjustable lens (LAL) and Light Delivery Device (LDD)

Interventions

  • DeviceLight Adjustable lens (LAL) and Light Delivery Device (LDD)

    Eligible eyes will receive Light adjustable lens with Light delivery Device treatments

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percent of Eyes With Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (UCDVA) of 20/20 or Better

    Time frame: 3 months post op

07

Results

Posted Sep 22, 2021

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneLight Adjustable Lens (LAL) and Light Delivery Device (LDD)
Started66
Completed64
Not completed2
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up2

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercent of Eyes With Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (UCDVA) of 20/20 or Better
Time frame:
3 months post op
Reported as:
Count of units · Eyes
Percent of Eyes With Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (UCDVA) of 20/20 or Better
EyesLight Adjustable Lens (LAL) and Light Delivery Device (LDD)
Percent of Eyes With Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (UCDVA) of 20/20 or Better101

Adverse events

Collected over Through study completion, an average of 3 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Light Adjustable Lens (LAL) and Light Delivery Device (LDD)0/66 (0%)0/111 (0%)25/111 (22.5%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventLight Adjustable Lens (LAL) and Light Delivery Device (LDD)
Superficial Punctate KeratitisEye disorders11/111
IritisEye disorders3/111
Corneal GuttataEye disorders2/111
Posterior Capsular OpacityEye disorders2/111
Vision changes including night vision changesEye disorders2/111
Anterior Capsule RuptureEye disorders1/111
BCDVA Drop of 10 letters of moreEye disorders1/111
Corneal ErosionEye disorders1/111
Cystoid Macular EdemaEye disorders1/111
Iris AtrophyEye disorders1/111

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Light Adjustable Lens (LAL) and Light Delivery Device (LDD)
Mean67.4 ± 7.2
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Light Adjustable Lens (LAL) and Light Delivery Device (LDD)
Female42
Male24
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Light Adjustable Lens (LAL) and Light Delivery Device (LDD)
Hispanic66
White0
Black0
Other0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Light Adjustable Lens (LAL) and Light Delivery Device (LDD)
Mexico66
Eyes
Eyes(Eyes)Light Adjustable Lens (LAL) and Light Delivery Device (LDD)
OD56
OS55
08

Study locations

1 site
  • CODET Vision Institute
    Tijuana, Mexico
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jun 2018 to primary completion in Mar 2020, 20 months.

Results were first posted in Sep 2021, 1 year 6 months after primary completion.

Of 32 industry-sponsored interventional studies with no phase under Aphakia, half reached primary completion within 17 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 23. This study's 20 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 37 studies reached it within 17 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 26.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 27, 2019
First posted
Mar 29, 2019
StartActual
Jun 14, 2018
Primary completionActual
Mar 1, 2020
CompletionActual
Mar 1, 2020
Results first posted
Sep 22, 2021
Last update
May 12, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 12, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03895034
Lead sponsor
RxSight, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 29, 2019
Start date
Jun 14, 2018
Primary completion
Mar 1, 2020
Completion
Mar 1, 2020
Results posted
Sep 22, 2021
Last update
May 12, 2022

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion