ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03939598Updated May 7, 2019

Feasibility of Preoperative Tattooing of Percutaneously Biopsied Axillary Lymph Node: A Quasi Experimental Pilot Study

An observational study in Breast Neoplasm, sponsored by Aga Khan University. Status unknown at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-05-07.

Sponsored by Aga Khan University · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified May 2019), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
40
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This study evaluates utility of a novel technique using India Ink to aid in the identification and retrieval of axillary lymph nodes during surgery, in breast cancer patients with suspicious lymph nodes.

The first part of the study will evaluate the feasibility of the technique in patients who commence their treatment with surgery. Provided its success, the second part of the study will evaluate the applicability of this same technique in patients who receive chemotherapy before having surgery.

Read the detailed description

Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality among females. Sentinel lymph node biopsy helps avoid axillary lymph node dissection and the associated morbidity. However, its utility is unclear in patients with biopsy proven axillary disease that has been treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The objective of our study is to evaluate a) the feasibility of a novel technique of preoperatively tattooing suspicious lymph nodes with India ink, their intraoperative identification and retrieval in patients undergoing upfront breast and axillary surgery(Phase I); and b) the application of this technique in patients who undergo surgery after receiving neo-adjuvant chemotherapy i.e. lag time between tattooing and lymph node retrieval (Phase II) with the ultimate objective to see if the status of the excised sentinel and tattooed lymph node will be predictive of the status of the axilla.

A quasi-experimental pilot study will be conducted to evaluate the feasibility of tattooing suspicious lymph nodes with sterile black India ink. The study will be conducted in two phases, with the second phase conditional upon the successful results of the first. In Phase I, only 10 patients who are committed to undergo upfront surgery (without neoadjuvant chemotherapy) will be included. These patients will have the suspicious lymph node tattooed by injecting India ink at the time of ultrasound guided core needle biopsy. Intraoperatively, the axilla will be inspected to determine whether India ink tattooed in the lymph nodes can be visualized by the surgeon. Microscopic inspection for the presence of the dye in nodes retrieved by sentinel biopsy and/or axillary dissection will also be done. In Phase II, this process will be repeated for patients who undergo surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and concordance between the sentinel, tattooed and non-sentinel nodes will be determined.

Ethical approval was obtained from the Aga Khan University Ethical Review Board (ERC# 2018-0345-1105). The process of sentinel node biopsy is a safe and routinely performed procedure at our institution. Intradermal injection of methylene blue can lead to skin necrosis; intra-parenchymal injection can cause induration and erythema with associated pain. These side effects can be minimized by diluting methylene blue which will be done. The complications that can result from all additional steps of study procedures will be discussed with the patient and their full responsibility will be borne by the institution. Although sterile black India Ink is safe to administer but possible side effects can include mucosal inflammation due to spillage of the ink, abscess formation and others such as an allergic reaction. If any of these situations are encountered full responsibility to treat the side effects will be borne by the study team using departmental funds.

02

Conditions studied

  • Breast Neoplasm

Browse trials for

03

In context

Breast Neoplasms

12,820 studies on the registry are indexed under Breast Neoplasms; 2,920 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 40 is below the median of 184 across 2,711 observational studies indexed under Breast Neoplasms.

Browse Breast Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Aga Khan University is the lead sponsor of 293 studies on the registry; 44 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients reporting to Breast Surgery Clinic at Aga Khan University, Main Campus in Karachi, Pakistan

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Breast cancer patient (biopsy proven or clinically suspected) with clinically suspicious (palpable on clinical exam or abnormal by ultrasound criteria but not biopsied yet) ipsilateral axillary lymph node(s). The ultrasonographic examination will be considered suspicious for metastasis if one or more of following criteria are present: 1. Eccentric cortical enlargement (>3 mm) or lobulation with displacement of hilum 2. Absent hilum and irregular border and hypoechoic echotexture 3. Spherical node 4. Perinodal vascularity. (18-20)
  • Participants willing to undergo axillary lymph node percutaneous biopsy with marking/tattooing of the biopsied lymph node at AKUH
  • Participants intending to have definitive surgery at AKUH

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants with terminal disease like renal failure will be excluded because these conditions can have profound effect on their course of treatment
  • Participants with distant metastases
  • Participants with prior breast or axillary surgery
  • Participants with bilateral breast cancer, and those who have already had an axillary core needle biopsy prior to inclusion (to avoid a second procedure for tattooing)
  • Participants with recurrent breast malignancy because their course of treatment might be different
  • Participants that were initially suspected to have breast cancer, but pathology results did not confirm the diagnosis
  • Pregnant and lactating women
  • Men with breast cancer
05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Intra-operative identification of tattooed lymph node(s) in upfront surgery group (Phase I)

    In patients undergoing upfront surgery: The rate of successful intraoperative identification of axillary lymph nodes tattooed with black India ink preoperatively.

    Time frame: December 31, 2019

  2. Intra-operative identification of tattooed lymph node(s) in the post-neoadjuvant surgery group (Phase II)

    In patients undergoing surgery post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy (and associated lag time): The rate of successful intraoperative identification of axillary lymph nodes tattooed with black India ink preoperatively.

    Time frame: December 31, 2020

Secondary outcomes

  1. Concordance rate between identified sentinel node(s) and tattooed lymph node(s)

    The rate of concordance between the intra-operatively identified sentinel node and tattooed node(s)

    Time frame: December 31, 2020

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Aga Khan University
    Karachi, Sindh 74800, Pakistan
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. Epub 2018 Sep 12. PubMed 30207593 ↗
  • Caudle AS, Cupp JA, Kuerer HM. Management of axillary disease. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2014 Jul;23(3):473-86. doi: 10.1016/j.soc.2014.03.007. Epub 2014 Apr 13. PubMed 24882346 ↗
  • Krag DN, Anderson SJ, Julian TB, Brown AM, Harlow SP, Ashikaga T, Weaver DL, Miller BJ, Jalovec LM, Frazier TG, Noyes RD, Robidoux A, Scarth HM, Mammolito DM, McCready DR, Mamounas EP, Costantino JP, Wolmark N; National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project. Technical outcomes of sentinel-lymph-node resection and conventional axillary-lymph-node dissection in patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer: results from the NSABP B-32 randomised phase III trial. Lancet Oncol. 2007 Oct;8(10):881-8. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70278-4. PubMed 17851130 ↗
  • Krag DN, Anderson SJ, Julian TB, Brown AM, Harlow SP, Costantino JP, Ashikaga T, Weaver DL, Mamounas EP, Jalovec LM, Frazier TG, Noyes RD, Robidoux A, Scarth HM, Wolmark N. Sentinel-lymph-node resection compared with conventional axillary-lymph-node dissection in clinically node-negative patients with breast cancer: overall survival findings from the NSABP B-32 randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010 Oct;11(10):927-33. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70207-2. PubMed 20863759 ↗
  • Fisher B, Jeong JH, Anderson S, Bryant J, Fisher ER, Wolmark N. Twenty-five-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing radical mastectomy, total mastectomy, and total mastectomy followed by irradiation. N Engl J Med. 2002 Aug 22;347(8):567-75. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa020128. PubMed 12192016 ↗
  • Giuliano AE, Ballman K, McCall L, Beitsch P, Whitworth PW, Blumencranz P, Leitch AM, Saha S, Morrow M, Hunt KK. Locoregional Recurrence After Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection With or Without Axillary Dissection in Patients With Sentinel Lymph Node Metastases: Long-term Follow-up From the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (Alliance) ACOSOG Z0011 Randomized Trial. Ann Surg. 2016 Sep;264(3):413-20. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001863. PubMed 27513155 ↗
  • Pilewskie M, Morrow M. Axillary Nodal Management Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Review. JAMA Oncol. 2017 Apr 1;3(4):549-555. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.4163. PubMed 27918753 ↗
  • Caudle AS, Yang WT, Krishnamurthy S, Mittendorf EA, Black DM, Gilcrease MZ, Bedrosian I, Hobbs BP, DeSnyder SM, Hwang RF, Adrada BE, Shaitelman SF, Chavez-MacGregor M, Smith BD, Candelaria RP, Babiera GV, Dogan BE, Santiago L, Hunt KK, Kuerer HM. Improved Axillary Evaluation Following Neoadjuvant Therapy for Patients With Node-Positive Breast Cancer Using Selective Evaluation of Clipped Nodes: Implementation of Targeted Axillary Dissection. J Clin Oncol. 2016 Apr 1;34(10):1072-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.64.0094. Epub 2016 Jan 25. PubMed 26811528 ↗
  • Kuehn T, Bauerfeind I, Fehm T, Fleige B, Hausschild M, Helms G, Lebeau A, Liedtke C, von Minckwitz G, Nekljudova V, Schmatloch S, Schrenk P, Staebler A, Untch M. Sentinel-lymph-node biopsy in patients with breast cancer before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (SENTINA): a prospective, multicentre cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2013 Jun;14(7):609-18. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70166-9. Epub 2013 May 15. PubMed 23683750 ↗
  • Boughey JC, Suman VJ, Mittendorf EA, Ahrendt GM, Wilke LG, Taback B, Leitch AM, Kuerer HM, Bowling M, Flippo-Morton TS, Byrd DR, Ollila DW, Julian TB, McLaughlin SA, McCall L, Symmans WF, Le-Petross HT, Haffty BG, Buchholz TA, Nelson H, Hunt KK; Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology. Sentinel lymph node surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with node-positive breast cancer: the ACOSOG Z1071 (Alliance) clinical trial. JAMA. 2013 Oct 9;310(14):1455-61. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.278932. PubMed 24101169 ↗
  • Bryant JA, Siddiqi NJ, Loveday EJ, Irvine GH. Presurgical, ultrasound-guided anchor-wire marking of impalpable cervical lymph nodes. J Laryngol Otol. 2005 Aug;119(8):627-8. doi: 10.1258/0022215054516241. PubMed 16102218 ↗
  • Straver ME, Loo CE, Alderliesten T, Rutgers EJ, Vrancken Peeters MT. Marking the axilla with radioactive iodine seeds (MARI procedure) may reduce the need for axillary dissection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Br J Surg. 2010 Aug;97(8):1226-31. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7073. PubMed 20602508 ↗
  • Donker M, Straver ME, Wesseling J, Loo CE, Schot M, Drukker CA, van Tinteren H, Sonke GS, Rutgers EJ, Vrancken Peeters MJ. Marking axillary lymph nodes with radioactive iodine seeds for axillary staging after neoadjuvant systemic treatment in breast cancer patients: the MARI procedure. Ann Surg. 2015 Feb;261(2):378-82. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000558. PubMed 24743607 ↗
  • Choy N, Lipson J, Porter C, Ozawa M, Kieryn A, Pal S, Kao J, Trinh L, Wheeler A, Ikeda D, Jensen K, Allison K, Wapnir I. Initial results with preoperative tattooing of biopsied axillary lymph nodes and correlation to sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Feb;22(2):377-82. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-4034-6. Epub 2014 Aug 28. PubMed 25164040 ↗
  • Caudle AS, Yang WT, Mittendorf EA, Black DM, Hwang R, Hobbs B, Hunt KK, Krishnamurthy S, Kuerer HM. Selective surgical localization of axillary lymph nodes containing metastases in patients with breast cancer: a prospective feasibility trial. JAMA Surg. 2015 Feb;150(2):137-43. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.1086. PubMed 25517573 ↗
  • Park S, Koo JS, Kim GM, Sohn J, Kim SI, Cho YU, Park BW, Park VY, Yoon JH, Moon HJ, Kim MJ, Kim EK. Feasibility of Charcoal Tattooing of Cytology-Proven Metastatic Axillary Lymph Node at Diagnosis and Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients. Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Jul;50(3):801-812. doi: 10.4143/crt.2017.210. Epub 2017 Aug 17. PubMed 28814071 ↗
  • Trakarnsanga A, Akaraviputh T. Endoscopic tattooing of colorectal lesions: Is it a risk-free procedure? World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Dec 16;3(12):256-60. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v3.i12.256. PubMed 22195235 ↗
  • Holwitt DM, Swatske ME, Gillanders WE, Monsees BS, Gao F, Aft RL, Eberlein TJ, Margenthaler JA. Scientific Presentation Award: The combination of axillary ultrasound and ultrasound-guided biopsy is an accurate predictor of axillary stage in clinically node-negative breast cancer patients. Am J Surg. 2008 Oct;196(4):477-82. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.06.006. Epub 2008 Aug 23. PubMed 18723153 ↗
  • Oz A, Demirkazik FB, Akpinar MG, Soygur I, Baykal A, Onder SC, Uner A. Efficiency of ultrasound and ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology in preoperative assessment of axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer. J Breast Cancer. 2012 Jun;15(2):211-7. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2012.15.2.211. Epub 2012 Jun 28. PubMed 22807939 ↗
  • Deurloo EE, Tanis PJ, Gilhuijs KG, Muller SH, Kroger R, Peterse JL, Rutgers EJ, Valdes Olmos R, Schultze Kool LJ. Reduction in the number of sentinel lymph node procedures by preoperative ultrasonography of the axilla in breast cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2003 May;39(8):1068-73. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(02)00748-7. PubMed 12736105 ↗
  • Sattar AK, Ali B, Masroor I, Afzal S, Tariq MU, Idrees R, Uzzaman M, Khalid W. Feasibility of preoperative tattooing of percutaneously biopsied axillary lymph node: an experimental pilot study. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020 Sep 24;6:140. doi: 10.1186/s40814-020-00682-2. eCollection 2020. PubMed 32983557 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Dec 27, 2018

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Mar 2019 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2019, 9 months after the start.

Of 1,012 non-industry observational studies under Breast Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 60 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 26 and three quarters within 141. This study's planned 9 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 1,165 studies reached it within 58 months; a quarter within 26 and three quarters within 125.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 24, 2019
First posted
May 7, 2019
StartActual
Mar 27, 2019
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2019
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2020
Last update
May 7, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 7, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03939598
Responsible party
Abida K. Sattar, MD, FACS (Chief of Breast Surgery, Aga Khan University) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 7, 2019
Start date
Mar 27, 2019
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2019 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2020 (estimated)
Last update
May 7, 2019

Study contacts

Abida K Sattar, MD
Contact
abida.sattar@aku.edu
+9221 34864751
Abida K. Sattar, MD
principal investigator · Aga Khan University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in May 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion