CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03917472KINGFISHERUpdated Aug 12, 2022Results posted

Efficacy and Safety of Brolucizumab vs Aflibercept in Patients With Visual Impairment Due to Diabetic Macular Edema

A Phase 3 interventional study of Brolucizumab and Aflibercept in Diabetic Macular Edema, sponsored by Novartis Pharmaceuticals. Completed at 92 sites in 5 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-08-12.

Sponsored by Novartis Pharmaceuticals · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
517
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of brolucizumab vs. aflibercept in the treatment of patients with visual impairment due to diabetic macular edema (DME).

Read the detailed description

This study was designed as a Phase III, multi-center, randomized, double-masked, active controlled, parallel group prospective study to evaluate if brolucizumab 6 mg dosed q4w is safe and effective in the treatment of subjects with visual impairment due to diabetic macular edema (DME). Subjects who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to one of two treatment arms i.e., brolucizumab 6 mg and aflibercept 2 mg. Only one eye was selected as study eye and treated with study medication.

The study included a screening period of up to 2 weeks to assess eligibility, followed by a double-masked treatment period (Day 1 to Week 48). For all subjects, the last study assessment was performed at the Week 52/end of study (EOS) visit. All subjects had study visits q4w through Week 52. The primary analysis was performed at the EOS visit (Week 52).

To ensure masking was maintained, the investigational site had both masked and unmasked staff to perform the masked and unmasked study assessments/procedures accordingly.

02

Conditions studied

  • Diabetic Macular Edema

Keywords

  • Diabetic Macular Edema
  • intravitreal injection
  • brolucizumab
  • aflibercept
  • double-masked
  • Diabetic Macular edema (DME)
  • macular edema
  • diabetic retinopathy
03

In context

Vision Disorders

308 studies on the registry are indexed under Vision Disorders; 81 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 517 is above the median of 66 across 211 interventional studies indexed under Vision Disorders.

Browse Vision Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

Novartis Pharmaceuticals is the lead sponsor of 2,673 studies on the registry; 228 are open to participants now.

Of its 576 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 431 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Signed informed consent must be obtained prior to participation in the study.
  • Patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) and Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) ≤ 12% at screening.
  • Study eye: Visual impairment due to DME with:

    • Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) score between 73 and 23 letters, inclusive, using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity testing charts at an initial testing distance of 4 meters
    • DME involving the center of the macula, with Central Subfield Thickness (CSFT) ≥ 320 µm on Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • High-risk proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) in the study eye
  • Concomitant conditions or ocular disorders in the study eye which confound interpretation of study results, compromise visual acuity or require medical or surgical intervention
  • Any active intraocular or periocular infection or active intraocular inflammation in the either eye
  • Uncontrolled glaucoma in the study eye
  • Presence of amblyopia, amaurosis or ocular disorders in the fellow eye with BCVA \<20/200
  • Use of anti-VEGF therapies, intraocular surgery or laser photocoagulation (macular or panretinal) in the study eye during the 3-month period prior to baseline
  • Use of intraocular or periocular corticosteroids in the study eye during the 6-month period prior to baseline, and use of fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal (IVT) implant (Iluvien) at any time prior to baseline
  • Prior investigational drugs in either eye, vitreoretinal surgery in the study eye at any time prior to baseline
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
517 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Brolucizumab 6mg q4w

    Brolucizumab 6 mg/0.05 mL every 4 weeks.

    Drug: Brolucizumab

  • Active comparator
    Aflibercept 2mg q4w

    Aflibercept 2mg/0.05 mL every 4 weeks

    Drug: Aflibercept

Interventions

  • DrugBrolucizumab

    Intravitreal injection

    Also known as: RTH258, ESBA1008

  • DrugAflibercept

    Intravitreal injection

    Also known as: Eylea

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Week 52

    BCVA will be assessed using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity testing charts. Visual function of the study eye was assessed using the ETDRS protocol. Participants with a BCVA ETDRS letter score of 73 to 23 (per the inclusion criteria) (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/40 to 20/320) in the study eye were included. Min and max possible scores are 0-100 respectively. A higher score represents better functioning. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used for the imputation of missing values.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness (CSFT) at Each Post-baseline Visit

    Central Subfield Thickness assessed by Spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) from the central reading center.

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4,8,12,16,20,24,28,32,36,40,44,48 and 52

  2. Number and Percentage of Participants With Fluid-free Macula in the Study Eye at Each Post-baseline Visit

    Subretinal Fluid (SRF) and Intraretinal Fluid (IRF) status in the central subfield: proportion of subjects with simultaneous absence of SRF and IRF in the study eye by visit. Events and censoring after 52 weeks are included in week 52 row.

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4,8,12,16,20,24,28,32,36,40,44,48 and 52

  3. Number and Percentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema (DME) (CSFT < 280 μm) at Each Post-baseline Visit for the Study Eye

    Central Subfield Thickness Assessed by Spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) from the central reading center.

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4,8,12,16,20,24,28,32,36,40,44,48 and 52

  4. Time to First Fluid-free Macula - Time-to-first Absence of Subretinal Fluid (SRF) and Intraretinal Fluid (IRF) in the Study Eye - Number of Subjects With Absence of SRF / IRF and Number of Subjects Censored by Visit

    Central Subfield Thickness Assessed by Spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) from the central reading center. Fluid status assessments after start of alternative DME treatment in the study eye are censored. Time to first fluid-free macula analysis is based on the subset of subjects with fluid present at baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment. Time (week) was calculated by (study day / 7). Events and censoring after 52 weeks were included in week 52 row.

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4,8,12,16,20,24,28,32,36,40,44,48 and 52

  5. Time to First Fluid-free Macula - Time-to-first Absence of Subretinal Fluid (SRF) and Intraretinal Fluid (IRF) in the Study Eye - Kaplan-Meier Analysis - Probability of Absence of SRF/IRF by Visit

    Central Subfield Thickness Assessed by Spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) from the central reading center. Fluid status assessments after start of alternative DME treatment in the study eye are censored. Time to first fluid-free macula analysis is based on the subset of subjects with fluid present at baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment. Time (week) was calculated by (study day / 7). Events and censoring after 52 weeks were included in week 52 row.

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4,8,12,16,20,24,28,32,36,40,44,48 and 52

  6. Time to First Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema (DME) (CSFT < 280 μm) in the Study Eye at Each Post-baseline Visit - Number of Subjects With Probability of Absence of DME and Number Censored by Visit

    Central Subfield Thickness Assessed by Spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) from the central reading center. CSFT assessments after start of alternative DME treatment in the study eye are censored. Time to first absence of DME based on subjects with valid baseline and at least one post-baseline CSFT assessment. Time (week) was calculated by (study day / 7). Events and censoring after 52 weeks were included in week 52 row.

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4,8,12,16,20,24,28,32,36,40,44,48 and 52

  7. Time to First Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema (DME) (CSFT < 280 μm) in the Study Eye at Each Post-baseline Visit - Kaplan-Meier Analysis - Probability of Absence of DME by Visit

    Central Subfield Thickness Assessed by Spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) from the central reading center. CSFT assessments after start of alternative DME treatment in the study eye are censored. Time to first absence of DME based on subjects with valid baseline and at least one post-baseline CSFT assessment. Time (week) was calculated by (study day / 7). Events and censoring after 52 weeks were included in week 52 row.

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4,8,12,16,20,24,28,32,36,40,44,48 and 52

  8. Best Corrected Visual Acuity (Letters Read): Change From Baseline in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Each Post-baseline Visit for the Study Eye

    BCVA will be assessed using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity testing charts. Visual function of the study eye was assessed using the ETDRS protocol. Participants with a BCVA ETDRS letter score of 73 to 23 (per the inclusion criteria) (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/40 to 20/320) in the study eye were included. Min and max possible scores are 0-100 respectively. A higher score represents better functioning.

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4,8,12,16,20,24,28,32,36,40,44,48 and 52

  9. Gain in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) (Letters Read): Number (%) of Subjects Who Gained ≥ 5, 10, or 15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Reached BCVA ≥ 84 Letters in the Study Eye at Week 52

    BCVA will be assessed using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity testing charts. Visual function of the study eye was assessed using the ETDRS protocol. Participants with a BCVA ETDRS letter score of 73 to 23 (per the inclusion criteria) (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/40 to 20/320) in the study eye were included. Min and max possible scores are 0-100 respectively. A higher score represents better functioning.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

  10. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS): Proportion of Subjects With >=2-step Improvement From Baseline in the DRSS Score at Each Assessment Visit for the Study Eye

    The Diabetic Retinopathy Disease Severity Scale measures the 5 levels of diabetic retinopathy - none, mild, moderate, severe, and proliferative. Severity of Diabetic retinopathy was evaluated using the ETDRS DRSS score assessed by the Central Reading Center based on color fundus photography images in the study eye. When the ETDRS-DR severities were evaluable, they were categorized on the original scale with scores varying from 10 (DR absent) to 85 (very advanced PDR). All DRSS values were then converted into a 12-level scale, allowing the derivation of the ≥2-step and ≥3-step change from baseline for each post-baseline assessment". A lower score represents better functioning. Subjects who had full/partial panretinal photocoagulation or local photocoagulation for new vessel (DRSS score 60) at any visit were excluded. DRSS scores after start of alternative DME treatment in the study eye are censored and replaced by the last value prior to start of this alternative treatment.

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24 and 52

  11. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS): Proportion of Subjects With >=3-step Improvement From Baseline in the DRSS Score at Each Assessment Visit for the Study Eye

    The Diabetic Retinopathy Disease Severity Scale measures the 5 levels of diabetic retinopathy - none, mild, moderate, severe, and proliferative. Severity of Diabetic retinopathy was evaluated using the ETDRS DRSS score assessed by the Central Reading Center based on color fundus photography images in the study eye. When the ETDRS-DR severities were evaluable, they were categorized on the original scale with scores varying from 10 (DR absent) to 85 (very advanced PDR). All DRSS values were then converted into a 12-level scale, allowing the derivation of the ≥2-step and ≥3-step change from baseline for each post-baseline assessment". A lower score represents better functioning. Subjects who had full/partial panretinal photocoagulation or local photocoagulation for new vessel (DRSS score 60) at any visit were excluded. DRSS scores after start of alternative DME treatment in the study eye are censored and replaced by the last value prior to start of this alternative treatment.

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24 and 52

  12. Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA): Frequency Distribution of Pre-existing ADA Status in the Brolucizumab Arm

    Time frame: Baseline

  13. Ocular AEs (Greater Than or Equal to 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred Term in the Study Eye

    Time frame: Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 30 days post treatment, up to a maximum duration of approximately 52 weeks.

  14. Number of Subjects With Non-ocular AEs (Greater Than or Equal to 2% in Any Treatment Arm)

    Time frame: Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 30 days post treatment, up to a maximum duration of approximately 52 weeks.

07

Results

Posted Apr 21, 2022

Participant flow

Study centers (no. of sites): Hungary (5), Israel (5), Slovakia (7), United States (78). Approximately, 495 subjects were planned to be randomized. Overall, 517 subjects were randomized either to brolucizumab 6 mg q4w arm (n=346) or aflibercept 2 mg q4w arm (n=171).

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneBrolucizumab 6mg q4wAflibercept 2mg q4w
Started346171
Completed311156
Not completed3515
Withdrew: Physician decision40
Withdrew: Adverse event31
Withdrew: Death75
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject114
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up105

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange From Baseline in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Week 52

BCVA will be assessed using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity testing charts. Visual function of the study eye was assessed using the ETDRS protocol. Participants with a BCVA ETDRS letter score of 73 to 23 (per the inclusion criteria) (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/40 to 20/320) in the study eye were included. Min and max possible scores are 0-100 respectively. A higher score represents better functioning. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used for the imputation of missing values.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 52
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Week 52
Scores on a scaleBrolucizumab 6mg q4wAflibercept 2mg q4w
Change From Baseline in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Week 5212.2 (11.2 to 13.2)11.0 (9.6 to 12.4)
Statistical analysis
  • Brolucizumab 6mg q4w vs Aflibercept 2mg q4w · ANOVA · p = 0.099 · Ls mean difference: 1.1 · 95% CI -0.6 to 2.9
  • Brolucizumab 6mg q4w vs Aflibercept 2mg q4w · ANOVA · p = <0.001
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness (CSFT) at Each Post-baseline Visit

Central Subfield Thickness assessed by Spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) from the central reading center.

Time frame:
Baseline, Weeks 4,8,12,16,20,24,28,32,36,40,44,48 and 52
Reported as:
Least squares mean · μm
Change From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness (CSFT) at Each Post-baseline Visit
μmBrolucizumab 6mg q4wAflibercept 2mg q4w
Week 4-146.9 (-157.9 to -136.0)-119.5 (-135.1 to -103.9)
Week 8-174.4 (-185.3 to -163.4)-144.1 (-159.7 to -128.5)
Week 12-191.3 (-201.8 to -180.8)-156.7 (-171.7 to -141.8)
Week 16-200.5 (-211.0 to -189.9)-162.4 (-177.4 to -147.4)
Week 20-209.5 (-219.6 to -199.4)-168.7 (-183.1 to -154.2)
Week 24-217.5 (-227.3 to -207.6)-178.8 (-192.8 to -164.7)
Week 28-222.4 (-232.5 to -212.4)-183.6 (-197.8 to -169.3)
Week 32-227.2 (-237.2 to -217.1)-185.9 (-200.2 to -171.6)
Week 36-229.7 (-240.1 to -219.3)-186.7 (-201.5 to -172.0)
Week 40-233.6 (-243.7 to -223.6)-188.4 (-202.6 to -174.1)
Week 44-237.5 (-247.4 to -227.5)-188.1 (-202.3 to -173.9)
Week 48-237.7 (-247.7 to -227.6)-192.0 (-206.4 to -177.7)
Week 52-237.8 (-247.9 to -227.7)-196.5 (-210.8 to -182.1)
Statistical analysis
  • Brolucizumab 6mg q4w vs Aflibercept 2mg q4w · ANOVA · p = <0.001 · Ls mean difference: -41.4 · 95% CI -58.9 to -23.8
SecondaryNumber and Percentage of Participants With Fluid-free Macula in the Study Eye at Each Post-baseline Visit

Subretinal Fluid (SRF) and Intraretinal Fluid (IRF) status in the central subfield: proportion of subjects with simultaneous absence of SRF and IRF in the study eye by visit. Events and censoring after 52 weeks are included in week 52 row.

Time frame:
Baseline, Weeks 4,8,12,16,20,24,28,32,36,40,44,48 and 52
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number and Percentage of Participants With Fluid-free Macula in the Study Eye at Each Post-baseline Visit
ParticipantsBrolucizumab 6mg q4wAflibercept 2mg q4w
Week 4234
Week 8314
Week 123810
Week 164811
Week 20549
Week 248419
Week 286513
Week 327617
Week 369121
Week 409623
Week 449620
week 489223
Week 5214438
Statistical analysis
  • Brolucizumab 6mg q4w vs Aflibercept 2mg q4w · Clopper-Pearson exact method. · p = <0.001 · Difference - %: 20.0 · 95% CI 12.5 to 28.6
SecondaryNumber and Percentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema (DME) (CSFT < 280 μm) at Each Post-baseline Visit for the Study Eye

Central Subfield Thickness Assessed by Spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) from the central reading center.

Time frame:
Baseline, Weeks 4,8,12,16,20,24,28,32,36,40,44,48 and 52
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number and Percentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema (DME) (CSFT < 280 μm) at Each Post-baseline Visit for the Study Eye
ParticipantsBrolucizumab 6mg q4wAflibercept 2mg q4w
Week 4619
Week 89324
Week 1212433
Week 1614742
Week 2016747
Week 2417752
Week 2818657
Week 3219562
Week 3620663
Week 4021165
Week 4421669
Week 4822268
Week 5222971
SecondaryTime to First Fluid-free Macula - Time-to-first Absence of Subretinal Fluid (SRF) and Intraretinal Fluid (IRF) in the Study Eye - Number of Subjects With Absence of SRF / IRF and Number of Subjects Censored by Visit

Central Subfield Thickness Assessed by Spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) from the central reading center. Fluid status assessments after start of alternative DME treatment in the study eye are censored. Time to first fluid-free macula analysis is based on the subset of subjects with fluid present at baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment. Time (week) was calculated by (study day / 7). Events and censoring after 52 weeks were included in week 52 row.

Time frame:
Baseline, Weeks 4,8,12,16,20,24,28,32,36,40,44,48 and 52
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Time to First Fluid-free Macula - Time-to-first Absence of Subretinal Fluid (SRF) and Intraretinal Fluid (IRF) in the Study Eye - Number of Subjects With Absence of SRF / IRF and Number of Subjects Censored by Visit
ParticipantsBrolucizumab 6mg q4wAflibercept 2mg q4w
Number of subjects with absence of SRF / IRF at Week 0 (n=344,170)00
Number of subjects with absence of SRF / IRF at Week 4 (n=344,170)61
Number of subjects with absence of SRF / IRF at Week 8 (n=335,168)183
Number of subjects with absence of SRF / IRF at Week 12 (n=314, 165)132
Number of subjects with absence of SRF / IRF at Week 16 (n=297, 161)174
Number of subjects with absence of SRF / IRF at Week 20 (n=277, 156)86
Number of subjects with absence of SRF / IRF at Week 24 (n=265,150)162
Number of subjects with absence of SRF / IRF at Week 28 (n=246,146)187
Number of subjects with absence of SRF / IRF at Week 32 (n=224,139)31
Number of subjects with absence of SRF / IRF at Week 36 (n=220,138)82
Number of subjects with absence of SRF / IRF at Week 40 (n=211, 134)164
Number of subjects with absence of SRF / IRF at Week 44 (194, 129)112
Number of subjects with absence of SRF / IRF at Week 48 (n=181, 125)30
Number of subjects with absence of SRF / IRF at Week 52 (n=177, 122)3012
Number of subjects censored at Week 0 (n=344, 170)00
Number of subjects censored at Week 4 (n-344, 170)31
Number of subjects censored at Week 8 (n=335,168)30
Number of subjects censored at Week 12 (n=314, 165)42
Number of subjects censored at Week 16 (n=297, 161)31
Number of subjects censored at Week 20 (n=277, 156)40
Number of subjects censored at Week 24 (n=265, 150)32
Number of subjects censored at Week 28 (n=246, 146)40
Number of subjects censored at Week 32 (n=224,139)10
Number of subjects censored at Week 36 (220, 138)12
Number of subjects censored at Week 40 (n=211,134)11
Number of subjects censored at Week 44 (n=194,129)22
Number of subjects censored at Week 48 (n=181, 125)13
Number of subjects censored at Week 52 (n=177, 122)147110
SecondaryTime to First Fluid-free Macula - Time-to-first Absence of Subretinal Fluid (SRF) and Intraretinal Fluid (IRF) in the Study Eye - Kaplan-Meier Analysis - Probability of Absence of SRF/IRF by Visit

Central Subfield Thickness Assessed by Spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) from the central reading center. Fluid status assessments after start of alternative DME treatment in the study eye are censored. Time to first fluid-free macula analysis is based on the subset of subjects with fluid present at baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment. Time (week) was calculated by (study day / 7). Events and censoring after 52 weeks were included in week 52 row.

Time frame:
Baseline, Weeks 4,8,12,16,20,24,28,32,36,40,44,48 and 52
Reported as:
Number · Probability of absence of SRF/IRF
Time to First Fluid-free Macula - Time-to-first Absence of Subretinal Fluid (SRF) and Intraretinal Fluid (IRF) in the Study Eye - Kaplan-Meier Analysis - Probability of Absence of SRF/IRF by Visit
Probability of absence of SRF/IRFBrolucizumab 6mg q4wAflibercept 2mg q4w
Probability of absence of SRF/IRF at Week 0 (n=344,170)0.000 (NA to NA)0.000 (NA to NA)
Probability of absence of SRF/IRF at Week 4 (n=344,170)0.018 (0.007 to 0.036)0.006 (0.001 to 0.030)
Probability of absence of SRF/IRF at Week 8 (n=335,168)0.071 (0.047 to 0.101)0.024 (0.008 to 0.056)
Probability of absence of SRF/IRF at Week 12 (n=314, 165)0.109 (0.079 to 0.145)0.036 (0.015 to 0.072)
Probability of absence of SRF/IRF at Week 16 (n=297, 161)0.161 (0.124 to 0.202)0.060 (0.030 to 0.103)
Probability of absence of SRF/IRF at Week 20 (n=277, 156)0.185 (0.145 to 0.228)0.096 (0.057 to 0.146)
Probability of absence of SRF/IRF at Week 24 (n=265,150)0.234 (0.190 to 0.281)0.108 (0.067 to 0.161)
Probability of absence of SRF/IRF at Week 28 (n=246,146)0.291 (0.243 to 0.341)0.151 (0.101 to 0.210)
Probability of absence of SRF/IRF at Week 32 (n=224,139)0.300 (0.252 to 0.351)0.157 (0.106 to 0.217)
Probability of absence of SRF/IRF at Week 36 (n=220,138)0.326 (0.275 to 0.377)0.169 (0.116 to 0.230)
Probability of absence of SRF/IRF at Week 40 (n=211, 134)0.377 (0.324 to 0.430)0.194 (0.137 to 0.258)
Probability of absence of SRF/IRF at Week 44 (194, 129)0.412 (0.358 to 0.466)0.206 (0.148 to 0.271)
Probability of absence of SRF/IRF at Week 48 (n=181, 125)0.422 (0.368 to 0.476)0.206 (0.148 to 0.271)
Probability of absence of SRF/IRF at Week 52 (n=177, 122)0.653 (0.540 to 0.745)0.328 (0.234 to 0.426)
SecondaryTime to First Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema (DME) (CSFT < 280 μm) in the Study Eye at Each Post-baseline Visit - Number of Subjects With Probability of Absence of DME and Number Censored by Visit

Central Subfield Thickness Assessed by Spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) from the central reading center. CSFT assessments after start of alternative DME treatment in the study eye are censored. Time to first absence of DME based on subjects with valid baseline and at least one post-baseline CSFT assessment. Time (week) was calculated by (study day / 7). Events and censoring after 52 weeks were included in week 52 row.

Time frame:
Baseline, Weeks 4,8,12,16,20,24,28,32,36,40,44,48 and 52
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Time to First Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema (DME) (CSFT < 280 μm) in the Study Eye at Each Post-baseline Visit - Number of Subjects With Probability of Absence of DME and Number Censored by Visit
ParticipantsBrolucizumab 6mg q4wAflibercept 2mg q4w
Number of subjects with Probability of absence of DME at Week 0 (n=346,171)00
Number of subjects with Probability of absence of DME at Week 4 (n=346,171)141
Number of subjects with Probability of absence of DME at Week 8 (n=329,169)5412
Number of subjects with Probability of absence of DME at Week 12 (n=272, 157)3213
Number of subjects with Probability of absence of DME at Week 16 (n=239, 142)3311
Number of subjects with Probability of absence of DME at Week 20 (n=204, 130)2610
Number of subjects with Probability of absence of DME at Week 24 (n=174,120)124
Number of subjects with Probability of absence of DME at Week 28 (n=161,115)137
Number of subjects with Probability of absence of DME at Week 32 (n=146,107)95
Number of subjects with Probability of absence of DME at Week 36 (n=135,102)102
Number of subjects with Probability of absence of DME at Week 40 (n=125, 98)71
Number of subjects with Probability of absence of DME at Week 44 (117, 96)112
Number of subjects with Probability of absence of DME at Week 48 (n=106, 92)63
Number of subjects with Probability of absence of DME at Week 52 (n=99, 88)134
Number censored at Week 0 (n=346,171)00
Number censored at Week 4 (n=346,171)31
Number censored at Week 8 (n=329,169)30
Number censored at Week 12 (n=272, 157)12
Number censored at Week 16 (n=239, 142)21
Number censored at Week 20 (n=204, 130)40
Number censored at Week 24 (n=174,120)11
Number censored at Week 28 (n=161,115)21
Number censored at Week 32 (n=146,107)20
Number censored at Week 36 (n=135,102)02
Number censored at Week 40 (n=125, 98)11
Number censored at Week 44 (117, 96)02
Number censored at Week 48 (n=106, 92)11
Number censored at Week 52 (n=99, 88)8684
SecondaryTime to First Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema (DME) (CSFT < 280 μm) in the Study Eye at Each Post-baseline Visit - Kaplan-Meier Analysis - Probability of Absence of DME by Visit

Central Subfield Thickness Assessed by Spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) from the central reading center. CSFT assessments after start of alternative DME treatment in the study eye are censored. Time to first absence of DME based on subjects with valid baseline and at least one post-baseline CSFT assessment. Time (week) was calculated by (study day / 7). Events and censoring after 52 weeks were included in week 52 row.

Time frame:
Baseline, Weeks 4,8,12,16,20,24,28,32,36,40,44,48 and 52
Reported as:
Number · Probability of absence of DME
Time to First Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema (DME) (CSFT < 280 μm) in the Study Eye at Each Post-baseline Visit - Kaplan-Meier Analysis - Probability of Absence of DME by Visit
Probability of absence of DMEBrolucizumab 6mg q4wAflibercept 2mg q4w
Probability of absence of DME at Week 0 (n=346,171)0.000 (NA to NA)0.000 (NA to NA)
Probability of absence of DME at Week 4 (n=346,171)0.041 (0.023 to 0.066)0.006 (0.001 to 0.030)
Probability of absence of DME at Week 8 (n=329,169)0.199 (0.158 to 0.243)0.076 (0.043 to 0.123)
Probability of absence of DME at Week 12 (n=272, 157)0.293 (0.246 to 0.342)0.153 (0.104 to 0.212)
Probability of absence of DME at Week 16 (n=239, 142)0.391 (0.339 to 0.443)0.219 (0.160 to 0.284)
Probability of absence of DME at Week 20 (n=204, 130)0.470 (0.416 to 0.522)0.279 (0.213 to 0.348)
Probability of absence of DME at Week 24 (n=174,120)0.506 (0.452 to 0.559)0.303 (0.235 to 0.374)
Probability of absence of DME at Week 28 (n=161,115)0.547 (0.491 to 0.598)0.346 (0.274 to 0.418)
Probability of absence of DME at Week 32 (n=146,107)0.575 (0.520 to 0.626)0.376 (0.303 to 0.450)
Probability of absence of DMEE at Week 36 (n=135,102)0.606 (0.551 to 0.657)0.389 (0.314 to 0.462)
Probability of absence of DME at Week 40 (n=125, 98)0.628 (0.574 to 0.678)0.395 (0.320 to 0.468)
Probability of absence of DME at Week 44 (117, 96)0.663 (0.609 to 0.712)0.408 (0.332 to 0.482)
Probability of absence of DME at Week 48 (n=106, 92)0.682 (0.629 to 0.730)0.427 (0.351 to 0.501)
Probability of absence of DME at Week 52 (n=99, 88)0.866 (0.302 to 0.983)0.516 (0.357 to 0.654)
SecondaryBest Corrected Visual Acuity (Letters Read): Change From Baseline in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Each Post-baseline Visit for the Study Eye

BCVA will be assessed using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity testing charts. Visual function of the study eye was assessed using the ETDRS protocol. Participants with a BCVA ETDRS letter score of 73 to 23 (per the inclusion criteria) (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/40 to 20/320) in the study eye were included. Min and max possible scores are 0-100 respectively. A higher score represents better functioning.

Time frame:
Baseline, Weeks 4,8,12,16,20,24,28,32,36,40,44,48 and 52
Reported as:
Least squares mean · scores on a scale
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (Letters Read): Change From Baseline in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Each Post-baseline Visit for the Study Eye
scores on a scaleBrolucizumab 6mg q4wAflibercept 2mg q4w
Week 45.7 (5.1 to 6.4)5.4 (4.5 to 6.4)
Week 87.7 (6.9 to 8.5)7.4 (6.4 to 8.5)
Week 129.1 (8.3 to 9.9)8.0 (6.9 to 9.1)
Week 169.6 (8.8 to 10.4)8.5 (7.3 to 9.7)
Week 2010.2 (9.3 to 11.1)9.2 (7.9 to 10.5)
Week 2410.7 (9.8 to 11.6)9.6 (8.3 to 10.9)
Week 2810.9 (10.0 to 11.8)10.7 (9.3 to 12.0)
Week 3211.5 (10.6 to 12.5)10.5 (9.2 to 11.9)
Week 3611.6 (10.6 to 12.6)10.8 (9.4 to 12.2)
Week 4011.7 (10.7 to 12.6)10.7 (9.4 to 12.1)
Week 4412.0 (11.0 to 13.0)10.6 (9.2 to 12.0)
Week 4812.2 (11.2 to 13.2)10.7 (9.3 to 12.1)
Week 5212.2 (11.2 to 13.2)11.0 (9.6 to 12.4)
SecondaryGain in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) (Letters Read): Number (%) of Subjects Who Gained ≥ 5, 10, or 15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Reached BCVA ≥ 84 Letters in the Study Eye at Week 52

BCVA will be assessed using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity testing charts. Visual function of the study eye was assessed using the ETDRS protocol. Participants with a BCVA ETDRS letter score of 73 to 23 (per the inclusion criteria) (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/40 to 20/320) in the study eye were included. Min and max possible scores are 0-100 respectively. A higher score represents better functioning.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 52
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Gain in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) (Letters Read): Number (%) of Subjects Who Gained ≥ 5, 10, or 15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Reached BCVA ≥ 84 Letters in the Study Eye at Week 52
ParticipantsBrolucizumab 6mg q4wAflibercept 2mg q4w
≥ 5 letters gain from baseline or BCVA ≥ 84 letters at Week 52286 (78.2 to 86.5)127 (67.0 to 80.6)
≥ 10 letters gain from baseline or BCVA ≥ 84 letters at Week 52211 (55.6 to 66.2)95 (47.8 to 63.1)
≥ 15 letters gain from baseline or BCVA ≥ 84 letters at Week 52151 (38.3 to 49.0)69 (32.9 to 48.1)
Statistical analysis
  • Brolucizumab 6mg q4w vs Aflibercept 2mg q4w · Clopper-Pearson exact method · Difference - %: 9.3 · 95% CI 1.7 to 17.0
  • Brolucizumab 6mg q4w vs Aflibercept 2mg q4w · Clopper-Pearson exact method · Difference - %: 7.7 · 95% CI -1.5 to 17.0
  • Brolucizumab 6mg q4w vs Aflibercept 2mg q4w · Clopper-Pearson exact method · Difference - %: 5.5 · 95% CI -2.7 to 14.3
SecondaryEarly Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS): Proportion of Subjects With >=2-step Improvement From Baseline in the DRSS Score at Each Assessment Visit for the Study Eye

The Diabetic Retinopathy Disease Severity Scale measures the 5 levels of diabetic retinopathy - none, mild, moderate, severe, and proliferative. Severity of Diabetic retinopathy was evaluated using the ETDRS DRSS score assessed by the Central Reading Center based on color fundus photography images in the study eye. When the ETDRS-DR severities were evaluable, they were categorized on the original scale with scores varying from 10 (DR absent) to 85 (very advanced PDR). All DRSS values were then converted into a 12-level scale, allowing the derivation of the ≥2-step and ≥3-step change from baseline for each post-baseline assessment". A lower score represents better functioning. Subjects who had full/partial panretinal photocoagulation or local photocoagulation for new vessel (DRSS score 60) at any visit were excluded. DRSS scores after start of alternative DME treatment in the study eye are censored and replaced by the last value prior to start of this alternative treatment.

Time frame:
Baseline, Weeks 12, 24 and 52
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS): Proportion of Subjects With >=2-step Improvement From Baseline in the DRSS Score at Each Assessment Visit for the Study Eye
ParticipantsBrolucizumab 6mg q4wAflibercept 2mg q4w
Week 125621
Week 248238
Week 529545
Statistical analysis
  • Brolucizumab 6mg q4w vs Aflibercept 2mg q4w · Clopper-Pearson exact method · Difference - %: 8.3 · 95% CI 0.2 to 16.5
  • Brolucizumab 6mg q4w vs Aflibercept 2mg q4w · Clopper-Pearson exact method · Difference - %: 6.0 · 95% CI -3.0 to 14.9
  • Brolucizumab 6mg q4w vs Aflibercept 2mg q4w · Clopper-Pearson exact method · p = 0.002 ((10% margin) (1-sided)) · Difference - %: 6.0 · 95% CI -3.9 to 16.1
SecondaryEarly Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS): Proportion of Subjects With >=3-step Improvement From Baseline in the DRSS Score at Each Assessment Visit for the Study Eye

The Diabetic Retinopathy Disease Severity Scale measures the 5 levels of diabetic retinopathy - none, mild, moderate, severe, and proliferative. Severity of Diabetic retinopathy was evaluated using the ETDRS DRSS score assessed by the Central Reading Center based on color fundus photography images in the study eye. When the ETDRS-DR severities were evaluable, they were categorized on the original scale with scores varying from 10 (DR absent) to 85 (very advanced PDR). All DRSS values were then converted into a 12-level scale, allowing the derivation of the ≥2-step and ≥3-step change from baseline for each post-baseline assessment". A lower score represents better functioning. Subjects who had full/partial panretinal photocoagulation or local photocoagulation for new vessel (DRSS score 60) at any visit were excluded. DRSS scores after start of alternative DME treatment in the study eye are censored and replaced by the last value prior to start of this alternative treatment.

Time frame:
Baseline, Weeks 12, 24 and 52
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS): Proportion of Subjects With >=3-step Improvement From Baseline in the DRSS Score at Each Assessment Visit for the Study Eye
ParticipantsBrolucizumab 6mg q4wAflibercept 2mg q4w
Week 12188
Week 243316
Week 524018
Statistical analysis
  • Brolucizumab 6mg q4w vs Aflibercept 2mg q4w · Clopper-Pearson exact method · Difference - %: 2.0 · 95% CI -2.5 to 6.6
  • Brolucizumab 6mg q4w vs Aflibercept 2mg q4w · Clopper-Pearson exact method · Difference - %: 2.4 · 95% CI -3.0 to 7.7
  • Brolucizumab 6mg q4w vs Aflibercept 2mg q4w · Clopper-Pearson exact method · Difference - %: 3.9 · 95% CI -2.0 to 9.8
SecondaryAnti-Drug Antibody (ADA): Frequency Distribution of Pre-existing ADA Status in the Brolucizumab Arm
Time frame:
Baseline
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA): Frequency Distribution of Pre-existing ADA Status in the Brolucizumab Arm
ParticipantsBrolucizumab 6mg q4w
Negative112
Positive230
SecondaryOcular AEs (Greater Than or Equal to 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred Term in the Study Eye
Time frame:
Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 30 days post treatment, up to a maximum duration of approximately 52 weeks.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Ocular AEs (Greater Than or Equal to 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred Term in the Study Eye
ParticipantsBrolucizumab 6mg q4wAflibercept 2mg q4w
Number of subjects with at least one AE10559
Vitreous detachment107
Cataract96
Conjunctival haemorrhage97
Punctate keratitis92
Uveitis81
Vitreous floaters85
Dry eye74
Eye pain65
Corneal abrasion05
Diabetic retinal oedema04
SecondaryNumber of Subjects With Non-ocular AEs (Greater Than or Equal to 2% in Any Treatment Arm)
Time frame:
Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 30 days post treatment, up to a maximum duration of approximately 52 weeks.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Subjects With Non-ocular AEs (Greater Than or Equal to 2% in Any Treatment Arm)
ParticipantsBrolucizumab 6mg q4wAflibercept 2mg q4w
Number of Subjects With Non-ocular AEs (Greater Than or Equal to 2% in Any Treatment Arm)20996

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 30 days post treatment, up to a maximum duration of approximately 52 weeks.. Non-serious events are listed at a 2% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Brolucizumab 6mg7/346 (2%)74/346 (21.4%)144/346 (41.6%)
Aflibercept 2mg5/171 (2.9%)36/171 (21.1%)92/171 (53.8%)
Overall12/517 (2.3%)110/517 (21.3%)236/517 (45.6%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 114
Most frequent serious events
EventBrolucizumab 6mgAflibercept 2mgOverall
Cerebrovascular accidentNervous system disorders6/3466/17112/517
COVID-19Infections and infestations8/3461/1719/517
Diabetic foot infectionInfections and infestations1/3462/1713/517
OsteomyelitisInfections and infestations3/3462/1715/517
PneumoniaInfections and infestations3/3462/1715/517
HypertensionVascular disorders1/3462/1713/517
Cardiac failure congestiveCardiac disorders4/3460/1714/517
COVID-19 pneumoniaInfections and infestations4/3460/1714/517
Acute kidney injuryRenal and urinary disorders4/3461/1715/517
Cardiac failureCardiac disorders3/3461/1714/517
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 36
Most frequent other events
EventBrolucizumab 6mgAflibercept 2mgOverall
HypertensionVascular disorders18/34613/17131/517
COVID-19Infections and infestations11/34611/17122/517
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders3/3469/17112/517
Conjunctival haemorrhage - Study eyeEye disorders9/3467/17116/517
Diabetic retinal oedema - Fellow eyeEye disorders10/3467/17117/517
Vitreous detachment - Study eyeEye disorders10/3467/17117/517
Blood creatinine increasedInvestigations4/3467/17111/517
HeadacheNervous system disorders3/3467/17110/517
Cataract - Study eyeEye disorders9/3466/17115/517
Dry eye - Fellow eyeEye disorders6/3466/17112/517

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Brolucizumab 6mg q4wAflibercept 2mg q4wTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years208115323
>=65 years13856194
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Brolucizumab 6mg q4wAflibercept 2mg q4wTotal
Mean60.9 ± 10.5960.2 ± 9.3160.7 ± 10.18
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Brolucizumab 6mg q4wAflibercept 2mg q4wTotal
Female15266218
Male194105299
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Brolucizumab 6mg q4wAflibercept 2mg q4wTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native011
Asian14721
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander101
Black or African American401555
White288145433
More than one race202
Unknown or Not Reported134
08

Study locations

92 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Phoenix, Arizona 85016, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Phoenix, Arizona 85053, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Tucson, Arizona 85704-5614, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Beverly Hills, California 90211, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Campbell, California 95008, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Fresno, California 93720, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Huntington Beach, California 92647, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Loma Linda, California 92354, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Mountain View, California 94040, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Oakland, California 94609, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Pasadena, California 91107, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Poway, California 92064, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Rancho Cordova, California 95670, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Redlands, California 92374, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Riverside, California 92505, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Sacramento, California 95817, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Sacramento, California 95841, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    San Francisco, California 94107, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Santa Ana, California 92705, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Santa Barbara, California 93103, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Torrance, California 90509-2910, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Ventura, California 93003, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Altamonte Springs, Florida 32701, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Deerfield Beach, Florida 33064, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Fort Myers, Florida 33912-7125, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Orlando, Florida 32804, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Pinellas Park, Florida 33782, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Saint Petersburg, Florida 33711, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Tampa, Florida 33609, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Atlanta, Georgia 30342, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Marietta, Georgia 30060, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    'Aiea, Hawaii 96701, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Bloomington, Illinois 61704, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Oak Forest, Illinois 60452, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Springfield, Illinois 62704, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Indianapolis, Indiana 46280, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    New Albany, Indiana 47150, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    West Des Moines, Iowa 50266, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Leawood, Kansas 66211, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Lenexa, Kansas 66215, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Hagerstown, Maryland 21740, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Boston, Massachusetts 02114, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Royal Oak, Michigan 48073, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Minneapolis, Minnesota 55435, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Kansas City, Missouri 64133, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Reno, Nevada 89502, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Bloomfield, New Jersey 07003, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Teaneck, New Jersey 07666, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Rochester, New York 14620, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Hickory, North Carolina 28602, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Southern Pines, North Carolina 28387, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Cleveland, Ohio 44122, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Columbus, Ohio 43210, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Dublin, Ohio 43016, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Eugene, Oregon 97401, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Kingston, Pennsylvania 95403, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Chattanooga, Tennessee 37421, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Germantown, Tennessee 38138, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Abilene, Texas 79606, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Austin, Texas 78705, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Austin, Texas 78731, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Austin, Texas 78750, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Bellaire, Texas 77401, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Dallas, Texas 75231, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Fort Worth, Texas 76104, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Harlingen, Texas 78550, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Houston, Texas 77025, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    San Antonio, Texas 78240, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Southlake, Texas 76092, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Norfolk, Virginia 23502, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Morgantown, West Virginia 26506, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Madison, Wisconsin 53705-3611, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Pecs, Baranya 7621, Hungary
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Zalaegerszeg, Zala 8900, Hungary
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Budapest, 1083, Hungary
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Debrecen, 4032, Hungary
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Szeged, H 6725, Hungary
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Haifa, 3339419, Israel
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Haifa, 3436212, Israel
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Kfar Saba, 4428164, Israel
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Petach Tikva, 4941492, Israel
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Tel Aviv, 6789140, Israel
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Arecibo, 00612, Puerto Rico
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Banska Bystrica, 97517, Slovakia
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Bratislava, 82606, Slovakia
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Bratislava, 85107, Slovakia
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Poprad, 058 45, Slovakia
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Trebisov, 075 01, Slovakia
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Trencin, 91171, Slovakia
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Zvolen, 960 01, Slovakia
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Jun 8, 2020
  • Statistical analysis plan · Jun 28, 2021

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of the patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data availability is according to criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 12, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03917472
Lead sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 17, 2019
Start date
Jul 17, 2019
Primary completion
Mar 24, 2021
Completion
Mar 24, 2021
Results posted
Apr 21, 2022
Last update
Aug 12, 2022

Study contacts

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
study director · Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion