ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03979378Updated Jun 11, 2019

Treatment of Ectopic Calcification / Ossification With Sodium Thiosulfate (CATSSO)

An observational study in Sodium Thiosulfate and Ectopic Ossification, sponsored by University Hospital, Limoges. Status unknown at 7 sites in France. Open to participants aged 3 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-06-11.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Limoges · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Jun 2019), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
120
Ages
3 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Ectopic calcification and ossification complicate many diseases, which are rare for the most part. These calcifications (or ossifications) are generally classified according to their apparent formation mechanism. Even if very different diseases can be at the origin, these calcifications (or ossifications) have as common points: an unknown physiopathology, a composition of calcium pyrophosphate for the most part and l no curative treatment validated to date.

Indeed, although several reported cases suggest the potential efficacy of different treatments , none of these treatments is currently recognized as effective because of the absence of confirmation data or because of contradictory results.

Sodium thiosulfate (STS) has been used for a long time as an antidote to cyanide poisoning and as a protective agent against cytotoxic side effects such as ifosphamide. More recently, STS has been reported in the treatment of renal calcification. vascular or even subcutaneous. First prospective studies on animal models and in humans seem to confirm the interest of this product in the treatment of these abnormal calcifications.

For several months, a magistral preparation in the form of ointment based on STS has been developed by the pharmacy of Limoges University Hospital in order to combine the local effect of STS while avoiding the side effects of an administration of this treatment by systemic way. The first uses of this preparation appear promising and some preliminary results have already been published. The benefit / risk ratio of this approach seems to be advantageous for clinicians since preparations whose composition is close are currently validated by the FDA and the World Health Organisation for the treatment of benign pathologies such as cutaneous dermatophytes or pityriasis versicolor.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sodium Thiosulfate
  • Ectopic Ossification
03

In context

Ossification, Heterotopic

33 studies on the registry are indexed under Ossification, Heterotopic; 9 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 120 is close to the median of 120 across 11 observational studies indexed under Ossification, Heterotopic.

Browse Ossification, Heterotopic studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Limoges is the lead sponsor of 262 studies on the registry; 37 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
3 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

patient with ectopic calcification / ossification

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • any patient treated with sodium thiosulfate dermally provided by the pharmacy of Limoges University Hospital.
  • availability of an objective imaging evaluation to compare the volume or surface of calcifications (or ossifications) treated (on two orthogonal incidences) before and after 6 months of treatment application.
  • consent to participation in the study signed by the patient or by one of the holders of parental authority in the case of a minor patient.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • calcification with concomitant cutaneous rupture which can allow an externalization of the calcium material by mechanical effects.
  • Patient with calcification secondary to one of the following pathologies:
  • diabetes
  • chronic renal failure
  • iatrogenic origin
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
120 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Calcification/Ossification volume

    Percentage decrease in the volume or surface area of calcifications (or ossification) treated on imaging of the same type performed before and 6 months after dermal STS use.

    Time frame: Month 6

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in aesthetic evolution from baseline at 6 month

    aesthetic evolution on picture

    Time frame: Day 0, Month 6

  2. Change in pain from baseline at 6 month

    Evaluation of pain with scale VAE (visual analog evaluation)

    Time frame: Day 0, Month 6

  3. Change of the quality of life from baseline at 6 month

    evolution of the quality of life with Skindex scale

    Time frame: Day 0, Month 6

  4. local or general side effects

    Number and nature of local or general side effects

    Time frame: Month 6

07

Study locations

7 of 7 sites recruiting
  • Grenoble university hospital
    Grenoble, France
    Recruiting
  • Kremlin Bicetre Hospital
    Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
    Recruiting
  • CHU de Limoges
    Limoges, France
    • Vincent GUIGONIS, MD · Contact · vincent.guigoni@unilim.fr
    • Claire BAHANS · Contact
    • Vincent GUIGONIS, MD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • HEGP
    Paris, France
    Recruiting
  • Lariboisière Hospital
    Paris, France
    • Korng EA, MD · Contact · korng.ea@aphp.fr
    • Korng EA, MD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • Necker Hospital
    Paris, France
    Recruiting
  • Robert Debré Hospital
    Paris, France
    Recruiting
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Feb 2015 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Feb 2020, 60 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 4, 2019
First posted
Jun 7, 2019
StartActual
Feb 2015
Primary completionEst.
Feb 2020
CompletionEst.
Feb 2020
Last update
Jun 11, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 11, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03979378
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 7, 2019
Start date
Feb 2015
Primary completion
Feb 2020 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 2020 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 11, 2019
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Jun 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion