CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT04000958Updated Aug 20, 2019

PIFR-based Inhalation Therapy in Patients Recovering From AECOPD

An interventional study of PIRF measured by InCheck DIAL and Regular treament in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, sponsored by Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital. Status unknown at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-08-20.

Sponsored by Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Jun 2019), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
460
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is designed to determine whether the optimized inhalation therapy based on peak inspiratory flow rates (PIFR) measured against the simulated resistance can reduce the rate of treatment failure in patients recovering from acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). Errors in inhaler use and quality of life are also to be evaluated.

The study will recruit 460 patients with AECOPD whose exacerbated symptoms are relieved by 5-7 days of standard therapy. The participants are divided into PIFR group and control group in a 1:1 ratio according to a random number table method. All the patients will be given inhaled corticosteroid(ICS)/long-acting β agonist(LABA) (budesonide/ formoterolSymbicort turbuhaler® 160/4.5 μg bid or Beclometasone/ Formoterol Foster® pressure metered dose inhaler(pMDI) 100/6 μg 2 puff bid). For symptomatic patients before acute exacerbation, Spiriva handihaler® 18μg qd or Spiriva respimat® 2.5μg qd will be prescribed in combination with ICS/LABA. For PIFR group, PIFR is measured by InCheck DIAL(Clement Clarke International Ltd, Harlow, UK and Alliance Tech Medical). If PIFR is less than 60L/min , the patient will be given pMDI with spacer. If PIFR value is over 60 L/min, the patient will be given dry powder inhaler(DPI).). The control group will be given DPI or pMDI with spacer according to the judgment of a respiratory physician. Both groups will be taught to use the device after the prescription, and then be reminded to use medication via a WeChat public account.

The primary endpoint of the study is the 30-day treatment failure including AECOPD recurrence resulting in an emergency visit, admission, or need for intensified medication). The secondary endpoints of the study are the error rate of inhalation device use, satisfaction with inhalation devices, symptoms and quality of life, 30-day mortality, chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases(COPD)-related treatment costs and PIFR.

02

Conditions studied

03

In context

Lung Diseases

3,303 studies on the registry are indexed under Lung Diseases; 355 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 460 is above the median of 72 across 2,118 interventional studies indexed under Lung Diseases.

Browse Lung Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital is the lead sponsor of 636 studies on the registry; 283 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(AECOPD) whose acute respiratory symptoms have been controlled after 5-7 day-standard AECOPD treatment including atomized or inhaled brochodilator plus oral or intravenous glucocorticoid (prednisone equivalent dose 40-50mg) or Pulmicort 2mg atomization Bid plus broad-spectrum antibiotics.
  • Patients with moderate and above chronic obstructive pulmonary disease diagnosed by spirometry, ie, forced expiratory volume in one second(FEV1)/forced vital capacity(FVC) \<70% post-bronchodilator and FEV1% predicted value \<80%.
  • Patients have signed an informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who is already using home nebulization therapy because of the severity of the illness.
  • Patients with bronchial asthma, pulmonary interstitial fibrosis, bronchiectasis, pulmonary embolism and other lung diseases; or hypertension, heart disease, chronic liver and kidney disease, diabetes, chronic gastrointestinal diseases, malignant tumors, critically ill patients.
  • Patient's mental state cannot match the observation or suffer from cognitive impairment.
  • Patient's peak inspiratory flow rates (PIFR) is less than 20L/min.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
460 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    PIFR group

    Drug: PIRF measured by InCheck DIAL

  • Active comparator
    control group

    Drug: Regular treament

Interventions

  • DrugPIRF measured by InCheck DIAL

    Peak inspiratory flow rates(PIFR) will be measured using the InCheck DIAL(Clement Clarke International Ltd, Harlow, UK and Alliance Tech Medical). The InCheck DIAL is accurate to +/- 10% or 10 L/min, whichever is greater, and can measure flows in the range of 15 to 120 L/min. Dry powder inhaler(DPI) is to be prescribed if PIFRr is over 60L/min, otherwise pressure metered dose inhaler(pMDI) with spacer is given. All the patients will be given inhaled corticosteroid(ICS)/long-acting β agonist(LABA). For symptomatic patients, long-acting anticholinergic agents(LAMA) will also be used.

  • DrugRegular treament

    The choice of inhalers depends on physician's evaluation. The medication is the same as experimental group.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. 30-day treatment failure rate

    Treatment failure means AECOPD recurrence resulting in an emergency visit, admission, or need for intensfied medication.

    Time frame: 30 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. the error rate of inhalation device use

    Time frame: 30 days/ 90 days

  2. satisfaction with inhalation devices

    Patients' satisfaction with inhalation devices will be assessed by the following items. If the patient meets any of the following, the result will be unsatisfactory: 1. The patient has forgotten to use the inhaler. 2. The patient has forgotten to use the inhaler in the last two weeks. 3. The patient has reduced the frequency of using inhaler without medical advice. 4. The patient has forgotten to bring an inhaler when traveling or leaving home. 5. The patient has quitted the inhaler without medical advice when feeling his condition improved. 6. The patient has felt it difficult to comply with the COPD treatment plan. 7. The patient has felt it difficult to use the inhaler.

    Time frame: 30 days/ 90 days

  3. score of St.George's Respiratory Questionnaire(SGRQ)

    St.George's Respiratory Questionnaire(SGRQ) is used to assess patient's quality of life. The SGRQ scale range is from 0 to 100. The higher the score is, the more severe the impact of COPD on patient' life is.

    Time frame: 30 days/ 90 days

  4. 30-day mortality

    Time frame: 30 days

  5. COPD-related treatment costs

    Time frame: 30 days/ 90 days

  6. Peak Inspiratory Flow Rates(PIFR)

    Time frame: 30 days/ 90 days

  7. 90-day mortality

    Time frame: 90 days

  8. score of modified British medical research council(mMRC)

    Modified British medical research council(mMRC) is used to assess patient's symptoms. The mMRC scale range is from 0 to 4. The higher the score is, the more severe the patient's dyspnea is.

    Time frame: 30 days/ 90 days

  9. score of COPD assessment test(CAT)

    COPD assessment test(CAT) is used to assess patient's symptoms. The CAT scale range is from 0 to 40. A score of 0-10 indicates the patient is slightly affected by COPD. A score of 11-20 indicates the patient is moderately affected by COPD. A score of 21-30 indicates the patient is seriously affected by COPD. A score of 31-40 indicates the patient is extremely affected by COPD.

    Time frame: 30 days/ 90 days

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • 180 Fenglin Road
    Shanghai, 200032, China
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Hua J, Zhang W, Cao HF, Du CL, Ma JY, Zuo YH, Zhang J. Effect of PIFR-based optimised inhalation therapy in patients recovering from acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: protocol of a prospective, multicentre, superiority, randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2020 May 7;10(5):e034804. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034804. Erratum In: BMJ Open. 2020 Aug 20;10(8):e034804corr1. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034804corr1. PubMed 32385061 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 20, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04000958
Lead sponsor
Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 27, 2019
Start date
Sep 1, 2019 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jul 1, 2021 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 1, 2021 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 20, 2019

Study contacts

Jing Zhang, MD
Contact
zhang.jing@zs-hospital.sh.cn
+86 18616881189

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Jun 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion