ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT03919799Updated Aug 30, 2023Results posted

KD025 in Subjects With Diffuse Cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis

A Phase 2 interventional study of Belumosudil (KD025) and Placebo in System; Sclerosis and Diffuse Cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis, sponsored by Kadmon, a Sanofi Company. Terminated at 26 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 100 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-08-30.

Sponsored by Kadmon, a Sanofi Company (part of Sanofi) · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Sponsor decision due to slow enrollment and strategic consideration; not driven by any safety concerns.

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
36
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 100 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-13

Among 153 studies in Scleroderma, Diffuse with a site in United States — 29 open to participants now, 39 under way, 5 of them phase 3. Scleroderma, Diffuse · United States.

Enrollment
51st of 120
36 · median 29
Started
2019
with 5 others
Phase 2
41 of 153
8 open now
Registered
94th of 153
by date

Among the 153 studies in Scleroderma, Diffuse with a site in United States, this one is the 51st largest by enrollment of the 120 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 6 that started in 2019, is one of 41 in phase 2, and was the 94th registered.

Scleroderma, Diffuse

310 studies on the registry are indexed under Scleroderma, Diffuse; 76 are open to participants now.

Browse Scleroderma, Diffuse studies →

Open to participants now

29 of the 153 studies in Scleroderma, Diffuse with a site in United States are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

24 more — sign in →

All 29 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in United States have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in United States →

Who these studies take

Of the 55 Scleroderma, Diffuse studies recruiting now, 28 (51%) set no upper age limit and 20 (36%) stop at 75 or younger; 10 take children under 18; 10 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years to 100 Years · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 153 studies in Scleroderma, Diffuse with a site in United States, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

This randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2 study was seeking to evaluate the efficacy and safety of belumosudil (KD025) for the treatment of diffuse cutaneous systematic sclerosis. Enrolment was terminated earlier than planned for business reasons unrelated to safety. A total of 36 participants were enrolled and randomized into 3 groups to either receive orally administered belumosudil (200 milligrams [mg] once daily [QD] and 200 mg twice daily [BID]) or matched placebo in 1:1:1 ratio in the double-blind (DB) period of this study. Study drug dosing was for 52 weeks: double-blinded for the first 28 weeks followed by an open-label extension of 24 weeks. After unblinding, the participants on belumosudil continued on the same belumosudil dose whereas the participants in the placebo group were re-randomized to one of the belumosudil doses in a 1:1 ratio.

Read the detailed description

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a chronic autoimmune disease that causes widespread microvascular damage and excessive deposition of collagen in the skin and internal organs. Limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis is primarily cutaneous, affecting the hands, arms, and face. Diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc) is a more serious manifestation of the disease and is often rapidly progressive, not only involving the skin, but also involving internal organs including kidney, heart, and lungs.

03

Conditions studied

  • System; Sclerosis
  • Diffuse Cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis

Browse trials for

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 100 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Male and female participants greater than or equal to (>=) 18 years old with the diagnosis of dcSSc according to the 2013 American College of Rheumatology and European League Against Rheumatism criteria.
  2. Had disease duration (defined as interval from first non-Raynaud disease manifestation) of less than or equal to (\<=) 5 years.
  3. Had mRSS of >= 15 but \<= 35.
  4. Active disease defined as any of the following within the 6 months prior to screening:

    1. Increase in mRSS by >= 3 units.
    2. Increase in mRSS by >= 2 units with involvement of 1 new body area.
    3. Involvement of 2 new body areas.
    4. Symptoms indicative of skin activity such as severe cutaneous itching or burning.
  5. Participants who had received concomitant must be on a stable dose for at least 3 months prior to screening.
  6. Adequate organ and bone marrow functions evaluated during the 28 days prior to enrollment as follows:

    1. >= 1.5*10\^9/L.
    2. count >=100*10\^9/L.
    3. Total \<= 1.0* (ULN).
    4. (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and serum creatinine \<= 1.5*ULN.
  7. Female participants of had a negative pregnancy test at screening. Females of childbearing potential were defined as sexually mature women without prior hysterectomy or who have had any evidence of menses in the past 12 months. However, women who had been amenorrheic for 12 or more months were still considered to be of childbearing potential if the amenorrhea was possibly due to prior chemotherapy, anti-estrogens, or ovarian suppression.

    1. Women of childbearing potential (i.e., menstruating women) had a negative urine pregnancy test (positive urine tests were to be confirmed by serum test) documented within the 24-hour period prior to the first dose of study drug.
    2. Sexually active women of childbearing potential enrolled in the study must agree to use 2 forms of accepted methods of during the course of the study and for 3 months after their last dose of study drug. Effective birth control includes (1) intrauterine device plus 1 barrier method; (2) on stable doses of hormonal contraception for at least 3 months (e.g., oral, injectable, implant, transdermal) plus 1 barrier method; or (3) two barrier methods. Effective barrier methods were male or female condoms, diaphragms, and spermicides (creams or gels that contain a chemical to kill sperm), or a vasectomized partner.
  8. For male participants who were sexually active and who were partners of premenopausal women, agreement to use 2 forms of contraception as in Criterion Number 7 above during the treatment period and for at least 3 months after the last dose of study drug.
  9. Male participants must not donate sperm for 3 months after last dose of study drug.
  10. Able to provide written prior to the performance of any study-specific procedures.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Participant had interval QTcF greater than (>) 450 milliseconds.
  2. Ongoing use or current use of concomitant medication known to have the potential for QTc prolongation.
  3. Female participant who was pregnant or breastfeeding.
  4. Participated in another study with an drug within 28 days of study entry (for studies involving biologics within 3 half-lives of the biologic).
  5. History or other evidence of severe illness or any other conditions that would make the participant, in the opinion of the Investigator, unsuitable for the study.
  6. Chronic heart failure with Class II, III, or IV.
  7. Acute or chronic liver disease (e.g., cirrhosis).
  8. Positive (HIV) test.
  9. Active virus (HCV), virus (HBV), or positive whole blood tuberculin test.
  10. Diagnosed with any within 3 years of enrollment, with the exception of basal cell or completely resected squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, resected in situ cervical malignancy, resected breast ductal carcinoma in situ, or low-risk prostate cancer after curative resection.
  11. Has had previous exposure to belumosudil or known allergy/sensitivity to belumosudil, or any other ROCK2 inhibitor.
  12. Scleroderma renal crisis within 4 months prior to enrollment.
  13. FVC \<= 50% Predicted.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(16)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Absolute neutrophil count (ANC)

The number of neutrophils, white blood cells that help fight infection, in a given amount of blood. Too few raises the risk of infection.

It is a count, not a percentage of the white cells. Limits are written in units that mean the same: ≥ 1.5 × 10⁹/L is ≥ 1,500 per mm³ (µL). Each lab has its own reference range.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

QT and QTc

On an ECG, the QT interval is the time the heart’s lower chambers take to activate electrically and recover in each beat. QTc is that time adjusted for heart rate (QTcF by Fridericia’s formula, QTcB by Bazett’s). Some medicines lengthen it, and a long QTc can raise the risk of a dangerous heart rhythm.

The study may name a correction formula and a limit in milliseconds, often around 450–480.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
36 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Belumosudil QD/Belumosudil QD

    Participants received belumosudil 200 mg tablet, QD orally for 28 weeks during the DB period. After completion of DB period, participants entered open-label extension (OLE) period and continued to receive belumosudil 200 mg tablet QD orally for 24 weeks in OLE period (i.e., up to Week 52).

    Drug: Belumosudil (KD025)

  • Experimental
    Belumosudil BID/Belumosudil BID

    Participants received belumosudil 200 mg tablet BID orally, for 28 weeks during the DB period. After completion of DB period, participants entered OLE period and continued to receive belumosudil 200 mg tablet BID orally for 24 weeks in OLE period (i.e., up to Week 52).

    Drug: Belumosudil (KD025)

  • Placebo comparator
    DB Period: Placebo

    Participants received placebo (matched to belumosudil) tablet, orally for 28 weeks during the DB period.

    Drug: Placebo

  • Experimental
    OLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil QD

    Participants who had received placebo in the DB period were entered and re-randomized into OLE period and received belumosudil 200 mg tablet QD orally for 24 weeks (i.e., up to Week 52) in the OLE period.

    Drug: Belumosudil (KD025)

  • Experimental
    OLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil BID

    Participants who had received placebo in the DB period were entered and re-randomized into OLE period and received belumosudil 200 mg tablet BID orally for 24 weeks (i.e., up to Week 52) in the OLE period.

    Drug: Belumosudil (KD025)

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. DB Period: Number of Participants With Combined Response Index in Diffuse Cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis (CRISS) Score Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 60 Percent (%) at Week 24

    CRISS components included the following domains: mRSS, FVC percent predicted, physician global assessment, patient global assessment, and SHAQ-DI. An algorithm determines the predicted probability of improvement from Baseline by incorporating change from baseline in the mRSS, FVC percent predicted, physician and patient global assessments, and SHAQ-DI. The outcome is a continuous variable between 0.0 and 1.0 (0 to 100%). Higher score indicated greater probability of improvement. CRISS score \>= 60% was considered the minimally important difference. Participants were not considered improved and assigned a probability of improving equal to 0.0 if they developed new onset of renal crisis, new onset or worsening of lung fibrosis, new onset of pulmonary arterial hypertension, or new onset of left ventricular failure during the trial. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) method was used to handle missing data.

    Time frame: Week 24

Secondary outcomes

  1. DB Period: Combined Response Index in Diffuse Cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis Score at Week 24

    CRISS components included the following domains: mRSS, FVC percent predicted, physician global assessment, patient global assessment, and SHAQ-DI. An algorithm determines the predicted probability of improvement from Baseline by incorporating change from baseline in the mRSS, FVC percent predicted, physician and patient global assessments, and SHAQ-DI. The outcome is a continuous variable between 0.0 and 1.0 (0 to 100%). A higher score indicated greater probability of improvement. Participants were not considered improved and assigned a probability of improving equal to 0.0 if they developed new onset of renal crisis, new onset or worsening of lung fibrosis, new onset of pulmonary arterial hypertension, new onset of left ventricular failure during the trial. Least squares (LS) mean and 95% confidence interval (CI) were obtained by mixed-effect model for repeated measures (MMRM).

    Time frame: Week 24

  2. OLE Period: Combined Response Index in Diffuse Cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis Score at Week 52

    CRISS components included following domains: mRSS, percent predicted FVC, physician global assessment, patient global assessment, and SHAQ-DI. An algorithm determines the predicted probability of improvement from Baseline by incorporating change from baseline in the mRSS, FVC percent predicted, physician and patient global assessments, and SHAQ-DI. The outcome was a continuous variable between 0.0 and 1.0 (0 to 100%). Higher score indicated greater probability of improvement. Participants were not considered improved and assigned a probability of improving equal to 0.0 if they developed new onset of renal crisis, new onset or worsening of lung fibrosis, new onset of pulmonary arterial hypertension, new onset of left ventricular failure during the trial. LOCF method was used to handle missing data.

    Time frame: Week 52

  3. DB Period: Change From Baseline in Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) at Week 24

    mRSS is an accepted clinical measure of skin thickness. The investigator assessed the skin thickness using the mRSS through simple palpation on 17 different skin sites (e.g., face, hands, fingers; proximal area of the arms, distal area of the arms, thorax, abdomen; proximal area of the legs, and distal area of the legs, feet). Each skin site was rated on a 0 to 3 scale; where 0 = normal skin, 1 = mild thickness, 2 = moderate thickness, and 3 = severe thickness and unable to pinch. Individual site skin scores in the 17 body areas were summed and defined as the total mRSS which ranged from 0 (normal skin) to 51 (severe thickening), where higher score indicated more severity of skin thickening/worst outcome. LS mean and 95% CI were calculated using MMRM model.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

  4. DB Period: Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Week 24

    FVC was the total amount of air exhaled from the lungs during the lung function test measured by spirometer which assessed the change in lung function related to the disease status of an underlying interstitial lung disease (ILD). LS mean and 95% CI were obtained from MMRM model.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

  5. DB Period: Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Participant's Overall Health Using Visual Analogue Scale Score at Week 24

    The Physician Global Assessment (reported by the physician) quantified the participant's overall health during the last week based on VAS which ranged from 0 (extremely poor) to 100 (excellent). Higher score indicated better outcome. LS mean and 95% CI were obtained from MMRM model.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

  6. DB Period: Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Participant's Overall Health Using Visual Analogue Scale Score at Week 24

    The Patient Global Assessment (reported by participant) quantified the participant's overall health during the last week based on a VAS which ranged from 0 (extremely poor) to 100 (excellent). Higher score indicated better outcome. LS mean and 95% CI were obtained from MMRM model.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

  7. DB Period: Change From Baseline in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (SHAQ-DI) Total Score at Week 24

    SHAQ-DI included the general health assessment questionnaire-disability index (HAD-DI) assessment and 6 scleroderma-specific VAS items to explore impact of participant's disease. General HAD-DI assessment included 8 domains: dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities addressing scleroderma related manifestations that contribute to disability. It is a quality of life measure. For each question, level of difficulty was scored from 0 to 3, where 0=no difficulty, 1=some difficulty, 2=much difficulty, 3=unable to do. Some domains in the SHAQ are visual analog scales that are measured first and then changed to a 0-3 scale. SHAQ-DI total score was computed as the sum of domain scores divided by the number of domains answered and it ranged from 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (maximum difficulty), where higher score indicated greater disability/worse functionality. LS mean and 95% CI were obtained from MMRM model.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

  8. DB Period: Percentage Improvement in Modified Rodnan Skin Score at Week 24

    The mRSS is an accepted clinical measure of skin thickness. The investigator assessed the skin thickness using the mRSS through simple palpation on 17 different skin sites (e.g., face, hands, fingers; proximal area of the arms, distal area of the arms, thorax, abdomen; proximal area of the legs, and distal area of the legs, feet). Each skin site was rated on 0 to 3 scale; where 0 = normal skin, 1 = mild thickness, 2 = moderate thickness, and 3 = severe thickness and unable to pinch. Individual site skin scores in the 17 body areas were summed and defined as the total mRSS which ranged from 0 (normal skin) to 51 (severe thickening), where higher score indicated more severity of skin thickening/worst outcome. Percentage improvement = change from Baseline value divided by Baseline value\*100. LS mean and 95% CI were obtained from MMRM model.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

  9. DB Period: Percentage Improvement in Physician Global Assessment of Participant's Overall Health Using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score at Week 24

    The Physician Global Assessment (reported by the physician) quantified the participant's overall health during the last week based on VAS which ranged from 0 (extremely poor) to 100 (excellent). Higher score indicated better outcome. Percentage improvement = change from Baseline value divided by Baseline value\*100. LS mean and 95% CI were obtained from MMRM model.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

  10. DB Period: Percentage Improvement in Patient Global Assessment of Participant's Overall Health Using Visual Analogue Scale Score at Week 24

    The Patient Global Assessment (reported by participant) quantified the participant's overall health during the last week based on a VAS which ranged from 0 (extremely poor) to 100 (excellent). Higher score indicated better outcome. Percentage improvement = change from Baseline value divided by Baseline value\*100. LS mean and 95% CI were obtained from MMRM model.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

  11. DB Period: Percentage Improvement in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (SHAQ-DI) Total Score at Week 24

    SHAQ-DI included general HAD-DI assessment and 6 scleroderma-specific VAS items to explore impact of participant's disease. General HAD-DI assessment included 8 domains: dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities addressing scleroderma related manifestations that contribute to disability. For each question, level of difficulty was scored from 0 to 3, where 0=no difficulty, 1=some difficulty, 2=much difficulty, 3=unable to do. Some domains in SHAQ are visual analog scales that are measured first and then changed to 0-3 scale. SHAQ-DI total score was computed as sum of domain scores divided by number of domains answered and it ranged from 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (maximum difficulty), where higher score indicated greater disability/worse functionality. Percentage improvement = change from Baseline value divided by Baseline value\*100. LS mean and 95% CI were obtained from MMRM model.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

  12. OLE Period: Change From Baseline in Modified Rodnan Skin Score at Week 52

    The mRSS is an accepted clinical measure of skin thickness. The investigator assessed the skin thickness using the mRSS through simple palpation on 17 different skin sites (e.g., face, hands, fingers; proximal area of the arms, distal area of the arms, thorax, abdomen; proximal area of the legs, and distal area of the legs, feet). Each skin site was rated on a 0 to 3 scale; where 0 = normal skin, 1 = mild thickness, 2 = moderate thickness, and 3 = severe thickness and unable to pinch. Individual site skin scores in the 17 body areas were summed and defined as the total mRSS which ranged from 0 (normal skin) to 51 (severe thickening), where higher score indicated more severity of skin thickening/worst outcome. In the below data table, 'number analyzed' = participants with available data for each specified category.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

  13. OLE Period: Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity at Week 52

    FVC was the total amount of air exhaled from the lungs during the lung function test measured by spirometer which assessed the change in lung function related to the disease status of an underlying ILD. Participants who received placebo in DB period and re-randomized into OLE period, OLE period Baseline was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained prior to participant receiving first dose of belumosudil in OLE period. Participants who received belumosudil in DB period and continued belumosudil in OLE period, Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 29 days prior to participant receiving first study medication in DB period.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

  14. OLE Period: Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Participant's Overall Health Using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score at Week 52

    The Physician Global Assessment (reported by the physician) quantified the participant's overall health during the last week based on VAS which ranged from 0 (extremely poor) to 100 (excellent). Higher score indicated better outcome. Participants who received placebo in DB period and re-randomized into OLE period, OLE period Baseline was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained prior to participant receiving first dose of belumosudil in OLE period. Participants who received belumosudil in DB period and continued belumosudil in OLE period, Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 29 days prior to participant receiving first study medication in DB period.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

  15. OLE Period: Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Participant's Overall Health Using Visual Analogue Scale Score at Week 52

    The Patient Global Assessment (reported by participant) quantified the participant's overall health during the last week based on a VAS which ranged from 0 (extremely poor) to 100 (excellent). Higher score indicated better outcome. Participants who received placebo in DB period and re-randomized into OLE period, OLE period Baseline was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained prior to participant receiving first dose of belumosudil in OLE period. Participants who received belumosudil in DB period and continued belumosudil in OLE period, Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 29 days prior to participant receiving first study medication in DB period.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

  16. OLE Period: Change From Baseline in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index Total Score at Week 52

    SHAQ-DI included general HAD-DI assessment and 6 scleroderma-specific VAS items to explore the impact of participant's disease. General HAD-DI assessment included 8 domains: dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities addressing scleroderma related manifestations that contribute to disability. For each question, level of difficulty was scored from 0 to 3, where 0=no difficulty, 1=some difficulty, 2=much difficulty, 3=unable to do. Some domains in SHAQ are visual analog scales that are measured first and then changed to a 0-3 scale. SHAQ-DI total score was computed as sum of domain scores divided by the number of domains answered and it ranged from 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (maximum difficulty), where higher score indicated greater disability/worse functionality. In the data table below, 'number analyzed' = participants with available data for each specified category.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

  17. OLE Period: Percentage Improvement in Modified Rodnan Skin Score at Week 52

    The mRSS is an accepted clinical measure of skin thickness. The investigator assessed the skin thickness using the mRSS through simple palpation on 17 different skin sites in (e.g., face, hands, fingers; proximal area of the arms, distal area of the arms, thorax, abdomen; proximal area of the legs, and distal area of the legs, feet). Each skin site was rated on a 0 to 3 scale; where 0 = normal skin, 1 = mild thickness, 2 = moderate thickness, and 3 = severe thickness and unable to pinch. Individual site skin scores in the 17 body areas were summed and defined as the total mRSS which ranged from 0 (normal skin) to 51 (severe thickening), where higher score indicated more severity of skin thickening/worst outcome. Percentage improvement = change from Baseline value divided by Baseline value\*100. In the data table below, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this outcome measure.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

  18. OLE Period: Percentage Improvement Physician Global Assessment of Participant's Overall Health Using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score at Week 52

    The Physician Global Assessment (reported by the physician) quantified the participant's overall health during the last week based on VAS which ranged from 0 (extremely poor) to 100 (excellent). Higher score indicated better outcome. Percentage improvement = change from Baseline value divided by Baseline value\*100. In the data below, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this outcome measure.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

  19. OLE Period: Percentage Improvement in Patient Global Assessment of Participant's Overall Health Using Visual Analogue Scale Score at Week 52

    The Patient Global Assessment (reported by participant) quantified the participant's overall health during the last week based on a VAS which ranged from 0 (extremely poor) to 100 (excellent). Higher score indicated better outcome. Percentage improvement = change from Baseline value divided by Baseline value\*100. In the data table below, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this outcome measure.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

  20. OLE Period: Percentage Improvement in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index Score at Week 52

    SHAQ-DI: general health assessment questionnaire-disability index (HAD-DI) assessment and 6 scleroderma-specific VAS items to explore impact of participant's disease. General HAD-DI assessment included 8 domains: dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities addressing scleroderma related manifestations that contribute to disability. For each question, level of difficulty was scored from 0 to 3; 0=no difficulty, 1=some difficulty, 2=much difficulty, 3=unable to do. Some domains in SHAQ are visual analog scales that are measured first and then changed to 0-3 scale. SHAQ-DI total score computed as sum of domain scores divided by number of domains answered ranging 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (maximum difficulty), where higher score indicated greater disability/worse functionality. Percentage improvement = change from Baseline value divided by Baseline value\*100. 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this outcome measure.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

  21. DB Period: Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity Level at Week 24-ILD Participants

    FVC was the total amount of air exhaled from the lungs during the lung function test measured by spirometer which assessed the change in lung function related to the disease status of an underlying ILD. For participants who received placebo/belumosudil in the DB period, the Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 29 days prior to participant receiving first study medication in the DB period. Change from Baseline in percent predicted FVC level at Week 24 in participants with ILD is reported in this outcome measure.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

  22. DB Period: Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Diffusing Capacity of the Lungs for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Week 24-ILD Participants

    DLco is a measurement of the ability of the lungs to transfer gases from the air to the blood. Participants breathe in (inhale) air containing a very small, harmless amount of a tracer gas, such as carbon monoxide. Participants hold their breath for 10 seconds, then rapidly blow it out (exhale). The exhaled gas was tested to determine amount of the tracer gas absorbed during the breath. For participants who received placebo/belumosudil in the DB period, the Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 29 days prior to participant receiving first study medication in the DB period. Change from Baseline in percent predicted DLco at Week 24 in participants with ILD is reported in this outcome measure.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

  23. DB Period: Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1) at Week 24-ILD Participants

    FEV1 was the volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration as measured by a spirometer. For participants who received placebo/belumosudil in the DB period, the Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 29 days prior to participant receiving first study medication in the DB period. Change from Baseline in percent predicted FEV1 at Week 24 in participants with ILD is reported in this outcome measure.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

  24. DB Period: Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Week 24-ILD Participants

    RV is the volume of air remaining in the lungs after maximum forceful expiration. For participants who received placebo/belumosudil in the DB period, the Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 29 days prior to participant receiving first study medication in the DB period. Change from Baseline in percent predicted RV at Week 24 in participants with ILD is reported in this outcome measure.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

  25. DB Period: Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Week 24-ILD Participants

    TLC is the volume of air in the lungs upon the maximum effort of inspiration. For participants who received placebo/belumosudil in the DB period, the Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 29 days prior to participant receiving first study medication in the DB period. Change from Baseline in percent predicted TLC at Week 24 in participants with ILD is reported in this outcome measure.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

  26. OLE Period: Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity at Week 52-ILD Participants

    FVC was the total amount of air exhaled from the lungs during the lung function test measured by spirometer which assessed the change in lung function related to the disease status of an underlying ILD. Participants who received placebo in DB period and re-randomized into OLE period, OLE period Baseline was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained prior to participant receiving first dose of belumosudil in OLE period. Participants who received belumosudil in DB period and continued belumosudil in OLE period, Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 29 days prior to participant receiving first study medication in DB period. Change from Baseline in percent predicted FVC at Week 52 in participants with ILD is reported in this outcome measure.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

  27. OLE Period: Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Diffusing Capacity of the Lungs for Carbon Monoxide at Week 52-ILD Participants

    DLco is a measurement of the ability of the lungs to transfer gases from the air to the blood. Participants breathe in (inhale) air containing a very small, harmless amount of a tracer gas, such as carbon monoxide. Participants hold their breath for 10 seconds, then rapidly blow it out (exhale). The exhaled gas was tested to determine amount of the tracer gas absorbed during the breath. Participants who received placebo in DB period and re-randomized into OLE period, OLE period Baseline was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained prior to participant receiving first dose of belumosudil in OLE period. Participants who received belumosudil in DB period and continued belumosudil in OLE period, Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 29 days prior to participant receiving first study medication in DB period. Change from Baseline in percent predicted DLco at Week 52 in participants with ILD is reported in this outcome measure.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

  28. OLE Period: Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume at Week 52-ILD Participants

    FEV1 was the volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration as measured by a spirometer. Participants who received placebo in DB period and re-randomized into OLE period, OLE period Baseline was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained prior to participant receiving first dose of belumosudil in OLE period. Participants who received belumosudil in DB period and continued belumosudil in OLE period, Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 29 days prior to participant receiving first study medication in DB period. Change from Baseline in percent predicted FEV1 at Week 52 in participants with ILD is reported in this outcome measure.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

  29. OLE Period: Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume at Week 52-ILD Participants

    RV is the volume of air remaining in the lungs after maximum forceful expiration. Participants who received placebo in DB period and re-randomized into OLE period, OLE period Baseline was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained prior to participant receiving first dose of belumosudil in OLE period. Participants who received belumosudil in DB period and continued belumosudil in OLE period, Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 29 days prior to participant receiving first study medication in DB period. Change from Baseline in percent predicted RV at Week 52 in participants with ILD is reported in this outcome measure.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

  30. OLE Period: Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity at Week 52-ILD Participants

    TLC is the volume of air in the lungs upon the maximum effort of inspiration. Participants who received placebo in DB period and re-randomized into OLE period, OLE period Baseline was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained prior to participant receiving first dose of belumosudil in OLE period. Participants who received belumosudil in DB period and continued belumosudil in OLE period, Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 29 days prior to participant receiving first study medication in DB period. Change from Baseline in percent predicted TLC at Week 52 in participants with ILD is reported in this outcome measure.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

  31. DB Period: Number of Participants With Lung Fibrosis at Baseline and Week 24-ILD Participants

    Lung fibrosis is a lung disease in which lung tissue becomes damaged and scared. Lung fibrosis was assessed using high-resolution computerized tomography (HRCT). HRCT is a type of computed tomography used to diagnose and stage the severity. Pure ground-class opacity, pulmonary fibrosis and honeycombing were recorded for each lung (right and left) and three lung zones (upper, middle, and lower). They were recorded categorically for the amount detected, ranged as Absent, 1-25%, 26-50%, 51-75% and \>75% for abnormality/lung fibrosis. For participants who received placebo/belumosudil in the DB period, the Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 29 days prior to participant receiving first study medication in the DB period. Number of participants with lung fibrosis at Baseline and Week 24 are reported in this outcome measure.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

  32. OLE Period: Number of Participants With Lung Fibrosis at Baseline and Week 52-ILD Participants

    Lung fibrosis is a lung disease in which lung tissue becomes damaged and scared. Lung fibrosis was assessed using HRCT. HRCT is a type of computed tomography used to diagnose and stage the severity. Pure ground-class opacity, pulmonary fibrosis and honeycombing were recorded for each lung (right and left) and three lung zones (upper, middle, and lower). They were recorded categorically for the amount detected, ranged as Absent, 1-25%, 26-50%, 51-75% and \>75% for abnormality/lung fibrosis. Number of participants with lung fibrosis at Baseline and Week 52 are reported in this outcome measure. In the data table below, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this outcome measure and 'number analyzed' = participants with available data for each specified category.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

  33. DB Period: Pharmacokinetics: Plasma Concentration of Belumosudil and Its Metabolite (KD025m2)

    Plasma concentration of belumosudil and its metabolite (KD025m2) at pre-dose and 3 hours post-dose at Week 4 and 8 is reported in this outcome measure. The Lower Limit of Quantification (LLOQ) was 10 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL).

    Time frame: Pre-dose and 3 hours post-dose at Week 4 and 8

  34. Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)

    Adverse event (AE): any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug and did not necessarily had to have a causal relationship with the treatment. Serious adverse event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, was a medically important event. TEAEs: AEs with onset after the first dose of study drug or existing AEs that worsened during TEAE Period (for DB period: From Day 1 (Week 0) up to Week 28; for OLE period: from Week 29 up to 4 weeks post last study drug administration).

    Time frame: For DB period: From Day 1 (Week 0) up to Week 28; for OLE period: from Week 29 up to 4 weeks post last study drug administration (i.e., up to Week 56)

  35. DB Period: Change From Baseline in Vital Signs: Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 24

    Vital signs (systolic and diastolic blood pressure) were measured with the participants after having rested in sitting position. Vital signs assessments were performed before the electrocardiogram (ECG) and other scheduled assessments. Change from Baseline in systolic and diastolic blood pressure at Week 24 was reported in this outcome measure.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

  36. OLE: Change From Baseline in Vital Signs: Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 52

    Change from Baseline in systolic and diastolic blood pressure at Week 52 was reported in this outcome measure. Vital signs (systolic and diastolic blood pressure) were measured with the participants after having rested in sitting position. Vital signs assessments were performed before ECGs and other schedules assessments. Participants who received placebo in DB period and re-randomized into OLE period, OLE period Baseline was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained prior to participant receiving first dose of belumosudil in OLE period. Participants who received belumosudil in DB period and continued belumosudil in OLE period, Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 29 days prior to participant receiving first study medication in DB period.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

  37. DB Period: Change From Baseline in Vital Signs: Pulse at Week 24

    Vital sign (pulse) was measured with the participants after having rested in sitting position. Vital signs assessments were performed before ECGs and other scheduled assessments. Change from Baseline in vital signs: pulse at Week 24 was reported in this outcome measure.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

  38. OLE Period: Change From Baseline in Vital Signs: Pulse at Week 52

    Vital sign (pulse) was measured with the participants after having rested in sitting position. Vital signs assessments were performed before ECGs and other scheduled assessments. Change from Baseline in vital signs: pulse at Week 52 was reported in this outcome measure. Participants who received placebo in DB period and re-randomized into OLE period, OLE period Baseline was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained prior to participant receiving first dose of belumosudil in OLE period. Participants who received belumosudil in DB period and continued belumosudil in OLE period, Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 29 days prior to participant receiving first study medication in DB period.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

  39. DB Period: Change From Baseline in Vital Signs: Respiratory Rate at Week 24

    Vital sign (respiratory rate) was measured with the participants after having rested in sitting position. Vital signs assessments were performed before ECGs and other scheduled assessments. Change from Baseline in vital signs: respiratory rate at Week 24 was reported in this outcome measure.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

  40. OLE Period: Change From Baseline in Vital Signs: Respiratory Rate at Week 52

    Vital sign (respiratory rate) was measured with the participants after having rested in sitting position. Vital signs assessments were performed before ECGs and other scheduled assessments. Change from Baseline in vital signs: respiratory rate at Week 52 was reported in this outcome measure. Participants who received placebo in DB period and re-randomized into OLE period, OLE period Baseline was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained prior to participant receiving first dose of belumosudil in OLE period. Participants who received belumosudil in DB period and continued belumosudil in OLE period, Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 29 days prior to participant receiving first study medication in DB period.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

  41. DB Period: Change From Baseline in 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values: Heart Rate at Week 24

    ECGs were recorded after the participant had rested in the supine position for at least 5 minutes and were performed prior to any blood sample collection. Change from Baseline in 12-lead ECG values: heart rate at Week 24 was reported in this outcome measure.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

  42. OLE Period: Change From Baseline in 12-lead Electrocardiogram Values: Heart Rate at Week 52

    ECGs were recorded after the participant had rested in the supine position for at least 5 minutes and were performed prior to any blood sample collection. Change from Baseline in 12-lead ECG values: heart rate at Week 52 was reported in this outcome measure. Participants who received placebo in DB period and re-randomized into OLE period, OLE period Baseline was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained prior to participant receiving first dose of belumosudil in OLE period. Participants who received belumosudil in DB period and continued belumosudil in OLE period, Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 29 days prior to participant receiving first study medication in DB period.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

  43. DB Period: Change From Baseline in 12-lead Electrocardiogram Values: PR Interval, RR Interval, QRS Interval, QT Interval and QTcF Interval at Week 24

    ECGs were recorded after the participant had rested in the supine position for at least 5 minutes and were performed prior to any blood sample collection. Change from Baseline in 12-lead ECG values: PR interval, RR interval, QRS interval, QT interval and QTcF interval at Week 24 was reported in this outcome measure.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

  44. OLE Period: Change From Baseline in 12-lead Electrocardiogram Values: PR Interval, RR Interval, QRS Interval, QT Interval and QTcF Interval at Week 52

    ECGs were recorded after the participant had rested in the supine position for at least 5 minutes and were performed prior to any blood sample collection. Change from Baseline in 12-lead ECG values: PR interval, RR interval, QRS interval, QT interval and QTcF interval at Week 52 was reported in this outcome measure. Participants who received placebo in DB period and re-randomized into OLE period, OLE period Baseline was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained prior to participant receiving first dose of belumosudil in OLE period. Participants who received belumosudil in DB period and continued belumosudil in OLE period, Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 29 days prior to participant receiving first study medication in DB period.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

  45. DB Period: Change From Baseline in Hematological Parameters: Percentage of Basophils/Leukocytes, Eosinophils/Leukocytes, Lymphocytes/Leukocytes, Monocytes/Leukocytes and Neutrophils/Leukocytes at Week 24

    Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to assess hematological parameters. Change from Baseline in hematological parameters: percentage of basophils/leukocytes, eosinophils/leukocytes, lymphocytes/leukocytes, monocytes/leukocytes and neutrophils/leukocytes at Week 24 was reported in this outcome measure.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

  46. OLE Period: Change From Baseline in Hematological Parameters: Percentage of Basophils/Leukocytes, Eosinophils/Leukocytes, Lymphocytes/Leukocytes, Monocytes/Leukocytes and Neutrophils/Leukocytes at Week 52

    Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to assess hematological parameters. Change from Baseline in hematological parameters: percentage of basophils/leukocytes, eosinophils/leukocytes, lymphocytes/leukocytes, monocytes/leukocytes and neutrophils/leukocytes at Week 52 was reported in this outcome measure. Participants who received placebo in DB period and re-randomized into OLE period, OLE period Baseline was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained prior to participant receiving first dose of belumosudil in OLE period. Participants who received belumosudil in DB period and continued belumosudil in OLE period, Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 29 days prior to participant receiving first study medication in DB period.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

  47. DB Period: Change From Baseline in Hematological Parameter: Hematocrit at Week 24

    Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to assess hematological parameters. Change from Baseline in hematological parameter (hematocrit, fraction of 1.0) at Week 24 was reported in this outcome measure. The hematocrit is percentage of the volume of whole blood that is made up of red blood cells.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

  48. OLE Period: Change From Baseline in Hematological Parameter: Hematocrit at Week 52

    Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to assess hematological parameters. Change from Baseline in hematological parameter (hematocrit, fraction of 1.0) at Week 52 was reported in this outcome measure. The hematocrit is percentage of the volume of whole blood that is made up of red blood cells. Participants who received placebo in DB period and re-randomized into OLE period, OLE period Baseline was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained prior to participant receiving first dose of belumosudil in OLE period. Participants who received belumosudil in DB period and continued belumosudil in OLE period, Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 29 days prior to participant receiving first study medication in DB period.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

  49. DB Period: Change From Baseline in Hematological Parameter: Hemoglobin at Week 24

    Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to assess hematological parameters. Change from Baseline in hematological parameter: hemoglobin at Week 24 was reported in this outcome measure.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

  50. OLE Period: Change From Baseline in Hematological Parameter: Hemoglobin at Week 52

    Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to assess hematological parameters. Change from Baseline in hematological parameter: hemoglobin at Week 52 was reported in this outcome measure. Participants who received placebo in DB period and re-randomized into OLE period, OLE period Baseline was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained prior to participant receiving first dose of belumosudil in OLE period. Participants who received belumosudil in DB period and continued belumosudil in OLE period, Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 29 days prior to participant receiving first study medication in DB period.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

  51. DB Period: Change From Baseline in Hematological Parameter: Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Volume at Week 24

    Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to assess hematological parameters. Change from Baseline in hematological parameter: erythrocytes mean corpuscular volume at Week 24 was reported in this outcome measure.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

  52. OLE Period: Change From Baseline in Hematological Parameter: Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Volume at Week 52

    Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to assess hematological parameters. Change from Baseline in hematological parameter: erythrocytes mean corpuscular volume at Week 52 was reported in this outcome measure. Participants who received placebo in DB period and re-randomized into OLE period, OLE period Baseline was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained prior to participant receiving first dose of belumosudil in OLE period. Participants who received belumosudil in DB period and continued belumosudil in OLE period, Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 29 days prior to participant receiving first study medication in DB period.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

  53. DB Period: Change From Baseline in Hematological Parameter: Platelets at Week 24

    Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to assess hematological parameters. Change from Baseline in hematological parameter: platelets at Week 24 was reported in this outcome measure.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

  54. OLE Period: Change From Baseline in Hematological Parameter: Platelets at Week 52

    Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to assess hematological parameters. Change from Baseline in hematological parameter: platelets at Week 52 was reported in this outcome measure. Participants who received placebo in DB period and re-randomized into OLE period, OLE period Baseline was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained prior to participant receiving first dose of belumosudil in OLE period. Participants who received belumosudil in DB period and continued belumosudil in OLE period, Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 29 days prior to participant receiving first study medication in DB period.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

  55. DB Period: Change From Baseline in Hematological Parameter: Erythrocytes at Week 24

    Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to assess hematological parameters. Change from Baseline in hematological parameter: erythrocytes at Week 24 was reported in this outcome measure.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

  56. OLE Period: Change From Baseline in Hematological Parameter: Erythrocytes at Week 52

    Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to assess hematological parameters. Change from Baseline in hematological parameter: erythrocytes at Week 52 was reported in this outcome measure. Participants who received placebo in DB period and re-randomized into OLE period, OLE period Baseline was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained prior to participant receiving first dose of belumosudil in OLE period. Participants who received belumosudil in DB period and continued belumosudil in OLE period, Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 29 days prior to participant receiving first study medication in DB period.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

  57. DB Period: Change From Baseline in Hematological Parameter: Leukocytes at Week 24

    Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to assess hematological parameters. Change from Baseline in hematological parameter: leukocytes at Week 24 was reported in this outcome measure.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

  58. OLE Period: Change From Baseline in Hematological Parameter: Leukocytes at Week 52

    Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to assess hematological parameters. Change from Baseline in hematological parameter: leukocytes at Week 52 was reported in this outcome measure. Participants who received placebo in DB period and re-randomized into OLE period, OLE period Baseline was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained prior to participant receiving first dose of belumosudil in OLE period. Participants who received belumosudil in DB period and continued belumosudil in OLE period, Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 29 days prior to participant receiving first study medication in DB period.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

  59. DB Period: Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: Albumin, Globulin and Protein at Week 24

    Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to assess clinical chemistry parameters. Change from Baseline in clinical chemistry parameter: albumin, globulin and protein at Week 24 was reported in this outcome measure.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

  60. OLE Period: Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: Albumin, Globulin and Protein at Week 52

    Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to assess clinical chemistry parameters. Change from Baseline in clinical chemistry parameter: albumin, globulin and protein at Week 52 was reported in this outcome measure. Participants who received placebo in DB period and re-randomized into OLE period, OLE period Baseline was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained prior to participant receiving first dose of belumosudil in OLE period. Participants who received belumosudil in DB period and continued belumosudil in OLE period, Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 29 days prior to participant receiving first study medication in DB period.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

  61. DB Period: Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: Alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Aminotransferase, Aspartate Aminotransferase, Creatine Kinase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase, and Lactate Dehydrogenase at Week 24

    Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to assess clinical chemistry parameters. Change from Baseline in clinical chemistry parameter: alkaline phosphatase, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, creatine kinase, gamma-glutamyl transferase, and lactate dehydrogenase at Week 24 was reported in this outcome measure.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

  62. OLE Period: Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: Alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Aminotransferase, Aspartate Aminotransferase, Creatine Kinase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase, and Lactate Dehydrogenase at Week 52

    Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to assess clinical chemistry parameters. Change from Baseline in clinical chemistry parameter: alkaline phosphatase, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, creatine kinase, gamma-glutamyl transferase, and lactate dehydrogenase at Week 52 was reported in this outcome measure. Participants who received placebo in DB period and re-randomized into OLE period, OLE period Baseline was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained prior to participant receiving first dose of belumosudil in OLE period. Participants who received belumosudil in DB period and continued belumosudil in OLE period, Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 29 days prior to participant receiving first study medication in DB period.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

  63. DB Period: Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: Bicarbonate, Blood Urea Nitrogen, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Phosphate and Sodium at Week 24

    Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to assess clinical chemistry parameters. Change from Baseline in clinical chemistry parameter: bicarbonate, blood urea nitrogen, calcium, chloride, glucose, potassium, magnesium, phosphate and sodium at Week 24 was reported in this outcome measure.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

  64. OLE Period: Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: Bicarbonate, Blood Urea Nitrogen, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Phosphate and Sodium at Week 52

    Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to assess clinical chemistry parameters. Change from Baseline in clinical chemistry parameter: bicarbonate, blood urea nitrogen, calcium, chloride, glucose, potassium, magnesium, phosphate and sodium at Week 52 was reported in this outcome measure. Participants who received placebo in DB period and re-randomized into OLE period, OLE period Baseline was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained prior to participant receiving first dose of belumosudil in OLE period. Participants who received belumosudil in DB period and continued belumosudil in OLE period, Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 29 days prior to participant receiving first study medication in DB period.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

  65. DB Period: Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: Direct Bilirubin, Bilirubin, Creatinine and Urate at Week 24

    Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to assess clinical chemistry parameters. Change from Baseline in clinical chemistry parameter: direct bilirubin, bilirubin, creatinine and urate at Week 24 was reported in this outcome measure.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

  66. OLE Period: Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: Direct Bilirubin, Bilirubin, Creatinine and Urate at Week 52

    Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to assess clinical chemistry parameters. Change from Baseline in clinical chemistry parameter: direct bilirubin, bilirubin, creatinine and urate at Week 52 was reported in this outcome measure. Participants who received placebo in DB period and re-randomized into OLE period, OLE period Baseline was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained prior to participant receiving first dose of belumosudil in OLE period. Participants who received belumosudil in DB period and continued belumosudil in OLE period, Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 29 days prior to participant receiving first study medication in DB period.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

  67. DB Period: Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: Calcium Corrected at Week 24

    Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to assess clinical chemistry parameters. Change from Baseline in clinical chemistry parameter: calcium corrected at Week 24 was reported in this outcome measure.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

  68. OLE Period: Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: Calcium Corrected at Week 52

    Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to assess clinical chemistry parameters. Change from Baseline in clinical chemistry parameter: calcium corrected at Week 52 was reported in this outcome measure. Participants who received placebo in DB period and re-randomized into OLE period, OLE period Baseline was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained prior to participant receiving first dose of belumosudil in OLE period. Participants who received belumosudil in DB period and continued belumosudil in OLE period, Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 29 days prior to participant receiving first study medication in DB period.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

  69. DB Period: Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: Glomerular Filtration Rate at Week 24

    Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to assess clinical chemistry parameters. Change from Baseline in clinical chemistry parameter: glomerular filtration rate at Week 24 was reported in this outcome measure. Expanded unit of measure is milliliter per minute per 1.73 square meters.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

  70. OLE Period: Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: Glomerular Filtration Rate at Week 52

    Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to assess clinical chemistry parameters. Change from Baseline in clinical chemistry parameter: glomerular filtration rate at Week 52 was reported in this outcome measure. Participants who received placebo in DB period and re-randomized into OLE period, OLE period Baseline was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained prior to participant receiving first dose of belumosudil in OLE period. Participants who received belumosudil in DB period and continued belumosudil in OLE period, Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 29 days prior to participant receiving first study medication in DB period.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

07

Results

Posted Aug 30, 2023
Limitations and caveats
The study was terminated early by the Sponsor due to slow enrollment and strategic consideration and was not driven due to any safety concerns.

Participant flow

The study was conducted at 26 active sites in the United States. A total of 48 participants were screened from 26 June 2019 to 24 January 2022, of which 12 participants were screen failures. Screen failures were mainly due to not meeting eligibility criteria.

DB Period (28 Weeks)
Participant flow — DB Period (28 Weeks)
MilestoneBelumosudil QD/Belumosudil QDBelumosudil BID/Belumosudil BIDDB Period: PlaceboOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil BID
Started12121200
Treated11121200
Completed10101100
Not completed22100
Withdrew: Randomized not treated10000
Withdrew: Adverse event11100
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject01000
OLE Period (24 Weeks)
Participant flow — OLE Period (24 Weeks)
MilestoneBelumosudil QD/Belumosudil QDBelumosudil BID/Belumosudil BIDDB Period: PlaceboOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil BID
Started1010056
Completed107056
Not completed03000
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject02000
Withdrew: Other-unspecified01000

Outcome measures

PrimaryDB Period: Number of Participants With Combined Response Index in Diffuse Cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis (CRISS) Score Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 60 Percent (%) at Week 24

CRISS components included the following domains: mRSS, FVC percent predicted, physician global assessment, patient global assessment, and SHAQ-DI. An algorithm determines the predicted probability of improvement from Baseline by incorporating change from baseline in the mRSS, FVC percent predicted, physician and patient global assessments, and SHAQ-DI. The outcome is a continuous variable between 0.0 and 1.0 (0 to 100%). Higher score indicated greater probability of improvement. CRISS score \>= 60% was considered the minimally important difference. Participants were not considered improved and assigned a probability of improving equal to 0.0 if they developed new onset of renal crisis, new onset or worsening of lung fibrosis, new onset of pulmonary arterial hypertension, or new onset of left ventricular failure during the trial. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) method was used to handle missing data.

Time frame:
Week 24
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
DB Period: Number of Participants With Combined Response Index in Diffuse Cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis (CRISS) Score Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 60 Percent (%) at Week 24
ParticipantsDB Period: Belumosudil QDDB Period: Belumosudil BIDDB Period: Placebo
DB Period: Number of Participants With Combined Response Index in Diffuse Cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis (CRISS) Score Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 60 Percent (%) at Week 24637
Statistical analysis
  • DB Period: Belumosudil QD vs DB Period: Placebo · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.9472 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Odds ratio (or): 1.06 · 95% CI 0.19 to 5.82
  • DB Period: Belumosudil BID vs DB Period: Placebo · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.3078 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Odds ratio (or): 0.39 · 95% CI 0.07 to 2.35
SecondaryDB Period: Combined Response Index in Diffuse Cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis Score at Week 24

CRISS components included the following domains: mRSS, FVC percent predicted, physician global assessment, patient global assessment, and SHAQ-DI. An algorithm determines the predicted probability of improvement from Baseline by incorporating change from baseline in the mRSS, FVC percent predicted, physician and patient global assessments, and SHAQ-DI. The outcome is a continuous variable between 0.0 and 1.0 (0 to 100%). A higher score indicated greater probability of improvement. Participants were not considered improved and assigned a probability of improving equal to 0.0 if they developed new onset of renal crisis, new onset or worsening of lung fibrosis, new onset of pulmonary arterial hypertension, new onset of left ventricular failure during the trial. Least squares (LS) mean and 95% confidence interval (CI) were obtained by mixed-effect model for repeated measures (MMRM).

Time frame:
Week 24
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
DB Period: Combined Response Index in Diffuse Cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis Score at Week 24
score on a scaleDB Period: Belumosudil QDDB Period: Belumosudil BIDDB Period: Placebo
DB Period: Combined Response Index in Diffuse Cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis Score at Week 2414.30 (9.47 to 19.12)10.16 (5.41 to 14.91)14.34 (10.04 to 18.64)
Statistical analysis
  • DB Period: Belumosudil QD vs DB Period: Placebo · MMRM · p = 0.9889 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: -0.04 · 95% CI -6.51 to 6.42
  • DB Period: Belumosudil BID vs DB Period: Placebo · MMRM · p = 0.1916 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: -4.18 · 95% CI -10.59 to 2.23
SecondaryOLE Period: Combined Response Index in Diffuse Cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis Score at Week 52

CRISS components included following domains: mRSS, percent predicted FVC, physician global assessment, patient global assessment, and SHAQ-DI. An algorithm determines the predicted probability of improvement from Baseline by incorporating change from baseline in the mRSS, FVC percent predicted, physician and patient global assessments, and SHAQ-DI. The outcome was a continuous variable between 0.0 and 1.0 (0 to 100%). Higher score indicated greater probability of improvement. Participants were not considered improved and assigned a probability of improving equal to 0.0 if they developed new onset of renal crisis, new onset or worsening of lung fibrosis, new onset of pulmonary arterial hypertension, new onset of left ventricular failure during the trial. LOCF method was used to handle missing data.

Time frame:
Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
OLE Period: Combined Response Index in Diffuse Cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis Score at Week 52
score on a scaleOLE Period: Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Belumosudil BIDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil BID
OLE Period: Combined Response Index in Diffuse Cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis Score at Week 5287.46 ± 27.3767.16 ± 8.74964.37 ± 41.95011.62 ± 19.282
SecondaryDB Period: Change From Baseline in Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) at Week 24

mRSS is an accepted clinical measure of skin thickness. The investigator assessed the skin thickness using the mRSS through simple palpation on 17 different skin sites (e.g., face, hands, fingers; proximal area of the arms, distal area of the arms, thorax, abdomen; proximal area of the legs, and distal area of the legs, feet). Each skin site was rated on a 0 to 3 scale; where 0 = normal skin, 1 = mild thickness, 2 = moderate thickness, and 3 = severe thickness and unable to pinch. Individual site skin scores in the 17 body areas were summed and defined as the total mRSS which ranged from 0 (normal skin) to 51 (severe thickening), where higher score indicated more severity of skin thickening/worst outcome. LS mean and 95% CI were calculated using MMRM model.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
DB Period: Change From Baseline in Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) at Week 24
score on a scaleDB Period: Belumosudil QDDB Period: Belumosudil BIDDB Period: Placebo
DB Period: Change From Baseline in Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) at Week 24-9.2 (-12.2 to -6.2)-4.0 (-7.0 to -1.0)-8.6 (-11.4 to -5.8)
Statistical analysis
  • DB Period: Belumosudil QD vs DB Period: Placebo · MMRM · p = 0.7710 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: -0.6 · 95% CI -4.7 to 3.6
  • DB Period: Belumosudil BID vs DB Period: Placebo · MMRM · p = 0.0308 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: 4.6 · 95% CI 0.5 to 8.8
SecondaryDB Period: Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Week 24

FVC was the total amount of air exhaled from the lungs during the lung function test measured by spirometer which assessed the change in lung function related to the disease status of an underlying interstitial lung disease (ILD). LS mean and 95% CI were obtained from MMRM model.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Least squares mean · percent predicted FVC
DB Period: Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Week 24
percent predicted FVCDB Period: Belumosudil QDDB Period: Belumosudil BIDDB Period: Placebo
DB Period: Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Week 240.6 (-4.0 to 5.2)-2.3 (-7.2 to 2.5)-0.8 (-5.2 to 3.6)
Statistical analysis
  • DB Period: Belumosudil QD vs DB Period: Placebo · MMRM · p = 0.6533 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: 1.4 · 95% CI -4.9 to 7.7
  • DB Period: Belumosudil BID vs DB Period: Placebo · MMRM · p = 0.6338 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: -1.5 · 95% CI -8.1 to 5.0
SecondaryDB Period: Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Participant's Overall Health Using Visual Analogue Scale Score at Week 24

The Physician Global Assessment (reported by the physician) quantified the participant's overall health during the last week based on VAS which ranged from 0 (extremely poor) to 100 (excellent). Higher score indicated better outcome. LS mean and 95% CI were obtained from MMRM model.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
DB Period: Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Participant's Overall Health Using Visual Analogue Scale Score at Week 24
score on a scaleDB Period: Belumosudil QDDB Period: Belumosudil BIDDB Period: Placebo
DB Period: Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Participant's Overall Health Using Visual Analogue Scale Score at Week 2422.4 (10.0 to 34.8)-0.8 (-13.2 to 11.6)7.8 (-4.1 to 19.6)
Statistical analysis
  • DB Period: Belumosudil QD vs DB Period: Placebo · MMRM · p = 0.0916 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: 14.6 · 95% CI -2.5 to 31.8
  • DB Period: Belumosudil BID vs DB Period: Placebo · MMRM · p = 0.3146 · Least square mean difference: -8.6 · 95% CI -25.7 to 8.6
SecondaryDB Period: Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Participant's Overall Health Using Visual Analogue Scale Score at Week 24

The Patient Global Assessment (reported by participant) quantified the participant's overall health during the last week based on a VAS which ranged from 0 (extremely poor) to 100 (excellent). Higher score indicated better outcome. LS mean and 95% CI were obtained from MMRM model.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
DB Period: Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Participant's Overall Health Using Visual Analogue Scale Score at Week 24
score on a scaleDB Period: Belumosudil QDDB Period: Belumosudil BIDDB Period: Placebo
DB Period: Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Participant's Overall Health Using Visual Analogue Scale Score at Week 24-5.8 (-22.4 to 10.8)3.5 (-13.1 to 20.1)4.2 (-11.4 to 19.8)
Statistical analysis
  • DB Period: Belumosudil QD vs DB Period: Placebo · MMRM · p = 0.3753 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: -10.0 · 95% CI -32.8 to 12.8
  • DB Period: Belumosudil BID vs DB Period: Placebo · MMRM · p = 0.9481 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: -0.7 · 95% CI -23.5 to 22.1
SecondaryDB Period: Change From Baseline in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (SHAQ-DI) Total Score at Week 24

SHAQ-DI included the general health assessment questionnaire-disability index (HAD-DI) assessment and 6 scleroderma-specific VAS items to explore impact of participant's disease. General HAD-DI assessment included 8 domains: dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities addressing scleroderma related manifestations that contribute to disability. It is a quality of life measure. For each question, level of difficulty was scored from 0 to 3, where 0=no difficulty, 1=some difficulty, 2=much difficulty, 3=unable to do. Some domains in the SHAQ are visual analog scales that are measured first and then changed to a 0-3 scale. SHAQ-DI total score was computed as the sum of domain scores divided by the number of domains answered and it ranged from 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (maximum difficulty), where higher score indicated greater disability/worse functionality. LS mean and 95% CI were obtained from MMRM model.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
DB Period: Change From Baseline in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (SHAQ-DI) Total Score at Week 24
score on a scaleDB Period: Belumosudil QDDB Period: Belumosudil BIDDB Period: Placebo
DB Period: Change From Baseline in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (SHAQ-DI) Total Score at Week 24-0.187 (-0.449 to 0.074)-0.112 (-0.374 to 0.149)-0.152 (-0.393 to 0.090)
Statistical analysis
  • DB Period: Belumosudil QD vs DB Period: Placebo · MMRM · p = 0.8387 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: -0.036 · 95% CI -0.392 to 0.320
  • DB Period: Belumosudil BID vs DB Period: Placebo · MMRM · p = 0.8234 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: 0.039 · 95% CI -0.317 to 0.395
SecondaryDB Period: Percentage Improvement in Modified Rodnan Skin Score at Week 24

The mRSS is an accepted clinical measure of skin thickness. The investigator assessed the skin thickness using the mRSS through simple palpation on 17 different skin sites (e.g., face, hands, fingers; proximal area of the arms, distal area of the arms, thorax, abdomen; proximal area of the legs, and distal area of the legs, feet). Each skin site was rated on 0 to 3 scale; where 0 = normal skin, 1 = mild thickness, 2 = moderate thickness, and 3 = severe thickness and unable to pinch. Individual site skin scores in the 17 body areas were summed and defined as the total mRSS which ranged from 0 (normal skin) to 51 (severe thickening), where higher score indicated more severity of skin thickening/worst outcome. Percentage improvement = change from Baseline value divided by Baseline value\*100. LS mean and 95% CI were obtained from MMRM model.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Least squares mean · percentage improvement
DB Period: Percentage Improvement in Modified Rodnan Skin Score at Week 24
percentage improvementDB Period: Belumosudil QDDB Period: Belumosudil BIDDB Period: Placebo
DB Period: Percentage Improvement in Modified Rodnan Skin Score at Week 2437.268 (23.074 to 51.462)19.262 (5.068 to 33.457)40.277 (27.047 to 53.507)
Statistical analysis
  • DB Period: Belumosudil QD vs DB Period: Placebo · MMRM · p = 0.7535 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: -3.009 · 95% CI -22.413 to 16.395
  • DB Period: Belumosudil BID vs DB Period: Placebo · MMRM · p = 0.0348 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: -21.015 · 95% CI -40.419 to -1.611
SecondaryDB Period: Percentage Improvement in Physician Global Assessment of Participant's Overall Health Using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score at Week 24

The Physician Global Assessment (reported by the physician) quantified the participant's overall health during the last week based on VAS which ranged from 0 (extremely poor) to 100 (excellent). Higher score indicated better outcome. Percentage improvement = change from Baseline value divided by Baseline value\*100. LS mean and 95% CI were obtained from MMRM model.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Least squares mean · percentage improvement
DB Period: Percentage Improvement in Physician Global Assessment of Participant's Overall Health Using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score at Week 24
percentage improvementDB Period: Belumosudil QDDB Period: Belumosudil BIDDB Period: Placebo
DB Period: Percentage Improvement in Physician Global Assessment of Participant's Overall Health Using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score at Week 2468.790 (38.465 to 99.115)1.240 (-29.085 to 31.564)23.224 (-5.757 to 52.204)
Statistical analysis
  • DB Period: Belumosudil QD vs DB Period: Placebo · MMRM · p = 0.0343 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: 45.566 · 95% CI 3.621 to 87.512
  • DB Period: Belumosudil BID vs DB Period: Placebo · MMRM · p = 0.2922 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: -21.984 · 95% CI -63.930 to 19.962
SecondaryDB Period: Percentage Improvement in Patient Global Assessment of Participant's Overall Health Using Visual Analogue Scale Score at Week 24

The Patient Global Assessment (reported by participant) quantified the participant's overall health during the last week based on a VAS which ranged from 0 (extremely poor) to 100 (excellent). Higher score indicated better outcome. Percentage improvement = change from Baseline value divided by Baseline value\*100. LS mean and 95% CI were obtained from MMRM model.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Least squares mean · percentage improvement
DB Period: Percentage Improvement in Patient Global Assessment of Participant's Overall Health Using Visual Analogue Scale Score at Week 24
percentage improvementDB Period: Belumosudil QDDB Period: Belumosudil BIDDB Period: Placebo
DB Period: Percentage Improvement in Patient Global Assessment of Participant's Overall Health Using Visual Analogue Scale Score at Week 24-2.583 (-42.146 to 36.981)18.194 (-21.369 to 57.758)14.174 (-22.838 to 51.186)
Statistical analysis
  • DB Period: Belumosudil QD vs DB Period: Placebo · MMRM · p = 0.5320 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: -16.757 · 95% CI -70.933 to 37.419
  • DB Period: Belumosudil BID vs DB Period: Placebo · MMRM · p = 0.8804 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: 4.020 · 95% CI -50.156 to 58.196
SecondaryDB Period: Percentage Improvement in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (SHAQ-DI) Total Score at Week 24

SHAQ-DI included general HAD-DI assessment and 6 scleroderma-specific VAS items to explore impact of participant's disease. General HAD-DI assessment included 8 domains: dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities addressing scleroderma related manifestations that contribute to disability. For each question, level of difficulty was scored from 0 to 3, where 0=no difficulty, 1=some difficulty, 2=much difficulty, 3=unable to do. Some domains in SHAQ are visual analog scales that are measured first and then changed to 0-3 scale. SHAQ-DI total score was computed as sum of domain scores divided by number of domains answered and it ranged from 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (maximum difficulty), where higher score indicated greater disability/worse functionality. Percentage improvement = change from Baseline value divided by Baseline value\*100. LS mean and 95% CI were obtained from MMRM model.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Least squares mean · percentage improvement
DB Period: Percentage Improvement in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (SHAQ-DI) Total Score at Week 24
percentage improvementDB Period: Belumosudil QDDB Period: Belumosudil BIDDB Period: Placebo
DB Period: Percentage Improvement in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (SHAQ-DI) Total Score at Week 2412.065 (-54.683 to 78.813)-37.898 (-101.221 to 25.424)4.544 (-53.353 to 62.440)
Statistical analysis
  • DB Period: Belumosudil QD vs DB Period: Placebo · MMRM · p = 0.8628 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: 7.522 · 95% CI -80.837 to 95.880
  • DB Period: Belumosudil BID vs DB Period: Placebo · MMRM · p = 0.3196 · Least square mean difference: -42.442 · 95% CI -128.242 to 43.359
SecondaryOLE Period: Change From Baseline in Modified Rodnan Skin Score at Week 52

The mRSS is an accepted clinical measure of skin thickness. The investigator assessed the skin thickness using the mRSS through simple palpation on 17 different skin sites (e.g., face, hands, fingers; proximal area of the arms, distal area of the arms, thorax, abdomen; proximal area of the legs, and distal area of the legs, feet). Each skin site was rated on a 0 to 3 scale; where 0 = normal skin, 1 = mild thickness, 2 = moderate thickness, and 3 = severe thickness and unable to pinch. Individual site skin scores in the 17 body areas were summed and defined as the total mRSS which ranged from 0 (normal skin) to 51 (severe thickening), where higher score indicated more severity of skin thickening/worst outcome. In the below data table, 'number analyzed' = participants with available data for each specified category.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in Modified Rodnan Skin Score at Week 52
score on a scaleOLE Period: Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Belumosudil BIDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil BID
Baseline25.7 ± 6.1512.8 ± 9.9124.0 ± 4.8114.7 ± 5.75
Change at Week 52-14.4 ± 4.09-2.0 ± 5.10-9.4 ± 3.51-2.5 ± 1.64
SecondaryOLE Period: Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity at Week 52

FVC was the total amount of air exhaled from the lungs during the lung function test measured by spirometer which assessed the change in lung function related to the disease status of an underlying ILD. Participants who received placebo in DB period and re-randomized into OLE period, OLE period Baseline was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained prior to participant receiving first dose of belumosudil in OLE period. Participants who received belumosudil in DB period and continued belumosudil in OLE period, Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 29 days prior to participant receiving first study medication in DB period.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · percent predicted FVC
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity at Week 52
percent predicted FVCOLE Period: Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Belumosudil BIDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil BID
Baseline98.5 ± 16.7795.8 ± 11.2683.3 ± 17.4776.7 ± 18.42
Change at Week 52-4.1 ± 5.361.0 ± 6.71-0.7 ± 13.692.7 ± 4.18
SecondaryOLE Period: Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Participant's Overall Health Using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score at Week 52

The Physician Global Assessment (reported by the physician) quantified the participant's overall health during the last week based on VAS which ranged from 0 (extremely poor) to 100 (excellent). Higher score indicated better outcome. Participants who received placebo in DB period and re-randomized into OLE period, OLE period Baseline was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained prior to participant receiving first dose of belumosudil in OLE period. Participants who received belumosudil in DB period and continued belumosudil in OLE period, Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 29 days prior to participant receiving first study medication in DB period.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Participant's Overall Health Using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score at Week 52
score on a scaleOLE Period: Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Belumosudil BIDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil BID
Baseline41.5 ± 18.0260.6 ± 20.6659.7 ± 12.8743.3 ± 25.07
Change at Week 5222.2 ± 27.80-6.2 ± 18.517.0 ± 29.583.3 ± 17.45
SecondaryOLE Period: Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Participant's Overall Health Using Visual Analogue Scale Score at Week 52

The Patient Global Assessment (reported by participant) quantified the participant's overall health during the last week based on a VAS which ranged from 0 (extremely poor) to 100 (excellent). Higher score indicated better outcome. Participants who received placebo in DB period and re-randomized into OLE period, OLE period Baseline was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained prior to participant receiving first dose of belumosudil in OLE period. Participants who received belumosudil in DB period and continued belumosudil in OLE period, Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 29 days prior to participant receiving first study medication in DB period.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Participant's Overall Health Using Visual Analogue Scale Score at Week 52
score on a scaleOLE Period: Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Belumosudil BIDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil BID
Baseline61.1 ± 17.2451.8 ± 26.8557.6 ± 18.5043.7 ± 20.72
Change at Week 52-12.1 ± 30.5815.0 ± 29.91-2.4 ± 13.8216.2 ± 33.91
SecondaryOLE Period: Change From Baseline in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index Total Score at Week 52

SHAQ-DI included general HAD-DI assessment and 6 scleroderma-specific VAS items to explore the impact of participant's disease. General HAD-DI assessment included 8 domains: dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities addressing scleroderma related manifestations that contribute to disability. For each question, level of difficulty was scored from 0 to 3, where 0=no difficulty, 1=some difficulty, 2=much difficulty, 3=unable to do. Some domains in SHAQ are visual analog scales that are measured first and then changed to a 0-3 scale. SHAQ-DI total score was computed as sum of domain scores divided by the number of domains answered and it ranged from 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (maximum difficulty), where higher score indicated greater disability/worse functionality. In the data table below, 'number analyzed' = participants with available data for each specified category.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index Total Score at Week 52
score on a scaleOLE Period: Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Belumosudil BIDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil BID
Baseline1.513 ± 0.7531.275 ± 0.5821.388 ± 0.6861.042 ± 0.727
Change at Week 52-0.200 ± 0.422-0.050 ± 0.068-0.089 ± 0.3120.063 ± 0.172
SecondaryOLE Period: Percentage Improvement in Modified Rodnan Skin Score at Week 52

The mRSS is an accepted clinical measure of skin thickness. The investigator assessed the skin thickness using the mRSS through simple palpation on 17 different skin sites in (e.g., face, hands, fingers; proximal area of the arms, distal area of the arms, thorax, abdomen; proximal area of the legs, and distal area of the legs, feet). Each skin site was rated on a 0 to 3 scale; where 0 = normal skin, 1 = mild thickness, 2 = moderate thickness, and 3 = severe thickness and unable to pinch. Individual site skin scores in the 17 body areas were summed and defined as the total mRSS which ranged from 0 (normal skin) to 51 (severe thickening), where higher score indicated more severity of skin thickening/worst outcome. Percentage improvement = change from Baseline value divided by Baseline value\*100. In the data table below, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this outcome measure.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · percentage improvement
OLE Period: Percentage Improvement in Modified Rodnan Skin Score at Week 52
percentage improvementOLE Period: Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Belumosudil BIDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil BID
OLE Period: Percentage Improvement in Modified Rodnan Skin Score at Week 5257.119 ± 13.719-13.687 ± 76.46341.123 ± 16.81320.959 ± 14.344
SecondaryOLE Period: Percentage Improvement Physician Global Assessment of Participant's Overall Health Using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score at Week 52

The Physician Global Assessment (reported by the physician) quantified the participant's overall health during the last week based on VAS which ranged from 0 (extremely poor) to 100 (excellent). Higher score indicated better outcome. Percentage improvement = change from Baseline value divided by Baseline value\*100. In the data below, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this outcome measure.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · percentage improvement
OLE Period: Percentage Improvement Physician Global Assessment of Participant's Overall Health Using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score at Week 52
percentage improvementOLE Period: Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Belumosudil BIDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil BID
OLE Period: Percentage Improvement Physician Global Assessment of Participant's Overall Health Using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score at Week 5276.075 ± 73.169-8.138 ± 29.91622.014 ± 56.88524.287 ± 71.494
SecondaryOLE Period: Percentage Improvement in Patient Global Assessment of Participant's Overall Health Using Visual Analogue Scale Score at Week 52

The Patient Global Assessment (reported by participant) quantified the participant's overall health during the last week based on a VAS which ranged from 0 (extremely poor) to 100 (excellent). Higher score indicated better outcome. Percentage improvement = change from Baseline value divided by Baseline value\*100. In the data table below, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this outcome measure.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · percentage improvement
OLE Period: Percentage Improvement in Patient Global Assessment of Participant's Overall Health Using Visual Analogue Scale Score at Week 52
percentage improvementOLE Period: Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Belumosudil BIDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil BID
OLE Period: Percentage Improvement in Patient Global Assessment of Participant's Overall Health Using Visual Analogue Scale Score at Week 52-7.833 ± 57.15440.966 ± 82.168-3.797 ± 26.57779.771 ± 122.523
SecondaryOLE Period: Percentage Improvement in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index Score at Week 52

SHAQ-DI: general health assessment questionnaire-disability index (HAD-DI) assessment and 6 scleroderma-specific VAS items to explore impact of participant's disease. General HAD-DI assessment included 8 domains: dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities addressing scleroderma related manifestations that contribute to disability. For each question, level of difficulty was scored from 0 to 3; 0=no difficulty, 1=some difficulty, 2=much difficulty, 3=unable to do. Some domains in SHAQ are visual analog scales that are measured first and then changed to 0-3 scale. SHAQ-DI total score computed as sum of domain scores divided by number of domains answered ranging 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (maximum difficulty), where higher score indicated greater disability/worse functionality. Percentage improvement = change from Baseline value divided by Baseline value\*100. 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this outcome measure.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · percentage improvement
OLE Period: Percentage Improvement in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index Score at Week 52
percentage improvementOLE Period: Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Belumosudil BIDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil BID
OLE Period: Percentage Improvement in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index Score at Week 5215.496 ± 33.7625.667 ± 8.788-33.254 ± 118.780-15.347 ± 35.326
SecondaryDB Period: Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity Level at Week 24-ILD Participants

FVC was the total amount of air exhaled from the lungs during the lung function test measured by spirometer which assessed the change in lung function related to the disease status of an underlying ILD. For participants who received placebo/belumosudil in the DB period, the Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 29 days prior to participant receiving first study medication in the DB period. Change from Baseline in percent predicted FVC level at Week 24 in participants with ILD is reported in this outcome measure.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · percent predicted FVC
DB Period: Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity Level at Week 24-ILD Participants
percent predicted FVCDB Period: Belumosudil QDDB Period: Belumosudil BIDDB Period: Placebo
Baseline93.3 ± 13.1581.3 ± 15.7780.2 ± 19.79
Change at Week 24-2.3 ± 15.73-2.2 ± 5.450.4 ± 2.79
SecondaryDB Period: Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Diffusing Capacity of the Lungs for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Week 24-ILD Participants

DLco is a measurement of the ability of the lungs to transfer gases from the air to the blood. Participants breathe in (inhale) air containing a very small, harmless amount of a tracer gas, such as carbon monoxide. Participants hold their breath for 10 seconds, then rapidly blow it out (exhale). The exhaled gas was tested to determine amount of the tracer gas absorbed during the breath. For participants who received placebo/belumosudil in the DB period, the Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 29 days prior to participant receiving first study medication in the DB period. Change from Baseline in percent predicted DLco at Week 24 in participants with ILD is reported in this outcome measure.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · percent predicted DLco
DB Period: Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Diffusing Capacity of the Lungs for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Week 24-ILD Participants
percent predicted DLcoDB Period: Belumosudil QDDB Period: Belumosudil BIDDB Period: Placebo
Baseline76.3 ± 20.4560.3 ± 15.9860.5 ± 10.21
Change at Week 24-6.3 ± 10.214.4 ± 7.471.3 ± 4.16
SecondaryDB Period: Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1) at Week 24-ILD Participants

FEV1 was the volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration as measured by a spirometer. For participants who received placebo/belumosudil in the DB period, the Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 29 days prior to participant receiving first study medication in the DB period. Change from Baseline in percent predicted FEV1 at Week 24 in participants with ILD is reported in this outcome measure.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · percent predicted FEV1
DB Period: Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1) at Week 24-ILD Participants
percent predicted FEV1DB Period: Belumosudil QDDB Period: Belumosudil BIDDB Period: Placebo
Baseline95.3 ± 7.3783.1 ± 14.8886.4 ± 17.29
Change at Week 24-8.7 ± 12.22-2.2 ± 6.020.8 ± 2.75
SecondaryDB Period: Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Week 24-ILD Participants

RV is the volume of air remaining in the lungs after maximum forceful expiration. For participants who received placebo/belumosudil in the DB period, the Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 29 days prior to participant receiving first study medication in the DB period. Change from Baseline in percent predicted RV at Week 24 in participants with ILD is reported in this outcome measure.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · percent predicted RV
DB Period: Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Week 24-ILD Participants
percent predicted RVDB Period: Belumosudil QDDB Period: Belumosudil BIDDB Period: Placebo
Baseline80.7 ± 26.5873.7 ± 24.3769.8 ± 27.97
Change at Week 24-17.7 ± 8.960.2 ± 16.6029.5 ± 18.08
SecondaryDB Period: Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Week 24-ILD Participants

TLC is the volume of air in the lungs upon the maximum effort of inspiration. For participants who received placebo/belumosudil in the DB period, the Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 29 days prior to participant receiving first study medication in the DB period. Change from Baseline in percent predicted TLC at Week 24 in participants with ILD is reported in this outcome measure.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · percent predicted TLC
DB Period: Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Week 24-ILD Participants
percent predicted TLCDB Period: Belumosudil QDDB Period: Belumosudil BIDDB Period: Placebo
Baseline89.0 ± 18.0379.0 ± 15.8380.6 ± 19.71
Change at Week 24-11.3 ± 4.62-2.2 ± 4.0210.5 ± 7.05
SecondaryOLE Period: Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity at Week 52-ILD Participants

FVC was the total amount of air exhaled from the lungs during the lung function test measured by spirometer which assessed the change in lung function related to the disease status of an underlying ILD. Participants who received placebo in DB period and re-randomized into OLE period, OLE period Baseline was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained prior to participant receiving first dose of belumosudil in OLE period. Participants who received belumosudil in DB period and continued belumosudil in OLE period, Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 29 days prior to participant receiving first study medication in DB period. Change from Baseline in percent predicted FVC at Week 52 in participants with ILD is reported in this outcome measure.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · percent predicted FVC
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity at Week 52-ILD Participants
percent predicted FVCOLE Period: Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Belumosudil BIDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil BID
Baseline93.3 ± 13.1597.5 ± 16.2680.5 ± 17.1268.0 ± 20.66
Change at Week 52-7.3 ± 3.59-4.0 ± 2.833.7 ± 12.504.0 ± 5.29
SecondaryOLE Period: Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Diffusing Capacity of the Lungs for Carbon Monoxide at Week 52-ILD Participants

DLco is a measurement of the ability of the lungs to transfer gases from the air to the blood. Participants breathe in (inhale) air containing a very small, harmless amount of a tracer gas, such as carbon monoxide. Participants hold their breath for 10 seconds, then rapidly blow it out (exhale). The exhaled gas was tested to determine amount of the tracer gas absorbed during the breath. Participants who received placebo in DB period and re-randomized into OLE period, OLE period Baseline was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained prior to participant receiving first dose of belumosudil in OLE period. Participants who received belumosudil in DB period and continued belumosudil in OLE period, Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 29 days prior to participant receiving first study medication in DB period. Change from Baseline in percent predicted DLco at Week 52 in participants with ILD is reported in this outcome measure.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · percent predicted DLco
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Diffusing Capacity of the Lungs for Carbon Monoxide at Week 52-ILD Participants
percent predicted DLcoOLE Period: Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Belumosudil BIDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil BID
Baseline76.3 ± 20.4578.0 ± 7.0760.3 ± 15.9856.3 ± 2.08
Change at Week 52-9.0 ± 9.272.0 ± 7.076.0 ± 7.211.7 ± 11.72
SecondaryOLE Period: Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume at Week 52-ILD Participants

FEV1 was the volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration as measured by a spirometer. Participants who received placebo in DB period and re-randomized into OLE period, OLE period Baseline was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained prior to participant receiving first dose of belumosudil in OLE period. Participants who received belumosudil in DB period and continued belumosudil in OLE period, Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 29 days prior to participant receiving first study medication in DB period. Change from Baseline in percent predicted FEV1 at Week 52 in participants with ILD is reported in this outcome measure.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · percent predicted FEV1
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume at Week 52-ILD Participants
percent predicted FEV1OLE Period: Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Belumosudil BIDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil BID
Baseline95.3 ± 7.37101.5 ± 13.4481.0 ± 15.0770.0 ± 19.00
Change at Week 52-6.8 ± 2.06-2.0 ± 4.244.0 ± 14.18-0.7 ± 7.09
SecondaryOLE Period: Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume at Week 52-ILD Participants

RV is the volume of air remaining in the lungs after maximum forceful expiration. Participants who received placebo in DB period and re-randomized into OLE period, OLE period Baseline was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained prior to participant receiving first dose of belumosudil in OLE period. Participants who received belumosudil in DB period and continued belumosudil in OLE period, Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 29 days prior to participant receiving first study medication in DB period. Change from Baseline in percent predicted RV at Week 52 in participants with ILD is reported in this outcome measure.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · percent predicted RV
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume at Week 52-ILD Participants
percent predicted RVOLE Period: Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Belumosudil BIDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil BID
Baseline80.7 ± 26.58113.0 ± 36.7776.2 ± 25.7381.7 ± 31.66
Change at Week 52-21.3 ± 22.50-28.0 ± 35.363.7 ± 11.93-22.5 ± 7.78
SecondaryOLE Period: Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity at Week 52-ILD Participants

TLC is the volume of air in the lungs upon the maximum effort of inspiration. Participants who received placebo in DB period and re-randomized into OLE period, OLE period Baseline was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained prior to participant receiving first dose of belumosudil in OLE period. Participants who received belumosudil in DB period and continued belumosudil in OLE period, Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 29 days prior to participant receiving first study medication in DB period. Change from Baseline in percent predicted TLC at Week 52 in participants with ILD is reported in this outcome measure.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · percent predicted TLC
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity at Week 52-ILD Participants
percent predicted TLCOLE Period: Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Belumosudil BIDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil BID
Baseline89.0 ± 18.03104.0 ± 14.1479.7 ± 17.2480.7 ± 19.14
Change at Week 52-13.0 ± 11.14-10.0 ± 8.493.3 ± 3.06-11.0 ± 4.24
SecondaryDB Period: Number of Participants With Lung Fibrosis at Baseline and Week 24-ILD Participants

Lung fibrosis is a lung disease in which lung tissue becomes damaged and scared. Lung fibrosis was assessed using high-resolution computerized tomography (HRCT). HRCT is a type of computed tomography used to diagnose and stage the severity. Pure ground-class opacity, pulmonary fibrosis and honeycombing were recorded for each lung (right and left) and three lung zones (upper, middle, and lower). They were recorded categorically for the amount detected, ranged as Absent, 1-25%, 26-50%, 51-75% and \>75% for abnormality/lung fibrosis. For participants who received placebo/belumosudil in the DB period, the Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 29 days prior to participant receiving first study medication in the DB period. Number of participants with lung fibrosis at Baseline and Week 24 are reported in this outcome measure.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
DB Period: Number of Participants With Lung Fibrosis at Baseline and Week 24-ILD Participants
ParticipantsDB Period: Belumosudil QDDB Period: Belumosudil BIDDB Period: Placebo
Honeycombing Left Lung Zone 1 - Baseline: Absent474
Honeycombing Left Lung Zone 1 - Baseline: 1-25%000
Honeycombing Left Lung Zone 1 - Baseline: 26-50%000
Honeycombing Left Lung Zone 1 - Baseline: 51-75%000
Honeycombing Left Lung Zone 1 - Baseline: >75%000
Honeycombing Left Lung Zone 1 - Week 24: Absent364
Honeycombing Left Lung Zone 1 - Week 24: 1-25%101
Honeycombing Left Lung Zone 1 - Week 24: 26-50%000
Honeycombing Left Lung Zone 1 - Week 24: 51-75%000
Honeycombing Left Lung Zone 1 - Week 24: >75%000
Honeycombing Left Lung Zone 2 - Baseline: Absent474
Honeycombing Left Lung Zone 2 - Baseline: 1-25%000
Honeycombing Left Lung Zone 2 - Baseline: 26-50%000
Honeycombing Left Lung Zone 2 - Baseline: 51-75%000
Honeycombing Left Lung Zone 2 - Baseline: >75%000
Honeycombing Left Lung Zone 2 - Week 24: Absent465
Honeycombing Left Lung Zone 2 - Week 24: 1-25%000
Honeycombing Left Lung Zone 2 - Week 24: 26-50%000
Honeycombing Left Lung Zone 2 - Week 24: 51-75%000
Honeycombing Left Lung Zone 2 - Week 24: >75%000
Honeycombing Left Lung Zone 3 - Baseline: Absent454
Honeycombing Left Lung Zone 3 - Baseline: 1-25%010
Honeycombing Left Lung Zone 3 - Baseline: 26-50%010
Honeycombing Left Lung Zone 3 - Baseline: 51-75%000
Honeycombing Left Lung Zone 3 - Baseline: >75%000
Honeycombing Left Lung Zone 3 - Week 24: Absent455
Honeycombing Left Lung Zone 3 - Week 24: 1-25%010
Honeycombing Left Lung Zone 3 - Week 24: 26-50%000
Honeycombing Left Lung Zone 3 - Week 24: 51-75%000
Honeycombing Left Lung Zone 3 - Week 24: >75%000
Honeycombing Right Lung Zone 1 - Baseline: Absent474
Honeycombing Right Lung Zone 1 - Baseline: 1-25%000
Honeycombing Right Lung Zone 1 - Baseline: 26-50%000
Honeycombing Right Lung Zone 1 - Baseline: 51-75%000
Honeycombing Right Lung Zone 1 - Baseline: >75%000
Honeycombing Right Lung Zone 1 - Week 24: Absent465
Honeycombing Right Lung Zone 1 - Week 24: 1-25%000
Honeycombing Right Lung Zone 1 - Week 24: 26-50%000
Honeycombing Right Lung Zone 1 - Week 24: 51-75%000
Honeycombing Right Lung Zone 1 - Week 24: >75%000
Honeycombing Right Lung Zone 2 - Baseline: Absent474
Honeycombing Right Lung Zone 2 - Baseline: 1-25%000
Honeycombing Right Lung Zone 2 - Baseline: 26-50%000
Honeycombing Right Lung Zone 2 - Baseline: 51-75%000
Honeycombing Right Lung Zone 2 - Baseline: >75%000
Honeycombing Right Lung Zone 2 - Week 24: Absent465
Honeycombing Right Lung Zone 2 - Week 24: 1-25%000
Honeycombing Right Lung Zone 2 - Week 24: 26-50%000
Honeycombing Right Lung Zone 2 - Week 24: 51-75%000
Honeycombing Right Lung Zone 2 - Week 24: >75%000
Honeycombing Right Lung Zone 3 - Baseline: Absent454
Honeycombing Right Lung Zone 3 - Baseline: 1-25%010
Honeycombing Right Lung Zone 3 - Baseline: 26-50%010
Honeycombing Right Lung Zone 3 - Baseline: 51-75%000
Honeycombing Right Lung Zone 3 - Baseline: >75%000
Honeycombing Right Lung Zone 3 - Week 24: Absent455
Honeycombing Right Lung Zone 3 - Week 24: 1-25%010
Honeycombing Right Lung Zone 3 - Week 24: 26-50%000
Honeycombing Right Lung Zone 3 - Week 24: 51-75%000
Honeycombing Right Lung Zone 3 - Week 24: >75%000
Pulmonary Fibrosis Left Lung Zone 1 - Baseline: Absent364
Pulmonary Fibrosis Left Lung Zone 1 - Baseline: 1-25%110
Pulmonary Fibrosis Left Lung Zone 1 - Baseline: 26-50%000
Pulmonary Fibrosis Left Lung Zone 1 - Baseline: 51-75%000
Pulmonary Fibrosis Left Lung Zone 1 - Baseline: >75%000
Pulmonary Fibrosis Left Lung Zone 1 - Week 24: Absent365
Pulmonary Fibrosis Left Lung Zone 1 - Week 24: 1-25%100
Pulmonary Fibrosis Left Lung Zone 1 - Week 24: 26-50%000
Pulmonary Fibrosis Left Lung Zone 1 - Week 24: 51-75%000
Pulmonary Fibrosis Left Lung Zone 1 - Week 24: >75%000
Pulmonary Fibrosis Left Lung Zone 2 - Baseline: Absent444
Pulmonary Fibrosis Left Lung Zone 2 - Baseline: 1-25%030
Pulmonary Fibrosis Left Lung Zone 2 - Baseline: 26-50%000
Pulmonary Fibrosis Left Lung Zone 2 - Baseline: 51-75%000
Pulmonary Fibrosis Left Lung Zone 2 - Baseline: >75%000
Pulmonary Fibrosis Left Lung Zone 2 - Week 24: Absent434
Pulmonary Fibrosis Left Lung Zone 2 - Week 24: 1-25%031
Pulmonary Fibrosis Left Lung Zone 2 - Week 24: 26-50%000
Pulmonary Fibrosis Left Lung Zone 2 - Week 24: 51-75%000
Pulmonary Fibrosis Left Lung Zone 2 - Week 24: >75%000
Pulmonary Fibrosis Left Lung Zone 3 - Baseline: Absent412
Pulmonary Fibrosis Left Lung Zone 3 - Baseline: 1-25%021
Pulmonary Fibrosis Left Lung Zone 3 - Baseline: 26-50%021
Pulmonary Fibrosis Left Lung Zone 3 - Baseline: 51-75%010
Pulmonary Fibrosis Left Lung Zone 3 - Baseline: >75%010
Pulmonary Fibrosis Left Lung Zone 3 - Week 24: Absent210
Pulmonary Fibrosis Left Lung Zone 3 - Week 24: 1-25%234
Pulmonary Fibrosis Left Lung Zone 3 - Week 24: 26-50%011
Pulmonary Fibrosis Left Lung Zone 3 - Week 24: 51-75%010
Pulmonary Fibrosis Left Lung Zone 3 - Week 24: >75%000
Pulmonary Fibrosis Right Lung Zone 1 - Baseline: Absent464
Pulmonary Fibrosis Right Lung Zone 1 - Baseline: 1-25%010
Pulmonary Fibrosis Right Lung Zone 1 - Baseline: 26-50%000
Pulmonary Fibrosis Right Lung Zone 1 - Baseline: 51-75%000
Pulmonary Fibrosis Right Lung Zone 1 - Baseline: >75%000
Pulmonary Fibrosis Right Lung Zone 1 - Week 24: Absent253
Pulmonary Fibrosis Right Lung Zone 1 - Week 24: 1-25%212
Pulmonary Fibrosis Right Lung Zone 1 - Week 24: 26-50%000
Pulmonary Fibrosis Right Lung Zone 1 - Week 24: 51-75%000
Pulmonary Fibrosis Right Lung Zone 1 - Week 24: >75%000
Pulmonary Fibrosis Right Lung Zone 2 - Baseline: Absent433
Pulmonary Fibrosis Right Lung Zone 2 - Baseline: 1-25%041
Pulmonary Fibrosis Right Lung Zone 2 - Baseline: 26-50%000
Pulmonary Fibrosis Right Lung Zone 2 - Baseline: 51-75%000
Pulmonary Fibrosis Right Lung Zone 2 - Baseline: >75%000
Pulmonary Fibrosis Right Lung Zone 2 - Week 24: Absent443
Pulmonary Fibrosis Right Lung Zone 2 - Week 24: 1-25%021
Pulmonary Fibrosis Right Lung Zone 2 - Week 24: 26-50%001
Pulmonary Fibrosis Right Lung Zone 2 - Week 24: 51-75%000
Pulmonary Fibrosis Right Lung Zone 2 - Week 24: >75%000
Pulmonary Fibrosis Right Lung Zone 3 - Baseline: Absent310
Pulmonary Fibrosis Right Lung Zone 3 - Baseline: 1-25%122
Pulmonary Fibrosis Right Lung Zone 3 - Baseline: 26-50%022
Pulmonary Fibrosis Right Lung Zone 3 - Baseline: 51-75%000
Pulmonary Fibrosis Right Lung Zone 3 - Baseline: >75%020
Pulmonary Fibrosis Right Lung Zone 3 - Week 24: Absent220
Pulmonary Fibrosis Right Lung Zone 3 - Week 24: 1-25%223
Pulmonary Fibrosis Right Lung Zone 3 - Week 24: 26-50%012
Pulmonary Fibrosis Right Lung Zone 3 - Week 24: 51-75%010
Pulmonary Fibrosis Right Lung Zone 3 - Week 24: >75%000
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Left Lung Zone 1 - Baseline: Absent243
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Left Lung Zone 1 - Baseline: 1-25%231
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Left Lung Zone 1 - Baseline: 26-50%000
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Left Lung Zone 1 - Baseline: 51-75%000
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Left Lung Zone 1 - Baseline: >75%000
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Left Lung Zone 1 - Week 24: Absent444
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Left Lung Zone 1 - Week 24: 1-25%021
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Left Lung Zone 1 - Week 24: 26-50%000
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Left Lung Zone 1 - Week 24: 51-75%000
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Left Lung Zone 1 - Week 24: >75%000
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Left Lung Zone 2 - Baseline: Absent343
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Left Lung Zone 2 - Baseline: 1-25%131
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Left Lung Zone 2 - Baseline: 26-50%000
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Left Lung Zone 2 - Baseline: 51-75%000
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Left Lung Zone 2 - Baseline: >75%000
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Left Lung Zone 2 - Week 24: Absent434
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Left Lung Zone 2 - Week 24: 1-25%031
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Left Lung Zone 2 - Week 24: 26-50%000
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Left Lung Zone 2 - Week 24: 51-75%000
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Left Lung Zone 2 - Week 24: >75%000
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Left Lung Zone 3 - Baseline: Absent242
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Left Lung Zone 3 - Baseline: 1-25%132
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Left Lung Zone 3 - Baseline: 26-50%100
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Left Lung Zone 3 - Baseline: 51-75%000
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Left Lung Zone 3 - Baseline: >75%000
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Left Lung Zone 3 - Week 24: Absent222
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Left Lung Zone 3 - Week 24: 1-25%222
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Left Lung Zone 3 - Week 24: 26-50%011
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Left Lung Zone 3 - Week 24: 51-75%010
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Left Lung Zone 3 - Week 24: >75%000
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Right Lung Zone 1 - Baseline: Absent342
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Right Lung Zone 1 - Baseline: 1-25%122
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Right Lung Zone 1 - Baseline: 26-50%010
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Right Lung Zone 1 - Baseline: 51-75%000
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Right Lung Zone 1 - Baseline: >75%000
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Right Lung Zone 1 - Week 24: Absent333
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Right Lung Zone 1 - Week 24: 1-25%122
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Right Lung Zone 1 - Week 24: 26-50%010
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Right Lung Zone 1 - Week 24: 51-75%000
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Right Lung Zone 1 - Week 24: >75%000
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Right Lung Zone 2 - Baseline: Absent352
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Right Lung Zone 2 - Baseline: 1-25%112
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Right Lung Zone 2 - Baseline: 26-50%010
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Right Lung Zone 2 - Baseline: 51-75%000
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Right Lung Zone 2 - Baseline: >75%000
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Right Lung Zone 2 - Week 24: Absent343
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Right Lung Zone 2 - Week 24: 1-25%122
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Right Lung Zone 2 - Week 24: 26-50%000
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Right Lung Zone 2 - Week 24: 51-75%000
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Right Lung Zone 2 - Week 24: >75%000
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Right Lung Zone 3 - Baseline: Absent231
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Right Lung Zone 3 - Baseline: 1-25%133
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Right Lung Zone 3 - Baseline: 26-50%110
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Right Lung Zone 3 - Baseline: 51-75%000
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Right Lung Zone 3 - Baseline: >75%000
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Right Lung Zone 3 - Week 24: Absent221
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Right Lung Zone 3 - Week 24: 1-25%234
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Right Lung Zone 3 - Week 24: 26-50%000
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Right Lung Zone 3 - Week 24: 51-75%000
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Right Lung Zone 3 - Week 24: >75%010
SecondaryOLE Period: Number of Participants With Lung Fibrosis at Baseline and Week 52-ILD Participants

Lung fibrosis is a lung disease in which lung tissue becomes damaged and scared. Lung fibrosis was assessed using HRCT. HRCT is a type of computed tomography used to diagnose and stage the severity. Pure ground-class opacity, pulmonary fibrosis and honeycombing were recorded for each lung (right and left) and three lung zones (upper, middle, and lower). They were recorded categorically for the amount detected, ranged as Absent, 1-25%, 26-50%, 51-75% and \>75% for abnormality/lung fibrosis. Number of participants with lung fibrosis at Baseline and Week 52 are reported in this outcome measure. In the data table below, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this outcome measure and 'number analyzed' = participants with available data for each specified category.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 52
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
OLE Period: Number of Participants With Lung Fibrosis at Baseline and Week 52-ILD Participants
ParticipantsOLE Period: Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Belumosudil BIDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil BID
Honeycombing Left Lung Zone 1 - Baseline: Absent4262
Honeycombing Left Lung Zone 1 - Baseline: 1-25%0001
Honeycombing Left Lung Zone 1 - Baseline: 26-50%0000
Honeycombing Left Lung Zone 1 - Baseline: 51-75%0000
Honeycombing Left Lung Zone 1 - Baseline: >75%0000
Honeycombing Left Lung Zone 1 - Week 52: Absent4233
Honeycombing Left Lung Zone 1 - Week 52: 1-25%0000
Honeycombing Left Lung Zone 1 - Week 52: 26-50%0000
Honeycombing Left Lung Zone 1 - Week 52: 51-75%0000
Honeycombing Left Lung Zone 1 - Week 52: >75%0000
Honeycombing Left Lung Zone 2 - Baseline: Absent4263
Honeycombing Left Lung Zone 2 - Baseline: 1-25%0000
Honeycombing Left Lung Zone 2 - Baseline: 26-50%0000
Honeycombing Left Lung Zone 2 - Baseline: 51-75%0000
Honeycombing Left Lung Zone 2 - Baseline: >75%0000
Honeycombing Left Lung Zone 2 - Week 52: Absent4233
Honeycombing Left Lung Zone 2 - Week 52: 1-25%0000
Honeycombing Left Lung Zone 2 - Week 52: 26-50%0000
Honeycombing Left Lung Zone 2 - Week 52: 51-75%0000
Honeycombing Left Lung Zone 2 - Week 52: >75%0000
Honeycombing Left Lung Zone 3 - Baseline: Absent4253
Honeycombing Left Lung Zone 3 - Baseline: 1-25%0000
Honeycombing Left Lung Zone 3 - Baseline: 26-50%0010
Honeycombing Left Lung Zone 3 - Baseline: 51-75%0000
Honeycombing Left Lung Zone 3 - Baseline: >75%0000
Honeycombing Left Lung Zone 3 - Week 52: Absent4223
Honeycombing Left Lung Zone 3 - Week 52: 1-25%0010
Honeycombing Left Lung Zone 3 - Week 52: 26-50%0000
Honeycombing Left Lung Zone 3 - Week 52: 51-75%0000
Honeycombing Left Lung Zone 3 - Week 52: >75%0000
Honeycombing Right Lung Zone 1 - Baseline: Absent4263
Honeycombing Right Lung Zone 1 - Baseline: 1-25%0000
Honeycombing Right Lung Zone 1 - Baseline: 26-50%0000
Honeycombing Right Lung Zone 1 - Baseline: 51-75%0000
Honeycombing Right Lung Zone 1 - Baseline: >75%0000
Honeycombing Right Lung Zone 1 - Week 52: Absent4233
Honeycombing Right Lung Zone 1 - Week 52: 1-25%0000
Honeycombing Right Lung Zone 1 - Week 52: 26-50%0000
Honeycombing Right Lung Zone 1 - Week 52: 51-75%0000
Honeycombing Right Lung Zone 1 - Week 52: >75%0000
Honeycombing Right Lung Zone 2 - Baseline: Absent4263
Honeycombing Right Lung Zone 2 - Baseline: 1-25%0000
Honeycombing Right Lung Zone 2 - Baseline: 26-50%0000
Honeycombing Right Lung Zone 2 - Baseline: 51-75%0000
Honeycombing Right Lung Zone 2 - Baseline: >75%0000
Honeycombing Right Lung Zone 2 - Week 52: Absent4233
Honeycombing Right Lung Zone 2 - Week 52: 1-25%0000
Honeycombing Right Lung Zone 2 - Week 52: 26-50%0000
Honeycombing Right Lung Zone 2 - Week 52: 51-75%0000
Honeycombing Right Lung Zone 2 - Week 52: >75%0000
Honeycombing Right Lung Zone 3 - Baseline: Absent4253
Honeycombing Right Lung Zone 3 - Baseline: 1-25%0000
Honeycombing Right Lung Zone 3 - Baseline: 26-50%0010
Honeycombing Right Lung Zone 3 - Baseline: 51-75%0000
Honeycombing Right Lung Zone 3 - Baseline: >75%0000
Honeycombing Right Lung Zone 3 - Week 52: Absent4233
Honeycombing Right Lung Zone 3 - Week 52: 1-25%0000
Honeycombing Right Lung Zone 3 - Week 52: 26-50%0000
Honeycombing Right Lung Zone 3 - Week 52: 51-75%0000
Honeycombing Right Lung Zone 3 - Week 52: >75%0000
Pulmonary Fibrosis Left Lung Zone 1 - Baseline: Absent3263
Pulmonary Fibrosis Left Lung Zone 1 - Baseline: 1-25%1000
Pulmonary Fibrosis Left Lung Zone 1 - Baseline: 26-50%0000
Pulmonary Fibrosis Left Lung Zone 1 - Baseline: 51-75%0000
Pulmonary Fibrosis Left Lung Zone 1 - Baseline: >75%0000
Pulmonary Fibrosis Left Lung Zone 1 - Week 52: Absent3221
Pulmonary Fibrosis Left Lung Zone 1 - Week 52: 1-25%1012
Pulmonary Fibrosis Left Lung Zone 1 - Week 52: 26-50%0000
Pulmonary Fibrosis Left Lung Zone 1 - Week 52: 51-75%0000
Pulmonary Fibrosis Left Lung Zone 1 - Week 52: >75%0000
Pulmonary Fibrosis Left Lung Zone 2 - Baseline: Absent4242
Pulmonary Fibrosis Left Lung Zone 2 - Baseline: 1-25%0021
Pulmonary Fibrosis Left Lung Zone 2 - Baseline: 26-50%0000
Pulmonary Fibrosis Left Lung Zone 2 - Baseline: 51-75%0000
Pulmonary Fibrosis Left Lung Zone 2 - Baseline: >75%0000
Pulmonary Fibrosis Left Lung Zone 2 - Week 52: Absent4133
Pulmonary Fibrosis Left Lung Zone 2 - Week 52: 1-25%0100
Pulmonary Fibrosis Left Lung Zone 2 - Week 52: 26-50%0000
Pulmonary Fibrosis Left Lung Zone 2 - Week 52: 51-75%0000
Pulmonary Fibrosis Left Lung Zone 2 - Week 52: >75%0000
Pulmonary Fibrosis Left Lung Zone 3 - Baseline: Absent4010
Pulmonary Fibrosis Left Lung Zone 3 - Baseline: 1-25%0222
Pulmonary Fibrosis Left Lung Zone 3 - Baseline: 26-50%0021
Pulmonary Fibrosis Left Lung Zone 3 - Baseline: 51-75%0000
Pulmonary Fibrosis Left Lung Zone 3 - Baseline: >75%0010
Pulmonary Fibrosis Left Lung Zone 3 - Week 52: Absent3011
Pulmonary Fibrosis Left Lung Zone 3 - Week 52: 1-25%1110
Pulmonary Fibrosis Left Lung Zone 3 - Week 52: 26-50%0102
Pulmonary Fibrosis Left Lung Zone 3 - Week 52: 51-75%0010
Pulmonary Fibrosis Left Lung Zone 3 - Week 52: >75%0000
Pulmonary Fibrosis Right Lung Zone 1 - Baseline: Absent4261
Pulmonary Fibrosis Right Lung Zone 1 - Baseline: 1-25%0002
Pulmonary Fibrosis Right Lung Zone 1 - Baseline: 26-50%0000
Pulmonary Fibrosis Right Lung Zone 1 - Baseline: 51-75%0000
Pulmonary Fibrosis Right Lung Zone 1 - Baseline: >75%0000
Pulmonary Fibrosis Right Lung Zone 1 - Week 52: Absent3221
Pulmonary Fibrosis Right Lung Zone 1 - Week 52: 1-25%1012
Pulmonary Fibrosis Right Lung Zone 1 - Week 52: 26-50%0000
Pulmonary Fibrosis Right Lung Zone 1 - Week 52: 51-75%0000
Pulmonary Fibrosis Right Lung Zone 1 - Week 52: >75%0000
Pulmonary Fibrosis Right Lung Zone 2 - Baseline: Absent4231
Pulmonary Fibrosis Right Lung Zone 2 - Baseline: 1-25%0031
Pulmonary Fibrosis Right Lung Zone 2 - Baseline: 26-50%0001
Pulmonary Fibrosis Right Lung Zone 2 - Baseline: 51-75%0000
Pulmonary Fibrosis Right Lung Zone 2 - Baseline: >75%0000
Pulmonary Fibrosis Right Lung Zone 2 - Week 52: Absent3110
Pulmonary Fibrosis Right Lung Zone 2 - Week 52: 1-25%1122
Pulmonary Fibrosis Right Lung Zone 2 - Week 52: 26-50%0001
Pulmonary Fibrosis Right Lung Zone 2 - Week 52: 51-75%0000
Pulmonary Fibrosis Right Lung Zone 2 - Week 52: >75%0000
Pulmonary Fibrosis Right Lung Zone 3 - Baseline: Absent3010
Pulmonary Fibrosis Right Lung Zone 3 - Baseline: 1-25%1221
Pulmonary Fibrosis Right Lung Zone 3 - Baseline: 26-50%0022
Pulmonary Fibrosis Right Lung Zone 3 - Baseline: 51-75%0000
Pulmonary Fibrosis Right Lung Zone 3 - Baseline: >75%0010
Pulmonary Fibrosis Right Lung Zone 3 - Week 52: Absent2011
Pulmonary Fibrosis Right Lung Zone 3 - Week 52: 1-25%2110
Pulmonary Fibrosis Right Lung Zone 3 - Week 52: 26-50%0012
Pulmonary Fibrosis Right Lung Zone 3 - Week 52: 51-75%0100
Pulmonary Fibrosis Right Lung Zone 3 - Week 52: >75%0000
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Left Lung Zone 1 - Baseline: Absent2232
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Left Lung Zone 1 - Baseline: 1-25%2031
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Left Lung Zone 1 - Baseline: 26-50%0000
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Left Lung Zone 1 - Baseline: 51-75%0000
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Left Lung Zone 1 - Baseline: >75%0000
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Left Lung Zone 1 - Week 52: Absent4132
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Left Lung Zone 1 - Week 52: 1-25%0101
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Left Lung Zone 1 - Week 52: 26-50%0000
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Left Lung Zone 1 - Week 52: 51-75%0000
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Left Lung Zone 1 - Week 52: >75%0000
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Left Lung Zone 2 - Baseline: Absent3242
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Left Lung Zone 2 - Baseline: 1-25%1021
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Left Lung Zone 2 - Baseline: 26-50%0000
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Left Lung Zone 2 - Baseline: 51-75%0000
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Left Lung Zone 2 - Baseline: >75%0000
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Left Lung Zone 2 - Week 52: Absent4222
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Left Lung Zone 2 - Week 52: 1-25%0001
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Left Lung Zone 2 - Week 52: 26-50%0010
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Left Lung Zone 2 - Week 52: 51-75%0000
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Left Lung Zone 2 - Week 52: >75%0000
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Left Lung Zone 3 - Baseline: Absent2141
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Left Lung Zone 3 - Baseline: 1-25%1121
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Left Lung Zone 3 - Baseline: 26-50%1001
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Left Lung Zone 3 - Baseline: 51-75%0000
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Left Lung Zone 3 - Baseline: >75%0000
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Left Lung Zone 3 - Week 52: Absent1110
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Left Lung Zone 3 - Week 52: 1-25%2123
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Left Lung Zone 3 - Week 52: 26-50%1000
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Left Lung Zone 3 - Week 52: 51-75%0000
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Left Lung Zone 3 - Week 52: >75%0000
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Right Lung Zone 1 - Baseline: Absent3132
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Right Lung Zone 1 - Baseline: 1-25%1121
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Right Lung Zone 1 - Baseline: 26-50%0010
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Right Lung Zone 1 - Baseline: 51-75%0000
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Right Lung Zone 1 - Baseline: >75%0000
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Right Lung Zone 1 - Week 52: Absent3230
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Right Lung Zone 1 - Week 52: 1-25%1003
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Right Lung Zone 1 - Week 52: 26-50%0000
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Right Lung Zone 1 - Week 52: 51-75%0000
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Right Lung Zone 1 - Week 52: >75%0000
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Right Lung Zone 2 - Baseline: Absent3241
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Right Lung Zone 2 - Baseline: 1-25%1012
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Right Lung Zone 2 - Baseline: 26-50%0010
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Right Lung Zone 2 - Baseline: 51-75%0000
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Right Lung Zone 2 - Baseline: >75%0000
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Right Lung Zone 2 - Week 52: Absent1121
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Right Lung Zone 2 - Week 52: 1-25%3112
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Right Lung Zone 2 - Week 52: 26-50%0000
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Right Lung Zone 2 - Week 52: 51-75%0000
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Right Lung Zone 2 - Week 52: >75%0000
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Right Lung Zone 3 - Baseline: Absent2130
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Right Lung Zone 3 - Baseline: 1-25%1123
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Right Lung Zone 3 - Baseline: 26-50%1010
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Right Lung Zone 3 - Baseline: 51-75%0000
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Right Lung Zone 3 - Baseline: >75%0000
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Right Lung Zone 3 - Week 52: Absent2120
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Right Lung Zone 3 - Week 52: 1-25%1012
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Right Lung Zone 3 - Week 52: 26-50%1101
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Right Lung Zone 3 - Week 52: 51-75%0000
Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Right Lung Zone 3 - Week 52: >75%0000
SecondaryDB Period: Pharmacokinetics: Plasma Concentration of Belumosudil and Its Metabolite (KD025m2)

Plasma concentration of belumosudil and its metabolite (KD025m2) at pre-dose and 3 hours post-dose at Week 4 and 8 is reported in this outcome measure. The Lower Limit of Quantification (LLOQ) was 10 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL).

Time frame:
Pre-dose and 3 hours post-dose at Week 4 and 8
Reported as:
Mean · ng/mL
DB Period: Pharmacokinetics: Plasma Concentration of Belumosudil and Its Metabolite (KD025m2)
ng/mLDB Period: Belumosudil QDDB Period: Belumosudil BID
Belumosudil: Pre-dose at Week 4162.68 ± 215.574837.75 ± 874.185
Belumosudil: 3 hours Post-dose at Week 41081.56 ± 1093.2591824.60 ± 1216.098
Belumosudil: Pre-dose at Week 890.74 ± 94.665613.67 ± 387.507
Belumosudil: 3 hours Post-dose at Week 81367.60 ± 1148.8201528.33 ± 1026.514
KD025m2: Pre-dose at Week 418.81 ± 24.45171.57 ± 89.009
KD025m2: 3 hours Post-dose at Week 4131.62 ± 235.429166.36 ± 175.126
KD025m2: Pre-dose at Week 85.53 ± 9.46160.47 ± 44.930
KD025m2: 3 hours Post-dose at Week 8189.23 ± 295.346139.78 ± 146.559
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)

Adverse event (AE): any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug and did not necessarily had to have a causal relationship with the treatment. Serious adverse event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, was a medically important event. TEAEs: AEs with onset after the first dose of study drug or existing AEs that worsened during TEAE Period (for DB period: From Day 1 (Week 0) up to Week 28; for OLE period: from Week 29 up to 4 weeks post last study drug administration).

Time frame:
For DB period: From Day 1 (Week 0) up to Week 28; for OLE period: from Week 29 up to 4 weeks post last study drug administration (i.e., up to Week 56)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)
ParticipantsDB Period: Belumosudil QDDB Period: Belumosudil BIDDB Period: PlaceboOLE Period: Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Belumosudil BIDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil BID
TEAEs1111119595
TESAEs2030010
SecondaryDB Period: Change From Baseline in Vital Signs: Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 24

Vital signs (systolic and diastolic blood pressure) were measured with the participants after having rested in sitting position. Vital signs assessments were performed before the electrocardiogram (ECG) and other scheduled assessments. Change from Baseline in systolic and diastolic blood pressure at Week 24 was reported in this outcome measure.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · millimeters of mercury
DB Period: Change From Baseline in Vital Signs: Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 24
millimeters of mercuryDB Period: Belumosudil QDDB Period: Belumosudil BIDDB Period: Placebo
Systolic blood pressure1.9 ± 15.133.9 ± 10.602.2 ± 8.72
Diastolic blood pressure-0.9 ± 10.527.1 ± 8.95-0.5 ± 7.27
SecondaryOLE: Change From Baseline in Vital Signs: Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 52

Change from Baseline in systolic and diastolic blood pressure at Week 52 was reported in this outcome measure. Vital signs (systolic and diastolic blood pressure) were measured with the participants after having rested in sitting position. Vital signs assessments were performed before ECGs and other schedules assessments. Participants who received placebo in DB period and re-randomized into OLE period, OLE period Baseline was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained prior to participant receiving first dose of belumosudil in OLE period. Participants who received belumosudil in DB period and continued belumosudil in OLE period, Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 29 days prior to participant receiving first study medication in DB period.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · millimeters of mercury
OLE: Change From Baseline in Vital Signs: Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 52
millimeters of mercuryOLE Period: Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Belumosudil BIDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil BID
Systolic blood pressure-2.4 ± 16.30-1.2 ± 15.305.0 ± 16.41-9.5 ± 19.61
Diastolic blood pressure-4.3 ± 8.060.6 ± 12.744.9 ± 9.17-6.2 ± 17.43
SecondaryDB Period: Change From Baseline in Vital Signs: Pulse at Week 24

Vital sign (pulse) was measured with the participants after having rested in sitting position. Vital signs assessments were performed before ECGs and other scheduled assessments. Change from Baseline in vital signs: pulse at Week 24 was reported in this outcome measure.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · beats per minute
DB Period: Change From Baseline in Vital Signs: Pulse at Week 24
beats per minuteDB Period: Belumosudil QDDB Period: Belumosudil BIDDB Period: Placebo
DB Period: Change From Baseline in Vital Signs: Pulse at Week 24-3.1 ± 9.49-2.8 ± 13.00-2.0 ± 7.46
SecondaryOLE Period: Change From Baseline in Vital Signs: Pulse at Week 52

Vital sign (pulse) was measured with the participants after having rested in sitting position. Vital signs assessments were performed before ECGs and other scheduled assessments. Change from Baseline in vital signs: pulse at Week 52 was reported in this outcome measure. Participants who received placebo in DB period and re-randomized into OLE period, OLE period Baseline was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained prior to participant receiving first dose of belumosudil in OLE period. Participants who received belumosudil in DB period and continued belumosudil in OLE period, Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 29 days prior to participant receiving first study medication in DB period.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · beats per minute
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in Vital Signs: Pulse at Week 52
beats per minuteOLE Period: Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Belumosudil BIDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil BID
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in Vital Signs: Pulse at Week 52-5.9 ± 6.47-1.6 ± 4.391.3 ± 13.73-12.2 ± 34.37
SecondaryDB Period: Change From Baseline in Vital Signs: Respiratory Rate at Week 24

Vital sign (respiratory rate) was measured with the participants after having rested in sitting position. Vital signs assessments were performed before ECGs and other scheduled assessments. Change from Baseline in vital signs: respiratory rate at Week 24 was reported in this outcome measure.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · breaths per minute
DB Period: Change From Baseline in Vital Signs: Respiratory Rate at Week 24
breaths per minuteDB Period: Belumosudil QDDB Period: Belumosudil BIDDB Period: Placebo
DB Period: Change From Baseline in Vital Signs: Respiratory Rate at Week 241.4 ± 3.410.1 ± 2.130.6 ± 1.86
SecondaryOLE Period: Change From Baseline in Vital Signs: Respiratory Rate at Week 52

Vital sign (respiratory rate) was measured with the participants after having rested in sitting position. Vital signs assessments were performed before ECGs and other scheduled assessments. Change from Baseline in vital signs: respiratory rate at Week 52 was reported in this outcome measure. Participants who received placebo in DB period and re-randomized into OLE period, OLE period Baseline was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained prior to participant receiving first dose of belumosudil in OLE period. Participants who received belumosudil in DB period and continued belumosudil in OLE period, Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 29 days prior to participant receiving first study medication in DB period.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · breaths per minute
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in Vital Signs: Respiratory Rate at Week 52
breaths per minuteOLE Period: Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Belumosudil BIDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil BID
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in Vital Signs: Respiratory Rate at Week 520.0 ± 2.311.4 ± 1.520.3 ± 1.860.0 ± 2.10
SecondaryDB Period: Change From Baseline in 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values: Heart Rate at Week 24

ECGs were recorded after the participant had rested in the supine position for at least 5 minutes and were performed prior to any blood sample collection. Change from Baseline in 12-lead ECG values: heart rate at Week 24 was reported in this outcome measure.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · beats per minute
DB Period: Change From Baseline in 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values: Heart Rate at Week 24
beats per minuteDB Period: Belumosudil QDDB Period: Belumosudil BIDDB Period: Placebo
DB Period: Change From Baseline in 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values: Heart Rate at Week 24-3.6 ± 8.71-2.1 ± 3.57-5.5 ± 10.52
SecondaryOLE Period: Change From Baseline in 12-lead Electrocardiogram Values: Heart Rate at Week 52

ECGs were recorded after the participant had rested in the supine position for at least 5 minutes and were performed prior to any blood sample collection. Change from Baseline in 12-lead ECG values: heart rate at Week 52 was reported in this outcome measure. Participants who received placebo in DB period and re-randomized into OLE period, OLE period Baseline was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained prior to participant receiving first dose of belumosudil in OLE period. Participants who received belumosudil in DB period and continued belumosudil in OLE period, Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 29 days prior to participant receiving first study medication in DB period.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · beats per minute
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in 12-lead Electrocardiogram Values: Heart Rate at Week 52
beats per minuteOLE Period: Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Belumosudil BIDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil BID
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in 12-lead Electrocardiogram Values: Heart Rate at Week 52-3.6 ± 10.831.0 ± 6.52-0.7 ± 10.88-13.8 ± 24.13
SecondaryDB Period: Change From Baseline in 12-lead Electrocardiogram Values: PR Interval, RR Interval, QRS Interval, QT Interval and QTcF Interval at Week 24

ECGs were recorded after the participant had rested in the supine position for at least 5 minutes and were performed prior to any blood sample collection. Change from Baseline in 12-lead ECG values: PR interval, RR interval, QRS interval, QT interval and QTcF interval at Week 24 was reported in this outcome measure.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · millisecond
DB Period: Change From Baseline in 12-lead Electrocardiogram Values: PR Interval, RR Interval, QRS Interval, QT Interval and QTcF Interval at Week 24
millisecondDB Period: Belumosudil QDDB Period: Belumosudil BIDDB Period: Placebo
PR Interval2.4 ± 10.961.6 ± 9.74-1.4 ± 7.58
RR Interval46.1 ± 114.8718.0 ± 39.7147.2 ± 110.91
QRS Interval0.8 ± 6.550.6 ± 3.89-0.5 ± 8.71
QT Interval8.9 ± 16.877.5 ± 14.8412.4 ± 23.64
QTcF Interval2.433 ± 12.0395.008 ± 12.5604.766 ± 14.177
SecondaryOLE Period: Change From Baseline in 12-lead Electrocardiogram Values: PR Interval, RR Interval, QRS Interval, QT Interval and QTcF Interval at Week 52

ECGs were recorded after the participant had rested in the supine position for at least 5 minutes and were performed prior to any blood sample collection. Change from Baseline in 12-lead ECG values: PR interval, RR interval, QRS interval, QT interval and QTcF interval at Week 52 was reported in this outcome measure. Participants who received placebo in DB period and re-randomized into OLE period, OLE period Baseline was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained prior to participant receiving first dose of belumosudil in OLE period. Participants who received belumosudil in DB period and continued belumosudil in OLE period, Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 29 days prior to participant receiving first study medication in DB period.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · millisecond
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in 12-lead Electrocardiogram Values: PR Interval, RR Interval, QRS Interval, QT Interval and QTcF Interval at Week 52
millisecondOLE Period: Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Belumosudil BIDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil BID
PR Interval6.2 ± 8.921.6 ± 9.636.5 ± 11.667.5 ± 10.99
RR Interval40.3 ± 120.90-25.2 ± 93.7318.5 ± 153.16145.2 ± 251.04
QRS Interval-0.2 ± 8.514.2 ± 6.830.5 ± 6.25-1.2 ± 4.31
QT Interval6.3 ± 16.76-0.4 ± 14.772.2 ± 22.3327.5 ± 53.48
QTcF Interval0.056 ± 12.7913.080 ± 14.8500.108 ± 13.3103.873 ± 17.489
SecondaryDB Period: Change From Baseline in Hematological Parameters: Percentage of Basophils/Leukocytes, Eosinophils/Leukocytes, Lymphocytes/Leukocytes, Monocytes/Leukocytes and Neutrophils/Leukocytes at Week 24

Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to assess hematological parameters. Change from Baseline in hematological parameters: percentage of basophils/leukocytes, eosinophils/leukocytes, lymphocytes/leukocytes, monocytes/leukocytes and neutrophils/leukocytes at Week 24 was reported in this outcome measure.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of white blood cells
DB Period: Change From Baseline in Hematological Parameters: Percentage of Basophils/Leukocytes, Eosinophils/Leukocytes, Lymphocytes/Leukocytes, Monocytes/Leukocytes and Neutrophils/Leukocytes at Week 24
percentage of white blood cellsDB Period: Belumosudil QDDB Period: Belumosudil BIDDB Period: Placebo
Basophils/Leukocytes0.00 ± 0.3400.26 ± 0.5750.04 ± 0.273
Eosinophils/Leukocytes0.02 ± 0.745-0.07 ± 1.2030.50 ± 1.001
Lymphocytes/Leukocytes-0.61 ± 3.6183.29 ± 4.4181.89 ± 7.214
Monocytes/Leukocytes-0.61 ± 1.024-0.41 ± 2.1530.22 ± 1.455
Neutrophils/Leukocytes1.24 ± 4.255-1.04 ± 8.411-2.60 ± 8.110
SecondaryOLE Period: Change From Baseline in Hematological Parameters: Percentage of Basophils/Leukocytes, Eosinophils/Leukocytes, Lymphocytes/Leukocytes, Monocytes/Leukocytes and Neutrophils/Leukocytes at Week 52

Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to assess hematological parameters. Change from Baseline in hematological parameters: percentage of basophils/leukocytes, eosinophils/leukocytes, lymphocytes/leukocytes, monocytes/leukocytes and neutrophils/leukocytes at Week 52 was reported in this outcome measure. Participants who received placebo in DB period and re-randomized into OLE period, OLE period Baseline was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained prior to participant receiving first dose of belumosudil in OLE period. Participants who received belumosudil in DB period and continued belumosudil in OLE period, Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 29 days prior to participant receiving first study medication in DB period.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of white blood cells
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in Hematological Parameters: Percentage of Basophils/Leukocytes, Eosinophils/Leukocytes, Lymphocytes/Leukocytes, Monocytes/Leukocytes and Neutrophils/Leukocytes at Week 52
percentage of white blood cellsOLE Period: Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Belumosudil BIDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil BID
Basophils/Leukocytes0.29 ± 0.341-0.06 ± 0.3360.79 ± 0.9340.00 ± 0.303
Eosinophils/Leukocytes-0.05 ± 0.7210.32 ± 0.6940.36 ± 3.2330.65 ± 0.737
Lymphocytes/Leukocytes-1.18 ± 4.996-0.02 ± 6.8235.80 ± 6.8171.87 ± 6.490
Monocytes/Leukocytes-0.22 ± 1.211-0.20 ± 0.7970.46 ± 1.577-0.75 ± 2.449
Neutrophils/Leukocytes1.18 ± 5.4010.02 ± 5.513-4.77 ± 7.592-1.75 ± 7.900
SecondaryDB Period: Change From Baseline in Hematological Parameter: Hematocrit at Week 24

Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to assess hematological parameters. Change from Baseline in hematological parameter (hematocrit, fraction of 1.0) at Week 24 was reported in this outcome measure. The hematocrit is percentage of the volume of whole blood that is made up of red blood cells.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of red blood cells in blood
DB Period: Change From Baseline in Hematological Parameter: Hematocrit at Week 24
percentage of red blood cells in bloodDB Period: Belumosudil QDDB Period: Belumosudil BIDDB Period: Placebo
DB Period: Change From Baseline in Hematological Parameter: Hematocrit at Week 240.002 ± 0.0270.003 ± 0.0400.012 ± 0.067
SecondaryOLE Period: Change From Baseline in Hematological Parameter: Hematocrit at Week 52

Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to assess hematological parameters. Change from Baseline in hematological parameter (hematocrit, fraction of 1.0) at Week 52 was reported in this outcome measure. The hematocrit is percentage of the volume of whole blood that is made up of red blood cells. Participants who received placebo in DB period and re-randomized into OLE period, OLE period Baseline was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained prior to participant receiving first dose of belumosudil in OLE period. Participants who received belumosudil in DB period and continued belumosudil in OLE period, Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 29 days prior to participant receiving first study medication in DB period.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of red blood cells in blood
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in Hematological Parameter: Hematocrit at Week 52
percentage of red blood cells in bloodOLE Period: Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Belumosudil BIDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil BID
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in Hematological Parameter: Hematocrit at Week 52-0.004 ± 0.033-0.024 ± 0.042-0.003 ± 0.023-0.032 ± 0.026
SecondaryDB Period: Change From Baseline in Hematological Parameter: Hemoglobin at Week 24

Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to assess hematological parameters. Change from Baseline in hematological parameter: hemoglobin at Week 24 was reported in this outcome measure.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · grams per liter
DB Period: Change From Baseline in Hematological Parameter: Hemoglobin at Week 24
grams per literDB Period: Belumosudil QDDB Period: Belumosudil BIDDB Period: Placebo
DB Period: Change From Baseline in Hematological Parameter: Hemoglobin at Week 241.2 ± 7.39-3.6 ± 14.772.6 ± 19.96
SecondaryOLE Period: Change From Baseline in Hematological Parameter: Hemoglobin at Week 52

Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to assess hematological parameters. Change from Baseline in hematological parameter: hemoglobin at Week 52 was reported in this outcome measure. Participants who received placebo in DB period and re-randomized into OLE period, OLE period Baseline was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained prior to participant receiving first dose of belumosudil in OLE period. Participants who received belumosudil in DB period and continued belumosudil in OLE period, Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 29 days prior to participant receiving first study medication in DB period.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · grams per liter
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in Hematological Parameter: Hemoglobin at Week 52
grams per literOLE Period: Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Belumosudil BIDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil BID
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in Hematological Parameter: Hemoglobin at Week 52-2.4 ± 8.45-2.8 ± 12.010.4 ± 6.70-8.0 ± 10.49
SecondaryDB Period: Change From Baseline in Hematological Parameter: Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Volume at Week 24

Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to assess hematological parameters. Change from Baseline in hematological parameter: erythrocytes mean corpuscular volume at Week 24 was reported in this outcome measure.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · femtoliters
DB Period: Change From Baseline in Hematological Parameter: Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Volume at Week 24
femtolitersDB Period: Belumosudil QDDB Period: Belumosudil BIDDB Period: Placebo
DB Period: Change From Baseline in Hematological Parameter: Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Volume at Week 24-0.7 ± 2.002.2 ± 3.150.5 ± 2.70
SecondaryOLE Period: Change From Baseline in Hematological Parameter: Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Volume at Week 52

Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to assess hematological parameters. Change from Baseline in hematological parameter: erythrocytes mean corpuscular volume at Week 52 was reported in this outcome measure. Participants who received placebo in DB period and re-randomized into OLE period, OLE period Baseline was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained prior to participant receiving first dose of belumosudil in OLE period. Participants who received belumosudil in DB period and continued belumosudil in OLE period, Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 29 days prior to participant receiving first study medication in DB period.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · femtoliters
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in Hematological Parameter: Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Volume at Week 52
femtolitersOLE Period: Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Belumosudil BIDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil BID
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in Hematological Parameter: Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Volume at Week 52-0.2 ± 2.20-0.6 ± 1.340.7 ± 2.56-3.3 ± 4.03
SecondaryDB Period: Change From Baseline in Hematological Parameter: Platelets at Week 24

Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to assess hematological parameters. Change from Baseline in hematological parameter: platelets at Week 24 was reported in this outcome measure.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · 10^9 cells per liter
DB Period: Change From Baseline in Hematological Parameter: Platelets at Week 24
10^9 cells per literDB Period: Belumosudil QDDB Period: Belumosudil BIDDB Period: Placebo
DB Period: Change From Baseline in Hematological Parameter: Platelets at Week 24-2.8 ± 69.88-29.3 ± 56.97-28.1 ± 64.79
SecondaryOLE Period: Change From Baseline in Hematological Parameter: Platelets at Week 52

Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to assess hematological parameters. Change from Baseline in hematological parameter: platelets at Week 52 was reported in this outcome measure. Participants who received placebo in DB period and re-randomized into OLE period, OLE period Baseline was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained prior to participant receiving first dose of belumosudil in OLE period. Participants who received belumosudil in DB period and continued belumosudil in OLE period, Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 29 days prior to participant receiving first study medication in DB period.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · 10^9 cells per liter
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in Hematological Parameter: Platelets at Week 52
10^9 cells per literOLE Period: Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Belumosudil BIDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil BID
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in Hematological Parameter: Platelets at Week 52-5.9 ± 59.12-25.6 ± 65.23-31.3 ± 62.3860.7 ± 95.98
SecondaryDB Period: Change From Baseline in Hematological Parameter: Erythrocytes at Week 24

Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to assess hematological parameters. Change from Baseline in hematological parameter: erythrocytes at Week 24 was reported in this outcome measure.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · 10^12 cells per liter
DB Period: Change From Baseline in Hematological Parameter: Erythrocytes at Week 24
10^12 cells per literDB Period: Belumosudil QDDB Period: Belumosudil BIDDB Period: Placebo
DB Period: Change From Baseline in Hematological Parameter: Erythrocytes at Week 240.05 ± 0.331-0.07 ± 0.4800.12 ± 0.666
SecondaryOLE Period: Change From Baseline in Hematological Parameter: Erythrocytes at Week 52

Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to assess hematological parameters. Change from Baseline in hematological parameter: erythrocytes at Week 52 was reported in this outcome measure. Participants who received placebo in DB period and re-randomized into OLE period, OLE period Baseline was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained prior to participant receiving first dose of belumosudil in OLE period. Participants who received belumosudil in DB period and continued belumosudil in OLE period, Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 29 days prior to participant receiving first study medication in DB period.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · 10^12 cells per liter
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in Hematological Parameter: Erythrocytes at Week 52
10^12 cells per literOLE Period: Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Belumosudil BIDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil BID
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in Hematological Parameter: Erythrocytes at Week 52-0.06 ± 0.337-0.18 ± 0.409-0.09 ± 0.227-0.17 ± 0.163
SecondaryDB Period: Change From Baseline in Hematological Parameter: Leukocytes at Week 24

Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to assess hematological parameters. Change from Baseline in hematological parameter: leukocytes at Week 24 was reported in this outcome measure.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · 10^9 cells per liter
DB Period: Change From Baseline in Hematological Parameter: Leukocytes at Week 24
10^9 cells per literDB Period: Belumosudil QDDB Period: Belumosudil BIDDB Period: Placebo
DB Period: Change From Baseline in Hematological Parameter: Leukocytes at Week 24-0.579 ± 1.030-0.673 ± 2.427-0.124 ± 1.310
SecondaryOLE Period: Change From Baseline in Hematological Parameter: Leukocytes at Week 52

Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to assess hematological parameters. Change from Baseline in hematological parameter: leukocytes at Week 52 was reported in this outcome measure. Participants who received placebo in DB period and re-randomized into OLE period, OLE period Baseline was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained prior to participant receiving first dose of belumosudil in OLE period. Participants who received belumosudil in DB period and continued belumosudil in OLE period, Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 29 days prior to participant receiving first study medication in DB period.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · 10^9 cells per liter
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in Hematological Parameter: Leukocytes at Week 52
10^9 cells per literOLE Period: Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Belumosudil BIDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil BID
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in Hematological Parameter: Leukocytes at Week 52-0.255 ± 1.519-0.386 ± 0.198-2.281 ± 4.379-1.015 ± 1.382
SecondaryDB Period: Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: Albumin, Globulin and Protein at Week 24

Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to assess clinical chemistry parameters. Change from Baseline in clinical chemistry parameter: albumin, globulin and protein at Week 24 was reported in this outcome measure.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · grams per liter
DB Period: Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: Albumin, Globulin and Protein at Week 24
grams per literDB Period: Belumosudil QDDB Period: Belumosudil BIDDB Period: Placebo
Albumin-0.3 ± 1.830.1 ± 2.42-0.9 ± 2.39
Globulin-1.5 ± 1.430.0 ± 2.71-2.7 ± 10.20
Protein-1.8 ± 3.050.1 ± 3.75-3.6 ± 9.07
SecondaryOLE Period: Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: Albumin, Globulin and Protein at Week 52

Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to assess clinical chemistry parameters. Change from Baseline in clinical chemistry parameter: albumin, globulin and protein at Week 52 was reported in this outcome measure. Participants who received placebo in DB period and re-randomized into OLE period, OLE period Baseline was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained prior to participant receiving first dose of belumosudil in OLE period. Participants who received belumosudil in DB period and continued belumosudil in OLE period, Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 29 days prior to participant receiving first study medication in DB period.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · grams per liter
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: Albumin, Globulin and Protein at Week 52
grams per literOLE Period: Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Belumosudil BIDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil BID
Albumin-1.3 ± 3.20-1.0 ± 2.650.0 ± 3.06-0.8 ± 2.14
Globulin-3.4 ± 2.83-0.8 ± 1.920.0 ± 2.830.5 ± 5.68
Protein-4.8 ± 4.68-1.8 ± 2.490.0 ± 4.90-0.3 ± 4.50
SecondaryDB Period: Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: Alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Aminotransferase, Aspartate Aminotransferase, Creatine Kinase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase, and Lactate Dehydrogenase at Week 24

Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to assess clinical chemistry parameters. Change from Baseline in clinical chemistry parameter: alkaline phosphatase, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, creatine kinase, gamma-glutamyl transferase, and lactate dehydrogenase at Week 24 was reported in this outcome measure.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · units per liter
DB Period: Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: Alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Aminotransferase, Aspartate Aminotransferase, Creatine Kinase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase, and Lactate Dehydrogenase at Week 24
units per literDB Period: Belumosudil QDDB Period: Belumosudil BIDDB Period: Placebo
Alkaline Phosphatase-1.7 ± 14.461.3 ± 7.764.1 ± 9.31
Alanine Aminotransferase1.9 ± 7.87-6.9 ± 16.840.4 ± 13.51
Aspartate Aminotransferase0.6 ± 5.17-6.9 ± 18.180.1 ± 7.48
Creatine Kinase16.9 ± 124.46-15.6 ± 83.11-1.7 ± 29.99
Gamma Glutamyl Transferase0.1 ± 7.67-0.8 ± 8.721.1 ± 6.99
Lactate Dehydrogenase6.9 ± 33.88-19.0 ± 28.336.7 ± 14.52
SecondaryOLE Period: Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: Alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Aminotransferase, Aspartate Aminotransferase, Creatine Kinase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase, and Lactate Dehydrogenase at Week 52

Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to assess clinical chemistry parameters. Change from Baseline in clinical chemistry parameter: alkaline phosphatase, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, creatine kinase, gamma-glutamyl transferase, and lactate dehydrogenase at Week 52 was reported in this outcome measure. Participants who received placebo in DB period and re-randomized into OLE period, OLE period Baseline was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained prior to participant receiving first dose of belumosudil in OLE period. Participants who received belumosudil in DB period and continued belumosudil in OLE period, Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 29 days prior to participant receiving first study medication in DB period.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · units per liter
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: Alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Aminotransferase, Aspartate Aminotransferase, Creatine Kinase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase, and Lactate Dehydrogenase at Week 52
units per literOLE Period: Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Belumosudil BIDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil BID
Alkaline Phosphatase0.9 ± 18.00-4.2 ± 9.232.3 ± 12.577.5 ± 17.06
Alanine Aminotransferase5.0 ± 11.932.2 ± 2.17-5.0 ± 18.411.2 ± 5.04
Aspartate Aminotransferase3.2 ± 9.830.4 ± 2.30-3.9 ± 22.41-3.5 ± 3.51
Creatine Kinase10.0 ± 79.2426.6 ± 42.3416.7 ± 92.29-16.2 ± 20.01
Gamma Glutamyl Transferase0.7 ± 5.61-0.8 ± 1.30-6.1 ± 14.09-1.2 ± 9.97
Lactate Dehydrogenase4.3 ± 51.53-8.8 ± 20.66-13.5 ± 37.95-39.8 ± 73.03
SecondaryDB Period: Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: Bicarbonate, Blood Urea Nitrogen, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Phosphate and Sodium at Week 24

Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to assess clinical chemistry parameters. Change from Baseline in clinical chemistry parameter: bicarbonate, blood urea nitrogen, calcium, chloride, glucose, potassium, magnesium, phosphate and sodium at Week 24 was reported in this outcome measure.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · millimoles per liter
DB Period: Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: Bicarbonate, Blood Urea Nitrogen, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Phosphate and Sodium at Week 24
millimoles per literDB Period: Belumosudil QDDB Period: Belumosudil BIDDB Period: Placebo
Bicarbonate-1.83 ± 2.0580.42 ± 0.9350.48 ± 1.946
Blood Urea Nitrogen-0.011 ± 0.163-0.086 ± 0.2240.005 ± 0.163
Calcium-0.022 ± 0.1020.005 ± 0.068-0.033 ± 0.059
Chloride-0.4 ± 2.32-0.3 ± 1.641.2 ± 1.40
Glucose-0.304 ± 1.260-0.767 ± 1.236-0.219 ± 1.016
Potassium-0.11 ± 0.5550.04 ± 0.388-0.04 ± 0.229
Magnesium-0.005 ± 0.071-0.011 ± 0.0550.000 ± 0.053
Phosphate-0.113 ± 0.1670.076 ± 0.093-0.085 ± 0.127
Sodium-1.4 ± 2.010.7 ± 1.570.5 ± 1.44
SecondaryOLE Period: Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: Bicarbonate, Blood Urea Nitrogen, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Phosphate and Sodium at Week 52

Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to assess clinical chemistry parameters. Change from Baseline in clinical chemistry parameter: bicarbonate, blood urea nitrogen, calcium, chloride, glucose, potassium, magnesium, phosphate and sodium at Week 52 was reported in this outcome measure. Participants who received placebo in DB period and re-randomized into OLE period, OLE period Baseline was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained prior to participant receiving first dose of belumosudil in OLE period. Participants who received belumosudil in DB period and continued belumosudil in OLE period, Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 29 days prior to participant receiving first study medication in DB period.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · millimoles per liter
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: Bicarbonate, Blood Urea Nitrogen, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Magnesium, Phosphate and Sodium at Week 52
millimoles per literOLE Period: Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Belumosudil BIDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil BID
Bicarbonate-1.60 ± 1.5721.90 ± 1.4140.63 ± 3.2560.53 ± 1.998
Blood Urea Nitrogen-0.008 ± 0.1270.094 ± 0.206-0.026 ± 0.130-0.030 ± 0.139
Calcium-0.074 ± 0.082-0.010 ± 0.065-0.006 ± 0.128-0.027 ± 0.080
Chloride0.4 ± 1.81-1.4 ± 2.071.4 ± 2.88-0.7 ± 1.03
Glucose-0.147 ± 1.0800.612 ± 1.063-0.319 ± 0.7000.092 ± 1.330
Potassium-0.18 ± 0.4410.00 ± 0.4690.01 ± 0.518-0.23 ± 0.273
Magnesium-0.028 ± 0.079-0.058 ± 0.025-0.013 ± 0.045-0.007 ± 0.030
Phosphate-0.108 ± 0.1370.016 ± 0.1160.124 ± 0.1260.037 ± 0.086
Sodium-1.1 ± 2.620.2 ± 0.451.3 ± 2.56-1.3 ± 1.03
SecondaryDB Period: Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: Direct Bilirubin, Bilirubin, Creatinine and Urate at Week 24

Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to assess clinical chemistry parameters. Change from Baseline in clinical chemistry parameter: direct bilirubin, bilirubin, creatinine and urate at Week 24 was reported in this outcome measure.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · micromole per liter
DB Period: Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: Direct Bilirubin, Bilirubin, Creatinine and Urate at Week 24
micromole per literDB Period: Belumosudil QDDB Period: Belumosudil BIDDB Period: Placebo
Direct Bilirubin0.171 ± 0.541-0.214 ± 0.996-0.233 ± 0.553
Bilirubin1.026 ± 2.3081.368 ± 2.251-0.466 ± 2.767
Creatinine3.536 ± 7.4552.652 ± 14.466-3.215 ± 9.078
Urate-4.760 ± 44.860-6.545 ± 31.1644.868 ± 43.383
SecondaryOLE Period: Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: Direct Bilirubin, Bilirubin, Creatinine and Urate at Week 52

Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to assess clinical chemistry parameters. Change from Baseline in clinical chemistry parameter: direct bilirubin, bilirubin, creatinine and urate at Week 52 was reported in this outcome measure. Participants who received placebo in DB period and re-randomized into OLE period, OLE period Baseline was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained prior to participant receiving first dose of belumosudil in OLE period. Participants who received belumosudil in DB period and continued belumosudil in OLE period, Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 29 days prior to participant receiving first study medication in DB period.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · micromole per liter
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: Direct Bilirubin, Bilirubin, Creatinine and Urate at Week 52
micromole per literOLE Period: Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Belumosudil BIDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil BID
Direct Bilirubin0.285 ± 0.605-0.171 ± 0.382-0.489 ± 0.969-0.428 ± 1.047
Bilirubin0.950 ± 2.280-1.026 ± 0.9370.489 ± 2.1440.285 ± 2.517
Creatinine8.840 ± 9.8838.840 ± 6.2512.526 ± 9.8360.000 ± 5.591
Urate2.644 ± 41.7682.380 ± 14.9346.800 ± 45.109-15.867 ± 47.102
SecondaryDB Period: Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: Calcium Corrected at Week 24

Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to assess clinical chemistry parameters. Change from Baseline in clinical chemistry parameter: calcium corrected at Week 24 was reported in this outcome measure.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · milligrams per deciliter
DB Period: Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: Calcium Corrected at Week 24
milligrams per deciliterDB Period: Belumosudil QDDB Period: Belumosudil BIDDB Period: Placebo
DB Period: Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: Calcium Corrected at Week 24-0.06 ± 0.3030.00 ± 0.249-0.05 ± 0.211
SecondaryOLE Period: Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: Calcium Corrected at Week 52

Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to assess clinical chemistry parameters. Change from Baseline in clinical chemistry parameter: calcium corrected at Week 52 was reported in this outcome measure. Participants who received placebo in DB period and re-randomized into OLE period, OLE period Baseline was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained prior to participant receiving first dose of belumosudil in OLE period. Participants who received belumosudil in DB period and continued belumosudil in OLE period, Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 29 days prior to participant receiving first study medication in DB period.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · milligrams per deciliter
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: Calcium Corrected at Week 52
milligrams per deciliterOLE Period: Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Belumosudil BIDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil BID
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: Calcium Corrected at Week 52-0.18 ± 0.2220.08 ± 0.192-0.03 ± 0.454-0.05 ± 0.373
SecondaryDB Period: Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: Glomerular Filtration Rate at Week 24

Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to assess clinical chemistry parameters. Change from Baseline in clinical chemistry parameter: glomerular filtration rate at Week 24 was reported in this outcome measure. Expanded unit of measure is milliliter per minute per 1.73 square meters.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · mL/min/1.73 m^2
DB Period: Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: Glomerular Filtration Rate at Week 24
mL/min/1.73 m^2DB Period: Belumosudil QDDB Period: Belumosudil BIDDB Period: Placebo
DB Period: Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: Glomerular Filtration Rate at Week 24-4.76 ± 11.414-6.88 ± 11.7493.36 ± 10.229
SecondaryOLE Period: Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: Glomerular Filtration Rate at Week 52

Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to assess clinical chemistry parameters. Change from Baseline in clinical chemistry parameter: glomerular filtration rate at Week 52 was reported in this outcome measure. Participants who received placebo in DB period and re-randomized into OLE period, OLE period Baseline was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained prior to participant receiving first dose of belumosudil in OLE period. Participants who received belumosudil in DB period and continued belumosudil in OLE period, Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 29 days prior to participant receiving first study medication in DB period.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · mL/min/1.73 m^2
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: Glomerular Filtration Rate at Week 52
mL/min/1.73 m^2OLE Period: Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Belumosudil BIDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil BID
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: Glomerular Filtration Rate at Week 52-26.60-16.40-0.40-9.70 ± 13.152

Adverse events

Collected over For DB period: From Day 1 (Week 0) up to Week 28; for OLE period: from Week 29 up to 4 weeks post last study drug administration (i.e., up to Week 56). Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
DB Period: Belumosudil QD0/11 (0%)2/11 (18.2%)10/11 (90.9%)
DB Period: Belumosudil BID0/12 (0%)0/12 (0%)11/12 (91.7%)
DB Period: Placebo0/12 (0%)3/12 (25%)11/12 (91.7%)
OLE Period: Belumosudil QD0/10 (0%)0/10 (0%)9/10 (90%)
OLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil QD0/5 (0%)0/5 (0%)5/5 (100%)
OLE Period: Belumosudil BID0/10 (0%)1/10 (10%)9/10 (90%)
OLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil BID0/6 (0%)0/6 (0%)5/6 (83.3%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventDB Period: Belumosudil QDDB Period: Belumosudil BIDDB Period: PlaceboOLE Period: Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Belumosudil BIDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil BID
Cardiac Failure CongestiveCardiac disorders0/110/120/120/100/51/100/6
Pneumonia AspirationRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/110/120/120/100/51/100/6
Covid-19Infections and infestations1/110/120/120/100/50/100/6
Flank PainMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/110/120/120/100/50/100/6
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders0/110/121/120/100/50/100/6
Atrial FlutterCardiac disorders0/110/121/120/100/50/100/6
Scleroderma Renal CrisisRenal and urinary disorders0/110/121/120/100/50/100/6
Pulmonary OedemaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/110/121/120/100/50/100/6
Deep Vein ThrombosisVascular disorders0/110/121/120/100/50/100/6
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 140
Most frequent other events
EventDB Period: Belumosudil QDDB Period: Belumosudil BIDDB Period: PlaceboOLE Period: Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil QDOLE Period: Belumosudil BIDOLE Period: Placebo/Belumosudil BID
HeadacheNervous system disorders2/110/127/121/101/50/100/6
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders4/110/125/120/102/50/101/6
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders4/111/122/121/102/51/101/6
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/110/121/120/100/50/102/6
PruritusSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders3/110/123/121/100/50/100/6
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders0/110/123/120/100/50/100/6
Raynaud's PhenomenonVascular disorders0/110/123/120/100/50/100/6
ThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders0/110/121/120/101/50/100/6
ArrhythmiaCardiac disorders0/110/120/120/101/50/100/6
VertigoEar and labyrinth disorders0/110/120/120/101/50/100/6

Baseline characteristics

Analysis was performed on modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population which included all participants who received at least one dose of the study drug.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)DB Period: Belumosudil QDDB Period: Belumosudil BIDDB Period: PlaceboTotal
Mean52.7 ± 11.9949.7 ± 15.8046.3 ± 10.6449.5 ± 12.91
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)DB Period: Belumosudil QDDB Period: Belumosudil BIDDB Period: PlaceboTotal
Female791026
Male4329
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)DB Period: Belumosudil QDDB Period: Belumosudil BIDDB Period: PlaceboTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native0000
Asian2002
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0000
Black or African American1304
White881127
More than one race0000
Unknown or Not Reported0112
Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS)
Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS)(score on a scale)DB Period: Belumosudil QDDB Period: Belumosudil BIDDB Period: PlaceboTotal
Mean26.5 ± 6.4725.2 ± 5.2923.1 ± 4.8524.9 ± 5.57
Percent predicted forced vital capacity (FVC)
Percent predicted forced vital capacity (FVC)(percent predicted FVC)DB Period: Belumosudil QDDB Period: Belumosudil BIDDB Period: PlaceboTotal
Mean98.6 ± 15.9184.0 ± 15.9086.2 ± 17.7589.3 ± 17.32
Physician Global Assessment of Participant's Overall Health Using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score
Physician Global Assessment of Participant's Overall Health Using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score(score on a scale)DB Period: Belumosudil QDDB Period: Belumosudil BIDDB Period: PlaceboTotal
Mean43.1 ± 17.8958.2 ± 12.5943.0 ± 18.0648.2 ± 17.43
Patient Global Assessment of Participant's Overall Health Using VAS Score
Patient Global Assessment of Participant's Overall Health Using VAS Score(score on a scale)DB Period: Belumosudil QDDB Period: Belumosudil BIDDB Period: PlaceboTotal
Mean56.5 ± 22.4758.6 ± 16.9259.6 ± 16.7258.3 ± 18.26
Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (SHAQ-DI) Total Score
Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (SHAQ-DI) Total Score(score on a scale)DB Period: Belumosudil QDDB Period: Belumosudil BIDDB Period: PlaceboTotal
Mean1.489 ± 0.7191.396 ± 0.6261.302 ± 0.7121.393 ± 0.670
08

Study locations

26 sites
  • Viable Research Management_Site number 131
    Phoenix, Arizona 85004, United States
  • Mayo Clinic - Scottsdale_Site number 150
    Scottsdale, Arizona 85259, United States
  • University of California, SD_Site number 008
    La Jolla, California 92037, United States
  • Pacific Arthrirtis Care Center_Site number 136
    Los Angeles, California 90045, United States
  • University of California - Los Angeles_Site number 104
    Los Angeles, California 90095, United States
  • Stanford University Medical Center_Site number 143
    Palo Alto, California 94304, United States
  • University of Connecticut_Site number 147
    Farmington, Connecticut 06030, United States
  • Yale University School of Medicine_Site number 140
    New Haven, Connecticut 06520, United States
  • Georgetown University_Site number 035
    Washington, District of Columbia 20007, United States
  • St. Francis Medical_Site number 085
    Clearwater, Florida 33765, United States
  • Omega Research Consultants_Site number 133
    DeBary, Florida 32713, United States
  • Northwestern Medicine_Site number 124
    Chicago, Illinois 60611, United States
  • DelRicht Research_Site number 159
    New Orleans, Louisiana 70115, United States
  • Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine_Site number 134
    Baltimore, Maryland 21224, United States
  • Massachusetts General Hospital_Site number 002
    Boston, Massachusetts 02114, United States
  • Boston University_Site number 137
    Boston, Massachusetts 02118, United States
  • University of Minnesota_Site number 051
    Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States
  • Mayo Clinic_Site number 146
    Rochester, Minnesota 55905, United States
  • Hospital For Special Surgery_Site number 138
    New York, New York 10021, United States
  • Columbia University Medical Center_Site number 086
    New York, New York 10032, United States
  • Thomas Jefferson University Hospital_Site number 096
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107, United States
  • University of Pittsburgh Medical Center_Site number 149
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States
  • Medical University of South Carolina_Site number 054
    Charleston, South Carolina 29425, United States
  • Virginia Mason Medical Center_Site number 145
    Seattle, Washington 98101, United States
  • Premier Clinical Research_Site number 130
    Spokane, Washington 99202, United States
  • Froedtert Hospital and the Medical College of Wisconsin_Site number 012
    Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53226, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Qualified researchers may request access to patient level data and related study documents including the clinical study report, study protocol with any amendments, blank case report form, statistical analysis plan, and dataset specifications. Patient level data will be anonymized and study documents will be redacted to protect the privacy of trial participants. Further details on Sanofi's data sharing criteria, eligible studies, and process for requesting access can be found at: https://vivli.org

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jun 2019 to primary completion in Aug 2022, 37 months.

Results were first posted in Aug 2023, 1 year after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 21, 2018
First posted
Apr 18, 2019
StartActual
Jun 26, 2019
Primary completionActual
Aug 9, 2022
CompletionActual
Feb 17, 2023
Results first posted
Aug 30, 2023
Last update
Aug 30, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 30, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03919799
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 18, 2019
Start date
Jun 26, 2019
Primary completion
Aug 9, 2022
Completion
Feb 17, 2023
Results posted
Aug 30, 2023
Last update
Aug 30, 2023

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Aug 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Belumosudil

Start the discussion