CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03890627PHREACTUpdated Oct 13, 2022

Thoracic Bio-reactance Measurement of Cardiac Output in Pulmonary Hypertension

An observational study in Pulmonary Hypertension, sponsored by Hospices Civils de Lyon. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-10-13.

Sponsored by Hospices Civils de Lyon · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
60
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Pulmonary Hypertension (PH) is a rare disease characterized by an increase in pulmonary vascular resistance, leading to a progressive decline in cardiac output (CO).Since cardiac output is correlated with the prognosis of the disease, the conduct of a right heart catheterization (thermodilution measurement, reference technique) during the annual follow-up visit of patients in competences centres is recommended. In practice, it is not systematically performed because of it is invasive, with potential risk for the patient, and there is limited logistical capacity for its implementation. The estimation of cardiac output is thus often based on cardiac ultrasound but its measurement is potentially biased.

Starling ™ SV is a non-invasive cardiac output monitor based on thoracic bio-reactance measurement. Several clinical studies have shown that cardiac output measured by bio-reactance is strongly correlated with the measurement obtained by catheterization in different indications. Rich et al. (2013) assessed bio-reactance specifically in 50 patients with Pulmonary Hypertension compared with thermodilution. The results showed that the measurement of cardiac output by bio-reactance was feasible in these patients, had a better accuracy than by catheterization, and was reliable for detecting changes in cardiac output after a vasodilatation test.

The Starling ™ SV monitor could thus have a place in the follow-up of patients who are being treated for Pulmonary Hypertension. Since it is a rapid, non-invasive examination, it could be performed on an outpatient basis, especially as a first-line test to check the stability of the CO, thus avoiding the systematic use of right heart catheterization, which would then be reserved only to patients for whom the measurement by bio-reactance would show a decrease of cardiac output compared to the previous value. Before being able to propose this use in current practice, it is necessary to carry out a pilot study which will make it possible to explore the interest of bio-reactance in this situation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pulmonary Hypertension
03

In context

Hypertension, Pulmonary

1,105 studies on the registry are indexed under Hypertension, Pulmonary; 234 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 60 is below the median of 116 across 386 observational studies indexed under Hypertension, Pulmonary.

Browse Hypertension, Pulmonary studies →

Lead sponsor

Hospices Civils de Lyon is the lead sponsor of 1,826 studies on the registry; 439 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adult patients with pulmonary hypertension and followed by a Competence Center.

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged over 18
  • Presenting pulmonary hypertension (PH) followed by the Competence Center of the Hospices Civils de Lyon
  • Follow-up for pulmonary hypertension groups 1, 4 or 5
  • Of which the cardiac index is ≥ 2,5 L/min/m²
  • Expressing its non-opposition to the participation of this study
  • Benefiting from a social security scheme or similar

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patient protected by Law
  • Patient for whom a thermodilution measurement of cardiac output (CO) is unreliable: right-left shunt; or uncorrected congenital heart disease; or variability> 10% of the 3 measurements of CO obtained by thermodilution
  • pulmonary hypertension groups 2 or 3
  • Hemodynamic aggravation since the previous visit: increased pressure or decreased cardiac index
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Thoracic bio-reactance measurement of cardiac output

    Device: Thoracic bio-reactance

Interventions

  • DeviceThoracic bio-reactance

    Cardiac output variation measured by thoracic bio-reactance, between inclusion and one year after hemodynamic evaluation by right cardiac catheterization, to discriminate stable patients from those that degrade.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Ability of the relative variation of cardiac output measured by thoracic bio-reactance to predict the patient's status (stable or unstable).

    A patient will be considered unstable if the decrease in the relative variation of cardiac output measured with thermodilution between visit one and one year after visit one is at least 15%. Then, the ability of the relative variation of cardiac output measured by thoracic bio-reactance to predict the patient's status (stable or unstable) will be assessed.

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Service d'Explorations Fonctionnelles Respiratoires, centre de compétences de l'hypertension pulmonaire Hospices Civils de Lyon, Groupement Hospitalier Est
    Bron, 69677, France
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 13, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03890627
Lead sponsor
Hospices Civils de Lyon
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 26, 2019
Start date
May 21, 2019
Primary completion
May 31, 2022
Completion
May 31, 2022
Last update
Oct 13, 2022

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion