ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT03914664Updated Jan 14, 2026

Neural Correlates of Sensory Phenomena in Tourette Syndrome

An observational study in Tourette Syndrome, Sensory Disorders and Hypersensitivity, sponsored by Vanderbilt University Medical Center. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-14.

Sponsored by Vanderbilt University Medical Center · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
50
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The most pervasive sensory manifestation of TS is sensory over-responsivity (SOR). SOR is defined as excessive behavioral response to commonplace environmental stimuli. SOR is an integral but poorly understood facet of the TS phenotype, one intertwined with core elements of the disorder and worse QOL. This proposal seeks to clarify the mechanistic bases of SOR in TS. Adults with with TS will be recruited 1) to complete a standardized clinical symptom assessment battery and 2) to undergo electroencephalogram (EEG), autonomic, and audio-visual monitoring during tactile and auditory stimuli paradigms, as well as at rest.

Read the detailed description

Tourette syndrome (TS) is a multifaceted disorder that affects 0.6-1% of the global population. Across the lifespan, individuals with TS suffer worse quality of life (QOL) than the general population. While tics are the defining feature of TS, it is the widespread psychiatric and sensory symptoms that exert greater impact on QOL: more than 85% of individuals with TS are diagnosed with a psychiatric disorder, and 90% experience distressing sensory symptoms. The latest TS disease models and practice guidelines account for common psychiatric symptoms, but sensory symptoms remain under-recognized and under-studied. Progress in understanding and treating TS requires deepening insight into the disorder's sensory dimension.

The most pervasive sensory manifestation of TS is sensory over-responsivity (SOR). SOR is defined as excessive behavioral response to commonplace environmental stimuli. SOR is associated with avoidant behavior and functional impairment. More than 50% of children and 80% of adults with TS report SOR. Across age groups, SOR is positively correlated with severity of tics and psychiatric symptoms and negatively correlated with QOL. Thus, SOR is an integral facet of the TS phenotype, one intertwined with core elements of the disorder and worse QOL. This proposal seeks to clarify the mechanistic bases of SOR in TS (Aims 1 and 2).

Enhanced understanding of SOR's neurobiological basis is crucial to a more complete knowledge of TS pathophysiology. Two neurophysiologic mechanisms are implicated in SOR: sensory gating impairment and autonomic hyperarousal. Sensory gating is the physiologic process whereby redundant environmental stimuli are filtered out in the early stages of perception. Impairment of sensory gating gives rise to altered sensory perception. Autonomic hyperarousal is a state of excessive sympathetic tone and/or reduced parasympathetic tone, which hampers behavioral adaptation to sensory input. In TS, multiple lines of evidence suggest both sensory gating and autonomic function are impaired. However, prior investigations have suffered from methodologic limitations and have not examined the link between neurophysiologic dysfunction and sensory symptoms.

Aim 1. Identify an electroencephalographic (EEG) signature of SOR in TS. Hypotheses: (1a) relative to healthy controls, TS adults exhibit impaired sensory gating; (1b) extent of impaired sensory gating in TS correlates with degree of SOR. We will recruit 60 TS adults and 60 age- and sex-matched healthy controls to complete rating scales for SOR, psychiatric symptoms, and tics. Subjects will then be monitored on dense-array scalp EEG during sequential auditory and tactile sensory gating paradigms.

Aim 2. Identify an autonomic signature of SOR in TS. Hypotheses: (2a) relative to healthy controls, TS adults exhibit autonomic hyperarousal in response to non-aversive sensory stimuli; (2b) extent of autonomic hyperarousal correlates with SOR severity in TS. Heart rate and electrodermal activity will be monitored during the Aim 1 sensory gating paradigms and during a 10-minute rest period. Heart rate variability and electrodermal activity will serve as indices of parasympathetic and sympathetic activity, respectively.

Impact: Results will clarify the extent of sensory gating impairment in TS, the nature of autonomic dysfunction in TS, and the clinical correlates of neurophysiologic dysfunction in TS.

02

Conditions studied

  • Tourette Syndrome
  • Sensory Disorders
  • Hypersensitivity
  • Tics
03

In context

Tourette Syndrome

240 studies on the registry are indexed under Tourette Syndrome; 40 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 50 is below the median of 60 across 46 observational studies indexed under Tourette Syndrome.

Browse Tourette Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Vanderbilt University Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 833 studies on the registry; 155 are open to participants now.

Of its 125 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 92 (74%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The two groups of participants will include:

  1. adult with Tourette syndrome or other chronic tic disorder
  2. healthy controls

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria for TS arm:

  • Diagnosis of Tourette syndrome or other chronic tic disorder
  • ≥ 18 years of age
  • Ability to complete survey instruments
  • English fluency (given that all scales are validated in English)

Exclusion criteria for TS arm:

- Known diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder, developmental delay, cerebral palsy, other significant neurologic disease, schizophrenia, or psychotic disorders will be excluded, in order to lessen potentially confounding factors.

(Note: Patients with OCD, ADHD, anxiety, and/or depression will be permitted, given that these diagnoses are widely prevalent in the adult TS population.)

  • Use of anti-seizure medications, stimulants, or other psychotropic medications known to alter EEG signal
  • Recreational substance use within past 30 days

Inclusion criteria for healthy control arm:

  • ≥ 18 years of age AND age within 5 years of a participant in the TS arm of same biological sex (for purposes of age- and sex-matching)
  • Ability to complete survey instruments
  • English fluency (given that all scales are validated in English)

Exclusion criteria for healthy control arm:

  • Any neurologic or psychiatric diagnoses
  • History of tics
  • Use of any psychotropic medications within the past 30 days
  • Recreational substance use within past 30 days
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Tourette Syndrome

    Adults (\>18 years of age) with diagnosis of Tourette syndrome

    Diagnostic Test: Electroencephalogram (EEG) testing procedure · Diagnostic Test: Autonomic function testing procedure

  • Healthy Control

    Adults who are generally healthy with no known neurologic or psychiatric diagnoses

    Diagnostic Test: Electroencephalogram (EEG) testing procedure · Diagnostic Test: Autonomic function testing procedure

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testElectroencephalogram (EEG) testing procedure

    EEG testing procedure, comprised of somatosensory and auditory event-related potential paradigms, as well as resting state EEG

  • Diagnostic testAutonomic function testing procedure

    Autonomic function testing procedure, comprised of electrodes to determine heart rate variability and electrodermal activity (EDA)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Network oscillations in response to sensory stimuli

    Neural activity captured on EEG can be spectrally decomposed into various frequency constituencies. Neural activity in the gamma frequency range, so-called gamma band oscillations (GBOs), are associated with sensory processing and integration and are postulated to underlie sensory phenomena in TS.

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Heart rate variability

    Change beat-to-beat variability in heart rate

    Time frame: Baseline

  3. Electrodermal activity in response to sensory stimuli

    Sweat response changes within 1-3 seconds of non-aversive sensory stimulus

    Time frame: Baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. Premonitory Urge to Tic Scale (PUTS)

    Validated self-report questionnaire comprised of 9 items assessing character and severity of premonitory urges. Scale range: 9 (least affected) - 36 (most affected)

    Time frame: Within 1 week of baseline

  2. Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS)

    Validated, gold-standard clinician-administered tic assessment scale, comprised of 11 items. Scale range: 0 (best) - 100 (worst)

    Time frame: Within 1 week of baseline

  3. Dimensional Obsessive Compulsive Scale (DOCS)

    Validated self-report questionnaire assessing severity of obsessive and compulsive symptoms, comprised of 20 items. Scale range 0 (least affected) - 80 (most affected)

    Time frame: Within 1 week of baseline

  4. Adult ADHD Self-Report Screening Scale

    Validated self-report scale, developed since release of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-V, comprised of 6 items. Scale range 0 (least affected) - 24 (most affected)

    Time frame: Within 1 week of baseline

  5. Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 (GAD-7)

    Validated self-report scale assessing presence and extent of anxiety, comprised of 7 items. Scale range 0 (least affected) - 21 (most affected)

    Time frame: Within 1 week of baseline

  6. Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9)

    Validated self-report scale assessing presence and extent of depression, comprised of 9 items. Scale range 0 (least affected) - 27 (most affected)

    Time frame: Within 1 week of baseline

  7. Sensory Gating Inventory (SGI)

    Validated self-report questionnaire assessing sensory hypo- or hyper-sensitivity, comprised of 36 items. The 4 sub-scales include Perceptual Modulation, Distractability, Over-Inclusion, and Fatigue and Stress Vulnerability. Total scale range 0 (least affected) - 180 (most affected)

    Time frame: Within 1 week of baseline

  8. Sensory Perception Quotient (SPQ)

    Validated self-report questionnaire assessing sensory hypo- or hyper-sensitivity, comprised of 35 items. Scale range 0 (highest sensory sensitivity) - 105 (lowest sensory sensitivity).

    Time frame: Within 1 week of baseline

  9. Gilles de la Tourette Syndrome - Quality of Life Scale (GTS-QOL)

    Validated self-report questionnaire assessing health-related quality of life for patients with Tourette syndrome, comprised of 27 items. Scale range 0 (best quality of life) - 108 (worst quality of life)

    Time frame: Within 1 week of baseline

  10. Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Sleep-Related Impairment

    Validated self-report questionnaire to measures sleep-related impairments, consisting of 8 items. Scale range 0 - 100 (t-score scaled with lower values indicating less impairment).

    Time frame: Within 1 week of baseline

  11. Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness-2 (MAIA-2)

    Validated self-report questionnaire assessing interoceptive sensibility, comprised of 37 items. Each scale item is a statement to which respondents must select "never" (0) to "always" (5) on a six-point Likert scale. No total MAIA-2 score exists. Rather, individual scale items belong to one of eight MAIA-2 subscales. For each subscale, higher score signifies more of that construct.

    Time frame: Within 1 week of baseline

  12. Body Perception Questionnaire - Short Form (BPQ-SF)

    Validated self-report questionnaire assessing interoceptive sensibility, comprised of 46 items total, divided into 3 sections: Body Awareness (raw total score 26-130), Supradiaphragmatic Reactivity (raw total score 15-69), and Subdiaphragmatic Reactivity (raw total score 6-28). Raw scores are converted to T-scores. Higher raw and T-scores indicate greater maladaptive body awareness.

    Time frame: Within 1 week of baseline

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified clinical variables, EEG data, and autonomic data metrics may be shared with other researchers.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Clinical study report, Analytic code

Time frame: The above information will be available for sharing within 6 months of publication.

Access criteria: Researchers wishing to access the above information should contact the investigative team and provide: 1) hypothesis-driven scientific question for which the data will be analyzed and 2) proposed methods for responsibly analyzing the data.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 14, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03914664
Responsible party
David Isaacs (Assistant Professor, Vanderbilt University Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 16, 2019
Start date
Jul 20, 2021
Primary completion
Feb 28, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 28, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 14, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion